fbpx
Connect with us

Mississippi Today

Major questions unanswered about JSU president’s leave one week later

Published

on

Major questions unanswered about JSU president's leave one week later

Significant questions surrounding the abrupt pause to Hudson's tenure as president of Jackson State remain one after the Institutions of Higher Learning Board of Trustees placed him on administrative leave with pay.

So far, a spokesperson from the board has declined to answer multiple questions in detail.

Those include context like if Hudson's contract has been terminated or if it is still in effect, the nature of the personnel issue that led the board to place Hudson on leave (rather than letting him resign or firing him), and if the board has ever before placed a president of the state's eight public universities on leave.

Advertisement

Jackson State community members have said the silence makes it harder for them to hold the board accountable for its decision-making.

On Thursday, March 2, the IHL board met twice — all trustees attended virtually — and immediately went into executive to discuss “a Jackson State University personnel matter.” After the final meeting, members of the press and public questioned IHL spokesperson Caron Blanton about how the board could call an open meeting but immediately close it to the public.

“It was an open meeting, you were all here, you could all hear everything except for what was said in executive session,” Blanton said at the time.

The Open Meetings Act permits public bodies like the IHL board to go into executive session for the “transaction of business and discussion of personnel matters relating to the job performance, character, professional competence, or physical or mental of a person holding a specific position…”

Advertisement

Hours after the meeting adjourned, IHL sent out a press release stating the board put Hudson on leave and selected Elayne Hayes-Anthony, the chair of Jackson State's journalism department, to serve as temporary acting president. The release expounded on Hayes-Anthony's credentials and service to the university but did not explain the criteria that trustees had used to appoint her. If Hayes-Anthony ultimately replaces Hudson, it would be the third time the IHL board has passed on a national search to select Jackson State's president.

The press release ended with a note that the board “will discuss the future leadership of Jackson State at its regular Board meeting later this month.”

No other information about Hudson was provided. The press release did not include the reason the board placed Hudson on leave.

The night of the meeting, a Mississippi reporter emailed two questions to Caron Blanton, IHL's communications director about the board's authority to place institutional executive officers on leave because it is not outlined in IHL's policies and bylaws.

Advertisement

Blanton replied the next day, writing in an email that “the Board's authority to place an institutional executive officer on administrative leave is provided in the Board's powers and responsibilities outlined in Mississippi Code Section 37-101-15.”
That code section does not specifically mention “administrative leave,” so Mississippi Today sought more information and asked if the board has ever before placed a university president on leave. A search of IHL's website, which contains press releases dating back to at least 2006, found just one other mention of administrative leave. That occurred in 2008, in a press release about a former commissioner's “request to voluntary (sic) step aside from his day-to-day duties during the State Auditor's investigation.”
Blanton did not reply until Wednesday, March 8.

“I am not declining to answer your questions,” Blanton wrote. “I answered your original question. The follow-up questions are a thinly-veiled attempt to gain additional information on the reasons JSU president Thomas Hudson was placed on administrative leave, which is a personnel matter. Since it is a personnel matter, I have no additional information to provide.”

On Wednesday evening, Blanton elaborated after Mississippi Today sent her the question again, along with eight more.

“The Board hires the institutional executive officers,” she wrote. “Any employer can place an employee on administrative leave.”

Advertisement

Blanton did not answer if the board had ever before placed a university president on leave, writing that “it would take a great deal of research to determine this. Please submit a public request and I will provide you with the estimated cost to provide the records.”

In response to questions about when the IHL board had conducted a background check on Hudson prior to his appointment as president in November 2020, including who conducted the check and how much they were paid, Blanton also directed Mississippi Today to submit a records request.

Blanton offered the same reply to five questions about Hudson's contract, if he had signed a separation agreement, why he was placed on leave or if the board had ever received complaints or grievances about his conduct.

“It is a personnel issue, so I will not be able to provide additional information,” she wrote.

Advertisement

This lack of transparency from the IHL board is familiar to many community members of Jackson State.

Ivory Phillips is a dean emeritus at Jackson State who fought for equitable funding for the university as the president of the faculty senate in the 1990s. In a recent editorial for the Jackson Advocate, the oldest Black newspaper in Mississippi, Phillips linked the IHL board's silence on Hudson to other answers that citizens of Jackson are routinely denied about the water system and the roads.
“Frankly, we were not surprised at this turn of ,” he wrote. “It simply shows how many entities, especially the college board, never plan to be transparent or accountable.”

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Did you miss our previous article…
https://www.biloxinewsevents.com/?p=223920

Advertisement

Mississippi Today

Some notable bills that died in the 2024 Mississippi legislative session

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Taylor Vance – 2024-05-07 05:30:00

As the Mississippi Legislature adjourned its 2024 regular on Saturday, only a fraction of the thousands of bills introduced by legislators survived to become law. 

The most notable item that died during the session was expansion, a policy that would have thousands of Mississippians to receive health coverage and potentially give struggling hospitals a needed financial boost. 

But several other pieces of legislation such as early voting and overhauling the way the state restores voting rights to people convicted of certain felony offenses also died during the session. 

Advertisement

Unless Republican Gov. Tate Reeves calls legislators into a special legislative session, lawmakers will now have to wait until their 2025 session next year to introduce any more legislation this year. 

Here are some other bills that died after the 2024 legislative session adjourned on Saturday:

Judicial redistricting 

House Bill 722 and Senate Bill 2771 would have redrawn the state's circuit and chancery court districts, but negotiations stalled between the House and the Senate on adopting a final map.  

Advertisement

The current court districts have largely remained unchanged for 30 years. Senate Judiciary A Committee Chairman Brice Wiggins, a Republican from Pascagoula who was the Senate's lead negotiator, believed the Legislature should use population data and the number of active court cases in each district to substantively redraw them. 

Wiggins sent the House a plan that passed the Senate 32-13. But the House didn't agree to the Senate plan, and it did not reveal its own redistricting proposal. 

House Judiciary B Chairman Kevin Horan, a Republican from Grenada and the main House negotiator, said he wanted to agree on a plan this year, but he thought there were too many stakeholders, such as judges, whom he believed did not have their opinions considered in how the new districts should look. 

“This issue is too important for them to not have their voices heard,” Horan said. 

Advertisement

Both committee leaders told they intend to conduct hearings in the summer or the fall to hear from judges, district attorneys and from the Administrative Office of Courts on what metrics should be considered for new districts. 

Lawmakers have until 2025 to agree on a set of new maps. If the two chambers cannot reach a compromise by early next year, Mississippi Supreme Court Chief Justice Michael Randolph will be tasked with redrawing the new chancery and circuit court districts. 

Mobile sports betting 

House Bill 774, the Mississippi Mobile Sports Wagering Act, would have legalized mobile sports betting and allowed Mississippi to join more than two dozen other states where the practice is legal. 

Advertisement

Sports wagering has been legal in Mississippi for years, but online betting has remained illegal in part from fears the move could erode profits of the state's brick and mortar casinos located along the Mississippi and the Gulf Coast.

The initial proposal would have required betting companies to contract with casinos, but some lawmakers raised concerns that the legislation did not offer any incentives for major betting companies to partner with smaller casinos. 

The two chambers passed different versions of the same bill, and they couldn't reach an accord during the conference committee process. 

Senate Gaming Chairman David Blount, a Democrat from , told Mississippi that there was division among casino owners on how the legislation would impact physical casinos and their employees and offered little protection for people who struggle with gambling addiction. 

Advertisement

Blount said he hopes casino owners and lawmakers will continue to discuss the issue during the off season and debate the issue more next year.  

Replacing Mississippi's white supremacist statues in Washington

Senate Bill 2231 and House Concurrent Resolution 12 would have replaced Mississippi's statutes of J.Z. George and Jefferson Davis, two white supremacists, in the U.S. Capitol in Washington. 

Other Southern states such as Alabama, Florida and Arkansas, have replaced their statues of white supremacists, but Mississippi remains the only state in the nation with two leaders in the National Statuary Hall Collection in Washington. 

Advertisement

Federal law allows for states to replace their statues, but a majority of lawmakers in both legislative chambers must vote to approve the replacement, and the state is required to pay for the costs of replacing the statues.

House Rules Chairman Fred Shanks, a Republican from Brandon, previously said he did not know much about the National Statuary Hall Collection, but that he would study the issue. 

Early voting 

Senate Bill 2580 would have established in-person early voting and let Mississippi join 47 other states that authorize the practice in some form.

Advertisement

The bill would have allowed 15 days of no-excuse early voting before election day and required voters to submit a valid photo ID to cast a ballot. It would have replaced in-person absentee voting. 

The bill passed the Senate overwhelmingly, but House Elections Chairman Noah Sanford, a Republican from Collins, said he received concerns about the proposal from some county circuit clerks, the local officials who administer elections. 

Instead, Sanford said he would like to conduct some hearings in the summer or fall to examine the issue further and allow circuit clerks and others to present information. He said that after the hearings he would be more open to passing early voting legislation. 

Restoring a ballot initiative 

Advertisement

For the third straight year, lawmakers could not agree on a way to restore Mississippi's ballot initiative process. 

House Concurrent Resolution 11 and Senate Bill 2770 would have created a process for voters to bypass lawmakers and place issues directly on a statewide ballot for consideration. The process would only allow voters to amend laws and not the constitution. 

The House passed a proposal that would have created an initiative process that  organizers to gather signatures from 8% of the number of registered voters during the last governor's race, which the Secretary of State's office estimated to be around 166,000.

Senate leaders proposed a plan that would have required petitions to gather signatures from  10% of the registered voters from the last presidential election – more than 200,000 signatures of registered voters – to place an issue on the ballot. The Senate chamber rejected that proposal. 

Advertisement

Both the House and Senate plans would have restricted voters from considering any initiative related to abortion. 

