fbpx
Connect with us

Mississippi Today

HB 1020 opponents try back-up plan to block judicial appointments in Jackson

Published

on

Plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit challenging House Bill 1020 are looking for a workaround to prevent the appointment of judges to the Circuit Court and a separate court system within the county.

Under the , passed during the past legislative , Supreme Court Justice Michael Randolph is tasked with appointing four temporary judges to the circuit court and one to the Capitol Complex Improvement District court. A lawsuit filed on behalf of Jackson residents argues HB 1020 violates the U.S. Constitution for race discrimination. A temporary restraining order in place since May has prevented Randolph from making those appointments, but Randolph was dismissed from the in June, putting into question whether the court can continue to block his appointments.

If the restraining order is lifted, Randolph will be able to immediately appoint judges, the plaintiffs argue. Attorneys are asking U.S. District Court Judge Henry Wingate to approve motions that would still block appointments without focusing on the chief justice.

Plaintiffs are requesting a temporary restraining order against four yet-to-be-known circuit court appointees to prevent them from taking oath and assuming office. Although the identities of the judges are not known, the plaintiffs plan to give them notice of the restraining order through a legal notice in the , attorneys said.

“A continuous and seamless prohibition is further necessary to maintain the status quo and avoid possible irreparable harm from any violation of constitutional rights to equal protection of the law,” plaintiffs wrote in the Aug. 3 motion for a temporary restraining order.

Advertisement

Another motion by the plaintiffs asks to amend the lawsuit complaint to add defendants: two , the five unknown court appointees and two yet-to-be-known prosecutors appointed to the Capital Complex Improvement District court by the attorney general.

Plaintiffs are also asking Wingate to clarify that Randolph was dismissed at the plaintiff's request for injunctive relief but not remaining claims for other forms of relief.

Attorneys for the defendants – state officials such as Department of Public Safety Commissioner Sean Tindell, Capitol Chief Bo Luckey and the attorney general – have opposed the motions in writing and in court Tuesday.

Wingate did not rule on any pending motions from the bench. He plans to prepare a written order addressing Randolph's presence in the lawsuit by next Wednesday, when he will hold another hearing. Remaining motions will likely be addressed in writing in the coming weeks.

Advertisement

A separate state challenge to House Bill 1020 is ongoing. The Supreme Court has not ruled in that case.

On Tuesday, Wingate also heard from the U.S. Department of Justice about why it wants to intervene in the lawsuit and whether its presence would prolong the case.

The Civil Rights Division argues the appointment of judges to the Hinds County Circuit Court and creation of a new separate court system in Jackson is racially discriminatory and unconstitutional, according to court .

The state argues that the federal government is attempting to sue the state of Mississippi to get around the court's dismissal of Randolph in the lawsuit and his ability to appoint judges.

Advertisement

Wingate also asked whether this was the DOJ's driving force behind the department's intervention.

Attorney Bert Russ said circumventing his order was not the driving force behind the department's intervention, nor would its presence prolong the case.

“Our interest is to ensure the residents of Hinds County are from discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause,” he said.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/?p=283664

Advertisement

Mississippi Today

On this day in 1967

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Jerry Mitchell – 2024-05-12 07:00:00

MAY 12, 1967

Benjamin Brown, a former organizer, was shot in the back on this day in , Mississippi. 

Brown had walked with a friend into the Kon-Tiki Café to pick up a sandwich to take home to his wife. On his way back, he encountered a standoff between enforcement and Jackson , who had been hurling rocks and bottles at them. Brown was hit in the back by three shotgun blasts. No arrests were ever made, and the Mississippi Sovereignty Commission gathered spy files on the students who protested. 

Eyewitnesses pointed their fingers at then-Mississippi Highway Patrolman Lloyd Jones, who reportedly admitted his involvement in the killing. When some accused a Jackson detective of killing Brown, Jones was quoted as replying that the detective “didn't shoot that n—–, I did.” 

Advertisement

Jones was quoted as saying that he took the shotgun home, cleaned it, wrapped it in a blanket and placed it in an attic for a few months before returning it to service. Jones was never charged and in 1995 was killed while working as sheriff in Simpson County.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

If you didn’t like MAEP, you may not like the new public school funding formula

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Bobby Harrison – 2024-05-12 06:00:00

House and Senate members often adjourn a legislative day in memory of a constituent or other well known person who recently died.

On the day the Mississippi House took its final vote to adopt a new school formula, Rep. Karl Oliver, R-Winona, asked “to adjourn in memory of the Mississippi Adequate Education plan…the failed plan.”

