by Lucas Thomae, Carolina Public Press April 17, 2025
RALEIGH — In summer 1997, well before Brad Briner became state treasurer, he worked as an intern at the investment banking company Goldman Sachs.
While he was there, Briner needed to acquire data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. His supervisor offered him a plane ticket to the nation’s capital and told him to go down to the USDA building to comb through paper records and get the information he needed.
But the late 1990s marked a new age in technology. Briner knew there was a more efficient way to get the job done.
“I turned to him and said: ‘Hey, there’s this thing called the internet and I can actually just pull it for you right here,’” Briner recalled.
Now, the Republicanthinks the country is on the cusp of another one of those moments with the emergence of artificial intelligence — and he doesn’t want North Carolina stuck in the past.
To that end, in late March, Briner announced the launch of a 12-week pilot program in partnership with industry-leading company OpenAI to explore how artificial intelligence can be integrated into the work of the Office of the State Treasurer.
The announcement was made amid a push from state lawmakers to pass regulations on the use of AI in industries such as health care.
The contrast in approaches is representative of a larger national debate over the technology.
As artificial intelligence rapidly integrates into the private sector, public officials are exploring the best, and safest, ways to use the technology.
‘First of its kind’
The public-private partnership was hailed as the “first of its kind” following a flashy press conference to announce the initiative at N.C. Central University, but this is far from OpenAI’s first venture into government affairs.
For at least five years now, the federal government has been working towards integrating AI into its workforce under both Democratic and Republican administrations.
It started with a December 2020 executive order from Donald Trump that mandated departments and agencies “design, develop, acquire and use AI in a manner that fosters public trust and confidence while protecting privacy, civil rights, civil liberties and American values.”
Joe Biden continued that goal during his presidency by promising to hire 500 AI experts across the federal workforce by the end of fiscal year 2025.
And Trump has picked up right where he left off since returning to office.
On April 3, the Office of Management and Budget issued further guidance to federal agencies on acquisition and use of AI tools in accordance with Trump’s original order from 2020.
Starting last year, OpenAI announced a year-long pilot program with 14 state agencies in Pennsylvania. In March, Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro called the program’s results “highly positive,” with average time savings of 95 minutes per day.
North Carolina is the next state to follow suit through its pilot program at the treasurer’s office.
The agency might not seem like an obvious candidate for an AI-powered makeover, but Briner, who was elected as a Republican in November, has an approach to finance that is not traditionally conservative. During his campaign, he criticized his predecessors for their risk-averse investment strategies he claimed consistently underperformed compared to other states. Briner has also advocated investing part of the state’s pension fund in cryptocurrency.
But despite the buzz and uncertainty associated with artificial intelligence, Briner said this partnership with OpenAI is anything but risky. Instead, it’s more like his office is trying to see if it’s a good fit.
Future for Briner is now
There are no legally binding ties or financial promises between the two parties yet.
Briner and OpenAI chief economic officer Ronnie Chatterji — a Durham resident and former Duke professor — signed a 12-week, non-binding memorandum of understanding that laid out the limited scope of the pilot program.
Notably, Chatterji ran as the Democratic candidate for state treasurer in 2020 and lost to Republican incumbent Dale Folwell. He and Briner also served together on the finance committee of a private school their children attended.
The memorandum of understanding signed by Briner and Chatterji states that the department will not pay OpenAI for any “off-the-shelf” use of ChatGPT — OpenAI’s flagship AI chatbot. But they may come to a separate payment agreement for more advanced integration of OpenAI’s technology.
The agreement does not get into much detail about what happens at the end of the program other than saying that the agency will deliver a final report of its findings and future recommendations.
Briner told CPP he is not committed to continuing with the program unless he sees “productivity growth” in the coming weeks.
Briner promises to be ‘respectful steward’
Briner assured that one of his top priorities in overseeing the program is being a “respectful steward of data,” and the agreement stipulates that OpenAI will not be given access to private information.
That is one “bright red line” Briner promised the initiative wouldn’t cross.
“The big issue with AI in state government,” Briner said, “is one that we are deliberately side-stepping, which is how do you ensure data privacy for non-public data in the context of using AI? That’s a big, thorny, complicated question, but we wanted to see if we could get tremendous productivity out of this tool by applying it only in the divisions where we don’t use private data.”
So the OpenAI program will focus on publicly-available datasets such as unclaimed property held by the state and the financial audits of local governments.
The state treasurer oversees an unclaimed property fund that holds more than $1.4 billion consisting of, among other things, bank accounts, wages and contents of safe deposit boxes that have been abandoned for years and turned over to the state. North Carolina runs a program called NC Cash dedicated to returning unclaimed funds to their owners.
Briner said that the division could use OpenAI’s tools to perform deep data searches to more easily identify and return property.
Moreover, the State and Local Government Finance Division, which audits the more than 1,100 units of local government in North Carolina each fiscal year, could use AI to flag potential financial issues.
Still, exactly how artificial intelligence technology would be used hasn’t been hammered out yet, but Briner said the goal is to see if the productivity in those two divisions will have improved by the time the pilot program expires in mid-May.
A hard line on software
Over at the state legislature, lawmakers appear to be more wary of artificial intelligence.
A couple of bills filed this year by state Sen. Jim Burgin aims to place more regulations over the use of AI chatbots.
“I’m really concerned about AI overall and the speed (at which it’s growing),” said Burgin, a Republican from Harnett County who has been a leader in the General Assembly on AI-focused policy. “It’s almost like one of those Chia heads. It’s got a little bit of water and it’s growing everywhere, and we need to think about that.”
One of the bills sponsored by Burgin — Senate Bill 624 — would require operators of AI-powered chatbots in the health care sector to be licensed by the state. It would also require operators of any chatbot to inform users that the computer program is “not human, human-like or sentient.”
Furthermore, it would give a state attorney general the power to sue chatbot operators in violation of those regulations.
A spokesman for Attorney General Jeff Jackson declined to comment on the bill other than to say that the office was “currently reviewing” the legislation.
Burgin, who is the president and owner of an insurance company, said he’s not opposed to the use of AI. What he’s trying to do is put up guardrails to prevent harmful misuse of the emerging technology.
“Do I think that there’s some exciting things about it? Yeah, I think there’s unlimited possibilities.”
SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.
James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.
SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00
North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.
(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.
Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.
Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”
Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.
Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.
Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”
Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”
House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.
