Today’s round of questions, my smart-aleck replies, and the real answers:
Question: When will Congressman Chuck Edwards hold a town hall meeting in WNC? A lot of other congressmen and women have held them lately, and they’ve become kind of heated.
My answer: I’m going to go out on a limb here and say, “Never.” Unless the congressman has a penchant for taking spittle showers, that is.
Real answer: If you haven’t been following along, several members of Congress have held town hall meetings in their districts lately, and they essentially turned into shouting matches, with a dose of heckling thrown in for good measure. It seems President Donald Trump’s budget- and federal workers-slashing agenda has gotten many voters pretty riled up, especially against Republican members of Congress like Edwards.
I reached out to Edwards’ spokesperson Maria Kim, who provided a statement from the congressman.
“Being accessible, listening, and answering questions for the people of WNC are among my favorite activities,” Edwards said. “That is why in my first term as congressman, I held eight in-person town halls. I planned another but had to cancel it due to the hurricane.
“That works out to be about one every quarter, and I hope to maintain a similar pace this term depending on my legislative calendar. Additionally, I continue to hold regular tele-town halls, which allow many more folks to participate directly by simply dialing in.”
Edwards, who lives in Hendersonville, was first elected in 2022 and then re-elected last November.
Michael Bitzer, a political scientist at Catawba College, said it would be no surprise that a member of Congress might opt out of doing an in-person town hall these days, given the country’s divisive mood.
“This used to be kind of standard fare, that when they weren’t in legislative session they were working back in the district,” Bitzer said. “Members of Congress would do these town halls to kind of gauge what’s going on in their communities and to really kind of show the constituency services that members are expected to do. I think the likely impact of political polarization has kind of turned that on its head.”
This is nothing new, of course, Bitzer said, noting that when former President Barack Obama was pushing the Affordable Care Act, the controversial plan generated vehement opposition and shouting matches at town halls.
“I think that’s become now the new norm — if a certain segment of the citizenry is aggravated, they are going to show up and they are going to let their members of Congress know,” Bitzer said, noting that back then the Tea Party, and then MAGA Republicans in recent months, were the ones getting fired up. “Now, I think you’re seeing the reverse happen. It’s maybe one of the last true bipartisan dynamics of our politics — that both sides can get equally yelled at.”
Bitzer noted that security looms large with elected officials these days. In the past two decades Republican and Democratic members of Congress have been shot, and President Trump endured two assassination attempts last year.
“That has got to be a primary consideration, particularly by the member and their staff — that we have seen these kinds of violence erupt,” Bitzer said. “And this is a potential breeding ground for those kinds of violent rhetoric, but also expressions and acts. So this is something that I think any elected official is going to take very carefully into consideration.”
Question: I have a question I’d love answered about license plates. I moved to Asheville a year ago from out of state, and when I registered my cars and got new plates the first three letters were LAK for both. As I started driving around more, and still a year later, I feel like almost everyone’s plates start with LAK! I know it’s not a huge city, but it feels like they have sooooo many LAK plates to give out and not many other combinations. I find it hard to believe that this many people also got new plates recently. How long have they been giving out LAK plates? Are there similar patterns like this in other North Carolina cities? What’s the explanation?
A reader asks why so many license plates starting with “LAK” appear in the Asheville area. It is a common site, but it’s nothing intentional, the DMV says. // Watchdog photo by John Boyle
My answer: I’m completely LAKing a response here, but I will ask you to set up an appointment with me for further snark, which I will get to in six months. Actually, I just checked and all the appointments are taken.
Real answer: The North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles is not up to any funny business here.
“This just sort of happens,” Marty Homan, a spokesperson for the North Carolina DMV, said via email. “It’s not intentional to have a certain letter combo in a certain area, except for the OBX plates in Dare County.”
The DMV makes deliveries every few months to its license plate agencies to fulfill plate orders.
“We print in batches with the same prefix, and then they are distributed,” Homan said. “So it is possible that a license plate agency, and even multiple in a certain region or on a certain delivery route, could all be getting the same prefix at a given time.”
The Asheville route goes like this: Asheville (south), Asheville (west), Marshall, Brevard, Hendersonville, Columbus/Polk County.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Got a question? Send it to John Boyle at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org or 828-337-0941. His Answer Man columns appear each Tuesday and Friday. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.
James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.
SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00
North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.
(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.
Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.
Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”
Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.
Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.
Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”
Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”
House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.
