News from the South - Missouri News Feed
After battery plant fire, southeast Missouri town alarmed about potential contamination
After battery plant fire, southeast Missouri town alarmed about potential contamination
by Allison Kite, Missouri Independent
February 17, 2025
FREDERICKTOWN — Jennifer Torr was at a coffee shop next door to the the Critical Mineral Recovery battery recycling plant when it caught fire in October, sending a tower of smoke into the air.
She had no idea when she and her husband, Darin, bought their blueberry farm a few miles north of town that the facility might one day pose a danger. But when she saw the building erupt in flames, she immediately thought, “we have to get out of this area.”
“I remember my husband and I getting in our vehicle and texting my kids, ‘You guys need to pack some bags,’” Torr said in an interview.
By the time they got back to the farm just over eight miles away, her family members were covering their faces to guard against the smell and fumes from the fire while they packed their car.
Since the fire, Torr and other residents have been organizing to bring their concerns to Madison County and state officials about the battery plant and a cobalt mine on the other side of town. Fredericktown lies at the heart of Missouri’s old Lead Belt. After generations of contamination from lead mining, residents worry now that battery development and recycling poses yet another health hazard.
“Will my grandchildren be sitting here and saying, ‘My grandma tried to stop this 60 years ago and now we’re all sick because nobody would listen?’” Kimi Royer asked her state legislator, Republican Rep. Dale Wright of Farmington, on a visit to Jefferson City earlier this month.
It took days for firefighters to fully extinguish the blaze at Critical Mineral Recovery, which recycled lithium-ion batteries. The facility opened at the edge of Fredericktown in 2023. Now, only its burnt husk remains.
Parts of Fredericktown were evacuated when the facility went up in flames, and families who lived across from the plant were displaced. Lawsuits filed by neighbors of the plant say the explosion caused respiratory problems and post-traumatic stress disorder and raised heavy metals levels in some residents’ blood.
Al Watkins, an attorney for Critical Mineral Recovery, said the company shares residents’ concerns about the effect of the fire on their health and property values.
At the opposite end of town, U.S. Strategic Metals hopes to mine cobalt, stirring fears of the kind of environmental contamination the community suffered from lead mining, which ended in the area in the 1960s.
Residents said in interviews earlier this month that they understand the need for the battery recycling plant and the mine. Cobalt is essential for battery production, and precious materials can be recovered from lithium-ion batteries.
“We’re not opposed to having this industry,” Torr said. “What we’re opposed to is having this placed in areas where they’re going to be next to people, communities where there’s schools and residential areas people are living.”
Melissa Vatterott, policy and strategy director for the Missouri Coalition for the Environment, has helped residents from the Fredericktown area push legislation at the Missouri Capitol that would require cobalt mines and battery plants be set back at least a mile from residential areas.
Vatterott noted communities, like Fredericktown, have seen adverse health effects from mining in the past.
“We should not be allowing more mining of a mineral for which the federal government has no standards for safe mining and make these same communities susceptible again to health harms,” she said.
The legislation would also require a permit for subsurface cobalt mining. The state currently requires land reclamation permits to mine minerals at the surface, but according to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the state doesn’t require a land reclamation permit for underground mining.
U.S. Strategic Metals mine has permits to govern wastewater discharges and mine waste.
“We want to make sure that if we’re going to be doing mining of some of these minerals, which we need to be doing, that we’re doing it responsibly,” said Democratic Rep. Eric Woods of Kansas City, the bill’s sponsor.
State Sen. Jamie Burger, a Republican who represents the communities near the mine and battery plant, is among the lawmakers who have heard concerns from the community about their safety.
“People were displaced from their homes, which is not good — ever,” Burger said. “…Then I also heard from people that want that to be rebuilt for job creation.”
Burger said he wanted to see what a one-mile setback would look like for the mine and battery plant. He said he thought the mining could be done in a safe manner and provide quality jobs for the area.
A new industry in town
For decades, lead mining was a pivotal industry for southeast Missouri. But it came at a high price.
Workers at mines across Madison County produced lead for more than 200 years, resulting in more than a dozen stacks of waste that has eroded and left lead in soil and water around the county. Contaminated soil was used for foundation bases, fill and topsoil, contaminating residents’ properties.
