Connect with us

The Center Square

Fiscal hawks: House budget plan could add $25 trillion in debt over next decade | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-02-16 08:56:00

(The Center Square) – House leaders have praised their early work on crafting a budget, but outside groups estimate the spending plan could add $25 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. 

Part of the disconnect is the extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts, which Republicans view as preventing a tax hike rather than a reduction in revenue. Extending the provisions could considerably add to U.S. debt without corresponding spending cuts. The Congressional Budget Office has said it won’t pay for itself without further budget offsets. Another issues is President Donald Trump’s tariff plan, which could raise revenue, but figuring out how much remains a challenge as Trump implements some tariffs and leaves others on pause.

In December, Trump promised to cut “hundreds of billions” in federal spending in 2025 through the reconciliation progress. Last week, Trump posted “balanced budget” in all capital letters followed by three exclamation points on Truth Social. He signed the post with his initials. Congress hasn’t proposed anything close to meeting those goals. 

The House resolution would allocate $4.5 trillion to extend the president’s 2017 tax cuts. The House resolution raises the debt ceiling by $4 trillion and instructs congressional committees to find at least $1.5 trillion in spending cuts over the next 10 years, only partially offsetting the tax cuts extension. In return, the bill would authorize a $300 billion increase in mandatory spending split among the Armed Services, Homeland Security, and Judiciary committees.

Trump’s comment aren’t the only ones that don’t square with the proposals Republicans have put forward. 

U.S. Rep. Jodey Arrington, a longtime fiscal hawk, holds the House Budget Committee gavel, but it’s unclear if he’ll correct course on the nation’s spending even with Trump in the White House and narrow GOP majorities in both legislative chambers. 

“This budget resolution is more than numbers on a ledger, it’s a blueprint for restoring America’s security, prosperity, and leadership in the world,” Arrington said. “It’s a promissory note for our children to preserve the land of liberty and opportunity by safeguarding it from an unwieldy government and the unbridled spending, taxing, and regulating that threatens to destroy it. This budget blueprint is the fiscal framework for our unified Republican leadership to rein in Washington’s reckless spending and endless bureaucracy, reignite economic growth and prosperity, and restore the bulwark of our common defense.”

However, the blueprint he’s talking about doesn’t stop the federal government from spending money it doesn’t have. An analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said the budget resolution includes $3.3 trillion of net allowable deficit increases. With interest, that would allow almost $4 trillion of additional debt. A bill consistent with those instructions would increase debt in 2034 to 126% of gross domestic product, a measure of economic output. The budget window – fiscal year 2025 through fiscal year 2034 – is an eight-year extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which could make the $4.8 trillion of tax cuts and spending increases in this budget window translate to $5.5-$6 trillion of 10-year increases, CRFB noted. 

“Overall, the budget resolution would allow lawmakers to increase borrowing by nearly $4 trillion over the next decade at a time when it would be a mistake to make our fiscal situation worse,” the nonpartisan group said. 

Michael A. Peterson, CEO of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, said the House budget plan could add $25 trillion in debt over the next decade. 

“Unfortunately, this resolution sets the stage for adding trillions more in new deficits and debt,” he said. “It allows for $4.5 trillion in revenue reductions, with only $1.2 trillion in offsets. All told, this plan would add more than $25 trillion to the debt over the next decade.”

Peterson said taxpayers can’t afford it and lawmakers should make changes.

“They should avoid budget gimmicks like unrealistic economic growth, undefined spending cuts, uncertain tariff revenue, or timing games, all of which simply conceal more debt,” he said. “The bottom line is that America is in terrible fiscal shape and the new administration and Congress have many available policy options to improve our fiscal outlook, or at the very least fully offset any policies they wish to enact or extend. Now is the time to prioritize our fiscal future and put our nation on a more sustainable path.”

Congress’ own research service, the Government Accountability Office, has for years been warning presidents and lawmakers that the nation remains on an unsustainable fiscal path. The GAO repeated those warnings last week.

A GAO report warned that unchecked spending could push public debt to 219% of GDP by 2051 and create a significant economic and national security risk.

