The water is flowing again in parts of Asheville’s water system, 19 days after Tropical Storm Helene destroyed main distribution lines from the North Fork Reservoir, but it is not potable and not likely to be anytime soon.
At the Monday daily briefing, Asheville Assistant City Manager Ben Woody said the water department is continuing to feed highly chlorinated water from North Fork, the city’s main water supply, directly into the distribution system.
“Our Water Resources Department is currently able to flow about 12 million gallons per day into the distribution system, and we’re using that right now to support flushing of the water system, as well as expansion of water into the distribution system,” Woody said. “Later this week, we hope to begin the process of an in-reservoir treatment that should increase the rate of settling in the reservoir, which will then allow us to begin treating that water through our water treatment plant.”
The 350-acre reservoir is fed by creeks that were overwhelmed by Helene’s heavy rains, depositing a high level of clay particles in the normally pristine lake. Woody said staff has now reported that clear water has returned to those feeder creeks, so that should further help reduce turbidity, or sedimentation.
The city provided a map that showed areas that are or soon will be receiving water. Areas closest to North Fork, generally those in the eastern part of Buncombe County, received water first. As of Monday, those areas likely to get water in the coming days are to the east of the French Broad River.
Water that began flowing from North Fork will reach areas of Asheville as shown by the arrows. // Credit: City of Asheville
“Water restoration will happen incrementally, steadily.” Asheville City Council member Sage Turner said in a Facebook post Monday afternoon. “Areas in the north, in Downtown, in Fairview, and in higher elevations in the south should start getting water today. We’ll fill the system east of the river, then move further west. This path is because of the different pressure zones.”
Asheville Mayor Esther Manheimer said in a Monday afternoon update, “Water service is slowly being restored — downtown should see service today, and North Asheville tomorrow.”
On Sunday the city was able to start supplying water to areas west of Swannanoa after restoring water to Haw Creek junction, a major part of the distribution system.
“That was a big milestone for us,” Woody said. “Actually, the damage to the water system in Swannanoa was more severe than expected, which is almost hard to believe.’’
City water flowed into the Haw Creek and South Tunnel Road areas on Sunday, Woody added, and the city was preparing to begin sending water to Fairview and to some of the higher-elevation areas of South Asheville that don’t have water.
“We also have preparations in place to begin sending water to our downtown area and areas of North Asheville,” Woody said, noting that they also would begin turning on pump stations in these areas.
Asheville has a lot of elevation changes, making pump stations critical, especially for higher areas. The water system has 54 unique pressure zones, 1,800 miles of lines and 37 water storage tanks “that we need to fully pressurize the system. We need about 21 million gallons of water to fill those storage tanks,” Woody said.
Woody stressed that the “process of restoration is going to be slow and incremental,” and will move in a westerly direction.
Woody showed pictures and video of workers flushing the system via fire hydrants, with the water starting out murky and brown and then becoming clear. Boil water advisories remain in place, and the city is recommending that when water returns, residents should flush their own home water systems for 15 minutes by letting the water run at an outdoor spigot or through the bathtub.
Workers flush fire hydrants to remove sediments until the water runs clear as shown in the before photo, left, and after. Credit: City of Asheville
As it repressurizes the system, the city continues to find line breaks, ranging in size and location, including one six-inch main in the Haw Creek area, Woody said.
The sediment in the water is largely clay particles, and the city received approval from the Environmental Protection Agency before recommending customers can use it for showering. The water is treated with chlorine, but it is not potable.
The city has steadfastly declined to give a specific timeline for water restoration, and Woody said that will continue to be the case, outside of the information in the restoration map.
“I can’t give a timeline outside of the pink areas on the map, because those are the areas that we first have to pressurize and repair any breaks before we can move to the other side of the French Broad,” Woody said.
Woody said the reason the river is “loosely the boundary right now is because we have pressure zones on that side of the river that we’re able to manage.
“So we have to be able to get the air out of the distribution network and get water largely into some of those pipes before we can move across the river into kind of the western pressure zones,” Woody said. “But I hope to have more information on that on Wednesday.”
The city’s water system has 63,000 residential, business and contract customers, supplying water to about 155,000 people.
On the boil water notices, Woody explained the difference between a notice and an advisory.
“A boil water notice means that we can confirm the presence of bacteria in the water source,” Woody said. “A boil water advisory means we can’t necessarily confirm the presence, but we have enough information to think there may be the presence of bacteria. So that’s a regulatory distinction, but the end result, the actions you take, are the same.”
The city recommends boiling water vigorously for at least one minute before consumption, but Woody said they still suggest people use bottled water for drinking, brushing their teeth or other consumption uses. The returning tap water is safe for laundry, showering (do not swallow water while showering), handwashing, washing dishes and flushing toilets.
As the water supply returns, the city is also asking residents to report pipe leaks by calling 828-251-1122.
The city also offers these tips regarding water restoration:
What to do before water service returns:
Flip off the breaker to your water heater.
Turn off water to your water heater.
Turn off hot water under your sinks.
Remove aerator (it typically unscrews) on faucets.
Turn off the ice maker.
Turn off water to your whole house filter, if you have one.
What to do when your water service returns
Flush your home plumbing by running the bathtub’s cold water faucet.
Your water heater may be turned back on once your home’s plumbing has been flushed.
It’s safe to flush your toilet after completing steps 1 and 2.
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. John Boyle has been covering Asheville and surrounding communities since the 20th century. You can reach him at (828) 337-0941, or via email at jboyle@avlwatchdog.org. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.
James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.
SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00
North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.
(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.
Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.
Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”
Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.
Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.
Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”
Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”
House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.
