Mississippi Today

How much will your hospital receive in state grant money?

Published

2 years ago

March 28, 2023

Lawmakers approved $104 million for Mississippi hospitals. Some say it’s not nearly enough.

by Devna Bose, Mississippi Today
March 28, 2023

Mississippi hospital leaders have been begging for help for months, and the Legislature has answered the call — though some advocates and lawmakers say it’s not nearly enough.

Both chambers on Tuesday approved a $103.7 million grant program that will be split by Mississippi’s struggling hospitals.

The pandemic weakened the state’s already-stressed health care infrastructure — costs for supplies and workers went up, and reimbursements from insurance providers did not. Many of the state’s hospitals have been bleeding out for the past few years, shutting floors and service lines one by one.

Now, a third of Mississippi’s rural hospitals are at risk of closure, and half of those within a couple of years. It’s a situation poised to worsen health outcomes in a state with already some of the worst in the country.

Both legislative chambers this week passed Senate Bill 2372, which establishes a grant program for hospitals, and House Bill 271, which funds it.

Previously, the Senate’s version of the bill aimed to give $80 million to hospitals, focusing its efforts on rural health care providers. Instead, the House wanted to give the funds to larger hospitals.

After closed-door deliberations among six legislative Republicans, the two sides reached a compromise on Tuesday: They’re distributing $103 million to hospitals through a hybrid funding model, using funds from the American Rescue Plan Act, according to the bill. The Mississippi Department of Health is receiving $700,000 to administer the program, according to Senate Medicaid Chairman Kevin Blackwell, R-Southaven.

The compromise falls short of what hospital leaders and some rank-and-file lawmakers said was needed. The Mississippi Hospital Association projected early this year that hospitals would need $230 million in extra funds to stay afloat. Despite the increase in grants, they’re still about $40 million short.

Negotiations of the grant program came as the state sits on a record revenue surplus of nearly $4 billion. And Republican lawmakers continue to leave more than $1 billion per year on the table by rejecting Medicaid expansion.

Tim Moore, president of the MHA, said on behalf of state hospitals that health care leaders are very appreciative of the actions taken by the Legislature to pass the measure, especially the creation of an allocation model that supports all hospitals, no matter the location or size.

But he added the lower-than-needed total will not solve the ongoing hospital crisis — that new, recurring revenue will along with a remodeling of Mississippi’s health care and payment infrastructure.

“The solution has not changed,” Moore said. “Payer issues and the burden of uncompensated care must be addressed. The Mississippi hospital system that provides care to all Mississippians costs $23 million dollars a day to operate. Any sustainable business model must generate adequate revenues to cover expenses. Hospitals are no exception.

“If a long term solution is not developed, access to care will decline and fewer services will be offered at local community hospitals,” Moore said.

Legislative Democrats in January proposed a grant program that would appropriate $200 million to the struggling hospitals and used the opportunity to blast Republicans’ inaction on the issue. This week, most House and Senate Democrats voted to approve the Republicans’ $104 million grant program but used floor debate to argue that the state should be doing more.

“It is particularly galling that in the same weekend when we saw Mississippians struggle to find emergency health care after a natural disaster, Republican leaders still felt it appropriate to allocate less than half of what hospitals have been begging for just to keep their doors open,” Rep. Robert Johnson, the House Democratic leader from Natchez, said on Tuesday. “They stood up and told all of us how awful the devastation of the tornado was, then they immediately turned around and refused to do the bare minimum.

“In one breath Republicans are telling us that we’ll rebuild from the storm, that they are pro-life, that they want a better future for the state,” Johnson continued. “And in the next breath they’re saying, ‘Take this and shut up.’ All while they’re telling us we’re in the best financial shape we’ve ever been in. It would be shocking if it weren’t so completely expected.”

Ahead of the final vote in the House and Senate on Tuesday, Republican lawmakers laid out the basic formula for the grant program. If a hospital has more than 100 beds, it will receive a base amount of $1 million.Hospitals with an emergency room and fewer than 100 beds will receive $625,000.

