Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Governor sees influence at risk as NC Republicans file flurry of bills

Published

on

carolinapublicpress.org – Sarah Michels – 2025-03-12 06:00:00

Josh Stein is arguably the weakest governor in the nation. Western Carolina University political science professor Chris Cooper jokes that if Republican lawmakers strip any more power away, he’ll be naked. 

But that doesn’t seem to be a deterrent this session as various bills attempt to shift more authority away from the governor — and other Democratic executives — to the Republican-led General Assembly or executive offices currently held by the GOP. 

Already, Stein operates in a “legislature-first state” where the governor has always played second fiddle to the General Assembly. 

For that, you can thank the royal governors, whose tight grip on colonial legislatures in the 1700s has left an enduring bad taste, Catawba College political science professor Michael Bitzer explained. 

As governor, Stein holds essentially no power over the state budget other than the obligation to share his vision with Republican lawmakers who are free to promptly discard it in favor of their own. 

His veto power is one of the weakest in the country, with no ability to object to specific items in budget bills, redistricting legislation, constitutional amendments or bills that apply to fewer than 15 counties. 

He doesn’t even get to appoint his executive team. The attorney general, secretary of state, superintendent of public instruction and six other primary executive offices are elected by the people. 

Moreover, the governor’s other appointment powers have shrunk throughout the years.

So why keep going? To show “who’s in control,” Bitzer said. 

In the red

“Power grab.” 

“Voter suppression.”

“You are overturning the will of the people.” 

In late November, audience members were forcibly removed from the North Carolina Senate gallery after loudly objecting to Senate Bill 382, a Hurricane Helene relief bill that included a few hundred pages of other legislative changes. 

Among them were several shifts of power from elected Democratic executives to the Republican-led legislature or elected GOP executives. 

The governor’s Utilities Commission appointment went to the treasurer, Republican Brad Briner

Stein’s election appointments — all members of the State Board of Elections and the chairs of the 100-county boards of election — were transferred to the state auditor, Republican Dave Boliek

Stein would need legislative approval to appoint his State Highway Patrol commander and political party input when filling court vacancies. 

The superintendent of public instruction, Democrat MauriceMo” Green, lost his ability to appeal charter school grants, renewals or amendments, as well as his oversight of the Center for Safer Schools. 

The attorney general, Democrat Jeff Jackson, was barred from intervening in Utilities Commission matters or taking a position in court that conflicted with the General Assembly. 

Former Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper vetoed Senate Bill 382, calling it a “sham.” The legislature overrode it, and now various aspects of the law are in court. 

In any case, the legislation served as a preview of what was to come in the 2025 General Assembly. 

Stripping more governor power 

A month after Helene hit Western North Carolina, Cooper issued an executive order, citing his emergency powers. The order temporarily raised the amount of weekly unemployment insurance benefits North Carolinians in the federally-declared disaster area could receive. 

But since then, things have taken a turn.

Enter House Bill 48, which simultaneously censures Cooper’s move as illegal and upholds his executive order. It states that the General Assembly or U.S. Congress, not the governor, would have to call for any future expansions of unemployment insurance. 

Bill sponsor, Republican Rep. Julia Howard, said the governor didn’t have authority to expand benefits, but “in the wisdom of the General Assembly, we felt that the right thing to do is to ratify that executive order.”

Democratic Rep. Deb Butler questioned why Republicans were trying to limit the governor’s ability to make a quick judgment in a crisis situation. 

“It’s just another step in a rather calculated effort to undermine the balance of power in this state, and it is something that I just cannot support,” she said. 

House Bill 48 made it through the state House and is awaiting committee assignment in the state Senate. A pair of proposed constitutional amendments seeking to limit governor powers haven’t made it quite as far yet. 

Other proposed House bills would further erode a governor’s influence.

House Bill 144 would remove the governor’s ability to appoint a majority of the State Board of Education, subject to legislative confirmation. Instead, voters would elect 14 of the board’s 17 members, if a majority of voters approved the amendment. 

And House Bill 64 would limit the governor’s clemency power — the ability to grant pardons or reduce sentences. If approved by voters, the constitutional amendment would require a majority of the General Assembly to approve the governor’s clemency actions. 

‘Being a shield’

North Carolina voters haven’t elected a Republican attorney general since 1896, but they have consistently elected Republicans to the legislature since 2011. 

“It just makes partisan sense to limit power from that Democratic official,” Western Carolina’s Cooper said. 

Attorneys general are the chief lawyers for states. In North Carolina, they provide legal opinions to the legislature, governor and other public officials. They also may sue or intervene in court on behalf of the state, its agencies or its citizens. 

Groups of attorneys general tend to work together to object or support certain presidential actions, depending on which party is in power. For example, Jackson has sued President Donald Trump over four of his executive orders — those banning birthright citizenship, pausing federal grants, granting DOGE access to federal payment systems and cutting medical research funding. 

Senate Bill 58 and House Bill 72 would keep Jackson from continuing that trend. It would remove the power to advance any argument in court that would invalidate a presidential executive order — even if the General Assembly also objected to that order, according to legislative staff. 

It’s nationalized, short-term power politics, playing out in North Carolina, Bitzer said. 

Democratic lawmakers questioned if the bill was “prudent” or whether Republican lawmakers were fully thinking it through. After all, the president won’t always be a Republican and the attorney general may not always be a Democrat. 

It might “come back to bite” Republicans later, predicted state Sen. Mujtaba Mohammed, D-Mecklenburg. 

“The people of North Carolina elected two different people from two different parties to be their leaders,” he said. “Sounds to me like North Carolina would want these types of checks and balances to protect our state sovereignty.” 

On Tuesday, state senators voted along party lines to approve Senate Bill 58 and send it to the House. 

In the meantime, Jackson continues to go to court over Trump’s executive orders, and, so far, he’s got a good track record. 

Jackson took to social media after a federal judge temporarily blocked medical research cuts, which would have harmed major research universities and “threaten(ed) thousands of jobs and innovation across the state.” 

“It was a reminder that an important part of this job is being a shield against unlawful federal acts that would undercut our economy and hurt our future,” Jackson said in a post on X. “For the good of our state, that shield should remain in place.” 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. You may republish our stories for free, online or in print. Simply copy and paste the article contents from the box below. Note, some images and interactive features may not be included here.

The post Governor sees influence at risk as NC Republicans file flurry of bills appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending