FRANKFORT – Tapping his broad base of Kentucky donors and landing three hefty contributions from out of state last summer, Gov. Andy Beshear’s super PAC raised $2.56 million in its first year of existence.
The political action committee, called In This Together, had mixed results as it spent $2.24 million of that money trying to promote Beshear’s policies and elect Democratic candidates both in Kentucky and across the country.
Disclosure reports filed with federal regulators early this month show that — by far — the largest shares of In This Together’s spending were applied here in Kentucky: to help defeat a proposed constitutional amendment that would have allowed the legislature to appropriate tax dollars for private schools, and to help elect appeals court Judge Pamela Goodwine to the Kentucky Supreme Court.
While In This Together was on the winning side in those campaigns, it lost its other top priority campaigns including its effort to elect Democratic governors in New Hampshire and Indiana.
Beshear created In This Together two months after winning reelection as governor in November of 2023. Its official purpose, according to its registration with the Internal Revenue Service, is to “help good people and good candidates win difficult elections.”
It’s also a mechanism to allow Beshear — prevented by the state Constitution from seeking a third term as governor — to fuel his political ambitions by making connections and winning friends both inside Kentucky and nationwide.
Kentucky Supreme Court Justice Pamela Goodwine shakes hands before Gov. Andy Beshear’s State of the Commonwealth address, Jan. 8, 2025, in Frankfort. (Kentucky Lantern photo by Arden Barnes)
In This Together is required to periodically disclose details of the donations it gets as well as the donations it makes — and it did so in a timely way in its first year. It files one part of its financial information (as a super PAC) with the Federal Election Commission, and another part (as a nonprofit “527 organization”) with the Internal Revenue Service.
Eric Hyers, who managed Beshear’s two campaigns for governor and is the strategist for In This Together, said this is “a common structure” for political organizations like In This Together “that wish to contribute and spend money across many different state elections, to comply with the varying state campaign finance laws.”
However, Kentucky Lantern and most – if not all – media outlets in Kentucky reported throughout 2024 only on the disclosures In This Together filed with the FEC, which include slightly less than half of the organization’s receipts and expenses.
Kentucky Lantern last week reviewed In This Together’s reports filed with both the FEC and IRS for this story which for the first time presents a comprehensive picture of the super PAC’s financial activity in its first year.
Combining these IRS disclosures with those from its FEC reports shows that during its first year, In This Together took in $2,562,615 and spent $2,241,047.
Who gave money to In This Together?
Here are the names of the largest donors listed in the forms filed with the IRS and FEC by In This Together:
Deborah Simon, Carmel, Indiana, retired, $250,000. Simon is a philanthropist and a Democratic mega donor. She is the daughter of the late Melvin Simon, a billionaire shopping mall magnate and co-owner of the Indiana Pacers. She also contributed to Beshear’s campaigns for governor in 2019 and 2023 as well as to the Kentucky Democratic Party and the Democratic Governors Association.Andrew Nathan Schwartzberg, Rockville, Maryland, president of Preservation Services LLC, $250,000. Preservation Services LLC is a real estate development business focusing on affordable housing.Glenn Fuhrman, New York, New York, CEO of Virtru Investment Partners, $200,000.Developers of new Frankfort shopping center The Paddocks of Frankfort, $100,000. (Donors specifically were TPOF Manager LLC, and two companies managed by Patrick Madden: Sir Barton Place and War Admiral Place.)Freedom Adult Day Healthcare, Louisville, and its managing member Nachiketa Bhatt, Prospect, $50,000. Bhatt contributed to the Kentucky Democratic party in recent years and to Beshear’s 2023 campaign.Mark A. Swartz and Mike Swartz, Kentucky highway contractors, $50,000. Mark Swartz, of Winchester, operates Swartz Enterprises; Mike, of Olympia, owns Mike Swartz Enterprises. Each gave $25,000 to In This Together. The Swartz family has been a major donor to Andy Beshear political committees. Their businesses perform tree removal and related services under state government contracts. Barbara Banke, Geyserville, California, $50,000. Banke heads Jackson Family Wines in California, as well as Stonestreet Farms in Kentucky. She is a mega political donor who has backed Republican causes in a big way, but she donated to Beshear in 2023.William Seale, Annapolis, Maryland, $50,000. Seale has been a big donor to Beshear political causes. A report listing his contribution to In This Together says he is retired.Beam Suntory, New York, distillery, $50,000
Those nine donors together gave $1,050,000 to In This Together – 41% of all the super PAC’s receipts.
But In This Together reported more than 750 other contributions during the year — in amounts from $5 to $25,000.
Many of these contributions were donations of $1,000 to $5,000 given by scores of Kentuckians who have been loyal backers of Beshear or Beshear appointees to state boards or commissions.
Who got the money from In This Together?
