Connect with us

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

What’s Next? Lawmakers, Policy Experts Say They Will Continue Fight To Reduce Evictions

Published

on

oklahomawatch.org – M. Scott Carter – 2025-05-28 06:00:00


Since 2016, Oklahoma’s population, GDP, and employment have risen, yet eviction filings have surged by nearly 27%. In 2024, 48,070 eviction cases were filed, up from 46,668 in 2022. Senate Bill 128 aimed to extend eviction timelines to help tenants but was vetoed by Gov. Stitt and narrowly failed override votes. Advocates emphasize that rising rents, low minimum wage, limited affordable housing, and weak tenant protections fuel evictions. Experts call for comprehensive reforms, including improved tenant rights, updated zoning laws, anti-retaliation policies, and increased affordable housing investments, to stabilize housing and reduce eviction rates that severely impact families and children’s well-being.

In Oklahoma, much has changed since 2016. The population has increased and more people have moved to the state’s urban centers. Oklahoma’s Latino/Hispanic population is up, as is the state’s gross domestic product. Employment is high and the prison population has declined.

Yet, eviction filings have skyrocketed.

In 2024, alone, court records show that 48,070 eviction cases were filed, an increase of more than 1,400 over 46,668 filings in 2022.

This year, a handful of lawmakers thought they had taken the first step to address that problem with Senate Bill 128, which would have added more time for tenants in the eviction process. By increasing time, advocates of the bill said, tenants had a better chance of staying in their homes.

That bill was vetoed by Gov. Kevin Stitt.

And though there was, briefly, talk of a veto override, the vote margins for the bill were too slim to support an override vote. In the House, the bill only had 51 yes votes, and of the remaining 50, 11 lawmakers were excused from voting. In the Senate, 19 members – including almost all of the Senate’s far right caucus – voted no.

“It was bipartisan, but the vote was very close,” Sen. Julia Kirt, the bill’s Senator author, said.

Politics aside, the number of eviction filings continues to increase. 

According to Shelterwell, a policy group pushing for affordable housing, eviction filings in Oklahoma have jumped by almost 27% since 2016.

For Kirt, that ever-increasing rate and the politics surrounding the Residential Landlord Tenant Act, will occupy her time for the next few months. But even she acknowledged it will take more than just extending the eviction timeline to reduce the number of evictions in Oklahoma.

“We can get together on the supply side discussion, but that won’t solve everything,” Kirt said. “We also have the issue of stability. We have a ridiculously high eviction rate. We have taken for granted, for years, that we have enough affordable housing and we don’t.”

And evictions, she said, hold children back. 

A study by Yale University’s Tobin Center for Economic Policy underscores that. The study, released in April, said children who are evicted from their homes are more likely to change schools, miss days of school and be chronically absent.

In addition, the study reported that evictions reduce the credits completed in high school.

“It also reduces a child’s likelihood of graduating high school by 12.5 percentage points, which suggests being evicted has about the same impact on graduation rates as juvenile incarceration,” the study said.

State Rep. Daniel Pae, the Lawton Republican who co-authored SB 128, agreed. Like Kirt, Pae said he would continue the push to upgrade the Landlord Tenant Act but, he added, reducing the eviction rate will involve changes to more than one area.

“This isn’t just about housing,” he said. “We have to think holistically when it comes to this issue. It’s also about access to good wraparound services, such as social services and other things to make sure we’re helping individuals to get on a better path.”

Pae said interim hearings on the issue and meetings with both supporters and opponents would be considered.

“We have to continue the discussions,” he said.

Policy experts said issues such as minimum wage, the amount of affordable housing available, zoning laws and even changes in the court system all needed to be addressed.

Victoria Wilson, an attorney for Oklahoma City University’s Tenant Rights Clinic, said part of the state’s eviction problem is a low minimum wage and rapidly increasing rental costs.

“Fewer and fewer people can afford them (increasing rent cost) and very, very few low-income folks actually get any kind of housing subsidy, so money is the broader answer,” she said.

Data from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development shows that nationally, just 92,000 residents lived in subsidized housing in 2023.

Wilson isn’t alone in that belief. Kafrey Landers, the executive director of the Apartment Association of Central Oklahoma, told Oklahoma Watch last year that skyrocketing multifamily insurance rates have played a big role in the rising cost of rent. 

A survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis reported that annual premiums had increased by an average of 14% from 2021 to 2022, 22% from 2022 to 2023, and 45% from 2023 to 2024. 

Wilson said that in addition to low incomes and high rental costs, tenants in Oklahoma have fewer rights than those in other states. She said many tenants have seen massive maintenance problems with the property they are renting and they eventually end up in court.

“When you’re in court over non-payment of rent, it’s almost never going to come up in front of the judge that you have maintenance issues,” Wilson said. “And when it does come up, it’s almost never helpful to the tenant’s case.”

Oklahoma’s Landlord Tenant Act does not include rent control, so landlords can increase rent anytime. In addition, the law doesn’t include a right to counsel for tenants and has no anti-retaliation provisions.

Katie Dilks, the executive director of the Oklahoma Access to Justice Foundation, told Oklahoma Watch in December that Oklahoma renters experience eviction at higher rates than most Americans.

“This is not because they are poorer or worse tenants, or because housing costs are higher here, but because our laws have been structured to make evictions cheap and fast,” Dilks said.

Wilson said the state needs to extend the amount of time an eviction case has to be set.

“When the case is filed, it has to be set for hearing in a five-day window,” she said. “And that has caused us many problems over the years.”

Wilson said that in Oklahoma, if you miss rent on the first of the month, you can be locked out of your dwelling by the ninth. She also called for changes in how the court handles the eviction docket.

“I frequently see people get evicted the same month they miss rent,” Wilson said. “It happens a lot in under 30 days.”

Wilson, who has worked with more than 1,000 clients on rental issues, said some eviction dockets have more than 300 cases set and the docket is only two hours long.

“That creates a lot of due process issues,” she said. “How are you supposed to get due process if you’re just running through the system and there really isn’t time for your case to be heard?”

Tenants need more time, she said, to understand everything that is happening.

Sabine Brown, a senior policy analyst with the Oklahoma Policy Institute, said in addition to higher wages and more affordable housing, state lawmakers need to modernize the Landlord-Tenant Act with provisions such as anti-retaliation.

“… Oklahoma is one of only six states that doesn’t have anti-retaliation protection.”

Sabine Brown, Oklahoma Policy Institute

“The first thing I’d point out is that Oklahoma is one of only six states that doesn’t have anti-retaliation protection,” she said. “This means that if a tenant requests repairs for a health or safety issue, instead of making that repair, the landlord could just end their lease, evict them, increase their lease and all that is perfectly legal in Oklahoma.”

Brown said the state should also make investments in affordable housing, including housing that targets the lowest-income families. She said the state is approximately 85,000 units short for low-income renters.

“We don’t have nearly enough housing stock,” she said. “Right now, it’s really hard for developers to build housing for low-income renters. The state could help bridge that gap by investing in affordable housing and making it possible for developers to build housing and keep their rent lower.”

Brown pointed to the Oklahoma Housing Stability Program as an example. That program invested $250 million in workforce housing using low-interest and zero-interest loans. She also called on public officials, both state and local, to update zoning laws to allow for more housing options, including multi-family housing.

“That’s typically been an issue that’s been left up to cities,” she said. “But we’ve seen other states across the country dive into zoning reform and look at ways they can open up more land for more affordable housing options.”

States such as California, Oregon, and Washington have banned single-family-only zoning in many areas, while other states, including Maryland, New Jersey, and New York, have passed housing legislation with zoning reforms.

With just days left before the 60th Session of the Oklahoma Legislature adjourns, it’s unlikely that any legislation addressing affordable housing or the changes to the Landlord Tenant Act will make it to the governor’s desk.

But for Pae, Kirt, Brown and Wilson, the end of the session opens a new platform for continuing their work and the push to modernize the law.

“There’s a lot more out there to do,” Kirt said. “Lots of people to talk to and issues to discuss. We’re going to keep at it. This is important.”

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post What’s Next? Lawmakers, Policy Experts Say They Will Continue Fight To Reduce Evictions appeared first on oklahomawatch.org

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article largely presents facts and perspectives highlighting challenges faced by renters in Oklahoma, emphasizing the rising eviction rates and the need for stronger tenant protections and affordable housing. It includes voices from policymakers and advocates calling for reforms such as extending eviction timelines, increasing affordable housing, and updating tenant rights. The framing leans toward progressive solutions to housing insecurity and critiques current policies, especially those associated with conservative opposition (e.g., Gov. Kevin Stitt’s veto). However, it also includes a Republican co-author’s acknowledgment of broader social needs, reflecting some bipartisan engagement. Overall, the tone favors reform and tenant advocacy while remaining largely factual and policy-focused.

