What is UNC Asheville doing on wooded property near Five Points? Taxi ‘shed’ at Asheville Regional Airport? What does ‘titled debris’ actually mean? • Asheville Watchdog
Today’s round of questions, my smart-aleck replies and the real answers:
Question: For years, UNCA has owned land off Dortch Avenue known as the South Campus walking trails that include about one mile of wooded hiking paths. Many residents (especially those of us with four-legged family members) of Five Points and nearby neighborhoods love the woods for the opportunity they provide for connection to nature and dog frolicking (we’re not opposed to cat- or small horse-frolicking, but dogs seem to be the more popular four-legged companion). The woods are a bit of a hidden gem, and they’ve been even more of a refuge with so many dog parks closed after Helene. In the last few weeks, we’ve noticed caution tape, survey stakes, and wetland tape in various places, and a tree removal crew has begun clearing some brush at the entrance. One of the workers informed us that the university is developing the land and plans to construct four buildings; work will apparently start in the spring. There hasn’t been any signage in the woods and we haven’t been able to learn any details from the university. Any chance you can help investigate? We’d love to know if the development rumors are true, if the university is developing or if they’ve sold the land, the timeline, how the project is actually being funded given the university’s financial situation, and what the building and space will be used for.
My answer: Every time I see a cat out for a “frolic” on a leash, it looks like the poor animal is absolutely miserable and would probably take out its owner if it weighed 30 pounds more.
Real answer: UNC-Asheville spokesman Brian Hart said no decisions have been made on the property.
“UNC Asheville is taking steps to better understand the characteristics of 90 acres of undeveloped portions of university property,” Hart said via email. “This includes assessing boundaries, topography, land composition, and utilities. To support this process, the university has authorized an experienced external vendor to conduct a thorough exploratory assessment, which will require removing a minimal number of trees and collecting soil samples.”
Hart said the university is dedicated to working with environmental experts about sustainable and responsible land use.
“In keeping with our commitment to transparency and collaboration, as options are being finalized, UNC Asheville will host listening sessions to share information about potential plans and to gather input from the community,” Hart said.
Hart said “exploring thoughtful and strategic opportunities for land use is part of the university’s efforts to have a positive impact here.”
“Any future development of university property will align with the best interests of the institution, the local and regional community, and the state of North Carolina, while respecting the natural environment that surrounds us,” Hart said.
The City of Asheville said it has not issued any permits for the current work, and that the permit for the work was issued through the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.
The DEQ did not respond to my request for information by deadline.
Question: We are an older couple (even older than John) who returned home recently, flying into AVL airport. After landing, we went to the info desk by baggage claim to inquire as to taxis to get to our home in Asheville. We were told there were no taxis, and we’d have to wait in an outer lot until an Uber or Lyft could pick us up. The only alternative presented to us was a black car service (probably $150). There was a shuttle bus waiting by chance, and we proceeded to the “shed” to wait. The wind was blowing strongly right through the shed, as there was no protection from the sides from the freezing cold (wind chill of 18) and it was located in an open parking lot. Luckily for us, an Uber was available in five minutes; a Lyft would have been at least 20 minutes — enough time for frostbite to set in! This is an unacceptable situation for us and certainly for visitors to Asheville. If the airport is going to abandon those waiting for rides to a lonely parking lot, they can at least provide a better shelter with sides and a heater, as well as some sort of emergency notification system if there is a problem. Even as a temporary fix, this is unacceptable, as a medical emergency is certainly possible in the shed. Our Uber driver told us he has seen instances where the rain is blowing through the shed sideways on those waiting. When will the airport provide an acceptable waiting area for those arriving at the airport?
My answer: I’m going to politely overlook the comment about these folks being “even older” than I am. Clearly it’s time for me to up my “Just for Men” beard dye game.
Real answer: Good news on this front.
“We have installed a 12- by 15-foot covered shelter in the ground transportation pick-up area, with four benches and standing room for additional customers,” Asheville Regional Airport spokeswoman Tina Kinsey said via email, adding that it is a temporary location due to construction at the airport. “We have wind/rain barriers for the sides of the shelter coming soon, as well as additional lighting inside. The pick-up area is lighted with exterior lights, and we have an emergency call box in place for our customers.”
Question: I just finished your recent column about debris removal and was fascinated by the concept of “titled” debris. I never thought about the implications of that before. Could you expand on whether and what kind of special problems and handling that causes? For example, if there’s a car in the river, does the county have to figure out who owns it, contact them, consult on what they want done with it, whether they’ll pay for or toward the removal, whether their insurance has any liability in the effort and so forth? Can the county just act without contacting the owner at all? Is there any kind of time limit beyond which the county can do what it needs to do to clear its waterways if they can’t contact an owner?
My answer: Initially, I just assumed “titled debris” meant the county was going to have to refer to river debris as “Sir Wrecked Minivan” and “Lady Semi Trailer.”
Real answer: Nothing is simple when it comes to Helene cleanup.
“County departments, to include the Buncombe County Sheriff’s Office, County Legal Department, Solid Waste, ID Bureau, and Emergency Management are working together on title property removal,” Johanna Cano, a spokeswoman for Buncombe County, told me via email. “There are a couple of different categories of title property removal that include right of way removal, right of entry (private property), and waterway removal.”
The different categories require different types of administrative paperwork for accessing the debris.
“While we are close to finalizing the process, at this point, as title property is identified and mapped out, crews will be going around to assess the property for identification such as a vehicle identification number or tag,” Cano said. “The team will work across departments to locate the owner and make arrangements for removal. As owners are identified, they will need to check with their insurance company to determine if their coverage can pay for towing, etc.”
If not, the county will use a towing company procured through a “request for proposals” to “remove the property and take it to a processing site where it can be claimed or otherwise processed,” Cano said.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Got a question? Send it to John Boyle at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org or 828-337-0941. His Answer Man columns appear each Tuesday and Friday. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-01 08:16:00
(The Center Square) – Taxpayers in North Carolina will face an average tax increase of $2,382 if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expires at the end of the year, says the National Taxpayers Union Foundation.
Results of analysis were released Thursday morning by the nonprofit organization billing itself a “nonpartisan research and educational affiliate of the National Taxpayers Union.” Its four state neighbors were similar, with South Carolina lower ($2,319) and higher averages in Virginia ($2,787), Georgia ($2,680) and Tennessee ($2,660).
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of eight years ago was a significant update to individual and business taxes in the federal tax code. According to the Tax Foundation, it was considered pro-growth reform with an estimate to reduce federal revenue by $1.47 trillion over a decade.
Should no action be taken before Jan. 1 and the act expire, the federal standard deduction would be halved; the federal child tax credit would decrease; higher federal tax brackets would return; the federal estate tax threshold will be lower; and some business tax benefits will be gone.
The foundation, in summarizing the impact on North Carolina business expensing, says the state conforms to Section 168(k). This means “only 60% expensing for business investments this year and less in future years. State policymakers could adopt 100% full expensing, particularly since the state conforms to the Section 163(j) limit on interest expense and the two provisions were meant to work together.”
The foundation says business net operation loss treatment policies in the state “are less generous than the federal government and impose compliance costs due to lack of synchronization with the federal code and are uncompetitive with most other states.”
The National Taxpayers Union Foundation also says lawmakers “should at least be conscious of any retroactive provisions when selecting their date of fixed conformity.” North Carolina is among 21 states conforming to the federal income tax base “only as of a certain date” rather than automatically matching federal tax code changes – meaning definitions, calculations or rules.
The foundation said nationally the average filer will see taxes raised $2,955. It estimates an increase for 62% of Americans. The biggest average increases by state are in Massachusetts ($4,848), Washington ($4,567) and Wyoming ($4,493) and the lowest are in West Virginia ($1,423), Mississippi ($1,570) and Kentucky ($1,715).
Individual wages, nationally, are expected to go down 0.5%, reducing economic growth by 1.1% over 10 years.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Right
The content primarily reports on the potential impact of the expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, relying heavily on analysis from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, which describes itself as a nonpartisan organization but is known to advocate for lower taxes and limited government intervention, positions typically aligned with center-right economic policies. The article uses neutral language in presenting facts and data and does not explicitly advocate for a particular political viewpoint; however, the emphasis on tax increases and business expensing challenges following the expiration suggests a subtle alignment with pro-tax-cut, business-friendly perspectives associated with center-right ideology. Thus, while the article largely reports rather than overtly promotes an ideological stance, the framing and source choice reflect a center-right leaning.
www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00
(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.
Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.
Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.
Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance
NCLeg.gov
“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”
SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.
“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”
The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.
“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”
Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.
SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.
