Today’s round of questions, my smart-aleck replies and the real answers:
Question: I want to know if I go to an Asheville Tourists baseball game and pay the full price for a ticket, and buy two beers and two hot dogs, what’s the total cost for that? And how much of that goes to the DeWine organization? How much goes to the city?
My answer: I’m pretty sure most baseball stadium food, including this proposed meal, comes with a personal defibrillator.
Real answer: As we’ve previously reported, the Asheville Tourists Baseball Club is owned by the DeWine Seeds Silver Dollar Baseball LLC, which is owned by the family of Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine. DeWine’s son Brian is the president of the team and the owner-operator with his wife, Kali.
It seems like whenever Gov. DeWine, a Republican, makes some news in Ohio, I get some questions about the local team here and where the money goes. As we reported in 2022, the governor “personally owns 32 percent of the team, according to records, but has no management role in the team.” Brian DeWine, a resident of Asheville since 2010, calls the Tourists ‘a local, family-owned business.’”
Now, about those dogs and brews. First, Brian DeWine tried to upsell the fan.
Brian DeWine is the president of the Asheville Tourists and the owner-operator with his wife, Kali. // Watchdog photo by Peter Lewis
“Are you sure your reader doesn’t also want to wash that down with a deep-fried moon-pie? Or a churro sundae?” DeWine asked.
Tempting, but I think they were hoping to live at least until Sunday.
“A beer is going to be $8-$9 and $1 and $3 on Thirsty Thursday,” DeWine said. “Hotdogs are $3.75, except on Fridays when they are $1.”
Tickets start at $9.50 for kids, $10.50 for military and seniors and $11.50 for an adult, he added, noting that all prices include sales tax. So under normal conditions, it looks like you’d be dropping $35 to get in, scarf down two ‘dogs and two beers, and enjoy the game.
The Tourists run the complete food and beverage operation, so the city, which owns McCormick Field, does not reap any financial benefits from it.
“The city does not collect a portion of food and beverage sales during baseball games at McCormick; we do however collect an annual rent payment from the team,” Chris Corl, the city of Asheville’s director of community and regional entertainment facilities, said via email. “This year’s rent is lower than ‘normal’ due to disruptions related to the construction project.”
The 2025 season at McCormick Field is being played “under construction,” as DeWine previously told The Watchdog. Some areas of the ballpark will be closed to fans during certain parts of the season, as the stadium undergoes a $38.5 million renovation project to comply with dictates from Major League Baseball to upgrade locker rooms and other facilities.
Corl provided the city’s rental rates for McCormick Field for last year, this year and next year:
2024: $100,000
2025: $50,000
2026: $450,000
The Tourists had their home opener April 8, although it was a rainy affair. The team’s 132-game schedule this year features 66 home games, including matchups on July 4, Mother’s Day, Memorial Day Weekend, and Labor Day Weekend.
Question: I haven’t heard any communications from the Asheville City Schools superintendent or the Buncombe County Schools district on how they are handling the Trump administration’s attack on DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion). I know that the ACS central office does have a fulltime staff member committed to equity, but I have not heard anything about changes in its programming or staffing. Might make for an interesting article to reach out to the Districts to ask what they are doing to respond to Trump’s and the Department of Education’s blocking of funding for districts with DEI policies or programs.
My answer: They’re keeping mum? Really? That’s odd in this climate …
Real answer: Asheville City Schools Chief of Staff Kimberly Dechant answered on behalf of city schools.
“At this time, Asheville City Schools remains committed to its mission of fostering an inclusive and equitable environment for ALL students and staff,” Dechant said via email (emphasis on “ALL” was hers). “There have been no changes to our programming or staffing related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.”
On April 3, the Trump administration’s Department of Education sent a “reminder” notice to school systems titled, “Reminder of Legal Obligations Undertaken in Exchange for Receiving Federal Financial Assistance and Request for Certification under Title VI and SFFA v. Harvard.”
The court reference refers to the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard University and UNC Chapel Hill, which essentially banned consideration of race in college admissions.
The reminder notice sent to schools further states: “Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides that ‘no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.”
As NPR reported last week, in its latest DEI directive to K-12 school leaders, “the Trump administration has asked every state and local school leader to recommit to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prevents race-based discrimination for federally funded programs. It says states that fail to recertify could lose their federal funds, including grants intended for low-income students.”
(On Thursday, a federal judge ruled that the Trump’s administration had overstepped the executive branch’s legal authority over local schools and had not provided a sufficient definition of DEI.)
Dechant said ACS is “closely monitoring developments at both the federal and state levels regarding any potential legislation or policy changes that may impact DEI initiatives.
“Until such legislation is passed and its implications are clarified, we will maintain our current approach and continue to prioritize equity in education for ALL students,” Dechant said, again emphasising “all.”
At Buncombe County Schools, spokesperson Ken Ulmer said the system “continues to comply with all federal, state, and local laws.
“Buncombe County Schools does not have any dedicated positions such as diversity officers,” Ulmer said. “As a school system, BCS is committed to serving each and every student in our district with the respect, support, and opportunities they deserve.”
The county system does have Assistant Superintendent Jamie Johnson’s role listed on its website as “Educational Equity and Student Support.”
Asheville Watchdog welcomes thoughtful reader comments on this story, which has been republished on our Facebook page. Please submit your comments there.\
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Got a question? Send it to John Boyle at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org or 828-337-0941. His Answer Man columns appear each Tuesday and Friday. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.
James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.
SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00
North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.
(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.
Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.
Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”
Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.
Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.
Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”
Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”
House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.