Specialty hospitals, such as Brentwood Behavioral Healthcare in Flowood which is an inpatient psychiatric treatment center, and critical access hospitals will get a base of $500,000. Critical access hospitals have very few inpatient beds but get more money for services they provide. Critical access hospitals, such as Sharkey Issaquena Community Hospital in Rolling Fork, are a designation a step below acute hospitals and are typically reimbursed by Medicare at a rate of 101%, theoretically allowing a 1% profit. Acute hospitals with no emergency rooms get $300,000 as a base amount.

Then, hospitals get an extra $250,000 if they operate small rural emergency rooms and a little less than $2,000 for each bed they have.

The most any one hospital is receiving is $2.3 million, which is going to University Hospitals & Health System. Some providers, such as Diamond Grove mental health clinic in Louisville, are receiving nothing. Others, like Jasper General Hospital, are receiving as little as $331,502.

Major hospital systems including Merit Health, North Mississippi Medical Center and Baptist Memorial are getting millions.

“In the original Senate bill, some hospitals received nothing,” Rep. Sam Mims, a Republican from Natchez and chair of the House Public Health and Human Services committee, said on the floor Tuesday. “This makes sure they all receive something.”

Mims, who was one of the three House negotiators of the grant program, works for Merit Health.

Neshoba County General Hospital in Philadelphia, the county’s only hospital, is getting just under $1 million in grant money. In recent months, the hospital has closed one of its acute floor wings and nurse stations — in the past decade, admissions have gone down by half.

Neshoba General CEO Lee McCall said that the hospital’s loss in the past five months is relatively equal to the extra grant money, and it’s about $200,000 more than what he expected to receive from the state. The hospital projects a $2.5 million loss this year.

“This amount and the Medicaid enhanced amounts will help significantly by cutting that deficit by more than half,” he said, referring to the extra money hospitals are receiving in supplemental MHAP payments, or payments hospitals receive to offset unequal reimbursement rates. “We are also implementing other cost cutting measures and initiatives to shrink the loss gap. It is much appreciated.”

He stressed that the grant money will get the hospital to temporarily break even, but there are still seven months to go in the year — and the years beyond that.

“The one time grant funding is much appreciated, but doesn’t fix the ongoing problems we’re dealing with in hospitals,” McCall said.

The Delta’s Greenwood Leflore Hospital is arguably in one of the most dire financial situations of all hospitals in the state. The hospital is also getting a little less than $1 million under the new program.

The hospital has already shuttered their neurology, urology and labor and delivery units, among others, in an effort to cut costs. They’re months away from closing, according to their interim CEO Gary Marchand.

“We appreciate the grant funds, and it will help in our efforts to continue operations in the short term,” Marchand said when reached by text Tuesday. “It will replace a portion of the cash reserves used during the pandemic.”

The legislation now goes to Gov. Tate Reeves for final approval. It’s not clear when funds will be distributed. Spokespeople from the Mississippi State Department of Health did not answer questions by press time.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Up Next

IHL names Daniel J. Ennis next president of Delta State

Don't Miss

Remember Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann’s plan to save hospitals? Here’s where those bills stand.

Mississippi Today

‘Get a life,’ Sen. Roger Wicker says of constituents

Published

3 days ago

August 15, 2025

Staff Editor

mississippitoday.org – @GanucheauAdam – 2025-08-15 09:40:00

by Adam Ganucheau, Mississippi Today
August 15, 2025

A note from Adam Ganucheau: A couple hours after this column published, Sen. Roger Wicker’s office reached out and demanded a correction, saying the senator’s “get a life” comment was directed to himself and not to constituents. That’s certainly not how I nor hundreds of Mississippians who commented on and shared the viral video heard it. Mississippi Today has updated portions of this column to reflect concerns raised by Wicker’s office. Here’s a link to the video/audio of his response to the question about constituent concerns. Mississippians can decide for themselves what Wicker meant.