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

No injuries reported in SW Oklahoma City house fire

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KFOR Oklahoma’s News 4 – 2025-07-19 06:58:54

SUMMARY: Fire crews responded to a house fire around 6:00 a.m. near Southwest 37th Street and Woodward Avenue in southwest Oklahoma City, close to I-44. Although a neighbor initially believed someone was inside, firefighters searched the home and confirmed it was empty. Three dogs were rescued from the residence, all unharmed. Flames originated in the roof area, damaging about 50% of the home. Smoke was still visible from the attic as crews worked on hot spots. The cause of the fire is still under investigation. The response occurred during a shift change, leading to increased fire truck activity in the area.

No injuries have been reported, but three dogs were found and rescued in a Friday morning house fire.

Stay informed about Oklahoma news and weather! Follow KFOR News 4 on our website and social channels.

https://kfor.com/
https://www.youtube.com/c/kfor4news
https://www.facebook.com/kfor4
https://twitter.com/kfor
https://www.instagram.com/kfortv4/

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Young photographer shoots for free, dedicated to his craft

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KFOR Oklahoma’s News 4 – 2025-07-17 22:47:37

SUMMARY: Hunter Shepard, a passionate young photographer from Oklahoma, captures high school sports moments for free, traveling across the state on his own dime. Despite being autistic and having ADHD, Hunter has an incredible memory and deep knowledge of sports. He takes professional-quality action shots and posts them online, only asking for donations. His kindness and dedication earned him recognition from Oklahoma’s News 4 “Pay It Forward” program. Surprised with \$400 for equipment and travel costs, Hunter humbly accepted the gift, emphasizing his love for photography and helping others preserve cherished memories of their “glory years” through his lens.

Young photographer shoots for free, dedicated to his craft

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Oklahoma Has Nation’s Highest Average Homeowners Insurance Premiums

Published

on

oklahomawatch.org – JC Hallman – 2025-07-16 06:00:00


Oklahoma has the highest average homeowners insurance premium at $6,133 annually, rising 50.8% since 2019. Insurance Commissioner Glen Mulready initially blamed hail but later admitted multiple factors drive rates. However, Oklahoma Watch revealed inaccuracies in Mulready’s claims about regulatory authority; unlike neighbors Texas and Kansas, Oklahoma’s Insurance Department (OID) lacks authority to approve or set rates except in rare cases. Texas and Kansas employ numerous actuaries who scrutinize filings to protect consumers, saving millions, while Oklahoma relies largely on insurers’ self-reviews. Critics urge legislative changes to improve oversight, as current laws prevent OID from ensuring rates are reasonable, leading to excessive hikes and record insurer profits.

After Oklahoma Watch debunked a claim that hail explained skyrocketing homeowners insurance rates, Oklahoma Insurance Department Commissioner Glen Mulready — who amplified the hail claims — backtracked in a statement published on the department’s website entitled “It’s Not Just Hail: A Look Into Oklahoma Homeowners Rates.”

According to a June 9 Lending Tree report, Oklahoma has the highest average homeowners insurance premium in the country at $6,133 per year, 2.2 times the national average of $2,801. Rates in Oklahoma have climbed 50.8% from 2019, the year Mulready took office, through 2024, rising faster than the national average of 40.4% the report said.

Mulready explained that insurance rates are driven by a combination of factors beyond hail, and championed the work of the department on behalf of consumers.

A new Oklahoma Watch investigation revealed some of these claims to be dubious.

A False Claim

Mulready said that the department fields complaints, enforces laws, and ensures that companies treat consumers fairly.

“We take action to protect consumers when insurers act illegally or violate contracts,” Mulready said.

Mulready said that $12 million was returned to consumers in 2024 by the Consumer Assistance/Claims Division of the OID. However, the Consumer Assistance/Claims Division has no impact on homeowners rates as set by insurance companies.

Mulready said that Oklahoma law prevents the OID from interfering on rates.

“OID has no statutory authority to set or approve homeowners rates except in certain, extraordinary circumstances,” Mulready said.

He went on to claim that 38 states follow a similar model.

