Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

With stubborn turbidity and concerns about water clarity growing, city amps up testing on the non-potable water it’s delivering

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – JOHN BOYLE – 2024-10-23 14:50:00

With turbidity at North Fork Reservoir barely budging in recent days, the City of Asheville continues to deliver discolored, non-potable water to customers, and announced Wednesday it has amped up its testing program.

Several water customers have reached out to Asheville Watchdog to express concerns about the water quality and whether it is safe for showering. A Water Resources spokesperson assured residents that the water is safe for non-consumption uses.

The entire city water system remains under a boil water notice, and the city has stressed that the heavily chlorinated but unfiltered water it’s distributing from North Fork Reservoir is meant only for flushing commodes, taking showers and other non-potable uses. Customers should use bottled water for drinking water.

Water Resources Department spokesperson Clay Chandler spent most of his time at the daily Helene briefing on Wednesday talking about the water testing program, but he said afterward it does not come in response to customer complaints.

“We certainly don’t underestimate customer concerns, but the testing plan on the website was formulated by us and approved by our regulators before we started moving water from North Fork,” Chandler said. “It’s definitely fair to say that we’ve leaned into making it accessible as possible in response to questions and concerns from customers.”

Chandler said the department conducts daily testing throughout the distribution system for total coliform, E. coli and chlorine “to ensure the safety of our customers.” Coliform is a bacteria commonly found in the environment and the intestines of humans and mammals, E. coli is a bacteria that can cause serious intestinal infections, and chlorine is a chemical used as a disinfectant in municipal water systems. There has been no evidence of E. coli, Chandler said, and chlorine levels remain high.

The water department, with guidance from the EPA and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, “developed and implemented a sampling plan specific to recovering from Helene,” he said. 

In all, Water Resources has 184 sampling stations throughout the system, and under normal conditions it runs tests on eight to 10 per day. While some chemicals have tested higher than recommended amounts, the levels are not significant, Chandler said.

“Since Helene, we have tested an average of 35 stations per day, and we hope to get that up to 40,” Chandler said, adding that testing is “slightly more accurate when the water is clear. And again, the water at North Fork, as everybody knows by now, is extremely turbid.”

Under normal conditions, the water in the North Fork Reservoir near Black Mountain is clear. // Photo credit: Phillips & Jordan Inc.

Turbidity is measured in Nephelometric Turbidity Units, or NTUs, and the EPA requires filter water to be less than .30 NTU for consumption. At North Fork, normal filtered water is between .03 and .05 NTU, but since the storm it’s remained stubbornly high, including Wednesday when it measured 26, according to Chandler. 

It was nearly the same level Monday, and it stood at 30 on Oct. 11.

Clarity of the reservoir, which was stirred up and then inundated by clay-laden floodwaters on Sept. 27, is key to once again providing the system’s 63,000 users with potable water.

“The target that we have now is 1.5 NTUs, which, while it’s a little bit higher than what we normally see, is still much lower than if you were to average water systems across the United States,” Chandler said. 

North Fork serves about 80 percent of the city’s water customers, and the city has already conducted one mineral treatment program designed to help with turbidity — an infusion of aluminum sulfate and caustic soda — but it has not been very effective, in part because of high winds the two days the chemicals were administered.

“Since we’re under some pretty extraordinary circumstances, we have decided to go ahead and test daily for aluminum, iron and manganese, because we know those can be elements of concern,” Chandler said.

While these minerals do cause discoloration and cloudiness in the water, they are generally safe in low levels.

“It’s certainly accurate to say that low levels of aluminum, iron and manganese are naturally occurring in water supplies and do not pose significant health hazards at those levels,” Chandler said after the briefing.

Typically, elevated levels of these substances are “extremely rare under normal circumstances,” he said. 

North Fork’s filters are made for clear water, as that’s what the reservoir’s heavily forested 20,000-acre watershed generally provides. The city will conduct another mineral treatment next week, and it plans to install a three-layer “curtain” system next week that should help improve water clarity.