When 34-year-old Thad Cochran arrived in Washington after his first election in 1972, the Republican felt it important to document what he’d heard and learned from Mississippians on the campaign trail and share it with his young staff.

He sat down at a typewriter and wrote a memo titled “General Responsiveness” and dated March 14, 1973:

During the campaign I detected a very strong animosity among the people toward government and those associated with government bureaus and agencies. This included elected officials and those associated with them. Part of the cause of this attitude was due to a lack of feeling or understanding by government people for the needs and opinions of the average citizen. We are all in a job to represent all our constituents. We are not the bureaucracy. A constituent who asks us for help should be assured to be in need of help with our office as his last resort. A constituent who writes a letter should be made to feel by our response that he is glad he wrote us. A constituent who claims to have been wronged by the government should be assumed to be correct. Everyone should guard against developing the attitude that we are better than, smarter than or more important than any constituent. We do not hold a position of authority over any constituent. We are truly servants of the people who selected us for this job.

Every year from 1973 through 2018, over his three U.S. House terms and six U.S. Senate terms, Cochran shared that memo with every staffer who worked in his offices. The guidance, he said all those years, was a necessary reminder to show respect to the people who offer feedback or need help. He never wanted his staff or himself to forget who sent them to Washington.

The memo, like so many other things, serves as a stark reminder that Cochran was among the last in a bygone era of American politics. The perspective he wrote and shared is a far cry from what Mississippians have been getting recently from our current U.S. senators.

“Surely everybody else has better things to do with their time,” senior U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker said to a room full of constituents earlier this month when asked about calls and emails his office has been getting. After half-heartedly explaining that he does see a list of names of people who reach out to his office, he quipped: “Get a life.”

Wicker’s office said Friday that the senator directed “Get a life” to himself, not to constituents.

Wicker, who typically chooses his words a little more carefully, perhaps has been trying to match his junior colleague’s energy.

“Why is everyone’s head exploding?” U.S. Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith said in April to Mississippi constituents who had expressed concerns over slashing federal Medicaid spending. “I can’t understand why everyone’s head is exploding.”

There are many kind staffers working for Republicans Wicker and Hyde-Smith who are helpful to Mississippi constituents in any number of ways privately or behind the scenes. These people care deeply about serving their home state and they do it well, and they cannot help how their bosses address the public. But, boy, their phones must be blowing up more than ever since the senators made these comments.

Consider, for a moment, what it means that we have devolved from having a leader who believed that “a constituent who claims to have been wronged by the government should be assumed to be correct” to one who thinks telling constituents to “get a life” is appropriate. Think about the fact that we replaced a leader who regularly reminded his staff that “we are truly servants of the people who selected us for this job” with one whose gut response to legitimate concerns from constituents is that their “heads are exploding.”

Just … wow. To call it alarming doesn’t fully encapsulate the gravity of their behavior. It’s enough to discourage even the most optimistic among us about the present and future of our state and our nation.

It’s enough to inspire you to ponder, in this intense political climate when unprecedented and harrowing federal government decisions are being made and going largely unchecked every day, whether our current U.S. senators even remember why they’re in Washington, why we sent them there.

It is necessary, in the shortest possible order, to ask and answer for ourselves what we should expect of our elected officials and whether we should feel OK about being dismissed or ignored outright like this.

You don’t have to be a Democrat to think that this behavior is out of line. Plenty of Republicans — some publicly and many privately — are increasingly disturbed by what’s happening in Washington. Regardless of your own personal political beliefs, be honest with yourself about whether you can read these comments from our senators and still feel that your best interests are being represented.

Sadly, we can no longer ask Cochran to help us answer these questions, but it sure seems clear where he’d stand. What about you?