That is false.

Mulready ignored the fact that Oklahoma’s tornado alley neighbors, Texas and Kansas, which by various measures enjoy lower homeowners insurance rates while suffering from weather conditions similar to or worse than Oklahoma, follow the same model but do in fact perform regulatory work to approve rates.

The difference is the role of actuaries, the number crunchers of the insurance world.

The Last of the Actuaries

“What I’ve found is that most people have not heard of us,” said Thomas Cummins, 83, who as far as he knows is the only independent actuary left in the state of Oklahoma.

Originally from Duncan, Cummins studied math at Oklahoma State University, but had to go to the University of Iowa to study actuarial science, which he defined as the effort to measure the financial impact of certain occurrences on financial markets or people.

Actuaries are financial statisticians, Cummins said. When they are employed by an insurance company, their role is to ensure that the company has enough money to cover claims on the policies they have written.

Cummins said there are about 30,000 actuaries in the United States, but he was aware of only three in Oklahoma: an actuary who lives in Tulsa but does most of his work in California, another actuary who is employed by Blue Cross Blue Shield, and Cummins himself, in business since 1981 and the last independent actuary working in the state, as far as he knows.


!function(){“use strict”;window.addEventListener(“message”,function(a){if(void 0!==a.data[“datawrapper-height”]){var e=document.querySelectorAll(“iframe”);for(var t in a.data[“datawrapper-height”])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data[“datawrapper-height”][t]+”px”;r.style.height=d}}})}();


Kim Holland, who served as Oklahoma’s insurance commissioner from 2005 to 2011, recalled that an actuary had been employed on the health side of the department during her tenure, but at that time there was no actuary on the property and casualty side, which included homeowners insurance.

Today, OID does employ a chief actuary. According to OID’s 2024 annual report, the chief actuary is Andy Schallhorn, who is also the deputy commissioner in charge of the financial division. Schallhorn’s job is described as monitoring the financial solvency of insurance companies and working to ensure compliance with Oklahoma law.

Oklahoma law is the problem.

The Devil in the Details

Mulready’s claim that Oklahoma’s insurance model matched that of 38 other states ignored significant state-to-state variety.

“All states have different regulatory requirements and prerogatives that vary on the needs and dynamics of that particular state,” Holland said.

Rich Gibson of the American Academy of Actuaries said what Mulready likely meant was that 38 states operate on what’s known as a file-and-use model.

File-and-use means insurance companies file rate changes and put them into use immediately to charge customers; states that scrutinize rate filings before they are put into use are known as prior approval states.

That’s where it gets tricky, because there are significant differences that separate file-and-use states.

In Texas and Kansas, when filings are put into use, actuaries immediately review them to ensure that rates are adequate (to protect insurance companies), not excessive (to protect consumers), or unfairly discriminatory.

The critical difference: Oklahoma does not examine rates to protect consumers. In fact, Oklahoma law prevents the Insurance Department from protecting consumers by ensuring that rates are not excessive.

“OID has no statutory authority to set or approve homeowners rates except in certain, extraordinary circumstances.”

Glen Mulready

When Mulready said that Oklahoma may set or approve rates only in extraordinary circumstances, he was not citing a similarity between Oklahoma and other states; rather, he was referencing a significant distinction between Oklahoma and its file-and-use, tornado alley neighbors.

Specifically, the automatic process of actuarial scrutiny in Texas and Kansas is applied to every rate filing. By way of contrast, Oklahoma can scrutinize rate filings only if the commissioner has previously found the market to be non-competitive.

As Oklahoma Watch documented in its original investigation, the process for declaring a non-competitive market is legally murky and not widely understood; it’s unclear whether the state’s lone 2016 invocation of the non-competitive market statute was fully legal.

Also unclear is the precise job of the chief actuary. The 2024 annual report made a brief reference to the chief actuary protecting consumers, but how the actuary can protect consumers when the law prevents scrutiny of excessive rates is an open question.

In response to an interview request, Mulready cited dissatisfaction with Oklahoma Watch’s original story. He indicated that he had instructed the public agency’s staff to no longer engage with Oklahoma Watch.

“We will not be participating in this story,” Mulready said in an email.

Texas and Kansas Save Consumers Millions

The Texas Department of Insurance employs 18 actuaries to review rate filings, of whom 12 are dedicated to scrutinizing an annual average of 3,000 property and casualty filings, which include homeowners insurance.