A sign opposing Amendment 2 is shown at a Protect Our Schools election night party in Louisville. (Kentucky Lantern photo by McKenna Horsley)
Here are the names of the political candidates and causes that got the largest donations from In This Together in 2024:
Kentuckians for Public Education, a PAC opposing Amendment 2, which was on the ballot in November, $950,000. This Kentucky PAC was created by Hyers, the Beshear strategist. Advertising it purchased included television commercials featuring Beshear and a teacher opposing the constitutional amendment backed by Republican legislative leaders that would have allowed tax dollars to be spent on private schools. Voters overwhelmingly defeated the amendment. Kentuckians for Good Judges, a PAC supporting Pamela Goodwine’s election, $335,000. This was also a PAC created by Hyers. In addition to the $335,000 given to this PAC, In This Together also made a $2,100 contribution to Goodwine’s campaign committee.In This Together New Hampshire, a PAC supporting Democratic candidate for governor in New Hampshire Joyce Craig, $255,000. Craig lost that election, but this contribution helped Beshear make connections in New Hampshire which might help him should he decide to run for president in 2028.Democratic Governors Association, Washington, D.C., $150,000. Beshear was recently elected by Democratic governors to be the organization’s vice chair this year and chair-elect for 2026. This raises Beshear’s national profile because he will play a leading role in fundraising for Democratic candidates for governor in 36 states during the 2026 midterm elections. McCormick for Governor, $100,000. This was Democratic candidate for Indiana governor Jennifer McCormick’s campaign committee. McCormick lost.Working Hard for Kentucky PAC, $26,500. This is another PAC created by Hyers. Its registration papers say its purpose is to “elect legislators who will work hard for Kentucky families.” Disclosure reports show that it spent nearly all of its money on digital advertising and direct mail opposing the reelection of Louisville Republican Rep. Emily Callaway. Calloway won her reelection.
In This Together made other, much smaller, contributions to candidates backed by Beshear.
Also, it should be noted that the activity of In This Together does not represent the complete picture of Beshear’s ongoing political activity. Also last year he created a separate dark money PAC that raises big contributions and supports Beshear’s chosen candidates and causes.
But as a dark money PAC, Heckbent does not disclose names of its contributors or those to whom it gives contributions.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
SUBSCRIBE
Kentucky Lantern is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kentucky Lantern maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jamie Lucke for questions: info@kentuckylantern.com.
SUMMARY: The weather forecast includes a tornado watch for far northwestern communities like Jackson and Lawrence counties, effective until 11 PM. Scattered storms have started to develop due to high heat and humidity. The Steamboat Race is about to begin near the Ohio River, with dry conditions so far but some storms may pop up nearby. Temperatures are around 84°F with 50% humidity and a light southwest breeze. Evening storms are expected mainly along I-64 and points north. Wednesday night will quiet down, but Thursday will see scattered storms again, especially in the afternoon. Rain chances continue through Derby week, but mostly in periodic showers with plenty of dry times. The unsettled pattern will likely ease by next week.
SUMMARY: Severe weather is expected to return on Thursday, with a cold front moving through the Ohio Valley and re-energizing the atmosphere, creating conditions for strong to severe storms, including damaging winds, large hail, and isolated tornadoes. All of Central and Eastern Kentucky is under a Level 2 (Slight Risk) for severe weather. The storms will be fueled by gusty southwest winds, pushing temperatures into the low 80s. For Oaks Day (Friday), scattered showers and storms are likely, and the forecast for Derby Day (Saturday) is uncertain, with possible lingering clouds and showers. Temperatures will be cooler, staying in the mid-60s for the weekend.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Dave Mason | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-29 19:00:00
(The Center Square) – California and Arizona Tuesday joined 22 other states and the District of Columbia to sue the Trump administration to stop cuts in AmeriCorps’ grants and workforce.
The lawsuit objects to the federal government reducing 85% of the workforce for the agency, which promotes national service and volunteer work addressing disaster recovery and other community needs.
According to americorps.gov, the agency enrolls more than 200,000 people each year in community service organizations. AmeriCorps also provides more than $4.8 billion in education awards.
Besides California and Arizona, states filing the suit are Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, Kentucky and Pennsylvania.
President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February directing every federal agency to reduce its staff. Since then, AmeriCorps has placed at least 85% of its workforce on administrative leave immediately and told employees they would be dismissed effective June 24, according to a news release from the Arizona Attorney General’s Office.
The states’ lawsuit contends the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce AmeriCorps and its grants violate the Administrative Procedures Act and the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution.
California is co-leading the lawsuit against the Trump administration.
“In California, AmeriCorps volunteers build affordable housing, clean up our environment, and address food insecurity in communities across our state,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a news release. “California has repeatedly taken action to hold the Trump Administration and DOGE accountable to the law — and we stand prepared to do it again to protect AmeriCorps and the vital services it provides.”
The Arizona Attorney General’s Office said the cuts in AmeriCorps affect grants such as:
$700,000 for Northern Arizona University, Arizona Teacher’s Residency, designed to address teacher shortages.
$308,000 for Area Agency on Aging, Caring Circles, which helps older Arizonans with needs such as transportation to medical appointments, grocery shopping and help with technology.
$495,000 for Vista College Prepartory’s tutoring and teacher support for math and reading for low-income students.
“AmeriCorps represents the best of our nation – providing opportunities for millions of Americans to serve their neighbors and communities and make our country a better place to live,” Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes said. “By unilaterally gutting this Congressionally authorized agency, Donald Trump and Elon Musk have yet again violated the law and the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution. Their illegal actions will harm Arizona communities.”
Mayes noted studies show AmeriCorps programs generate more than $34 per every dollar spent in terms of their impact on communities.
“Slashing these programs serves no purpose and is incredibly short-sighted from those claiming to champion efficiency,” she said.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
This article reports on a legal action filed by multiple states against the Trump administration over cuts to AmeriCorps, without offering an overt ideological stance. The content outlines the details of the lawsuit, the parties involved, and their claims. The language used is largely factual, describing the positions of the states, particularly California and Arizona, without endorsing one side. While the article highlights the perceived impacts of the cuts and quotes politicians critical of the Trump administration, it refrains from promoting an explicit viewpoint, focusing instead on reporting the legal and administrative actions at hand. The tone remains neutral and provides an equal space to both the states’ concerns and the implications of the lawsuit. It primarily serves as a factual report on the legal challenge, rather than an advocacy piece, and does not adopt a partisan perspective on the issue.
