News from the South - Florida News Feed
‘Voices for Veterans’ panel: Nation has a moral obligation to care for those who served
by Greg Childress, Florida Phoenix
May 25, 2025
A panel of speakers at a Tuesday “Voices for Veterans” event recently agreed that America has a moral obligation to care for members of the military after they have completed their service.
The panelists’ remarks were in response to a question by moderator Michael McElroy, a political correspondent at Cardinal & Pine, the North Carolina online publication that hosted the event for the purpose of “supporting North Carolina’s veterans and military families.”
Big VA cuts spark big worries
The comments came amid concerns about steep staffing cuts at Veterans Administration hospitals. VA staff and supporters contend proposed cuts will hinder the ability to adequately care for veterans. More than 80,000 positions — just over 17% of the roughly 470,000 people it employs — could be eliminated as part of a major restructuring of the federal government’s second largest department.
The Trump administration is thinking about numbers and not people when it proposes such deep cuts to the VA, said Ann Marie Patterson-Powell, a VA nurse.
“They’re not looking at the human side of it. Patterson-Powell said. “We promised those who signed up and left their families, their homes — everything behind — to serve the country. We said, ‘If you do this for me, we’re going to take care of you when you come back.’”
The nation must do for veterans what it said it would do with “no strings attached, with no arguments, with no pushback,” Patterson-Powell said.
(U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Press Secretary Pete Kasperowicz defended the Trump administration’s planned staffing cuts, saying, “We’re going to maintain VA’s mission-essential jobs like doctors, nurses and claims processors, while phasing out non-mission essential roles like DEI officers.”)
Dr. Kyle Horton, founder of On Your Side Health, a nonprofit that addresses health care disparities and works to improve veterans’ care, said the nation has a sacred obligation to protect those who serve.
“Those who wrote a blank check in service to this country with their lives do not deserve to be penny-pinched by Washington bureaucrats,” Horton said.
Horton added: “They don’t deserve to be penny-pinched by Captain Bone Spurs in the White House [a reference to President Donald Trump, who obtained a medical excuse from serving in the Vietnam War due to bone spurs] right now and they don’t deserve to be penny pinched by DOGE [the so-called Department of Government Efficiency] and [Elon] Musk who don’t even know what they’re doing. Period.”
Patterson-Powell said there is a push by the Trump administration to privatize the VA. That could be harmful to veterans who wouldn’t receive the specialized care they now get at the VA, she said.
Scott Peoples, a retired Army captain, member of Veterans for Responsible Leadership (VFRL) and an advocate for free and fair elections, noted that America fights its wars with volunteers. The proposed budget VA budget cuts could make people think twice about making a commitment to serve, Peoples said.
“How we take care of them after service is kind of our Number One recruiting tool as well for future people who want to join the military,” Peoples said.
He said the Trump administration’s firing of VA staff members made him angry.
“Every single one of those people got into it for the right reasons; wants to serve their country by taking care of our veterans and the way they have so inhumanely shrugged off cutting people with no transparency, just people receiving emails, people having moved their families across country [to work at the VA], is just despicable,” Peoples said.
Grier Martin, Secretary of the NC Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, said the cuts would have a devastating impact on rural communities.
“If these cuts go through, you’re going to see the VA’s presence in rural areas start to dry out,” Martin said. “These are areas that are already starting to see their civilian hospitals close also.”
The state’s decision to expand Medicaid has been helpful in helping some rural hospitals remain open, he said, but veterans will have difficulty finding care near home if the VA’s presence is diminished.
“If you live on the coast, you’re not going to drive to Durham and you’re probably not going to drive to Fayetteville to the VA hospital to get your care,” Grier said.
Rep. Eric Ager (D-Buncombe) said the outpouring of concern and support for veterans gives him cause for hope amid threats of major cuts to the VA.
“That is how change happens,” Ager said. “It may not be immediate. It may not always be completely satisfying. But the fact that veterans are coming together, that the community is coming together to support veterans, I think will eventually lead to change.”
Threats to democracy
A second panel discussion moderated by Cardinal & Pine’s managing editor Billy Ball, focused on threats to democracy and the evolving role of veterans as defenders of democracy.
Panelist Bobby Jones, president of VFRL and retired Navy commander, said he could see the cost of freedom in the faces of the veterans in the audience. Jones said the services the VA provides are essential to national security.
“I know this panel is about national security, but my thing is you cannot have one without the other,” Jones said. “The VA has to be sound in order for us to have a proper national security apparatus.”
Jones was critical of Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. He said neither man understands the concept of service to country.
“For the first time, I believe in American history, we have leadership that doesn’t get it, that thinks the Constitution is nothing more than a suggestion,” Jones said. “Hell, even the South for the Civil War had the good sense to defect and secede before going against the Constitution.”
America is in “unparalleled, unprecedented times” and veterans must step up to lead the country out the quagmire, Jones said.