“We project that public debt will reach an unprecedented level by 2027,” said Gene Dodaro, U.S. Comptroller General and head of the GAO. “We’re calling on Congress and the Administration to act now to develop and implement a strategy to address this acute challenge. Inaction could result in great difficulties for many Americans and impede policymakers’ flexibility to respond to future economic recessions or unexpected events.”

Republican Study Committee Chairman August Pfluger, R-Texas, said the group will continue to look for ways to reduce the deficit.

“I commend Budget Chairman Jodey Arrington on navigating a budget resolution through markup and setting up the Trump agenda for success,” he said. “RSC’s stated position is this process must reduce the budget deficit and we will continue to work with the Administration and designated committees to achieve additional savings.”

The post Fiscal hawks: House budget plan could add $25 trillion in debt over next decade | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

26 attorneys general file brief in support of Trump’s deportation of gang members | Virginia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Sarah Roderick-Fitch | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-03-18 17:16:00

(The Center Square) – A coalition of state attorneys general is filing an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, urging the court to lift a nationwide restraining order that is “preventing” the “immediate deportation” of “Tren de Aragua gang members.”

Leading the effort are Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares and South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson, who joined 24 other states after a judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order Saturday evening temporarily halting the deportations of members of the Venezuelan gang. The order came as the aircraft carrying the gang members was airborne.

The deportations followed President Donald Trump’s announcement that he was invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. This prompted Chief Judge James Boasberg to immediately issue a temporary restraining order blocking the removal of “all noncitizens in U.S. custody who are subject” to the president’s order.

Boasberg ordered the planes en route to Central America to be turned around. The Trump administration immediately appealed Boasberg’s order to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The planes carrying the migrants arrived in El Salvador, with the Trump administration claiming they complied with the court order but that the aircraft was out of U.S. airspace by the time Boasberg issued his order.

In January, the president designated Tren de Aragua a foreign terrorist organization, along with seven other cartels from Latin America.

In the latest brief, the coalition of attorneys general argues that allowing the TRO to stand “undermines public safety and national security, placing American lives at risk.”

The group defended the president’s executive order, saying it is “grounded in clear constitutional and statutory authority to remove TdA members.” They added that the district court “overstepped its bounds by issuing a restraining order without fully considering the Executive Branch’s compelling interest in national security.”

Miyares underscored the duties of the government in protecting its citizens, adding that the president’s actions are constitutionally protected.

“The core duty of government is to protect its citizens. The President, acting within his constitutional and statutory authority, did just that by ordering the removal of TdA gang members who have no legal right to be in this country and pose a direct threat to Americans’ safety. TdA is a violent transnational criminal organization responsible for heinous crimes across the United States. The law is clear, and so is our position,” said Miyares.

The brief comes on the heels of Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, introducing articles of impeachment against Boasberg, who was appointed to the bench by former president Barack Obama.

Earlier in the day, the president called Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic” in a Truth Social post, adding that the judge “should be impeached.”

The post led U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts to issue rare comments criticizing the president, saying the court system should be left to resolve legal disputes.

“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said Tuesday in a statement. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

In addition to the attorneys general from Virginia and South Carolina, the following states joined the coalition: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and West Virginia.

The post 26 attorneys general file brief in support of Trump’s deportation of gang members | Virginia appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

The Center Square

EPA review of Clean Water Act standards draws praise, panic | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Thérèse Boudreaux – (The Center Square – ) 2025-03-18 17:00:00

(The Center Square) – The Environmental Protection Agency is reviewing regulatory changes the Biden administration made that broadened the definition of “waters of the United States,” or WOTUS, expanding the number of water bodies subject to federal permitting.

This latest step by the Trump administration toward environmental deregulation has agriculture and business advocates celebrating and environmentalists predicting a future flood of water pollution across the nation.

The definition of “waters of the United States” – which the Biden administration had expanded to include nearly all of the nation’s streams and wetlands – determines whether landowners and businesses must pay for federal permits under the Clean Water Act before beginning a project.

EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has argued that clearer, streamlined permitting will reduce costs, encourage construction of homes and manufacturing facilities, and ensure WOTUS regulations align with the U.S. Supreme Court’s Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency ruling of 2023, which condemned the Biden administration’s changes.

