fbpx
Connect with us

Mississippi Today

Falling short: 99% of Mississippi nursing homes don’t meet new staffing regs

Published

on

Viometrice Simmons remembers when she first fell in love with nursing. She was about 5 years old, sitting on the porch of her childhood home in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, as her aunt picked corn from the garden.

When she heard her great grandmother calling for her aunt from the bedroom, Simmons strode into the room, hopped up on the hospital bed and helped to turn and change the 84-year-old the way she had seen the women in her family do many times.

Forty-seven years later, that's still the way she operates as a certified nursing assistant in the Mississippi nursing home she serves. 

“When you walk in that door, every is your patient,” Simmons said.

Despite her dedication and more than 30 years of experience, she is only making $17 an hour at the nursing home where she currently works. In order to make ends meet, she works two jobs between 6 a.m. and 5 p.m., sometimes working overtime until 10 at night. She says some nights she gets out of work and sits in her car for an hour and a half because she's too drained to move.

Advertisement

“I feel helpless. I feel exhausted,” she said. “But I know I got to keep going because who else is going to do it? If the people with the hearts give up, there's going to be no one left for the people in there who are just forgotten about.”

Simmons never considered going back to school to become a registered nurse. What she loves about her job is being a familiar and reliable face for her . A CNA is responsible for providing the majority of hands-on resident care, and is often the person a nursing home resident sees the most on any given day.

“I don't just want to be pushing pills,” Simmons said. “I want to let them talk to me. A lot of the residents tell me things that their families don't even know about them.”

Poor pay and high turnover are among the reasons Simmons believes new federal staffing requirements in nursing homes will be, in effect, meaningless.

Advertisement

“Where are they going to get the staff from?” Simmons asked. “People are not doing it because they're underpaid, and they can't feed their families on that kind of money.”

In Mississippi, all but two of the 200 skilled nursing facilities – those licensed to provide medical care from registered nurses – would need to increase staffing levels under federal regulations the Biden administration proposed in September, according to data analyzed by Mississippi Today, USA TODAY and Big Local at Stanford University.

That's in line with the national trend: Over the first quarter of 2023 – from January to March – less than 1% of skilled nursing facilities in the U.S. met the draft rule's two core standards of provider care.

After signing the executive order in September, Biden accepted public comment through Nov. 6. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is the agency responsible for reviewing the more than 40,000 comments and writing the final rule – which hasn't happened yet and can take anywhere from months to years. Sixty days after the final rule is published in the Federal Registrar, the first phase in a staggered implementation process will begin.

Advertisement
Falling Short: Rebuilding elderly care in rural America

Rural nursing homes across the country, already understaffed, face significant new federal staffing requirements. With on-the-ground reporting from INN's Rural News Network and data analysis assistance from USA TODAY and Big Local News at Stanford University, eight newsrooms explore what the rule change would look like for residents in communities across America. Support from The National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM) Foundation made the project possible.

The proposal, which at the heels of a years-long battle nursing home lobbyists waged against reform, outlines minimal standards. For example, the draft rule mandates 2.45 hours of CNA care and .55 hours of RN care per resident per day. That's less than the 2.8 hours and .75 hours recommended by a CMS landmark 2001 study – even though residents' needs have gotten more complex over the last two decades with more people living longer.

The proposal also mandates an RN on duty 24-7. Current regulations mandate having 24-7 care, but allow the position to be filled by licensed practical nurses, who are used more frequently because their salaries are lower than those of RNs. The proposal does not have a requirement for LPN care, leaving experts worried nursing homes will simply replace LPNs with other staff.

“The 24-hour staffing requirement is good, as long as they make that in addition to the administrative nurses,” explained gerontologist and national nursing home expert Charlene Harrington. “But the other requirements they propose are just shockingly low. And that's partly because the nursing homes have been lobbying against these standards for over a year and a half. So, all these advocates and the experts are very upset about it.”

The only two skilled nursing homes in Mississippi already meeting the not-yet imposed standards are Reginald P. White and James T. Champion nursing facilities – sister of East Mississippi Hospital, one of the state's two psychiatric hospitals. The two Meridian nursing homes met the staffing minimums every day of the 91-day second quarter of 2023.

Advertisement

These homes receive about 20% of their from the state, according to Mississippi Department of Mental Health Planning and Communications Director Adam Moore. That's in addition to the funding they receive from Medicaid and Medicare, as well as personal insurance and private pay.

Kevin Walker, administrator of Reginald P. White Facility, and Judd Nance, administrator of James T. Champion Facility, were surprised to learn they met the new requirements every day between April and June.

“We probably try to staff a little heavier than most nursing homes do, but we think we're short all the time,” Nance said.