Ball asked the panel to discuss the much-watched North Carolina Supreme Court race between Republican Jefferson Griffin and Allison Riggs, a Democrat. The outcome of the closely contested race wasn’t resolved until this month after nearly six months. Griffin conceded after a federal judge ordered the state to certify Riggs’ election victory.
Military and overseas votes were at the center of the election dispute. Griffin challenged the validity of some military and overseas absentee ballots in the 2024 contest.
“To protect military and veterans’ families’ votes, really has to come from the voters, really has to come from political pressure,” said Sean Wright, a former Army medic. “We have to make it, as voters, unacceptable to take away the right to vote.”
Rep. Terry Brown (D-Mecklenburg) said men and women who serve overseas have expectations that they will be treated with a certain amount of respect.
“This election really showed how little the powers that be cared about that,” Brown said. “I like to think about it in terms of people that talk a good game, but they don’t back it up.”
Brown said Americans can’t afford to take a day off defending democracy.
“We have to make sure that’s it’s not just doing election season, it’s not just when there are votes on the line, it’s not just when a bad thing happens,” Brown said. “It’s all the time that we’re making sure that y’all are laser-focused on protecting against threats to our democracy.”
Jay Carey, leader of Resist & Persist, a nonpartisan veterans advocacy organization, said the challenge to the state Supreme Court election was a test by the GOP to determine how much the judicial system and voters could stomach.
Carey, who garnered national attention after he was escorted out of U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards’ townhall meeting in Asheville in March, said there will be more challenges to valid election victories.
“They’re [the challenges] are going to get more and more ridiculous,” Carey said. “It’s going to tie up time and waste more money. Like I said, it was a test. They just wanted to see what they could do.”
The discussion turned to talk of Trump’s removing the military’s Judge Advocate Generals (JAG) and replacing them with what some panelists said are loyalists to the administration. JAGs advise commanders on legal matters and oversee the military judicial system.
Jones said the legal protections provided by JAGs are critical to defending the nation against internal threats he fears are coming from the Trump administration.
“I can’t stress the panic level enough on this,” Jones said. “All of the dominoes are falling. To those of us paying attention, it’s blatantly obvious. Any time there’s a voice of dissent, they shut it down.”
This story first appeared in the NC Newsline, a member with the Phoenix in the nonprofit States Newsroom.
Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.
The post ‘Voices for Veterans’ panel: Nation has a moral obligation to care for those who served appeared first on floridaphoenix.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This content reflects a center-left bias as it strongly criticizes the Trump administration’s proposed cuts to the Veterans Administration while advocating for increased support and care for veterans. It emphasizes the moral obligation to veterans and expresses concern about privatization efforts and reduced staffing, which aligns with more progressive views on government responsibility for social services. The skeptical tone toward Trump and his associates, as well as the defense of voting rights and democracy, further signals a left-leaning perspective. However, the inclusion of multiple voices and factual reporting without extreme rhetoric positions it closer to center-left rather than far-left.
News from the South - Florida News Feed
Judge limits a small part of a court order blocking Trump’s election overhaul as lawsuits continue
SUMMARY: A federal judge modified part of a preliminary injunction against President Trump’s election overhaul executive order. The adjustment restricts the block on assessing citizenship for voter registration forms to only 19 states that sued, not nationwide. However, this has limited practical impact since another judge blocked the mandate across all 50 states in a separate case. The change follows a Supreme Court ruling limiting nationwide injunctions. Other aspects of the initial injunction, including proof-of-citizenship and mail-in ballot rules, remain blocked. The Department of Justice continues to fight the lawsuits filed by Democratic state attorneys general and civil rights groups.
The post Judge limits a small part of a court order blocking Trump’s election overhaul as lawsuits continue appeared first on www.clickorlando.com
News from the South - Florida News Feed
‘I want to see the video’: Mom wants answers after school employee slaps son with special needs
SUMMARY: A Pasco County mother is demanding answers after a school bus assistant allegedly slapped her 10-year-old son, Ian, who has Down syndrome and autism. A deputy’s report confirmed a video shows the assistant hitting the child after Ian tried to kiss their hand. The district refuses to release the video, citing legal protections and risk management concerns. Ian’s mother, a former special education teacher, says her nonverbal son cannot advocate for himself. The assistant resigned days after the incident, and had a prior similar complaint. The sheriff’s office declined charges, stating there was no criminal intent, calling it self-defense.
ABC Action News’ I-Team reporter Kylie McGivern speaks with a mother seeking the so see the video showing what happened to her child with special needs.
News from the South - Florida News Feed
US Senate spending panel axes provision moving FBI headquarters to Maryland
by Jennifer Shutt, Florida Phoenix
July 18, 2025
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee removed language from one of its annual government funding bills Thursday that would have prevented the Trump administration from relocating the FBI’s headquarters anywhere other than a previously selected location in a Maryland suburb outside Washington, D.C.
The change of course came one week after the committee voted to adopt an amendment from Maryland Democratic Sen. Chris Van Hollen that would have blocked the FBI from moving to the Ronald Reagan Building, which sits a few blocks away from the agency’s crumbling D.C. headquarters.
Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski had voted with the committee’s Democrats to approve the amendment citing security concerns, but flipped to oppose it after speaking with FBI Director Kash Patel.
“I came away with a satisfaction that my questions had been answered. I still have reservations about the move. I’ll be frank with you,” Murkowski said. “But I don’t believe that we should lock the FBI into the Greenbelt location, which that amendment would do.”
Murkwoski said the General Services Administration, which manages federal properties and had selected the suburban Maryland location, picked the Reagan Building after finishing an initial assessment. A third party, however, has not yet completed its security review.
Murkowski cautioned the Trump administration against moving quickly to relocate the FBI headquarters, saying she’s “not convinced that we’ve got enough information to know that ultimately the Ronald Reagan Building is going to be the best location.”
Security analysis incomplete
Van Hollen said that he believes the committee should be “preserving decisions” that Congress has already made and raised concerns the Reagan Building hasn’t passed a security analysis.
“This has been a long, bipartisan process,” Van Hollen said. “And so when we got the request for reprogramming from the FBI, I had hoped that we would, on a bipartisan basis, say, ‘No, we’re not going to accept your reprogramming request because it flies in the face of long-standing bipartisan support for this process.’”
Van Hollen reminded members of the committee that the first Trump administration halted efforts to pick a location outside of Washington, D.C., and instead proposed keeping the FBI headquarters at the same site.
The FBI inspector general later published a report concluding “the revised plan contained ambiguous facility security information and did not include certain other facility security information known by the FBI, which created an inadequate and unclear summary of the security posture of the proposed new facility.”
Van Hollen said Thursday he isn’t convinced the Reagan Building can meet the security requirements that Congress has said must go along with a new FBI headquarters.
Van Hollen also expressed frustration that he wasn’t included in the meeting between some Republican senators and the FBI director, preventing him from asking about the decision to move from the prior GSA site in Maryland to the new GSA site within the Reagan Building.
Had Van Hollen’s amendment remained in the annual funding bill for the departments of Commerce and Justice it likely would have stopped the legislation from moving to the floor. Instead, the committee voted 20-9 to approve the measure.
Congress is supposed to complete work on the dozen appropriations bills by the start of the next fiscal year on Oct. 1, but is significantly behind schedule and will need a bipartisan stopgap spending bill to avoid a shutdown.
Fight over relocation
The federal government has been debating the best location for a new FBI headquarters for well over a decade while its current office space in the J. Edgar Hoover Building continues to deteriorate.
The GSA spent years deliberating between three potential locations in Maryland and Virginia before selecting Greenbelt, Maryland, in November 2023.
But the Trump administration announced earlier this month it wanted to use the Reagan Building instead, saying it would save the government money.
“FBI’s existing headquarters at the Hoover building is a perfect example of a government building that has accumulated years of deferred maintenance, suffering from an aging water system to concrete falling off the structure,” GSA Acting Administrator Stephen Ehikian wrote in a statement.
The Reagan Building holds numerous other offices, including the Department of Commerce, Customs and Border Protection, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Children’s Museum and several private businesses.
The announcement indicated the administration may relocate Customs and Border Protection.
“GSA will continue to support and work with CBP and their agency partners to fulfill their mission while the transition of the FBI to the Reagan Building commences,” the statement read.
It didn’t, however, include a timeline or a price tag.
Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.
The post US Senate spending panel axes provision moving FBI headquarters to Maryland appeared first on floridaphoenix.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This article primarily reports on the Senate Appropriations Committee’s decision regarding the FBI headquarters relocation, with a clear emphasis on Democratic concerns, particularly those of Sen. Chris Van Hollen. The reporting gives substantial space to his viewpoint and critiques of the Trump administration’s actions, while Republican positions are presented with less elaboration. Although it includes quotes from Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski and official statements, the framing leans toward validating Democratic objections and portrays the administration’s plans with skepticism. The language remains factual, but the selection and presentation of sources subtly favor a center-left perspective.
-
News from the South - Tennessee News Feed5 days ago
Bread sold at Walmart, Kroger stores in TN, KY recalled over undeclared tree nut
-
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed7 days ago
Man shot and killed in Benton County, near Rogers
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed1 day ago
Aiken County family fleeing to Mexico due to Trump immigration policies
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
Girls Hold Lemonade Stand for St. Jude Hospital | July 12, 2025 | News 19 at 10 p.m. – Weekend
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed7 days ago
Anti-ICE demonstrators march to Beaufort County Sheriff's Office
-
News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed7 days ago
Police say couple had 50+ animals living in home
-
Mississippi Today1 day ago
Driver’s license office moves to downtown Jackson
-
Mississippi Today4 days ago
Coast judge upholds secrecy in politically charged case. Media appeals ruling.