Today’s round of questions, my smart-aleck replies, and the real answers:
Question: When will Congressman Chuck Edwards hold a town hall meeting in WNC? A lot of other congressmen and women have held them lately, and they’ve become kind of heated.
My answer: I’m going to go out on a limb here and say, “Never.” Unless the congressman has a penchant for taking spittle showers, that is.
Real answer: If you haven’t been following along, several members of Congress have held town hall meetings in their districts lately, and they essentially turned into shouting matches, with a dose of heckling thrown in for good measure. It seems President Donald Trump’s budget- and federal workers-slashing agenda has gotten many voters pretty riled up, especially against Republican members of Congress like Edwards.
I reached out to Edwards’ spokesperson Maria Kim, who provided a statement from the congressman.
“Being accessible, listening, and answering questions for the people of WNC are among my favorite activities,” Edwards said. “That is why in my first term as congressman, I held eight in-person town halls. I planned another but had to cancel it due to the hurricane.
“That works out to be about one every quarter, and I hope to maintain a similar pace this term depending on my legislative calendar. Additionally, I continue to hold regular tele-town halls, which allow many more folks to participate directly by simply dialing in.”
Edwards, who lives in Hendersonville, was first elected in 2022 and then re-elected last November.
Michael Bitzer, a political scientist at Catawba College, said it would be no surprise that a member of Congress might opt out of doing an in-person town hall these days, given the country’s divisive mood.
“This used to be kind of standard fare, that when they weren’t in legislative session they were working back in the district,” Bitzer said. “Members of Congress would do these town halls to kind of gauge what’s going on in their communities and to really kind of show the constituency services that members are expected to do. I think the likely impact of political polarization has kind of turned that on its head.”
This is nothing new, of course, Bitzer said, noting that when former President Barack Obama was pushing the Affordable Care Act, the controversial plan generated vehement opposition and shouting matches at town halls.
“I think that’s become now the new norm — if a certain segment of the citizenry is aggravated, they are going to show up and they are going to let their members of Congress know,” Bitzer said, noting that back then the Tea Party, and then MAGA Republicans in recent months, were the ones getting fired up. “Now, I think you’re seeing the reverse happen. It’s maybe one of the last true bipartisan dynamics of our politics — that both sides can get equally yelled at.”
Bitzer noted that security looms large with elected officials these days. In the past two decades Republican and Democratic members of Congress have been shot, and President Trump endured two assassination attempts last year.
“That has got to be a primary consideration, particularly by the member and their staff — that we have seen these kinds of violence erupt,” Bitzer said. “And this is a potential breeding ground for those kinds of violent rhetoric, but also expressions and acts. So this is something that I think any elected official is going to take very carefully into consideration.”
Question: I have a question I’d love answered about license plates. I moved to Asheville a year ago from out of state, and when I registered my cars and got new plates the first three letters were LAK for both. As I started driving around more, and still a year later, I feel like almost everyone’s plates start with LAK! I know it’s not a huge city, but it feels like they have sooooo many LAK plates to give out and not many other combinations. I find it hard to believe that this many people also got new plates recently. How long have they been giving out LAK plates? Are there similar patterns like this in other North Carolina cities? What’s the explanation?
A reader asks why so many license plates starting with “LAK” appear in the Asheville area. It is a common site, but it’s nothing intentional, the DMV says. // Watchdog photo by John Boyle
My answer: I’m completely LAKing a response here, but I will ask you to set up an appointment with me for further snark, which I will get to in six months. Actually, I just checked and all the appointments are taken.
Real answer: The North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles is not up to any funny business here.
“This just sort of happens,” Marty Homan, a spokesperson for the North Carolina DMV, said via email. “It’s not intentional to have a certain letter combo in a certain area, except for the OBX plates in Dare County.”
The DMV makes deliveries every few months to its license plate agencies to fulfill plate orders.
“We print in batches with the same prefix, and then they are distributed,” Homan said. “So it is possible that a license plate agency, and even multiple in a certain region or on a certain delivery route, could all be getting the same prefix at a given time.”
The Asheville route goes like this: Asheville (south), Asheville (west), Marshall, Brevard, Hendersonville, Columbus/Polk County.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Got a question? Send it to John Boyle at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org or 828-337-0941. His Answer Man columns appear each Tuesday and Friday. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00
(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.
Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.
Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.
Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance
NCLeg.gov
“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”
SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.
“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”
The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.
“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”
Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.
SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 14:47:00
(The Center Square) – Called “crypto-friendly legislation” by the leader of the chamber, a proposal on digital assets on Wednesday afternoon passed the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Passage was 71-44 mostly along party lines.
The NC Digital Assets Investments Act, known also as House Bill 92, has investment requirements, caps and management, and clear definitions and standards aimed at making sure only qualified digital assets are included. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, said the state would potentially join more than a dozen others with “crypto-friendly legislation.”
With him in sponsorship are Reps. Stephen Ross, R-Alamance, Mark Brody, R-Union, and Mike Schietzelt, R-Wake.
Nationally last year, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act – known as FIT21 – passed through the U.S. House in May and in September was parked in the Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.
Dan Spuller, cochairman of the North Carolina Blockchain Initiative, said the state has proven a leader on digital asset policy. That includes the Money Transmitters Act of 2016, the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021, and last year’s No Centrl Bank Digital Currency Pmts to State. The latter was strongly opposed by Gov. Roy Cooper, so much so that passage votes of 109-4 in the House and 39-5 in the Senate slipped back to override votes, respectively, of 73-41 and 27-17.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a factual report on the passage of the NC Digital Assets Investments Act, highlighting the legislative process, party-line votes, and related legislative measures. It does not adopt a clear ideological stance or frame the legislation in a way that suggests bias. Instead, it provides neutral information on the bill, its sponsors, and relevant background on state legislative activity in digital asset policy. The tone and language remain objective, focusing on legislative facts rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.