Having adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of whether nursing home residents will do well. And doing well doesn't just mean the bare minimum of safety.

Advertisement

Any nursing facility participating in Medicaid or Medicare reimbursement is required by law to provide services that “attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident,” as dictated by the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987.

Richard Mollot, the executive director of Long Term Care Community Coalition – a national nonprofit dedicated to advocating for residents of nursing homes and their families – says that when it comes to laws, the Nursing Home Reform Act is unique because it focuses on the customer – in this case, the resident.

“Most laws focus on the industry itself,” Mollot said. “For instance, all car manufacturers are expected to meet specific miles-per-gallon efficiency or have certain safety features. Nursing homes, on the other hand, are required to provide the staffing, supplies, and services to assure that every resident is able to attain and maintain their highest practicable well-being as an individual, based upon a comprehensive assessment of the person and a care plan that includes not only clinical needs, but the resident's cultural background, goals, and personal preferences, too.”

Currently, states are in charge of regulating staffing in nursing homes. Some states have no staffing minimums, while the ones that do keep the requirements very low. In Mississippi, regulations require there to be at least a ratio of one CNA for every 15 residents during the day, and 25 residents at night – despite the fact that studies have shown one CNA for every six to eight residents during the day and 11 to 13 at night is optimal. 

Advertisement

Even these suboptimal regulations are rarely enforced, according to Harrington, due in part to a national shortage of inspectors. States are required by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to conduct annual surveys and certifications of nursing homes receiving Medicaid and Medicare. In Mississippi, 54% of nursing home state surveyor positions were vacant in 2022, and 44% of the working surveyors had less than two years of experience.

“Enforcement is very weak, especially on staffing,” said Harrington. “We'd like to see CMS really crack down on the nursing homes that don't have enough staff, and maybe put a hold on admissions until they have enough staff. If they're not actually able to hire staff they shouldn't be able to admit patients.”

Negligence that seems minor can compound into serious health issues and – not to mention it often breaches basic expectations of dignity. Even in rehabilitation centers, where residents should be receiving support for mobility, low staffing can mean they are placed in diapers rather than assisted to bathrooms.

In previous nursing homes, Simmons says she witnessed bathroom requests going unanswered and continent residents being diapered out of convenience.

Advertisement

The results can be devastating. Residents who are confined to bed and unable to go to the bathroom not only suffer low morale, but can also develop concurrent urinary tract infections. In the elderly, these infections can cause delirium and exacerbate dementia. Those who try to get up on their own may suffer falls, broken bones and concussions as a result.

“You see residents with UTIs and falls and stuff because they're crying out for help to go to the bathroom in the middle of the night and they fall because they have to go to the bathroom and they're told to go to the bathroom in their briefs,” Simmons said. “Who wants to be sitting somewhere with a wet brief on? It's humiliating. And it's unacceptable.”

According to Mollot, it's a violation of the Nursing Home Reform Act, and one that could be resolved with adequate staffing.

“Nursing homes claim that diapering residents is necessary because they don't have enough staff to respond to call bells or implement resident-centered toileting practices,” Mollot said. “But if you think about it, that is pretty outrageous. In effect, facilities are admitting that they are taking in and retaining vulnerable human beings for whom they have neither the ability nor intention of providing decent care. Why do we accept the warehousing of millions of vulnerable Americans every year?”

Advertisement

Simmons says she has been let go twice, in two different states, shortly after filing incident reports to Occupational Safety and Health Administration and to the staffing agency she was contracted with.

But Simmons is resolved to continue advocating for the residents she serves and hopes that in time, higher pay and more stringent regulations will to better working environments for staff and quality of life for residents in nursing homes.

“I don't care if they fire me from every job,” she said. “When I know something is not right, I'm going to stand up for it. And can't nobody stop me from doing that.”

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Advertisement

Mississippi Today

2024 Mississippi legislative session not good for private school voucher supporters

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Bobby Harrison – 2024-05-19 14:11:52

Despite a recent ruling allowing $10 million in public money to be spent on private schools, 2024 has not been a good year for those supporting school vouchers.

School-choice supporters were hopeful during the 2024 legislative session, with new House Speaker Jason White at times indicating for vouchers.

But the Legislature, which recently completed its session, did not pass any new voucher bills. In fact, it placed tighter restrictions on some of the limited laws the state has in place allowing public money to be spent on private schools.

Advertisement

Notably, the Legislature passed a bill that provides significantly more oversight of a program that provides a limited number of scholarships or vouchers for special-needs children to attend private schools.

Going forward, thanks to the new , to receive the vouchers a parent must certify that their child will be attending a private school that offers the special needs educational services that will the child. And the school must information on the academic progress of the child receiving the funds.

Also, efforts to expand another state program that provides tax credits for the benefit of private schools was defeated. Legislation that would have expanded the tax credits offered by the Children's Promise Act from $8 million a year to $24 million to benefit private schools was defeated. Private schools are supposed to educate low income students and students with special needs to receive the benefit of the tax credits. The legislation expanding the Children's Promise Act was defeated after it was reported that no state agency knew how many students who fit into the categories of poverty and other specific needs were being educated in the schools receiving funds through the tax credits.

Interestingly, the Legislature did not expand the Children's Promise Act but also did not place more oversight on the private schools receiving the tax credit funds.

Advertisement

The bright spot for those supporting vouchers was the early May state Supreme Court ruling. But, in reality, the Supreme Court ruling was not as good for supporters of vouchers as it might appear on the surface.

The Supreme Court did not say in the ruling whether school vouchers are constitutional. Instead, the state's highest court ruled that the group that brought the lawsuit – for Public Schools – did not have standing to pursue the legal action.

The Supreme Court justices did not give any indication that they were ready to say they were going to ignore the Mississippi Constitution's plain language that prohibits public funds from being provided “to any school that at the time of receiving such appropriation is not conducted as a school.”

In addition to finding Parents for Public Schools did not have standing to bring the lawsuit, the court said another key reason for its ruling was the fact that the funds the private schools were receiving were federal, not state funds.  The public funds at the center of the lawsuit were federal COVID-19 relief dollars.

Advertisement

Right or wrong, The court appeared to make a distinction between federal money and state general funds. And in reality, the circumstances are unique in that seldom does the state receive federal money with so few strings attached that it can be awarded to private schools.

The majority opinion written by Northern District Supreme Justice Robert Chamberlin and joined by six justices states, “These specific federal funds were never earmarked by either the federal government or the state for educational purposes, have not been commingled with state education funds, are not for educational purposes and therefore cannot be said to have harmed PPS (Parents for Public Schools) by taking finite government educational away from public schools.”

And Southern District Supreme Court Justice Dawn Beam, who joined the majority opinion, wrote separately “ to reiterate that we are not ruling on state funds but (ARPA) funds … The ARPA funds were given to the state to be used in four possible ways, three of which were directly related to the COVID -19 health emergency and one of which was to make necessary investments in water, sewer or broadband infrastructure.”

Granted, many public school advocates lamented the , pointing out that federal funds are indeed public or taxpayer money and those federal funds could have been used to help struggling public schools.

Advertisement

Two justices – James Kitchens and Leslie King, both of the Central District, agreed with that argument.

But, importantly, a decidedly conservative-leaning Mississippi Supreme Court stopped far short – at least for the time being – of circumventing state constitutional language that plainly states that public funds are not to go to private schools.

And a decidedly conservative Mississippi Legislature chose not to expand voucher programs during the 2024 session.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

On this day in 1925

Published

on

MAY 19, 1925

In this 1963 , leader Malcolm X speaks to reporters in Washington. Credit: Associated Press

Malcolm X was born Malcolm Little in Omaha, Nebraska. When he was 14, a teacher asked him what he wanted to be when he grew up and he answered that he wanted to be a lawyer. The teacher chided him, urging him to be realistic. “Why don't you plan on carpentry?”

In prison, he became a follower of Nation of Islam leader Elijah Muhammad. In his speeches, Malcolm X warned Black Americans against self-loathing: “Who taught you to hate the texture of your hair? Who taught you to hate the color of your skin? Who taught you to hate the shape of your nose and the shape of your lips? Who taught you to hate yourself from the top of your head to the soles of your feet? Who taught you to hate your own kind?”

Prior to a 1964 pilgrimage to Mecca, he split with Elijah Muhammad. As a result of that , Malcolm X began to accept followers of all races. In 1965, he was assassinated. Denzel Washington was nominated for an Oscar for his portrayal of the civil rights leader in Spike Lee's 1992 award-winning film.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/?p=359877

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

On this day in 1896

Published

on

MAY 18, 1896

The ruled 7-1 in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation on railroads or similar public places was constitutional, forging the “separate but equal” doctrine that remained in place until 1954.

In his dissent that would foreshadow the ruling six decades later in Brown v. Board of Education, Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote that “separate but equal” rail cars were aimed at discriminating against Black Americans.

“In the view of the Constitution, in the eye of the , there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens,” he wrote. “Our Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of , all citizens are equal before the law. The humblest is the peer of the most powerful. The law … takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the are involved.”

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/?p=359301

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News from the South

Trending