Connect with us

The Center Square

Trump gains more ground in war against DEI | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Casey Harper – (The Center Square – ) 2025-02-15 10:49:00

(The Center Square) – A major shift is underway in the way large companies talk about and fund Diversity, Equity and Inclusion programs.

President Donald Trump began the transition when he signed an executive order last month eliminating DEI policies and staff at the federal government and extending the anti-DEI policy to federal contractors.

Private companies, some of which had already begun the transition before Trump took office, remarkably began backing off their DEI policies, even if only symbolically with little internal change.

Costco resisted, pushing back on the Trump administration, but other major brands like Amazon Wal-Mart, Target, and Meta announced a pullback from DEI. Media reports indicated DEI discussions on earnings calls has plummeted.

Others, such as Wisconsin-based financial services company Fiserv, have not yet made a change, at least not publicly.

A murky legal future awaits companies willing to take the risk to stick with DEI policies, particularly in hiring.

Fiserv receives hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts.

According to Fiserv’s website’s Diversity & Inclusion page, the company is “committed to promoting diversity and inclusion (D&I) across all levels of the organization, in our communities and throughout our industry.”

Fiserv says that it “partner[s] with people and organizations around the world to advance our D&I efforts and create opportunities for our employees, entrepreneurs around the world and the next generation of innovators.”

The company’s diversity and inclusion page includes a careers section that discusses “engaging diverse talent” and events to connect with “diverse candidates.”

Critics of DEI initiatives and policies say they discriminate against white men and Asians and lead to hiring and promotion decisions based on factors such as race and sexual orientation rather than merit.

In its 2023 Corporate Social Responsibility Report, the company boasted that “60% of director nominees for the 2024 annual meeting reflect gender or racial/ethnic diversity.”

According to an April 2024 report from Payments Dive, Fiserv was “buoyed by sales to government entities” in Q1 of 2024 and reported $500 million in revenue from those contracts. The U.S. Coast Guard contracted with Fiserv in 2024 to help with payroll, according to HigherGov, among other government contracts.

Fiserv did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

A watershed moment against DEI came when during the Biden administration, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against longstanding affirmative action policies at American universities, one key example of white and Asian Americans being discriminated against.

Trump’s election has only solidified the new legal framework for what is permissible when considering race and gender in hiring, promotion, and workplace etiquette.

From Trump’s order:

In the private sector, many corporations and universities use DEI as an excuse for biased and unlawful employment practices and illegal admissions preferences, ignoring the fact that DEI’s foundational rhetoric and ideas foster intergroup hostility and authoritarianism.

Billions of dollars are spent annually on DEI, but rather than reducing bias and promoting inclusion, DEI creates and then amplifies prejudicial hostility and exacerbates interpersonal conflict.

DEI has become increasingly controversial as activists use the moniker to advance every liberal policy on race and gender, often at taxpayer expense. In the federal government, DEI had become widespread and infiltrated into every part of governance, from racial quotas for promotions at the Pentagon to driving healthcare research at the National Institutes of Health.

At private companies, DEI policies guided investment decisions via ESG (Environmental, Social Governance) as well as personnel decisions with racial quotas for company board rooms. Those ideas are out of favor with the Trump administration.

Some of the companies resisting the shift from DEI could face legal action.

A coalition of state attorneys general sent a letter to Costco alleging it is violating the law, as The Center Square previously reported.

“Although Costco’s motto is ‘do the right thing,’ it appears that the company is doing the wrong thing – clinging to DEI policies that courts and businesses have rejected as illegal,” the letter said.

This week, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey filed a lawsuit against Starbucks for similar policies.

“By making employment decisions based on characteristics that have nothing to do with one’s ability to work well, Starbucks, for example, hires people by thumbing the scale based on at least one of Starbucks’ preferred immutable characteristics rather than an evaluation of an applicant’s merit and qualifications,” the lawsuit said. “Making hiring decision on non-merit considerations will skew the hiring pool towards people who are less qualified to perform their work, increasing costs for Missouri’s consumers.”