The entirety of Madison County is a Superfund site under cleanup by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Now, U.S. Strategic Metals hopes to mine cobalt at one of the old lead mine sites.
The mine, situated at the edge of Fredericktown, sits on what U.S. Strategic Metals says is one of the largest reserves of cobalt in North America. Cobalt, an essential component of lithium-ion batteries, can be detrimental to human health.
The EPA is reviewing whether cobalt and cobalt compounds might cause cancer. But inhaling cobalt particles can cause damage to the respiratory system, blood and the thyroid.
Aside from the impacts of cobalt, Fredericktown residents are worried about potential health impacts from stirring up the lead and other contaminants at the site.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
“When something is in a Superfund, you don’t come in and dirty it up even more,” said Walter Schwartz, who lives near the mine, adding that he’s worried the mine will bring groundwater, soil and air pollution.
According to a request for a permit filed with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Strategic Metals hopes to build a plant to process materials from mining tailings, the leftover material from lead mining. Then, the company plans to mine fresh material from underground.
The Department of Natural Resources said it’s still waiting for further air quality information regarding cobalt from the company necessary to process the permit application.
The company did not return multiple requests for comment.
Residents near the mine have complained that following U.S. Strategic Metals’ takeover in 2018, blasts from the mine shook their homes, causing drywall and foundation damage.
Schwartz moved to the area in 2022 from Michigan and is turning it into his “sanctuary,” planting fruit trees and raising chickens in his backyard. When blasts from the mine started shaking his house, causing a shelf to fall from the wall, he became worried about his investment.
“I’m looking at a bleak future of pollution and property value running down,” he said.
The Department of Natural Resources said it had received complaints from area residents and referred them to the Missouri Department of Public Safety.
While U.S. Strategic Metals seeks a permit to expand, it’s facing accusations from the EPA of violating the Clean Water Act.
The agency sued in early 2024, accusing operators of the mine of allowing pollutants — including cobalt, copper, lead and nickel — to leave the site. The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri also accuses mine operators Environmental Operations Inc.; Missouri Cobalt LLC; and Missouri Mining Investments LLC, of allowing stormwater runoff to discharge through a channel not authorized by the site permit and into a nearby creek.
During an inspection by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, the lawsuit says, officials saw muddy red water leaving the site and entering Goose Creek.
Lawyers for the mine did not return a request for comment.
Jonathan Klusmeyer, a spokesman for the Environmental Protection Agency, said the agency has identified metals contamination downstream of several mine waste sites in Madison County and is assessing potential cleanup strategies. He said the agency conducts free domestic well water testing for related contamination and provides alternate drinking water for affected residents.
The EPA, Klusmeyer said, does expect the return of mining operations to have an effect on the Superfund site because the operator will be required to work with the EPA and state on plans to recover critical minerals from capped mine waste. That will “prevent recontamination of the site, protect workers during the process, restore the caps and site drainage, test and verify the effectiveness of decontamination efforts and manage any generated residues,” Klusmeyer said.
After the fire
Critical Mineral Recovery was only open a year before it caught fire in October.
In a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the company said it “anticipates rebuilding the facility with a significant expansion at the same location as the previously recycling facility on 32 acres of land in Fredericktown.”
But Critical Mineral Recovery’s attorney, Albert Watkins, said in an email that the “property at which the fire occurred will be rebuilt, but not for the same purpose as originally intended.”
“The significant expansion refers to the Fredericktown area, for which evaluation of options is under way,” Watkins said.
Wakins said the company shares residents’ concerns about the impact of the fire on their health and wants to rebuild “in a more remote location away from residences and schools and more densely populated areas.”
Following the fire, he said the company provided financial support to displaced families, but declined to say how much.
Royer has led efforts to get community members to urge county or state officials to adopt legislation to insulate Frederickstown from the effects of the mine and battery plant. She traveled to Jefferson City earlier this month to present a stack of signatures on a petition asking lawmakers to support legislation that would prohibit mining, refining, manufacturing or recycling certain minerals, including cobalt and lead, within one mile of residences, schools, wildlife refuges, surface water, state or federal parks or conservation areas.
Lawmakers from the area told The Independent they’re evaluating the community’s concerns.
Wright, the Republican state legislator from Farmington, said he thought a one-mile setback sounded “pretty reasonable.” He was seeking more information from the state on mining regulations and planned to speak with Woods, the bill’s sponsor, before committing to support it.
“We want to make sure that people are kept safe,” said state Sen. Mike Henderson, a Republican whose district reaches close to Fredericktown. “We also want to make sure we keep jobs in the community.”
Henderson said residents came to him concerned about safety and the air quality. He noted one resident had to evacuate with three small children.
“It’s not a good situation,” Henderson said. “No one’s trying to say it is. I think right now, we’re just trying to work our way through it to see what takes place from here.”
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.
The post After battery plant fire, southeast Missouri town alarmed about potential contamination appeared first on missouriindependent.com
News from the South - Missouri News Feed
Nutriformance shares how strength training can help your golf game
SUMMARY: Nutriformance emphasizes the importance of strength training for golfers to maintain power, endurance, and consistent swing performance throughout the season. Bill Button, a golf fitness trainer, highlights in-season strength training as crucial to prevent loss of distance and stamina, especially for the back nine. Recommended exercises include shoulder rotation and balance drills using medicine balls or bodyweight to enhance power, lower body strength, and balance. Nutriformance also offers golf-specific fitness, personal training, nutrition coaching, physical therapy, and massage. Mobility exercises, like spine rotation with kinetic energy, are key to maintaining flexibility and preventing injury for golfers.

Nutriformance is located at 1033 Corporate Square in Creve Coeur
News from the South - Missouri News Feed
26k+ still powerless: CU talks Wednesday repair plans
SUMMARY: Springfield is experiencing its worst power outage event since 2007, caused by storms with winds up to 90 mph that toppled trees and power lines. City Utilities declared a large-scale emergency Tuesday, calling in mutual-aid crews. Approximately 26,500 people remain without power as of early Wednesday, about half the peak outage number. Crews are working around the clock but progress is slow, especially overnight. Priorities include restoring power to critical locations like hospitals and areas where repairs can restore electricity to many customers quickly. Customers with damaged weather heads or service points face longer repair times. The utility warns against approaching downed power lines.
The post 26k+ still powerless: CU talks Wednesday repair plans appeared first on www.ozarksfirst.com
News from the South - Missouri News Feed
Missouri lawmakers should reject fake ‘chaplains’ in schools bill
by Brian Kaylor, Missouri Independent
April 30, 2025
As the 2025 legislative session of the Missouri General Assembly nears the finish line, one bill moving closer to Gov. Mike Kehoe’s desk purports to allow public schools to hire spiritual chaplains.
However, if one reads the text of the legislation, it’s actually just pushing chaplains in name only.
The bill already cleared the Senate and House committees, thus just needing support from the full House. As a Baptist minister and the father of a public school child, I hope lawmakers will recognize the bill remains fundamentally flawed.
A chaplain is not just a pastor or a Sunday School teacher or a street preacher shouting through a bullhorn. This is a unique role, often in a secular setting that requires a chaplain to assist with a variety of religious traditions and oversee a number of administrative tasks.
That’s why the U.S. military, Missouri Department of Corrections, and many other institutions include standards for chaplains like meeting educational requirements, having past experience, and receiving an endorsement from a religious denominational body.
In contrast, the legislation on school “chaplains” originally sponsored by Republican Sens. Rusty Black and Mike Moon includes no requirements for who can be chosen as a paid or volunteer school “chaplain.” Someone chosen to serve must pass a background check and cannot be a registered sex offender, but those are baseline expectations for anyone serving in our schools.
While a good start, simply passing a background check does mean one is qualified to serve as a chaplain.
The only other stipulation in the bill governing who can serve as a school “chaplain” is that they must be a member of a religious group that is eligible to endorse chaplains for the military. Senators added this amendment to prevent atheists or members of the Satanic Temple from qualifying as a school “chaplain.”