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post 'Get a life,' Sen. Roger Wicker says of constituents appeared first on mississippitoday.org

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content critiques Republican senators for their dismissive attitude toward constituents, contrasting them with a more respectful past leader. It highlights concerns about current political behavior and governance, emphasizing accountability and responsiveness to the public. While it acknowledges that some Republicans privately share these concerns, the tone and framing suggest a leaning that favors more progressive or reform-minded perspectives, typical of center-left commentary.

Mississippi Today

UFC cage fighting at the White House: Will Mississippi follow the lead?

Published

4 days ago

August 14, 2025

Staff Editor

mississippitoday.org – @rick_cleveland – 2025-08-14 10:19:00

by Rick Cleveland, Mississippi Today
August 14, 2025

Change occurs so quickly in the 250th year of our nation’s existence sometimes we feel the need to call timeout, survey the rapidly shifting landscape and wonder: What next? What in Hades happens next?

Rick Cleveland

We have a former Fox Network weekend host in charge of our military. We have a former professional wrestling promoter heading up the Department of Education (which she wants to scrap entirely). We have an anti-vaccine advocate leading the Department of Health and Human Services. Hard to tell these days who are our allies and who are our enemies. Few of our traditional allies trust us anymore. Our president creates, then delays, then reduces and then increases tariffs so often we can’t keep up.

Indeed, what the heck comes next?

Well, stop the presses. Now we know what’s next: Cage fighting on the White House grounds, UFC style. Trump has indicated he wants it to happen. His close friend Dana White, CEO of Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), says unequivocally this is going to happen. Paramount, which has been so much in the news lately, will televise it. Millions of dollars will be made. Eyes will be blackened! Brains will be concussed!! Blood will flow!!! Ratings will soar!!!! MAGA!!!!!

Ancient Rome had the Colosseum and gladiators fighting to the death for the entertainment of the emperor. Washington will have cage fighting, no holds barred, at the White House, heretofore a National Historic Landmark so designated for its significance to American history, architecture, arts and culture. At least there will be no lions in the White House cage. Or will there be? Perhaps alligators.

The target date is July 4, 2026. As Trump put it in a speech in Iowa: “We’re going to have a UFC fight, think of this, on the grounds of the White House. We have a lot of land there. … We’re going to have a UFC fight, championship fight, full fight.”

Yes, he really did say we have a lot of land there, leaving out the obvious. It doesn’t take much land for a caged-in, 746-square foot UFC octagon. Besides, there’s not enough room for a golf course, which Trump might prefer.

U.S. presidents have dabbled in sports before, though not quite the way Trump, who owns 17 golf courses worldwide, has immersed himself in golf. Trump in his second term reportedly has played golf on a quarter of the days he has been president, costing taxpayers roughly $70 million in travel and secret service expenses.

Previous presidents have not been quite so active, although Nixon installed a bowling alley in the White House basement. Eisenhower added a putting green on the White House lawn. Clinton added a jogging track to the White House grounds. Obama loved to play pick-up basketball. Most all recent presidents have been huge sports fans. But, at least to my knowledge, Trump is the first UFC aficionado in the White House.

Which brings to my mind this question: Which president would have been best at UFC? My money definitely would be on sturdy Teddy Roosevelt, who boxed at Harvard and sparred at both boxing and judo while president. He was a fitness freak. He also found time as president to save college football, although I’m not at all sure President Teddy would fancy what college football has become.

There are other president-athletes to consider. Abe Lincoln was a champion amateur wrestler and would have had a decided advantage in reach over most presidents. Gerald Ford was a Michigan football star who played on two national championship teams and was the Wolverines’ MVP as a senior. Ford was in the trenches, a center on offense and a linebacker on defense. This was back before facemasks. Clearly, he was a tough guy.

William Howard Taft, our 27th president, was a varsity heavyweight wrestler at Yale. In retrospect, it seems a shame sumo wrestling wasn’t popular in the early 20th century. Taft, 5 feet, 11 inches tall and weighing just over 350 pounds, would have been a natural.