Mississippians have not had an initiative process since 2021, when the Mississippi Supreme Court ruled it invalid because of a technicality over the state's congressional districts. 

Felony suffrage overhaul 

House Bill 1609 would have automatically restored voting rights to people convicted of nonviolent felony offenses, as long as they had not committed another felony within five years of completing the terms of their sentence. 

Advertisement

The legislation passed the House by a bipartisan majority, but Senate Constitution Chairwoman Angela Hill killed the measure by not bringing it up for a vote. 

Under the Mississippi Constitution, people convicted of any of 10 felonies — including perjury, arson and bigamy — lose their voting rights for . A 2009 opinion from the Mississippi Attorney General's Office expanded the list of disenfranchising felonies to 22.

The constitutional provision stems from Jim Crow-era policy where the framers of the 1890 constitution chose disenfranchising crimes thought to be more likely committed by Black people.  

Mississippi is one of only a handful of states that does not automatically restore voting rights to people who complete their sentences. Instead, two-thirds of lawmakers in both chambers must agree to restore the suffrage to individuals in a piecemeal fashion.  

Advertisement

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

Bill increasing tax credits for private schools defeated at end of session

Published

on

mississippitoday.org – Bobby Harrison – 2024-05-07 04:12:00

Legislation that would have increased the proceeds from tax credits available to private schools died a quiet late in the just-completed 2024 .

The proposal to increase the tax credits available through the 's Promise Act was defeated in the 52-member Senate with 21 yes votes and 16 no votes. Since the proposal dealt with taxation, it needed a three-fifths majority to pass.

Since 2020, private schools have been receiving money through the tax credits with limited state scrutiny or accountability, according to the Department of Revenue, which certifies schools that can participate in the program.

Advertisement

In response to written requests from legislators, the Department of Revenue recently reported, “DOR does not know how the funds were used.”

When asked the number of children served through the Children's Promise Act, DOR said, “This information may be provided with the original application but is not updated annually or maintained by DOR.”

In the original application, “DOR reviews the information provided and issues a letter ruling advising whether they qualify or not.  The original request is covered under confidentiality statues.”

Under the Children's Promise Act, a person or corporation can make a donation to one of the private schools certified by the Department of Revenue and a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for up to 50% of the donor's state tax liability.

Advertisement

The maximum a private school currently can receive through the program is $405,000 a year.

The program was initiated in 2019 and billed as a mechanism to additional money to non-profits that care for foster children. But a provision to provide tax credits to private schools was tucked into the bill.

Currently under the a total of $9 million a year in tax credit money can be doled out to private schools.

Original legislation filed during the 2024 session by House Ways and Means Chairman Trey Lamar, R-Senatobia, would have significantly increased the amount of the tax credit money the private schools could have received.  The original House plan would add another $6 million for the current year and then would reach a total of $24 million for 2025.

Advertisement

But in negotiations with Senae during the final days of the session, an agreement was reached where the private schools would have been able to receive an additional $3 million, for a total of $12 million. But that compromise was voted down in the Senate. After it was defeated in the Senate, Lamar did not bring up the compromise for a vote in the House.

Under the current law, private schools are eligible for the tax credits if they educate:

  • Children in the foster care system.
  • Children who have a chronic illness or physical, intellectual, developmental or emotional disability.
  • Children eligible for or reduced meals.

Nancy Loome, executive director of the Campaign, said technically if the school has one student with a speech impediment, for instance, it could receive the tax credit money.

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

Mississippi Today

Read Mississippi Today’s Pulitzer Prize finalist series ‘’Unfettered Power: Mississippi Sheriffs”

Published

on

Mississippi 's “Unfettered Power: Mississippi Sheriffs” investigation has been named a finalist for the 2024 Pulitzer Prize for Local .

The 2023 investigation from the Mississippi Center for Investigative Reporting at and The New York Times' Local Investigations Fellowship revealed how Mississippi sheriffs rule like kings, wielding vast power, exploiting and abusing the very people they are called to protect with no one stopping them.

Sign up for our free, daily newsletter and get news that holds power to account.

Advertisement

The seven-part 2023 , which has continued into 2024, included new details about the Rankin County “Goon Squad.”

Advertisement

Click the links below to read the Pulitzer Prize-recognized series.

Sex Abuse, Beatings and an Untouchable Mississippi Sheriff

Where the Sheriff is King, These Women Say He Coerced Them Into Sex

New Evidence Raises Questions in Controversial Mississippi Law Enforcement Killing

Advertisement

The Sheriff, His Girlfriend and His Illegal Subpoenas

How a ‘Goon Squad' of Deputies Got Away With Years of Brutality

Days After Rankin's ‘Goon Squad' Tortured Two Men, Supervisors Gave the Sheriff a Pay Boost

Who Investigates the Sheriff? In Mississippi, Often No One.

Advertisement

READ MORE: The complete “Unfettered Power: Mississippi Sheriffs” series

This article first appeared on Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Continue Reading

News from the South

Trending