Texas Department of Insurance actuaries submit questions to insurance companies or request changes on approximately 75% of filings; 10% of filings are withdrawn or rejected.

Since 2021, actuarial review of filings has saved Texas consumers $131.7 million, a TDI spokesman said in a written statement.

The Kansas Insurance Department employs a Chief of Actuarial Services and utilizes a pool of consulting actuaries to evaluate hundreds of property and casualty rate filings annually, said KID Deputy Chief of Staff Kyle Strathman.

Filings are evaluated for rate reasonableness, to ensure that rates are not excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory.

“If a filing is found to be out of compliance, the carrier is required to make an adjustment to the filing,” Strathman said, while declining to provide a precise dollar estimate on what the rate review process saves consumers each year.

It’s not Just Homeowners Insurance

Rather than encouraging competition by advising consumers to discriminate and shop among insurance companies, an I-44 billboard featuring Commissioner Mulready’s face alongside images of severe weather incidents sends a dire message: you can’t fight higher rates, so batten down the hatches and ride out the storm.

The problem of rising property insurance rates extends beyond homeowners insurance.

Sherie Donahay, president of the Bradbury Corner Homeowners’ Association in Edmond, reached out to OID to complain when the association’s rates skyrocketed despite the fact that Bradbury Corner had few assets to insure.

“I know the policy had doubled since 2023,” Donahay said, adding that she was aware of rate increases at other HOAs as well.

Donahay expressed her concern to OID that Bradbury Corner was being used to cover costs in other states where there were huge homeowners associations.

“I continue to see record profits on Wall Street by insurance companies.”

Keith Easley

In 2023, Sasakwa Public Schools Superintendent Kyle Wilson was featured in a story about rapidly rising property insurance rates for schools; Wilson fretted over whether out-of-control rate hikes would affect his ability to hire much-needed teachers.

Since then, Wilson said, rates had continued to rise for Sasakwa Public Schools; the anticipated 2026 rate of $151,000 was more than three times the 2020 rate of $45,000.

Insurance Companies Review Themselves, Actually

Oklahoma law does require insurance companies to submit an annual statement of actuarial opinion; however, the statement, by law, is authored by the company’s own appointed actuary.

In Oklahoma, insurance companies review themselves, actually.

Former commissioner Holland noted that during her tenure OID worked to clean up old regulations, and interacted with lawmakers constantly to suggest legislative changes.

Holland recalled that she had support from both political parties during her time in office. It helped that she had worked in insurance her whole career; she wasn’t hostile to the industry, but continued to believe that oversight was necessary.

“Do I think they need to be held accountable?” Holland said. “I did then, and I do now.”

In Oklahoma Watch’s original investigation, former legislator Kevin Easley, who championed a law that was later warped into the statutes that now govern homeowners insurance, spoke passionately about the changes to the legislation he had helped pass.

“They can damn sure change it back, can’t they?” Easley said at the time.

Now an oil and gas executive, Easley seconded Holland’s nostalgia for a time when agency heads worked closely with lawmakers to make problem-solving recommendations.

Easley was unimpressed with Mulready’s description of Oklahoma’s insurance model. Regardless of whether the model was similar to other states, Easley doubted whether 38 states were having the same kinds of problems Oklahoma is having.

“I continue to see record profits on Wall Street by insurance companies,” Easley said. “If the model in Oklahoma does not provide the authority to get involved in setting rates that are market-based, then maybe Mulready needs to be recommending to the legislature that the model be changed. If the model isn’t working, we should be changing the model.”

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Oklahoma Has Nation’s Highest Average Homeowners Insurance Premiums appeared first on oklahomawatch.org

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Left-Leaning

This article from Oklahoma Watch presents a critical examination of Insurance Commissioner Glen Mulready’s claims and the broader policy framework governing homeowners insurance in Oklahoma. While it cites factual data and sources, the language and framing—such as labeling Mulready’s statements as “false,” using pointed headlines like “Insurance Companies Review Themselves, Actually,” and concluding with statements emphasizing corporate profits—indicate a skeptical stance toward deregulated markets and industry-friendly policy. The article implicitly advocates for stronger regulatory oversight, aligning with policy preferences typically associated with the political left, thus suggesting a left-leaning bias in tone and presentation.

Continue Reading

Trending