Members of the Satanic Temple testified in a Senate Education Committee hearing that they opposed the bill but would seek to fill the positions if created, which apparently spooked lawmakers. That discriminatory amendment, however, does nothing to ensure a chosen “chaplain” is actually qualified. For instance, the Episcopal Church is on the military’s list of endorsing organizations. Just because some Episcopalians meet the military’s requirements for chaplains and can serve does not mean all Episcopalians should be considered for a chaplaincy position.
While rejecting this unnecessary bill is the best option, if lawmakers really want to create a school chaplaincy program, they must significantly alter the bill to create real chaplain standards. Lawmakers could look to other states for inspiration on how to fix it.
For instance, Arizona lawmakers a few weeks ago passed a similar bill — except their legislation includes numerous requirements to limit who can serve as a chaplain. Among the various standards in the Arizona bill is that individuals chosen to serve as a school chaplain must hold a Bachelor’s degree, have at least two years of experience as a chaplain, have a graduate degree in counseling or theology or have at least seven years of chaplaincy experience and have official standing in a local religious group.
Rather than passing a pseudo-chaplaincy bill, Missouri lawmakers should add similar provisions.
The Arizona bill also includes other important guardrails missing in Missouri’s bill that will help protect the rights of students and their parents. Arizona lawmakers created provisions to require written parental consent for students to participate in programs provided by a chaplain. Especially given the lack of standards for who can serve as a school “chaplain,” the absence of parental consent forms remains especially troubling.
Additionally, Missouri’s school “chaplain” bill includes no prohibition against proselytization. This is particularly concerning since the conservative Christian group who helped craft the bill in Missouri and other states — and who sent a representative to Jefferson City to testify for the bill in a committee hearing — has clearly stated their goal is to bring unconstitutional government prayer back into public schools.
To be clear, the U.S. Supreme Court did not kick prayer out of schools. As long as there are math tests, there will be prayer in schools. What the justices did was block the government from writing a prayer and requiring students to listen to it each day. Such government coercion violated the religious liberty rights of students, parents, and houses of worship, so the justices rightly prohibited it. Using “chaplains” to return to such coercion is wrong and should be opposed.
There are many proposals and initiatives lawmakers could focus on in these waning weeks of the session if they really want to improve public education. There are numerous ways they could work to better support our teachers and assist our students. Attempting to turn public schools into Sunday Schools is not the answer.
Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.
The post Missouri lawmakers should reject fake ‘chaplains’ in schools bill appeared first on missouriindependent.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
The article critiques proposed legislation in Missouri that would allow public schools to hire “spiritual chaplains,” arguing that the bill is insufficiently rigorous in defining qualifications and raises concerns about religious proselytization in schools. The author’s perspective is clear in its opposition to the bill, highlighting the lack of standards for chaplain selection and the potential for the legislation to be a vehicle for promoting government-sponsored religion in schools. The tone is critical of the bill’s sponsors, particularly the conservative Christian groups behind it, and references U.S. Supreme Court rulings on school prayer to reinforce the argument against the proposal. The language and framing suggest a liberal-leaning stance on the separation of church and state, and the article advocates for stronger protections to prevent religious coercion in public education. While the author presents factual details, such as comparing Missouri’s bill to Arizona’s more stringent chaplaincy standards, the overall argument pushes for a progressive stance on religious freedom and public school policies, leading to a Center-Left bias.
-
Mississippi Today2 days ago
Trump appoints former Gov. Phil Bryant to FEMA Review Council as state awaits ruling on tornadoes
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed5 days ago
Missouri lawmakers on the cusp of legalizing housing discrimination
-
Mississippi Today4 days ago
Derrick Simmons: Monday’s Confederate Memorial Day recognition is awful for Mississippians
-
Mississippi Today7 days ago
Struggling water, sewer systems impose ‘astronomic’ rate hikes
-
Mississippi News6 days ago
Events happening this weekend in Mississippi: April 25-27
-
News from the South - West Virginia News Feed7 days ago
Is West Virginia — and the rest of the country — prepared to care for our seniors?
-
Mississippi Today6 days ago
Tyler Perry comedy about a Mississippi lieutenant governor ‘She The People’ set to stream on Netflix
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed6 days ago
Florida woman accused of setting fires during burn ban