fbpx
Connect with us

The Center Square

State prosecutors ask Supreme Court to protect veterans’ rights | Virginia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Sarah Roderick-Fitch | – 2023-04-17 11:16:00

(The Center Square) – Virginia Jason Miyares is leading a bipartisan group of attorneys general from 33 states and the District of Columbia in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case of a veteran denied certain educational benefits through the Department of Affairs.

Miyares and the coalition of attorneys general assert Virginia and decorated Army veteran Jason Rudisill was wrongly denied his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits.

Advertisement

After completing his first tour of duty, Rudisill, as an enlisted soldier, utilized his Montgomery GI Bill benefits to complete his undergraduate degree.

“[Rudisill] was twice honorably discharged, and relied on approximately 25 months of education benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill before November 2007 to obtain his undergraduate degree. He then reenlisted, was commissioned as an officer, and served a third tour from 2007 to 2011,” according to the brief filed by the prosecutors.

After completing his third tour of duty, Rudisill was accepted into Yale Divinity School with hopes of returning to the armed forces as a chaplain.

Rudisill attempted to use his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits, but the VA denied his request. The VA defended its by saying Rudisill was not entitled to use both the Montgomery GI Bill and the Post 9/11 GI Bill.

Advertisement

The VA specifies veterans' preference in deciding which GI Bill they opt to utilize, “If you're eligible for more than one education benefit, such as the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the Montgomery GI Bill, you must choose which benefit to receive.”

Advocates for Rudisill argue veterans with “multiple requisite periods of service” are entitled up to 48 months of educational benefits.

During Rudisill's third tour of duty passed the Post 9/11 GI Bill.

“He applied for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits based on his understanding that, under the Bill, he had approximately 22 months of education benefits remaining out of his 48 aggregate months,” the brief explained.

Advertisement

The VA determined Rudisill's Post-9/11 benefits would be limited to 10 months and 16 days, “because [Rudisill] had used some of his entitled benefits under the prior version of the GI Bill.”

The Montgomery GI Bill and the Post-9/11 GI Bill entitle eligible veterans to receive up to 36 months of tuition payouts. The Montgomery GI Bill offers up to a set monthly amount, which is sent directly to the student. The Post-9/11 GI Bill, pays the tuition to the school. Under the Post-9/11 GI Bill are eligible for housing or book stipends, which is not included under the Montgomery GI Bill.

The coalition of attorneys general  contends hundreds of thousands of veterans' “rights” are in “jeopardy” by the Federal Circuit's decision and are requesting the Supreme Court “secure” those rights by striking the lower court's decision.

The state prosecutors say the decision made by the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit to uphold the VA's decision in the case of Rudisill v. McDonough, could negatively impact post-9/11 veterans.

Advertisement

“The Federal Circuit took away both James Rudisill and thousands of other post 9/11 veterans' GI education benefits,” said Miyares. “This decision actively hurts veterans' reentry into civilian life and deprives them of earned benefits.”

Miyares is concerned the decision will negatively impact veterans as they transition out of the military.

“Over 700,000 veterans in the Commonwealth of Virginia. This decision actively hurts veterans' reentry into civilian life and deprives them of earned benefits,” Miyares said.

The Center Square reached out to the VA for comment; it had yet to respond at the time of publication.

Advertisement

State prosecutors joining Miyares are from Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, , Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming and the District of Columbia.

Source link

Advertisement

The Center Square

Louisiana’s Murrill files lawsuit to protect Title IX, female athletes | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | – 2024-04-29 14:06:00

(The Center Square) — Attorney General Liz Murrill announced Monday she is leading a with Mississippi, Montana and Idaho to fight the Biden Administration's new Title IX rules.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court of Western Louisiana, seeks the overturn of the rules on constitutional grounds, an injunction preventing the administration from enforcing Title IX “in accordance with erroneous interpretation” in the rule and attorney fees and court costs. 