A 2022 Starbucks document touts a DEI goal: “By 2025, our goal is to achieve BIPOC representation of at least 30% at all corporate levels and at least 40% at all retail and manufacturing roles.”

Bailey called the Starbucks policies discriminatory and illegal.

“With Starbucks’ discriminatory patterns, practices, and policies, Missouri’s consumers are required to pay higher prices and wait longer for goods and services that could be provided for less had Starbucks employed the most qualified workers, regardless of their race, color, sex, or national origin,” Bailey said. “As Attorney General, I have a moral and legal obligation to protect Missourians from a company that actively engages in systemic race and sex discrimination. Racism has no place in Missouri. We’re filing suit to halt this blatant violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act in its tracks.”

The post Trump gains more ground in war against DEI | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

U.S. Senate prepares for passage of One Big Beautiful Bill Act | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Dan McCaleb and Alan Wooten – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-29 09:03:00


President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed a key Senate procedural vote 51-49, with two Republicans—Thom Tillis and Rand Paul—joining all Democrats in opposition. Democrats forced a full reading of the 940-page bill to delay the final vote, expected Sunday night or Monday. Trump praised Republicans who supported the bill, highlighting goals like economic growth, reducing wasteful spending, border security, military support, Medicaid reform, and protecting the Second Amendment. The bill extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, with the House having passed its version 215-214. Trump aims to sign it by July 4.

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act cleared a Senate hurdle late Saturday, with a final vote in the upper chamber coming as early as Sunday night or Monday.

The procedural vote was 51-49, with two Senate Republicans – U.S. Sens. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., and Rand Paul, R-Ky. – joining all Democrats in voting against.

To delay a final vote in the Senate, Democrats forced a full reading of the 940-page bill on the floor.

Trump celebrated the vote in posts on Truth Social.

“They, along with all of the other Republican Patriots who voted for the Bill, are people who truly love our Country!” Trump wrote. “As President of the USA, I am proud of them all, and look forward to working with them to GROW OUR ECONOMY, REDUCE WASTEFUL SPENDING, SECURE OUR BORDER, FIGHT FOR OUR MILITARY/VETS, ENSURE THAT OUR MEDICAID SYSTEM HELPS THOSE WHO TRULY NEED IT, PROTECT OUR SECOND AMENDMENT, AND SO MUCH MORE. GOD BLESS AMERICA &, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

The budget reconciliation bill, upon final passage, will implement Trump’s tax, energy, border, and defense policies, including an extension of the tax cuts he delivered during his first term, which are scheduled to sunset at the end of 2025 without action.

Assuming final passage in the Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives – where its version passed 215-214 – would need to agree to changes. Trump has said he wants the measure on his desk by July 4.

The post U.S. Senate prepares for passage of One Big Beautiful Bill Act | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on the legislative progress of President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” with largely factual language, but the framing and selected quotes reflect a sympathetic perspective toward Trump and his policies. The article highlights Trump’s positive statements about the bill and its benefits—such as growing the economy, reducing wasteful spending, and securing the border—without presenting critical viewpoints or counterarguments. The use of phrases like “Republican Patriots” (quoted from Trump) and emphasis on policy goals aligned with conservative priorities contribute to a right-leaning tone. Overall, the piece leans toward supporting the Republican legislative effort while minimally covering opposing perspectives, indicating a right-leaning bias.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Tillis: Projected Medicaid costs to North Carolina budget too much | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-29 05:46:00


U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., opposed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act due to substantial cuts to Medicaid, which he says would harm North Carolina hospitals and rural communities. He criticized the bill’s impact on Medicaid coverage, urging a return to the House’s Medicaid approach with reforms to prevent waste and implement work requirements. Despite supporting elements like tax cuts and increased child tax credits, Tillis voted no to protect vulnerable populations. The bill narrowly passed the Senate and heads back to the House. Tillis faces potential primary challengers, with former President Trump seeking a candidate to better represent North Carolina and the U.S.

(The Center Square) – Improvements in the budget reconciliation bill, the North Carolina senator ultimately decided, were not satisfactory to “pass the president’s agenda” as he said one month ago.