Earlier in the week, Chandler said portable filtration systems exist, but North Fork pumps out more than 20 million gallons of water daily, a level of production those units can’t handle.

“That does not mean that we have given up on that,” Chandler said. “The Army Corps of Engineers is putting pencil back to paper to see if they can come up with some solutions that can meet the 20 million gallons per day capacity that we have to meet.”

“If I sort of implied that that part of it had been given up on, that is absolutely not the case,” Chandler continued. “Water Resources, our partners at EPA, and the Army Corps of Engineers are working literally around the clock to come up with something.”

Chlorine levels are high

The federal government has set secondary “Maximum Contaminant Limits,” or MCLs for drinking water. Normally, the city water has a chlorine level of four parts per million.

“But after Helene, both the EPA and North Carolina DEQ allowed us to chlorinate initially at eight parts per million, because that was the only thing that we could add to the water,” Chandler said. “Remember, we’re not using our normal treatment and filtration systems. We’re sending water straight out of the lake and hyper-chlorinating it.”

The city has since dropped that level to six parts per million. 

“It’s a very good sign, because that means as we test for chlorine throughout the distribution system, chlorine levels are remaining high, because there are very few pathogens in the distribution system that’s eating it up,” Chandler said. “So if chlorine remains high throughout the distribution system, that’s a very positive sign.”

Since Helene, the city has had no detections of E. coli.

“We are not allowed a single positive (test result) here for E. coli, because that would automatically trigger a boil water (notice),” Chandler said. “And to be clear, that is not the reason we issued the boil water notice that we’re under now. We issued that boil water notice because of the sediment that’s in the water.”

Customers have likely noticed the water in their homes or businesses being cloudy and brown in some places, Chandler said. “That is why we are under this current boil water notice, not an E. coli positive hit.”

Discoloration mostly an aesthetic issue

The discolored water is mostly an aesthetic issue, although the water is not drinkable. Chandler acknowledged that, “Obviously, clear water is more appealing. Cloudy water is not.” 

But he noted that federal and state regulators do not enforce recommendations on water aesthetics.

“For example, the levels of iron and manganese in the unfiltered water that we’ve sent through our distribution system have slightly exceeded the MCLs, and our regulators are completely aware of that,” Chandler said. “They’re at North Fork every day. They’re in City Hall, in our offices, every day.”

The practical effect of the discolored water is that “those with medical conditions who might be susceptible to increased levels of aluminum or manganese, should simply consult with their doctor,” Chandler said.

A screenshot shows a couple of the questions listed in a lengthy FAQ section on the City of Asheville’s water recovery page, which contains information about the testing program. 

Aluminum produces a cloudy look to the water, Chandler said, while the rusty look comes from iron, which also leaves a metallic taste and causes a reddish-brown staining on toilets.

Manganese, which is black to brown in color, “causes a metallic taste in the water and produces yellow staining on toilets and other appliances,” Chandler said.

“It is also very important to note that the in-reservoir treatment process that we concluded last week and that we will restart next week, it will actually work to reduce levels of iron and manganese in the water,” he said.

Aluminum sulfate is a “salt-ish” mineral the department uses to regularly treat the reservoir, as it makes clay particles coagulate and sink, leading to clearer water for filtering and treatment. Caustic soda helps with optimum pH levels for the coagulation to work best.

Chandler said it’s important to note the city has “not exceeded the MCL as far as aluminum yet.

“We know that level is going to go up next week when we start the second round of the in-reservoir treatment process, and so that’s why we’re rolling out these real time test results today,” he said.

Chandler also noted that with school restarting next week, the city has tested water for lead at every city school, with the exception of Hall Fletcher Elementary, which is in the process of switching from city water to a newly installed well. That testing will take seven to 10 business days.

The city has a lengthy FAQ section on its water recovery page, and it contains information about the testing program. 


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post With stubborn turbidity and concerns about water clarity growing, city amps up testing on the non-potable water it’s delivering appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

The Watchdog

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending