One of these days, I promise, I’ll spread some Christmas cheer.
But today, my gift is a little, well, doom-ish. Before you fire off an email calling me Scrooge McChristmaskiller, hear me out.
I’m going to recap a fascinating climate discussion held earlier this month, which included high-profile scientists — and a touch of hopeful news. Sure, overall it’s a little bleak, but we have the power to make it less so.
How’s that for a sales pitch?
On Dec. 4, Congregation Beth HaTephila and several other sponsors brought in prominent climate scientist and energy systems analyst Zeke Hausfather, described pre-event as a “world-class, oft quoted climate scientist.” Local climate scientists David Easterling of the National Centers for Environmental Information in Asheville; and Andrew Jones, executive director and cofounder of Climate Interactive in Asheville, also presented to a packed house at The Collider downtown.
To give you a dose of hope early on, I’ll tell you Jones pitched the En-ROADS Climate Solutions Simulator, which is super cool and lets you play around with potential climate solutions and see how much various options can reduce global temperatures. Give it a try.
The En-ROADS Climate Solutions Simulator allows you to play around with potential climate solutions and see how much various options can reduce global temperatures. In the screenshot above, the temperature increase projection in the upper right is based on all options maintaining the status quo. In the screenshot below, greatly increasing energy efficiency in transport as well as buildings and industry dropped the projected temperature increase more than a half degree Celsius and a full degree Fahrenheit.
But here’s the bad news. Hausfather noted that between the 1850s, when reliable global temperature records became available, and the early 1900s, temperatures “went up and down year to year, but there wasn’t really that much of a change.’’
“But since 1970 the earth’s temperature has been rising fairly rapidly,” Hausfather said. “And now, as of 2024, we’re seeing temperatures close to 1.5 degrees (Celsius) above pre-industrial levels.
“And these levels of temperatures, just like levels of CO2, are unprecedented for a very long period in the Earth’s history. So temperatures today are probably higher than we’ve seen for at least 120,000 years, potentially further back than that.”
OK, have a great week. I’m getting on a rocketship for a trip to a reserve Earth-like planet in the Goldilocks zone. I’m pretty sure Elon Musk is moving there, too.
Seriously, Hausfather’s statistics aren’t good, especially when you consider 1.5 degrees Celsius is 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit – and when you consider that about 40 percent of the carbon dioxide we pump into the atmosphere stays there, which means temperatures will likely stay up for a while.
“Certainly, we know that if temperatures stay at today’s levels, they will be there for a century or so,” Hausfather said.
All of this ties in locally because we keep having warmer seasons and we have an increased chance of more devastating storms like Helene, which caused extensive flooding, landslides, and loss of life Sept. 27. We also see more heavy rains in general, as well as droughts that contribute to wildfires out west.
This all comes down to human activity – everything from using coal-burning power plants and factories to driving gas-powered vehicles.
Climate change: We’re the cause of it
I’m always amazed when people don’t believe global warming is real, or they acknowledge it is happening but say there’s no way people are causing it. Hausfather addressed the latter first.
Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather spoke to a packed house at The Collider in early December. Hausfather offered a sobering assessment of climate change but also provided some upbeat news on the world’s progress toward cleaner energy. // Watchdog photo by John Boyle
“So I often get a question from people when I’m talking about climate change, of, ‘How could humans really affect the climate? It’s so big.’” Hausfather said. “Planet Earth is so massive, and I think people don’t really understand just how big an impact humans have had in terms of the atmosphere.”
We really like to burn fossil fuels, which emit a lot of carbon dioxide.
“We have burned a mind-numbing amount of carbon,” Hausfather said. “We have burned about 2.6 trillion tons of carbon dioxide since the Industrial Revolution, the vast majority of that in the form of fossil fuels.”
We’re also proficient at removing trees, which consume CO2 and produce oxygen, and that is cooking our own goose, too.
Hausfather put those 2.6 trillion tons of carbon dioxide in perspective.
“That’s roughly the same amount of mass as every living thing on earth, plus everything ever made by humans — the pyramids, all of our roads, all of our buildings combined,” he said. “We have burned that much carbon and put that much carbon dioxide up into the atmosphere, and that’s dramatically changed the composition of our atmosphere.
“Now, about 40 percent of that carbon dioxide has accumulated in the atmosphere, about 1.1 trillion tons. The remainder, thankfully, has been absorbed back into the Earth’s system, primarily into the ocean and into the biosphere.”
That’s good, because climate change “would be twice as bad if the earth weren’t helping clean up some of our mess,” he noted, adding that Earth is getting worse at cleaning up our mess.
Scientists can study tree rings, stalactites, ocean corals and ice cores for information on global temperatures going way back, before recorded history.
I kind of wish they hadn’t.
“We have not seen a period in the Earth’s history where carbon dioxide concentrations have been this high for at least over 3 million years, potentially 4 million,” Hausfather said. “And in the period where it was much higher, the earth’s temperature was much, much hotter than it is today.”
Today, we can measure the effects of our human activities, so it’s not like declaring what’s fueling global warming is speculation.
“This isn’t just supercomputer models that we throw a bunch of fancy equations into,” Hausfather said. “We can measure this. We can measure it by satellites. We can measure it by ground sensors.”
It gets worse, because we’re pumping out other greenhouse gas emissions like methane and nitrous oxide that contribute to warming, as well as aerosols, such as sulfur dioxide emissions, that are essentially suspended particles in the atmosphere.
“These get a lot of press because of their really bad health impacts,” Hausfather said. “Somewhere around 7 million people die each year globally, particularly in Asia, from outdoor air pollution, and most of that is particulate matter that is derived from sulfur dioxide.”
Because sulfur dioxide reflects light back into space, it actually cools the climate, he said, describing “global dimming,” which happens because the sky is so hazy, particularly in Asia.
This is also really bad, because it masks some of the warming we’ve had.
Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah! And brace yourself …
We’ve got to clean up the pollution, Hausfather said, which is mostly caused by burning fossil fuels, to solve climate change.
“But this does create a dilemma for us, because as we clean up the air and as we switch away from fossil fuels, a lot of additional warming that we’ve been masking is going to come back to bite us, and that’s a challenge,” Hausfather said.
I’ve got to imagine this guy has single handedly killed more parties than Charles Manson.
The effects on storms like Helene
But hey, we haven’t even gotten to the Helene stuff!
If you warm the planet by one degree Celsius, you get about 7 percent heavier rainfall, the scientist told us.
“Now for tropical cyclones or hurricanes … we see a magnification of somewhere closer to 10 to 15 percent increased rainfall from these intense storms and hurricanes in a warming world,” Hausfather said.
How big an impact this had on Helene is still an area of active scientific research, he noted, although a few early studies have pegged the increased rainfall due to climate change at 10 to 50 percent. It clearly had an effect, though Helene would’ve been catastrophic any way you slice it.
Easterling, who lives in northern Henderson County, pointed out that during Helene and the precipitation a couple days before, his gauge recorded 15 inches of rain.
That exceeded the 1,000-year rainfall amount by about 3 inches. Easterling noted these thresholds for 1,000-year events or 100-year or 500-year events are based on older data, and even an update coming in the next few years is probably going to underestimate future intensity of rainfall.
“The bottom line is, as the atmosphere warms, there’s more moisture in the air, and that (increased) moisture in the air is available to rain out in heavier events,” Easterling said.
It gets a bit worse, as Hausfather noted when he continued.
“The last two years, 2023 and 2024, have been particularly exceptional,” he said, pointing to one of his many charts. “And so we are well above anything we’ve seen previously in the climate, even in the last few decades.”
Scientists aren’t quite sure why.
This year, some parts of the world are going to come in a little bit above 1.5 degrees Celsius from pre-industrial levels, “which is the sort of temperature target the world set itself during the Paris agreement to, ideally, not exceed.” That refers to the 2015 Paris Climate Accords.
“You know, we don’t want to be pushing up against that target already, especially this early,” Hausfather said. “And these big jumps in temperature have really pushed us there.”
The entire planet is on track to breach the 1.5 degree limits in the next decade, perhaps as early as the late 2020s or early 2030s, Hausfather said. The goal from Paris was to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius and preferably 1.5 degrees.
To do that now, Hausfather said, we’d have to cut global emissions to zero over the next decade.
There is some hope
If you think this talk was dark thus far, keep in mind I’ve left out a fair amount of detail. Even Hausfather acknowledged he could’ve been wearing a black cloak and toting a sickle.
“So that’s kind of the grim side of the talk, but I’m going to leave you guys with a little bit of optimistic things, too, because it’s not all doom and gloom,” Hausfather said.
Global carbon dioxide emissions have flattened over the last decade and the reasons are encouraging.
“A big part of it is that we’ve succeeded in making clean energy cheap,” Hausfather said. “Things like solar energy are the cheapest form of new energy in almost all the world today. The cost of solar batteries have fallen by more than 90 percent over the last decade. Cost of wind (power) has fallen.”
This chart on the En-ROADS Climate Solutions website shows how electricity generated by solar has soared in the past decade. “The world is spending a lot more money on clean energy,” climate scientist Zeke Hausfather said during his presentation.
Electric vehicles, bikes, heat pumps, and more have become ubiquitous, especially in China.
“And the world is spending a lot more money on clean energy,” Hausfather said.
Clearly, we cannot become complacent, and we have to do more.
Jones, the Climate Interactive co-founder, had the audience shout out ways we can “bend the curve” — bring those global temperatures down. We all made suggestions for the En-ROADS page. There, you can move slider bars up or down on all kinds of potential ways to help, ranging from curbing deforestation and agricultural emission to boosting energy efficiency and employing more electrification.
Boost renewable energy and cut coal usage, and the increase in global temperature drops.
It’s pretty cool to watch, and the graphics are great. And it showed we can drop the warming.
Buy an electric lawn mower (on my list for the spring), an electric vehicle, or at least a hybrid. Maybe buy an electric bike, or get a more efficient heat pump or refrigerator.
Yes, this night was sobering, and a little depressing. But the situation is not hopeless.
We just can’t keep doing nothing and hoping for the best.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting during this crisis is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00
(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.
Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.
Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.
Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance
NCLeg.gov
“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”
SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.
“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”
The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.
“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”
Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.
SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 14:47:00
(The Center Square) – Called “crypto-friendly legislation” by the leader of the chamber, a proposal on digital assets on Wednesday afternoon passed the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Passage was 71-44 mostly along party lines.
The NC Digital Assets Investments Act, known also as House Bill 92, has investment requirements, caps and management, and clear definitions and standards aimed at making sure only qualified digital assets are included. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, said the state would potentially join more than a dozen others with “crypto-friendly legislation.”
With him in sponsorship are Reps. Stephen Ross, R-Alamance, Mark Brody, R-Union, and Mike Schietzelt, R-Wake.
Nationally last year, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act – known as FIT21 – passed through the U.S. House in May and in September was parked in the Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.
Dan Spuller, cochairman of the North Carolina Blockchain Initiative, said the state has proven a leader on digital asset policy. That includes the Money Transmitters Act of 2016, the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021, and last year’s No Centrl Bank Digital Currency Pmts to State. The latter was strongly opposed by Gov. Roy Cooper, so much so that passage votes of 109-4 in the House and 39-5 in the Senate slipped back to override votes, respectively, of 73-41 and 27-17.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a factual report on the passage of the NC Digital Assets Investments Act, highlighting the legislative process, party-line votes, and related legislative measures. It does not adopt a clear ideological stance or frame the legislation in a way that suggests bias. Instead, it provides neutral information on the bill, its sponsors, and relevant background on state legislative activity in digital asset policy. The tone and language remain objective, focusing on legislative facts rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.