“The previous Administration’s definition of ‘waters of the United States’ placed unfair burdens on the American people and drove up the cost of doing business,” Zeldin said in a statement. “Our goal is to protect America’s water resources consistent with the law of the land while empowering American farmers, landowners, entrepreneurs, and families.”

Zeldin said the EPA will conduct the review along with the United States Army Corps of Engineers and invite input from stakeholders and state partners before issuing a rule revision.

Republican lawmakers and business leaders are hailing the move as the likely end of what they view was a “weaponization” of federal regulatory powers that bypassed state and local authorities and infringed on property rights.

“This is great news for farmers, small businesses, manufacturers, home builders, infrastructure builders, local communities, and property owners across the country,” House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chair Sam Graves, R-Mo., said in a statement.

“The Biden Administration, with its costly and burdensome WOTUS rule, created confusion, uncertainty, and hardship for everyone by pushing the federal government’s regulatory powers far beyond the intent of the Clean Water Act,” Graves added. “Even worse, they ignored the Supreme Court’s Sackett ruling that should have reigned in their illegal rulemaking.”

Both the American Farm Bureau and the National Association of Homebuilders support Zeldin’s plans, referencing the uncertainty and delays farmers and builders have faced since the WOTUS expansion.

“Obtaining a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit under WOTUS can take upwards of a year, and these permitting delays put home building projects on hold and increase construction costs,” NAHB Chairman Buddy Hughes stated. “[This] action by the EPA will help alleviate federal permitting roadblocks that are exacerbating the nation’s housing affordability crisis.”

But environmental advocates are strongly opposed to the move, arguing it gives a free pass to corporate polluters.

“After decades of misinformation and campaigning, corporate polluters won big when Sackett v. EPA gutted clean water protections for most wetlands and millions of miles of streams. Now, the Trump administration wants to strip even more protections,” Julian Gonzalez from Earthjustice, an environmental law nonprofit, said in a statement. “This administration is ignoring the will of the people, who overwhelmingly demand clean water.”

The post EPA review of Clean Water Act standards draws praise, panic | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Costly regulation adds for businesses cited in companion proposals | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-03-18 16:10:00

(The Center Square) – North Carolina agencies would have to get legislative approval for any new regulation that would have more than $1 million in economic impact under bills introduced Friday in the Senate and House of Representatives.

The legislation is part of a nationwide push by conservative groups such as Americans for Prosperity to stop unelected state agency leaders from raising costs for businesses by adding new regulations.

“The NC REINS Act is about giving the people of North Carolina a stronger voice in the rules that shape their lives,” state Rep. Allen Chesser, R-Nash, in a news conference Tuesday. “Right now, unelected bureaucrats can impose regulations with major financial consequences without direct oversight from the General Assembly. The current process is not transparent. We can do better.”

Chesser sponsored NC REINS ACT, or House Bill 402. Companion legislation in the upper chamber is the same name in Senate Bill 290, shepherded by Sen. Benton Sawrey, R-Johnston.

This is not a new issue, Dalton Clark, legislative liaison for Americans for Prosperity said Tuesday.

“It’s something that has been debated several times at the General Assembly,” Clark said. “I think the No. 1 question we’ve got is ‘Why now?”

The legislation now has “overwhelming” bipartisan support, Clark said. A poll shows 80% support for the bill, he said.

Donald Bryson, CEO of the Locke Foundation, said his organization has been pushing for this type of legislation for a decade.

“This is about good governance overall and reinstating accountability and transparency to democratic governance,” he said. ”At what point does a rule or regulation that’s created become so large that it in fact should be a law?”

The proposal “clarifies this strange gray area,” Bryson said.

Similar legislation is pending in at least a dozen states, including Georgia and South Carolina, said Jaimie Cavanaugh, legal policy counsel at Pacific Legal Foundation. Wyoming passed a bill this year, she said.

The Center Square was unsuccessful getting comment from Gov. Josh Stein’s office before publication.

Some legislative critics of the proposal have said that the proposal could be dangerous because it would create an extra layer of approval for regulations aimed at protecting public health.

The post Costly regulation adds for businesses cited in companion proposals | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

Continue Reading

Trending