U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.




U.S. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., was one of two votes from his party late Saturday night against passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. House Resolution 1, he said, had tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina hospitals and rural communities.

“This will force the state to make painful decisions like eliminating Medicaid coverage for hundreds of thousands in the expansion population, and even reducing critical services for those in the traditional Medicaid population,” Tillis said. “The Senate should return to the House’s Medicaid approach. That plan includes commonsense reforms to address waste, fraud and abuse; and implements work requirements for some able-bodied adults to ensure taxpayer-funded benefits are going to our most vulnerable neighbors.”

Tillis wanted to vote for the measure.

“There is a lot for North Carolinians to love about the rest of the One Big Beautiful Bill, including extending the historic Trump tax cuts, increasing the child tax credit, providing historic funding for border security, and ending wasteful spending,” he said after his no vote. “We can and must accomplish this without hurting our rural communities and hospitals, and without jeopardizing access to care for hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians who need it the most.”

The Congressional Budget Office, in an analysis shared by Democrats of the Finance Committee on Saturday, estimated cuts to Medicaid to reach $930 billion. Tillis released a Finance Committee report specific to the state saying the state’s budget would have a $32 billion impact to cover hospitals over the next decade.

Other published reports had the figure closer to $40 billion.

For more than a decade after passage of Obamacare, Republican majorities of the Legislature flatly rejected expansion of Medicaid because of costs. Finally passing it two years ago was historic in multiple storylines.

North Carolina became the 41st state to expand Medicaid in 2023 as part of a deal by a Republican majority General Assembly and former Democratic-Gov. Roy Cooper. It was Cooper’s chief campaign and gubernatorial priority. The deal cemented when a separate standalone bill on expansion mandated a two-year budget bill was required to be enacted with or without the governor’s signature.

In the $60.7 billion package 84 days late of the July 1 start to the fiscal year, the General Assembly included universal school choice for all K-12 students – known as opportunity scholarships – including private schools. It also did not provide funding Democrats have long sought related to what is known as the three-decades running Leandro litigation. Cooper didn’t sign or veto, and both became law.

The state got a $1.6 billion bonus from the federal government for enacting Medicaid.

Passed 51-49 just before midnight Saturday evening with Vice President J.D. Vance in the building just in case of a tie, the vote was procedural and begins debate. A final vote could come Sunday or Monday.

The House of Representatives – where its version passed 215-214 – would need to agree to changes. President Donald Trump hopes to sign it on or before Friday.

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., was the other Grand Old Party vote against.

All 45 Democrats and two independents caucusing with them also voted no. Sens. Ron Johnson, Rick Scott, R-Fla., Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Cynthia Lee, R-Wyo., were among late votes swinging in favor. Sens. R-Wis., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Susan Collins, R-Maine, swung sooner.

Tillis and Collins are considered most dangerous Republican seats to flip or change in the 2026 midterms.

“Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis,” Trump wrote overnight on social media. “I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the great people of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America.”

Rumors of Trump hopeful to primary Tillis are not new. Candidate filing period opens at noon Dec. 1 and runs through noon Dec. 19, and the state’s senior senator – and third-longest tenured among the state’s 16 in the Beltway – has $5.6 million cash on hand. That’s 11th-highest of senators’ reeelection bids.

In late May, Tillis had said, “Republicans must extend the Trump tax cuts and pass the president’s agenda. Failure is not an option. Here’s what needs to happen next in the Senate: We will make some improvements to the Big, Beautiful Bill, push for more spending cuts, and get the job done.”

Tillis has taken heat back home in western North Carolina for comments related to the embattled Federal Emergency Management Agency. And it’s only part of potential opponents’ early campaign fodder.

He has agreed in principle with Trump on reducing health care costs but not on the means to the end. Tillis was the last to agree for confirmation of Pete Hegseth to lead the Pentagon. And on a 12-10 GOP majority panel, it was Tillis in the Judiciary Committee who stalled Ed Martin’s confirmation route for a U.S. attorney seat in the District of Columbia.