Oliver continued: “It has always failed and never met its expectations. Today we laid it to rest.”

Advertisement

House Speaker Jason White, R-West, gleefully responded that all House members might want to sign onto Oliver's adjourn in memory motion.

Of course, the Senate went on to pass the bill rewriting the Adequate Education Program and Gov. Tate Reeves, a long-time opponent of MAEP, signed the legislation into this , no doubt stirring much celebration for folks like Oliver and White.

But for those celebrating the demise of MAEP, be warned with a paraphrased song lyric: Meet the new school funding formula, same as the old school funding formula.

The core principle of the Mississippi Adequate Education Program lives in the new funding formula, named simply the Mississippi Student Funding Formula.

Advertisement

Like MAEP, the new formula uses an objective formula to determine the base student cost (amount of funding per student) and provides that amount of money multiplied by school enrollment or attendance to each local school district.

And here's the kicker: Like MAEP, the Mississippi Student Funding Formula mandates that the Legislature appropriate that amount of money annually to each local district.

The new law states plainly, “Base student cost shall not be lower than the previous year.” So that means the new law mandates lawmaker provide enough funds to pay for what will likely be an ever increasing base student cost or, if they don't want to fully fund education, they have to hope enrollment drops or they simply do like they did with MAEP and not follow the law. The new law does provide a small loophole, saying when a revenue shortfall is so severe that state budgets must be cut, education also can be reduced.

But the new law goes on to say, “If the total revenue increases the year, the formula shall be recalculated or increased.” Just like MAEP, the amount of money called for by the formula is adjusted yearly for . And it is recalculated every fourth year, meaning unless there are unusual circumstances the formula will generate more money for education each year.

Advertisement

For years, many politicians, the governor, argued that the state could not afford MAEP's objective funding formula. So, while cutting taxes by more than a dollars annually, legislators chose to ignore the law saying MAEP “shall” be fully funded. At the same time those tax cuts were being enacted, many legislative , led by then-Lt Gov. Reeves and former Speaker Philip Gunn, were to replace MAEP because they said it was too expensive.

During the 2024 session, new Speaker Jason White and House Education Chair Rob Roberson, R-Starkville, pulling significant help from Reps. Kent McCarty and Jansen Owen, said they wanted to rewrite MAEP not because it sent too much money to the public schools, but because it did not send enough money to poorer school districts. And, granted, the new plan has several features that help poor and at-risk students.

But the House plan, which was nearly identical to a funding formula developed by advocacy groups who support sending public funds to private schools, did not include an objective funding formula. Senate Education Chair Dennis DeBar, R-Leakesville, said it the Legislature to determine “willy nilly” the amount of money to send to public schools.

DeBar and Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann were not among the group of legislators who opposed the objective funding formula. A matter of fact, they said they would not agree to rewrite MAEP unless the new method of sending money to public schools also was arrived at objectively. DeBar and Senate staff essentially developed the new objective formula that was placed into the House's formula rewrite.

Advertisement

In the haste and zeal to replace MAEP, politicians who did not like the objective formula agreed to adopt, gulp, a new objective funding formula — one that provides a little less money than MAEP, but still a significant amount and still with a mandate for the Legislature to provide that amount of funds each year.

In a lawsuit challenging the Legislature for not fully funding MAEP, the state Supreme Court ruled in 2017 that “shall” did not actually mean shall. In other words, the justices ruled that legislators did not have to fully fund MAEP even though the law said they “shall” do so.

When and if the new Mississippi Student Funding Formula is not fully funded, maybe the Supreme Court will get another chance to rule on whether legislators have to follow the laws they pass.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

On this day in 1968

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Jerry Mitchell – 2024-05-11 07:00:00

MAY 11, 1968

Five-year-old Veronica Pitt touches a tattered poster of Martin Luther King Jr. as she and her 3-year-old brother Raythorn Resurrection with other evacuees on May 24, 1968. Credit: AP: Bob Daugherty.

The Poor People's Campaign arrived in Washington, D.C. A town called “Resurrection City” was erected as a to the slain Martin Luther King Jr. 

King had conceived the campaign, which was led by his successor at the head of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Ralph David Abernathy. leader Jesse reached out to young Black wanting vengeance for King's assassination. 

“Jackson sat them down and said, ‘This is just not the way, brothers. It's just not the way,”' recalled Lenneal Henderson, then a student at the of California at Berkeley. “He went further and said, ‘Look, you've got to pledge to me and to yourself that when you go back to wherever you , before the year is out, you're going to do two things to make a difference in your neighborhood.' It was an impressive moment of leadership.”

Advertisement

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

News from the South

Trending