On the local front, you don’t have to read Mississippi Today daily to know that Mississippi’s current political leaders often follow President Trump’s lead. Indeed, there seems a highly competitive contest to see which Mississippi politico can get the tightest grip on Trump’s coattails. They all want to follow Trump’s blueprint and make Mississippi great again.

With that in mind, can UFC fighting at the Governor’s Mansion, right there on Capitol Street, be far behind?

Think of the possibilities. For starters, how about Shad White vs. Andy Gipson? Who you got?

Clarification: This column was updated to reflect that the United States of America is in its 250th year of existence.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post UFC cage fighting at the White House: Will Mississippi follow the lead? appeared first on mississippitoday.org

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article adopts a critical tone toward former President Trump and his administration, highlighting controversial appointments and policies with a degree of skepticism and irony. It uses humor and historical comparisons to question the appropriateness of hosting UFC cage fighting at the White House, suggesting a disapproval of the spectacle and the current political climate. While not overtly partisan, the piece leans toward a center-left perspective by scrutinizing conservative figures and policies more than offering balanced praise.

Mississippi Today

Trump nominates two Mississippi Supreme Court justices to federal bench

Published

5 days ago

August 13, 2025

Staff Editor

mississippitoday.org – @MSTODAYnews – 2025-08-13 12:09:00

by Taylor Vance, Mississippi Today
August 13, 2025

President Donald Trump on Tuesday announced his nomination of James Maxwell and Robert Chamberlin, two Mississippi Supreme Court justices, to vacant federal judicial seats in northern Mississippi.

Pending Senate confirmation of the nominations, Gov. Tate Reeves will appoint two state high court justices temporarily, then special elections will be held in November of 2026.

Trump made the announcement on Truth Social, his social media platform, where he said the two justices, if confirmed, would uphold the Constitution and the rule of law. Both Chamberlin and Maxwell, through the state Administrative Office of the Court’s public information officer, declined to comment.

Mississippi Supreme Court Justice James Maxwell

The two nominations will go before the U.S. Senate for confirmation. Both of Mississippi’s Republican U.S. senators, Roger Wicker and Cindy Hyde-Smith, commended Trump for nominating the two jurists and said they supported their confirmation.

“I want to thank President Donald Trump for his nomination of two solid and experienced jurists for the U.S. District Court,” Wicker said in a statement. “I wholeheartedly support Justice Chamberlin and Justice Maxwell and look forward to their speedy confirmation.”

Maxwell earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Mississippi. Former Gov. Haley Barbour in February of 2009 appointed Maxwell to the state Court of Appeals. Maxwell was elected to the post in 2010 and reelected in 2014. Former Gov. Phil Bryant appointed him to the state Supreme Court in January 2016. He was later elected to an eight-year term in November of 2016 and reelected in 2024.

Mississippi Supreme Court Justice Robert Chamberlin

Chamberlin earned his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Mississippi. He first served as a state circuit court judge for 12 years in the 17th Circuit District. In 2016, he was elected to an open seat on the state Supreme Court and reelected in 2024.

Before becoming a judge, Chamberlin was a member of the state Senate for five years, representing DeSoto County.

Chamberlin and Maxwell will replace U.S. District Judges Michael Mills and Sharion Aycock, both of whom decided to take senior status in recent years.

It’s unclear who Reeves might appoint to fill the vacancies. He has previously filled judicial vacancies on the state Court of Appeals with prosecutors or circuit court judges with prosecutorial experience, such as the appointments of Judge John Weddle and Judge John Emfinger.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Trump nominates two Mississippi Supreme Court justices to federal bench appeared first on mississippitoday.org

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The content presents a straightforward report on President Donald Trump’s judicial nominations, highlighting support from Republican senators and emphasizing the nominees’ qualifications and conservative credentials. The tone is neutral and factual, but the focus on Trump and Republican figures, along with positive framing of their actions, suggests a slight lean toward center-right perspectives without overt partisan commentary.