The post Tillis: Projected Medicaid costs to North Carolina budget too much | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on Republican Senator Thom Tillis’s opposition to a significant budget reconciliation bill, presenting his arguments and concerns in detail. The tone is factual and largely neutral, providing context on Medicaid expansion in North Carolina, budgetary impacts, and legislative processes. It includes direct quotes, official data, and references to bipartisan actions without overt editorializing. The framing highlights Republican perspectives, especially on fiscal responsibility and healthcare reform, reflecting a center-right viewpoint through the choice of focus and language. However, it refrains from explicitly endorsing or opposing these views, maintaining overall balanced reporting with a slight tilt toward conservative policy emphasis.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Rollins backs North Carolina, nation’s pork producers in California tiff | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Alan Wooten – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-28 07:01:00


California’s Proposition 12, which sets space requirements for farm animals, including pigs, is supported by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and North Carolina Rep. David Rouzer as enforceable within California but not beyond its borders. Rouzer emphasized the importance of fair, science-based regulations for North Carolina’s pork producers, a major industry worth \$111.1 billion nationally. Rollins expressed concern over Proposition 12’s negative effects on pork producers outside California, highlighting the need to protect other states’ industries from extraterritorial regulations. Both leaders support balancing state rights with preventing adverse impacts on interstate agriculture.

(The Center Square) – California, says the leader of the USDA and a North Carolina congressman, has the right to enforce its Proposition 12.

The state line, however, is where that enforcement should end.

In the battle of pork production, U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins affirmed that position in a congressional hearing this month. This week, U.S. Rep. David Rouzer, R-N.C., reminded Tarheel State farmers of her allegiances.

“North Carolina pork producers have a friend at USDA in Secretary Brooke Rollins,” Rouzer said, expressing gratitude for her push back against Prop 12. “Secretary Rollins is right, California has the right to do what California wants to do, but NC-07 farm families feed the nation, and they deserve fair, science-based regulations, not California mandates.”

Proposition 12 is the colloquial term for the Farm Animal Confinement Initiative. Egg-laying hens, breeding pigs and veal calves have space requirements, and sale of products from the animals is prohibited if not meeting the standard.

Rouzer comes from the 7th Congressional District, the southeastern portion of the state where trips on country roads often mean getting behind a hog truck hauling to the world’s largest pork production facility in the Bladen County crossroads community of Tar Heel. North Carolina’s $111.1 billion agriculture industry includes a No. 3 national ranking in pork production behind Iowa and Minnesota.

California’s market includes about 40 million people and 15% of domestic pork consumption. Compliance with the Golden State’s law can require new construction or retrofits with enormous fiscal impact.

In the Committee on Agriculture, Rollins told panelists, “No one is more of a believer in federalism, the 10th Amendment, and our Founders vision of the state’s rights to be able to be their own laboratories of innovation. When those ideas, those rules and laws begin to impact other states in such a negative way, that is not what our Founders intended.

“The extreme impact of Prop 12, especially on our pork producers – I believe this is a bipartisan question. We may not all agree in this room, but I think most agree even on the Democrat side of the House, that it cannot stand. I stand in full support of your effort.”

Rollins said her department may be able to inject something toward a solution.

“California has a right to do what California wants to do,” she said. “The minute that crosses the border and begins to compromise, in such a significant way, our pork producers we need to act.”

The post Rollins backs North Carolina, nation’s pork producers in California tiff | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the opposition by USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins and Representative David Rouzer to California’s Proposition 12, presenting their viewpoints and framing the issue around state rights and impacts on North Carolina pork producers. The language used by the quoted officials emphasizes federalism, economic harm to farmers, and resistance to California’s regulatory reach. While it reports statements and positions from officials without overt editorializing, the selection and presentation of these perspectives align more closely with a Center-Right viewpoint, highlighting concerns common among conservative and agricultural constituencies about state regulatory overreach and business impacts. The absence of counterbalancing views or perspectives from proponents of Proposition 12 further emphasizes this lean.

Continue Reading

Trending