Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Wildfires across NC mostly caused by dry conditions, carelessness

Published

on

carolinapublicpress.org – Jack Igelman – 2025-03-14 08:00:00

As NC wildfires rage, many can be blamed on one thing: people. ‘We’re our own worst enemy,’ official says.

Dozens of wildfires are burning across the state following a stretch of unseasonably warm weather, high winds and low humidity.

And just like in years past, the majority of blazes can be traced to be one source: people.

Between Feb. 24 and March 3, the North Carolina Forest Service responded to a staggering 806 wildfires — all caused by humans — that burned more than 3,300 acres across the state. 

[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]

The latest occurred on Monday. Firefighters responded to a 123-acre wildfire along Millis Road, just west of Nine Mile Road at the Croatan National Forest in Carteret County. 

While winds contributed to the fire’s initial growth, rain helped stop its progression. Firefighters worked on removing burning snags and logs around the perimeter. Crews will continue suppression efforts, checking for heat and reinforcing firelines.

Although what caused the fire hasn’t yet been determined, unattended campfires and discarded cigarettes are typically the main causes of many blazes this time of year.

“We’re our own worst enemy,” said Philip Jackson, a spokesman for the North Carolina Forest Service

The heat is on

Human-caused forest fires present his state agency and other land managers with a crucial challenge: protecting the growing number of people living in areas where forest and development meet. 

“The population is growing to the point where people are beginning to inhabit areas that were previously undeveloped wild forestland,” Jackson explained.  

Such areas where the built environment intermingles with nature has been referred to as the “wildland-urban interface.” And North Carolina has more wildland-urban interface acres than any other U.S. state, presenting complex challenges for fire management and public safety.

Meanwhile, local, state and federal agencies work to contain ongoing blazes. Staffing shortages, however, are straining wildland firefighting resources.

A recent weekend saw a surge of wildfires. But the bump in activity, however, wasn’t unexpected, according to Jackson.

David Nelson, the U.S. Forest Service’s fire management officer for the Croatan National Forest, oversees a controlled burn in February 2024. The agency manages more than one million acres of public forest in North Carolina. U.S. Forest Service / Provided

“It was a pretty weekend to be outside,” he said, “so we saw more wildfire starts from campfires and debris burns.”  

The spring fire season usually lasts until May. During that time, the potential for blazes will be high. For the next several weeks, low humidity will transform vegetation and woody debris into kindling that’s easily ignited by a stray ember from a routine leaf burn on a windy afternoon.

What worries wildfire responders most are escaped residential brushfires that come from burning leaves or piles of yard debris. 

The largest wildfire — so far — was caused by a wind-fallen power line on March 2 in Polk County. The blaze spread to 619 acres and was 91% contained three days later. It’s since been extinguished.

Jackson said that firefighters conducted a controlled, low-intensity fire on the perimeter of the blaze to limit its spread. The strategic fire allowed firefighters “to widen and strengthen containment lines,” he said. “When the fire reaches that area there’s nothing more to burn because it’s already cold and black.”

But that’s just one fire down. There are several more to contend with. 

Wildfires take their toll

In the first half of the 20th century, the U.S. Forest Service and other forest managers feared outbreaks of destructive wildfires and snuffed out flames as quickly as possible. But researchers in the 1960s and 1970s demonstrated the benefits of letting wildfires burn — or using “prescribed fire,” which helped reverse decades of fire-suppression policies.

Although fires have meaningful ecological benefits to some forested landscapes, unplanned fires pose a potential danger to wildland firefighters and people who live on the edges of forests. Wildfire response is also expensive, requiring specialized personnel, incident command teams and heavy equipment, such as bulldozers and aircraft.

Of late, the U.S. Forest Service battled several blazes within each of its four national forests including the 20-acre McClure Road Fire in Cherokee County’s Nantahala National Forest; the 194-acre Hicks Cemetery Fire in Haywood County’s Pisgah National Forest; and Montgomery County’s 505-acre Fall Dam Fire in the Uwharrie National Forest.

The current fire in the Croatan National Forest is on the heels of a 114-acre blaze that occurred recently across the same area in coastal Craven County — a region that’s no stranger to wildfires

In April 2023, the 35,000-acre Great Lakes Fire burned large swaths of highly-flammable pocosin swampland. That fire was, in part, contained by a fortunate shift in winds and the use of controlled fire to reduce fuel in between the highly flammable pocosins and clusters of homes along edges of the National Forest boundary.

In the Pisgah and Nantahala National Forest in Western North Carolina, rangers are particularly concerned about woody debris due to Hurricane Helene. Fighting wildfires in remote areas of the National Forest is complicated by steep terrain that makes it difficult to reach and contain flames.  

To that end, the U.S. Forest Service and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy have partnered to remove fallen trees that may have commercial value in the Pisgah National Forest near the Appalachian Trail in McDowell, Burke, Yancey and Mitchell counties.  

Although fires have meaningful ecological benefits, unplanned blazes, like this one on Collett Ridge in November 2023, pose a potential danger to firefighters and people who live on the edges of forests. U.S. Forest Service / Provided

However, recent cuts to the Forest Service’s workforce may hamper the agency’s ability to properly do its job. In February, the Trump administration cut 3,400 U.S. Forest Service positions, representing 10% of the agency’s workforce.

In a statement, the U.S. Department of Agriculture told CPP that wildland firefighting positions are considered public safety jobs.

“Protecting the people and communities we serve, as well as the infrastructure, businesses and resources they depend on to grow and thrive, remains a top priority for the USDA and the Forest Service,” the agency said. 

Feeling the burn

The U.S. Forest Service manages more than one million acres of public forest in North Carolina, but the majority of wildfires begin on private land. According to Jackson, 83% of the state’s forestland is privately owned.

“Private landowners are a huge stakeholder,” he said. 

In addition to dry conditions and large fuel loads, staffing issues facing the North Carolina Forest Service are complicating fire prevention support and wildfire response.

“We continue to struggle with vacancies due to recruitment and retention issues,” Jackson admitted. “We’re doing the best we can to provide adequate firefighting coverage in areas that are prone to wildfire or more at risk.”

Jackson said the approach isn’t sustainable in the long term, especially during above-average fire seasons. The agency is seeking more funding for higher salaries to attract and retain firefighters.

In addition to the agency’s staffing issues, a recent incident in Eastern North Carolina emphasized a new problem facing firefighters: drones. A state-owned airtanker approaching a wildfire in Craven County was diverted in early March to avoid a collision with a drone hovering above the wildfire. 

“We want folks to understand to never fly a drone near or around the wildfire,” Jackson said. “First and foremost it’s illegal, but it significantly hinders our ability to do our job.”

This article first appeared on Carolina Public Press and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

The post Wildfires across NC mostly caused by dry conditions, carelessness appeared first on carolinapublicpress.org

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending