Connect with us

The Center Square

With concession 184 days later, Riggs wins nation’s last unsettled election | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Alan Wooten – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-07 10:36:00

(The Center Square) – Democrat Allison Riggs is going to retain her seat on the North Carolina Supreme Court, ending the nation’s last undecided race from the Nov. 5 election.

On Wednesday morning 184 days since Election Day, Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin said he would not appeal the ruling of a federal judge instructing the State Board of Elections to certify the results. Riggs, the incumbent, will win by 734 votes from more than 5,540,090 cast.

The state board was meeting at the time of Griffin’s concession announcement; it did not take action.

Chief Justice Richard Myers, presiding in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division, on Monday ruled the state board “shall not take any action in furtherance of the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court’s orders.” He issued a stay of seven days to allow Griffin time to appeal if he so chose.

The race drew in more than $2.3 million in donations to the two campaigns.

On Election Night, with 2,658 precincts reporting, Griffin led Riggs by 9,851 votes of 5,540,090 cast. Provisional and absentee ballots that qualified were added to the totals, swinging the race by 10,585 votes.

Board of elections decisions and court rulings – Wake County Superior Court, state Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals – had pared that initial number down to somewhere between 1,675 and 5,700 for the most recent decision by Myers.

The protests the state board denied included registration records of voters, such as lack of providing either a driver’s license number or the last four digits of a Social Security number.

Other ballots protested and denied by the state board included voters overseas who have never lived in the United States, and for lack of photo identification provided with military and overseas voters. Myers’ ruling was the final blow to these protests.

Griffin was trying to become the sixth Republican in a row to win a seat on the state’s Supreme Court. Democrats held a 6-1 edge going into the 2020 election and lost three state Supreme Court races, reducing their advantage to 4-3. In 2022, Republicans won both races to gain their 5-2 majority.

The Supreme Court bench has historically been both nonpartisan and partisan. The General Assembly, under majority Democrats, changed the bench to nonpartisan for the 2004 election cycle; Republicans, in majority, changed it back after the 2016 election cycle.

Riggs was recused from all actions involving the state Supreme Court. She remains seated until the election certification is given by the state election board. Griffin is a judge on the state Court of Appeals and was recused from all actions there as well.

Riggs’ win will be her first judicial election triumph and as an incumbent no less, appointed by then-Gov. Roy Cooper nine months after he had appointed her to the Court of Appeals following her 14-year stint with the Southern Coalition for Social Justice.

Griffin earned his eight-year seat on the appellate bench with a 2020 win over Democrat Chris Brook. He had lost two years earlier to Toby Hampson in a three-way race that included two Republicans.

The post With concession 184 days later, Riggs wins nation’s last unsettled election | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This article primarily reports on the outcome and legal contestations of a North Carolina Supreme Court race without advocating for either political side. It provides detailed facts about the election results, the judicial rulings, candidate backgrounds, and related procedural actions in a neutral tone. The language is factual and devoid of emotionally charged or partisan phrasing, focusing on the sequence of events and official decisions rather than promoting an ideological viewpoint. The article covers both Democratic and Republican candidates and explains the legal context thoroughly, adhering to balanced and neutral reporting rather than suggesting a specific ideological stance.

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Erin: Coastal flooding at high tides forecast in Carolinas, Virginia | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-20 07:40:00


Hurricane Erin, a Category 2 storm with 100 mph winds, is generating high tide storm surges of 1-3 feet from South Carolina to Virginia, and 2-4 feet on North Carolina’s Outer Banks. The storm, located 645 miles southeast of Cape Hatteras, has a vast wind field with hurricane-force winds extending 90 miles from its center. Rainfall is expected to be light, with most damage from storm surge causing flooding and water over dunes and the key N.C. 12 highway. Mandatory evacuations are in place for parts of the Outer Banks, with emergency declarations in Hyde and Dare counties. The hurricane’s path moves northward, affecting tides and flooding risks along the coast through Thursday and into Maine by Friday. Recent rescues from rip currents have been high, and the storm’s near miss is a relief amid ongoing recovery from deadly Hurricane Helene last year.

(The Center Square) – High tide peak storm surges from Hurricane Erin are forecast from 1 to 3 feet between South Carolina and Virginia, and 2 to 4 feet on the Outer Banks of North Carolina.

Erin at 8 a.m. Wednesday was Category 2 at 100 mph maximum sustained winds and moving 13 mph to the north-northwest, having started to make the turn away from the mainland as expected. The National Hurricane Center, an arm of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said the storm’s center was 645 miles south-southeast of Cape Hatteras, and 900 miles west-southwest of Bermuda.