Advertisement

The lawsuit says the rule is a “a naked attempt to strong-arm our schools into molding our in the current federal 's preferred image of how a child should think, act and speak. The Final Rule is an affront to the dignity of families and school administrators everywhere and is nowhere close to legal.”

The lawsuit also says the new rule will “gut the very essence of Title IX and destroy decades of advances in equal educational opportunities, especially for women and girls.”

“With the stroke of a pen and 400 pages of rules written by would-be lawmakers in Washington, D.C. conference rooms, the DOE published Title IX regulations intended to remake American societal norms through classrooms, lunchrooms, bathrooms and locker rooms of American schools,” Murrill said at a Monday conference with Gov. Jeff Landry. “Make no mistake: These rules eviscerate Title IX. They are entirely contrary to what Title IX was intended to achieve and what we have implemented and intended Title IX to mean and protect for 50 years.

“Title IX was intended to prevent pervasive discrimination against biological women.”

Advertisement

She also said the federal government's overreach was like a degree and dimension “like no other.” 

“Whatever lever, whatever power the governor's office has or the statutes vest in me, we will 100% be standing behind this , this attorney general and behind the BESE board because we do not intend to comply,” Landry said. “We are not going to pretend there is some kind of sexual category other than the ones the Almighty has set forth. There's only two of them. We look forward to this fight because this fight is right.”

Louisiana Superintendent of Education Cade Brumley, who was flanked by some members of the Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, said that this was a “line in the sand issue and a bridge too far for the state of Louisiana” and voiced his for the lawsuit. 

Title IX prohibits educational institutions that federal funds from discriminating on the basis of sex in both educational programs and activities.

Advertisement

The new rules finalized by the Department of Education and which are supposed to go into effect Aug. 1. expand the definition of sex discrimination to include gender identity and pregnancy, but the agency didn't issue any rules relating to transgender athletes. Among the changes include a prohibition on single-sex bathroom and locker rooms and requirements that a school use pronouns based on a student's preferred gender identity. 

Read More

The post Louisiana's Murrill files lawsuit to protect Title IX, female athletes | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

The Center Square

Multiple states sue over Biden Title IX rule | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – 2024-04-29 13:58:00

(The Center Square) – Several Republican attorneys general have sued over the Biden administration's Title IX rule change, arguing it is illegal. More states are expected to follow.

The lawsuits after the Biden administration's Department of Education rewrote the Title IX statute to expand the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity.”

Advertisement

Title IX, which is part of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, states, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

Title IX was created to prohibit discrimination against women in all educational programs that federal money, K-12 schools, colleges and universities. The new rule redefines biological sex and requires schools to allow men and boys, claiming to be women and girls, respectively, to use female-only facilities and join female-only or lose federal funding.

The lawsuits were filed after Republican governors and education commissioners last said their states would not comply.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was among the first to speak out, saying, “Florida rejects [president] Joe Biden's attempt to rewrite Title IX. We will not comply and we will fight back. We are not going to let Joe Biden try to inject men into women's activities … undermine the rights of parents and … abuse his constitutional authority to try to impose these policies on us here in Florida.”

Advertisement

On April 25, Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr., sent a letter to all superintendents and charter school leaders stating, “at Governor Ron DeSantis' direction no educational institution should begin implementing any changes. Instead of implementing Congress's clear directive to prevent discrimination based on biological sex, the Biden administration maims the statute beyond recognition in an attempt to gaslight the country into believing that biological sex no longer has any meaning.”

The same day, Oklahoma's State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters also instructed Oklahoma schools not to comply, saying, “Biden's re-write of Title IX is one of the most illegal and radical moves we have ever seen from the Federal Government. Oklahoma will not sit idly by while radicals trample on the Constitution and take away women's rights. We are taking swift and aggressive action against Biden in his war on women.”

On Monday, Texas sued, arguing the rule is illegal. “Title IX does not apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. But even if those concepts were protected against discrimination by Title IX, the Final Rule's provisions do not faithfully implement such protections because they mark as unlawful school policies that do not discriminate based on those concepts –  instead, the Final Rule requires schools to discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity by allowing single-sex programs and facilities but requiring opposite-sex access to them for only those individuals with a transgender gender identity,” Texas' 30-page brief states.

The asks a district court in north Texas to postpone the effective date of the rule, Aug. 1, declare the rule unlawful and permanently enjoin the Department of Education from implementing it.

Advertisement

Gov. Greg Abbott instructed the Texas Education Agency to ignore Biden's “illegal dictate.” He also wrote a letter to , saying, “Title IX was written by Congress to support the advancement of women academically and athletically. The law was based on the fundamental premise that there are only two sexes – male and female. You have rewritten Title IX to force schools to treat boys as if they are girls and to accept every student's self-declared gender identity. This ham-handed effort to impose a leftist belief onto Title IX exceeds your authority as President.”

Abbott said rewriting Title IX “tramples laws” that he signed to protect women's sports in Texas. Last year, Abbott and multiple Republican governors signed bills into law to protect women's and girls' sports.

A coalition of four Republican attorneys general, led by , also sued on Monday. Mississippi, Montana and Idaho joined Louisiana, arguing in their 43-page brief that the rule “is an affront to the dignity of families and school administrators everywhere, and is nowhere close to legal.”

The lawsuit makes similar arguments as Texas' and asks a U.S. district court in Louisiana to declare the rule is contrary to law, violates Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, is an unlawful exercise of legislative power under Article 1 of the Constitution, is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and violates the Administrative Procedures Act.

Advertisement

The lawsuits were filed after a coalition of 15 attorneys general led by Montana Austin Knudsen, called on the DOE in 2022 to cancel its plans to rewrite Title IX, The Center Square reported.

Knudsen argues the rule “could cost Montana taxpayers money in civil lawsuits and the possible loss of federal funding in states that seek to protect equal opportunities for women and girls. It would also harm victims of sex discrimination and violence, as Title IX is used in grievance procedures to produce a fair outcome.”

Read More

Advertisement

The post Multiple states sue over Biden Title IX rule | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Mississippi unemployment rate dropped slightly in March | Mississippi

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | – 2024-04-25 13:44:00

(The Center Square) – The unemployment rate in Mississippi in March dropped slightly to 3%, but the 's labor force participation rate continues to be one of the nation's worst.

That's down from February's 3.1%.

Advertisement

The Mississippi Department of Employment Security's monthly workforce report shows a gain of 10,000 non-farm for the year to date to the same time period last year. Compared to March 2023, the state's workforce expanded by 6,300 jobs, going from 1.17 million employed to 1.18 million.

Neighboring states Arkansas (3.5%), Tennessee (3.2%) and (4.4%) were not much different. North Dakota had the nation's lowest unemployment rate at 2%.

Workforce participation rate for March was 53.7%, holding steady from February. The national rate is 62.7%.

Biggest gaining job sectors in March included construction (up 2.2% from last March) and leisure and hospitality (up 2%). 

Advertisement

Among the state's metropolitan , the Coast had a job gain of 1.4% or 2,300 newly employed in March compared to the same time last year. The Hattiesburg area had no job gains in March thanks to a loss of 100 manufacturing jobs, while the metro area's job gain was a negligible 0.3% while adding 900 positions.  

Initial unemployment claims were 4,242 in March, down from 5,004 in March 2023. Continuing gains increased to 27,128 in March to 23,644 in March 2023.

The state's leading employers include trade, transportation and utilities (244,900 workers or 20.6% of the state's workforce), (241,000 or 20.3%), education and services (155,900 or 13.1%), manufacturing (144,600 or 12.2%) and leisure and hospitality (135,500 or 11.4%). 

Advertisement

Read More

The post Mississippi unemployment rate dropped slightly in March | Mississippi appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South

Trending