Veteran meteorologists have marveled at the size of the storm.

Hurricane force winds (74 mph or greater) extend outward 90 miles from the center, and tropical storm force winds (39 mph or greater) extend 265 miles from the center. Rain for the Carolina coast is just 1 to 2 inches Wednesday and into Thursday, with damage coming more from storm surge than rain or wind.

The next high tides on the Outer Banks are 6:18 p.m. Wednesday, and Thursday at 6:45 a.m. and 7:10 p.m. Erin has already sent Atlantic Ocean water over dunes and N.C. 12, the famed 148-mile roadway linking peninsulas and islands of the Outer Banks.

Mandatory evacuations have been issued for Ocracoke Island in Hyde County and Hatteras Island in Dare County. Each county has declared an emergency.

Storm surge warnings were in effect from Cape Lookout to Duck; a tropical storm warning was in effect from Beaufort Inlet to the Virginia border inclusive of the Pamlico and Albemarle sounds; and a tropical storm watch was in effect from the North Carolina-Virginia border to Chincoteague, Va.

The Wednesday evening high tide for coastal South Carolina, including Charleston, and southern North Carolina is being closely watched for flooding. Early Thursday evening is the expected time of coastal flooding from the southern Delmarva Peninsula and southern Chesapeake Bay down to eastern North Carolina.

The storm’s projected path through the weekend skirts parallel to moving more away from the Atlantic Seaboard. Thursday’s pass is by the Carolinas and Virginia, and Friday the storm will be moving by Maine.

Coastal rescues from rip currents in North Carolina, according to published reports, have numbered between 75 and 100 over Monday and Tuesday.

As often happens with hurricanes, water began to run over N.C. 12 on Tuesday. The highway begins at U.S. 70 at the community of Sea Level and runs to a point just north of Corolla and south of the Currituck Banks North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve. Two ferries, Hatteras Island to Ocracoke Island and Cedar Island to Ocracoke Island, are part of the route.

The storm’s landfall miss of the state is particularly welcome in light of Hurricane Helene. Recovery from that storm is in its 47th week. Helene killed 107 in the state, 236 across seven states in the South, and caused an estimated $60 billion in damage to North Carolina.

The post Erin: Coastal flooding at high tides forecast in Carolinas, Virginia | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a straightforward report on Hurricane Erin, including storm forecasts, evacuation orders, and impact assessments. It strictly focuses on factual information from official sources, such as the National Hurricane Center and local emergency declarations, without expressing opinions or framing the content to favor any particular political ideology. The language is neutral and informative, adhering to objective reporting standards. While it references the impact of a previous storm for context, it does so only to highlight the potential severity of the current situation, without commentary or political framing. Overall, the content reports on the actions of governmental agencies and the meteorological facts without promoting an ideological stance, maintaining a centrist bias through purely factual coverage.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Think tank, election attorney support Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Tate Miller – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-20 06:29:00


President Donald Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting, which he claims is prone to fraud, is supported by the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) and election attorney Greg Teufel. AFPI called Trump’s efforts essential for protecting the republic, arguing that mass mail-in voting leads to fraud, chaos, and disenfranchisement, citing issues like permanent absentee voter status and ballot trafficking. Teufel emphasized that mail-in ballots are vulnerable to coercion and fraud since they are not completed under official supervision. Trump plans an executive order to eliminate mail-in ballots and costly voting machines, promoting more secure methods like Watermark Paper for the 2026 midterms.

(The Center Square) – While most Democrats are opposed, President Donald Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting, which he says is ripe for fraud, has been met with approval from both an election attorney as well as the America First Policy Institute.

“President Trump should be applauded for leading the charge to ensure that every American’s vote matters and is not undermined by corruption,” the America First Policy Institute (AFPI) told The Center Square by email.

“This is not just a policy fight,” AFPI said. “This is a fight for the survival of our republic.”

AFPI is a non-profit and non-partisan research institute aiming to “advance policies that put the American people first,” according to its website.

Election attorney and founder of law firm OGC Law, LLC Greg Teufel told The Center Square that “eliminating mail-in balloting would go a long way toward restoring confidence in our election procedures.”

“Mail-in voting has long been recognized as the most vulnerable type of voting for election fraud,” Teufel said.

“Because ballots are not completed in front of election officials, coercion, bribery, and voting on behalf of people of limited competence is all possible,” Teufel told The Center Square.

AFPI likewise told The Center Square that “President Trump is right in saying that our elections will never be secure so long as we have widespread use of mail-in ballots.”

“With rare exception, mass mail-in voting is a recipe for fraud and chaos,” AFPI said. “Other nations recognize this, and many abandoned this broken system decades ago.”

“The United States of America is the greatest nation in the world, and our electoral system should set the global standard for security and transparency,” AFPI said.

AFPI listed to The Center Square examples of the issues of mail-in voting.

For instance, “in some states, one now can apply to be on the voter rolls as a ‘permanent absentee voter,’ which means one automatically gets an absentee ballot application every election,” AFPI said.

Additionally, “reliance solely on mail-in voting may lead to the disenfranchisement of America’s eligible citizen class and could also lead to fraud through ballot trafficking,” AFPI told The Center Square.

“Mass mail-in voting presents vulnerabilities with the chain of custody of a ballot and increases the prevalence of error in states that do not maintain clean voter rolls,” AFPI said.

The Center for Election Innovation and Research did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Trump posted on his Truth Social account Monday: “I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS.”

“ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS,” Trump said.

The president further said that “while we’re at it,” he will get rid of “Highly ‘Inaccurate,’ Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election.”

Trump said the efforts to protect elections will be brought about by an executive order “to help bring honesty to the 2026 Midterm Elections.”

The post Think tank, election attorney support Trump’s vow to end mail-in voting | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents statements and perspectives primarily from sources supportive of former President Donald Trump’s stance on ending mail-in voting, including the America First Policy Institute and an election attorney who express concerns about election fraud associated with mail-in ballots. The language used to describe these perspectives, such as quoting the claim that mail-in voting is “a recipe for fraud and chaos” and highlighting Trump’s critical social media post, indicates a framing that favors this viewpoint. While the article does mention opposition from “most Democrats,” it does so briefly and without similar elaboration or counterarguments from sources that support mail-in voting. The overall tone and choice of sources suggest an endorsement or at least a sympathetic presentation of the Trump-aligned position on election integrity issues, aligning the article with a right-leaning bias.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Oklahoma to require teachers pass political belief test | Oklahoma

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Andrew Rice | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-19 17:06:00


Oklahoma will require teachers relocating from California or New York to pass a 50-question certification exam on American citizenship, religion, gender, and government to ensure their values align with the state’s. Oklahoma Superintendent Ryan Walters criticized New York and California’s teaching standards as opposing Oklahoma’s, citing California’s stance on biological sex differences. The exam, developed with Prager University—a nonprofit used by ten other states—covers constitutional knowledge and U.S. government structure. Teacher union leaders, including Randi Weingarten and Cari Elledge, condemned the move as politically motivated, arguing Walters should prioritize student education over political agendas.

(The Center Square) – Oklahoma will begin requiring teachers who move to the state from California or New York to pass certification exams proving their values align with Oklahoma’s.

The test reportedly contains 50 questions on American citizenship, religion, gender and makeup of the U.S. government.

Ryan Walters, the Oklahoma superintendent of public instruction, said teaching standards in New York and California are “antithetical” to Oklahoma’s standards. He said an example of this is California requiring teachers to assert there are no biological differences between sexes.

“We want to make sure, as we are recruiting the best and the brightest in the country, that they align with our values,” Walters said.

Walters said the state is working with the nonprofit organization Prager University, which produces educational materials, to conduct the exam. Ten other states, including Florida, Idaho and South Carolina, use educational materials provided by PragerU.

Some of the questions on the exam reportedly include:

What are the first three words of the Constitution?

Why is freedom of religion important to American identity?

What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?

How many U.S. Senators are there?

Why do some states have more Representatives than others?

Randi Weingarten, president of the union American Federation of Teachers, criticized Walters’ decision in a statement.

“His priority should be educating students,” Weingarten said of Walters. “But instead, it’s getting Donald Trump and other MAGA politicians to notice him.”

Cari Elledge, president of the Oklahoma Education Association, agreed. She told USA Today the decision by the Oklahoma Department of Education was made as a “political stunt.”

The post Oklahoma to require teachers pass political belief test | Oklahoma appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the new teacher certification exam in Oklahoma and includes statements from both supporters and critics of the policy. While the piece presents factual information about the exam and quotes from Oklahoma’s superintendent of public instruction, it also highlights the involvement of PragerU, a conservative educational organization, and includes critical responses from union leaders who frame the policy as politically motivated. The language used to describe the exam and the inclusion of critiques suggest a slight lean toward a Center-Right perspective, as it emphasizes conservative values and the alignment with Oklahoma’s standards, but it also fairly presents opposing viewpoints without overt editorializing. Overall, the article reports on ideological positions without strongly promoting one side, though the framing and source choices indicate a moderate conservative bias.

Continue Reading

Trending