Connect with us

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

US and Iran have a long, complicated history, spanning decades before US strikes on nuclear sites

Published

on

kentuckylantern.com – Guest columnist – 2025-06-24 04:40:00


U.S.-Iran relations have been fraught since the 1953 U.S.-backed overthrow of Iran’s Prime Minister Mossadegh, who nationalized oil. The U.S. supported the repressive Shah until the 1979 Iranian Revolution replaced him with an Islamic government, leading to the U.S. Embassy hostage crisis and severed diplomatic ties. Throughout the 1980s, the U.S. tacitly supported Iraq in its war with Iran, even covertly selling arms to Iran, sparking the Iran-Contra scandal. The 2000s saw tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, leading to failed diplomacy, sanctions, and cyberattacks. Attempts at nuclear deals culminated in the 2015 agreement, later abandoned by the U.S. In 2025, escalating conflict followed U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites after Israeli strikes, worsening already strained relations.

by Guest columnist, Kentucky Lantern
June 24, 2025

With the U.S. bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran, relations between the two countries have arguably reached one of the lowest points in modern times. But the bad blood between the two countries isn’t new: The U.S. and Iran have been in conflict for decades – at least since the U.S. helped overthrow a democracy-minded prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh, in August 1953. The U.S. then supported the long, repressive reign of the Shah of Iran, whose security services brutalized Iranian citizens for decades.

The two countries have been particularly hostile to each other since Iranian students took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in November 1979, resulting in economic sanctions and the severing of formal diplomatic relations between the nations.

Mohammad Mossadegh. (Wikimedia Commons)

Since 1984, the U.S. State Department has listed Iran as a “state sponsor of terrorism,” alleging the Iranian government provides terrorists with training, money and weapons.

Some of the major events in U.S.-Iran relations highlight the differences between the nations’ views, but others arguably presented real opportunities for reconciliation.

1953: US overthrows Mossadegh

In 1951, the Iranian Parliament chose a new prime minister, Mossadegh, who then led lawmakers to vote in favor of taking over the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, expelling the company’s British owners and saying theywanted to turn oil profits into investments in the Iranian people. The U.S. feared disruption in the global oil supply and worried about Iran falling prey to Soviet influence. The British feared the loss of cheap Iranian oil.

President Dwight Eisenhower decided it was best for the U.S. and the U.K. to get rid of Mossadegh. Operation Ajax, a joint CIA-British operation, convinced the Shah of Iran, the country’s monarch, to dismiss Mossadegh and drive him from office by force. Mossadegh was replaced by a much more Western-friendly prime minister, handpicked by the CIA.

Demonstrators in Tehran demand the establishment of an Islamic republic. (AP Photo/Saris)

1979: Revolutionaries oust the shah, take hostages

After more than 25 years of relative stability in U.S.-Iran relations, the Iranian public had grown unhappy with the social and economic conditions that developed under the dictatorial rule of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

Pahlavi enriched himself and used American aid to fund the military while many Iranians lived in poverty. Dissent was often violently quashed by SAVAK, the shah’s security service. In January 1979, the shah left Iran, ostensibly to seek cancer treatment. Two weeks later, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned from exile in Iraq and led a drive to abolish the monarchy and proclaim an Islamic government.

Iranian students at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran show a blindfolded American hostage to the crowd in November 1979. (AP Photo)

In October 1979, President Jimmy Carter agreed to allow the shah to come to the U.S. to seek advanced medical treatment. Outraged Iranian students stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, taking 52 Americans hostage. That convinced Carter to sever U.S. diplomatic relations with Iran on April 7, 1980.

Two weeks later, the U.S. military launched a mission to rescue the hostages, but it failed, with aircraft crashes killing eight U.S. servicemembers.

The shah died in Egypt in July 1980, but the hostages weren’t released until Jan. 20, 1981, after 444 days of captivity.

An Iranian cleric, left, and an Iranian soldier wear gas masks to protect themselves against Iraqi chemical-weapons attacks in May 1988. (Photo by Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images)

1980-1988: U.S. tacitly sides with Iraq

In September 1980, Iraq invaded Iran, an escalation of the two countries’ regional rivalry and religious differences: Iraq was governed by Sunni Muslims but had a Shia Muslim majority population; Iran was led and populated mostly by Shiites.

The U.S. was concerned that the conflict would limit the flow of Middle Eastern oil and wanted to ensure the conflict didn’t affect its close ally, Saudi Arabia.

The U.S. supported Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in his fight against the anti-American Iranian regime. As a result, the U.S. mostly turned a blind eye toward Iraq’s use of chemical weapons against Iran.

U.S. officials moderated their usual opposition to those illegal and inhumane weapons because the U.S. State Department did not “wish to play into Iran’s hands by fueling its propaganda against Iraq.” In 1988, the war ended in a stalemate. More than 500,000 military and 100,000 civilians died.

1981-1986: US secretly sells weapons to Iran

The U.S. imposed an arms embargo after Iran was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984. That left the Iranian military, in the middle of its war with Iraq, desperate for weapons and aircraft and vehicle parts to keep fighting.

The Reagan administration decided that the embargo would likely push Iran to seek support from the Soviet Union, the U.S.’s Cold War rival. Rather than formally end the embargo, U.S. officials agreed to secretly sell weapons to Iran starting in 1981.

The last shipment, of anti-tank missiles, was in October 1986. In November 1986, a Lebanese magazine exposed the deal. That revelation sparked the Iran-Contra scandal in the U.S., with Reagan’s officials found to have collected money from Iran for the weapons and illegally sent those funds to anti-socialist rebels – the Contras – in Nicaragua.

At a mass funeral for 76 of the 290 people killed in the shoot-down of Iran Air 655, mourners hold up a sign depicting the incident. (AP Photo/CP/Mohammad Sayyad)

1988: U.S. Navy shoots down Iran Air flight 655

On the morning of July 8, 1988, the USS Vincennes, a guided missile cruiser patrolling in the international waters of the Persian Gulf, entered Iranian territorial waters while in a skirmish with Iranian gunboats.

Either during or just after that exchange of gunfire, the Vincennes crew mistook a passing civilian Airbus passenger jet for an Iranian F-14 fighter. They shot it down, killing all 290 people aboard.

The U.S. called it a “tragic and regrettable accident,” but Iran believed the plane’s downing was intentional. In 1996, the U.S. agreed to pay US$131.8 million in compensation to Iran.

1997-1998: The U.S. seeks contact

In August 1997, a moderate reformer, Mohammad Khatami, won Iran’s presidential election.

U.S. President Bill Clinton sensed an opportunity. He sent a message to Tehran through the Swiss ambassador there, proposing direct government-to-government talks.

Shortly thereafter, in early January 1998, Khatami gave an interview to CNN in which he expressed “respect for the great American people,” denounced terrorism and recommended an “exchange of professors, writers, scholars, artists, journalists and tourists” between the United States and Iran.

However, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei didn’t agree, so not much came of the mutual overtures as Clinton’s time in office came to an end.

In his 2002 State of the Union address, President George W. Bush characterized Iran, Iraq and North Korea as constituting an “Axis of Evil” supporting terrorism and pursuing weapons of mass destruction, straining relations even further.

Inside these buildings at the Natanz nuclear facility in Iran, technicians enrich uranium. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

2002: Iran’s nuclear program raises alarm

In August 2002, an exiled rebel group announced that Iran had been secretly working on nuclear weapons at two installations that had not previously been publicly revealed.

That was a violation of the terms of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which Iran had signed, requiring countries to disclose their nuclear-related facilities to international inspectors.

One of those formerly secret locations, Natanz, housed centrifuges for enriching uranium, which could be used in civilian nuclear reactors or enriched further for weapons.

Starting in roughly 2005, U.S. and Israeli government cyberattackers together reportedly targeted the Natanz centrifuges with a custom-made piece of malicious software that became known as Stuxnet.

That effort, which slowed down Iran’s nuclear program was one of many U.S. and international attempts – mostly unsuccessful – to curtail Iran’s progress toward building a nuclear bomb.

2003: Iran writes to Bush administration

In May 2003, senior Iranian officials quietly contacted the State Department through the Swiss embassy in Iran, seeking “a dialogue ‘in mutual respect,’” addressing four big issues: nuclear weapons, terrorism, Palestinian resistance and stability in Iraq.

Hardliners in the Bush administration weren’t interested in any major reconciliation, though Secretary of State Colin Powell favored dialogue and other officials had met with Iran about al-Qaida.

When Iranian hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected president of Iran in 2005, the opportunity died. The following year, Ahmadinejad made his own overture to Washington in an 18-page letter to President Bush. The letter was widely dismissed; a senior State Department official told me in profane terms that it amounted to nothing.

Representatives of several nations met in Vienna in July 2015 to finalize the Iran nuclear deal. (Austrian Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs/Flickr)

2015: Iran nuclear deal signed

After a decade of unsuccessful attempts to rein in Iran’s nuclear ambitions, the Obama administration undertook a direct diplomatic approach beginning in 2013.

Two years of secret, direct negotiations initially bilaterally between the U.S. and Iran and later with other nuclear powers culminated in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, often called the Iran nuclear deal.

Iran, the U.S., China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom signed the deal in 2015. It severely limited Iran’s capacity to enrich uranium and mandated that international inspectors monitor and enforce Iran’s compliance with the agreement.

In return, Iran was granted relief from international and U.S. economic sanctions. Though the inspectors regularly certified that Iran was abiding by the agreement’s terms, President Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement in May 2018.

2020: U.S. drones kill Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani

On Jan. 3, 2020, an American drone fired a missile that killed Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani, the leader of Iran’s elite Quds Force. Analysts considered Soleimani the second most powerful man in Iran, after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei.

At the time, the Trump administration asserted that Soleimani was directing an imminent attack against U.S. assets in the region, but officials have not provided clear evidence to support that claim.

Iran responded by launching ballistic missiles that hit two American bases in Iraq.

2023: The Oct. 7 attacks on Israel

Hamas’ brazen attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, provoked a fearsome militarized response from Israel that continues today and served to severely weaken Iran’s proxies in the region, especially Hamas – the perpetrator of the attacks – and Hezbollah in Lebanon.

2025: Trump 2.0 and Iran

Trump saw an opportunity to forge a new nuclear deal with Iran and to pursue other business deals with Tehran. Once inaugurated for his second term, Trump appointed Steve Witkoff, a real estate investor who is the president’s friend, to serve as special envoy for the Middle East and to lead negotiations.

Negotiations for a nuclear deal between Washington and Tehran began in April, but the countries did not reach a deal. They were planning a new round of talks when Israel struck Iran with a series of airstrikes on June 13, forcing the White House to reconsider is position.

On June 22, in the early morning hours, the U.S. chose to act decisively in an attempt to cripple Iran’s nuclear capacity, bombing three nuclear sites and causing what Pentagon officials called “severe damage.” Iran vowed to retaliate.

About the author

Jeffrey Fields is a professor of the Practice of International Relations and director of the Dornsife College Washington DC Program at the University of Southern California. His research and teaching focus on U.S. foreign policy, diplomacy, international security, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Kentucky Lantern is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Kentucky Lantern maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jamie Lucke for questions: info@kentuckylantern.com.

The post US and Iran have a long, complicated history, spanning decades before US strikes on nuclear sites appeared first on kentuckylantern.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This content provides a comprehensive historical overview of U.S.-Iran relations, emphasizing both U.S. and Iranian actions with critical context. It highlights controversial U.S. interventions, such as the 1953 coup and covert arms sales, as well as diplomatic efforts like the Iran nuclear deal. While it is generally factual and measured, the focus on U.S. missteps and the inclusion of humanitarian impacts suggests a critical perspective toward U.S. foreign policy, aligning it with a centrist to center-left framing that values accountability and diplomacy over unilateral military action.

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Early summer heat waves continues

Published

on

www.wtvq.com – T.G. Shuck – 2025-06-24 15:25:00

SUMMARY: Central and Eastern Kentucky continues to experience intense summer heat with temperatures reaching the low to mid-90s and heat indices surpassing 100 degrees due to a persistent high-pressure dome. A Heat Advisory remains in effect through 8 PM Wednesday, marking several consecutive days of oppressive heat. Residents are urged to stay hydrated, take breaks, and avoid peak afternoon heat, especially if working or exercising outdoors. By late week, a slight shift in the heat dome may bring a modest temperature drop to upper 80s–low 90s with continued humidity and increased chances for scattered afternoon thunderstorms through the weekend. A cold front may provide relief next Tuesday.

Read the full article

The post Early summer heat waves continues appeared first on www.wtvq.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

TVA requests power conservation amid high temperatures

Published

on

www.wnky.com – WNKY Staff – 2025-06-24 11:12:00

SUMMARY: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), along with Warren RECC and Bowling Green Municipal Utilities, urges residents to reduce non-essential electricity use amid extreme heat to maintain reliable power. Butch Massey of Warren RECC emphasized that small changes can greatly help meet high energy demand. Recommended actions include raising thermostats by one degree, delaying use of heat-producing appliances during peak times, lowering water heater temperatures to 120°F, washing clothes in cold water, and turning off unused lights and electronics. Residents are also reminded to check on neighbors, pets, and livestock during the heat. Power outages can be reported via phone, app, or text.

Read the full article

The post TVA requests power conservation amid high temperatures appeared first on www.wnky.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

Officials discuss ways to protect workers as temperatures rise in Louisville

Published

on

www.youtube.com – WLKY News Louisville – 2025-06-23 17:55:30

SUMMARY: Officials in Louisville are taking steps to protect outdoor workers as extreme heat rises. Precautions include starting work earlier to avoid peak heat, shortening workdays, hydrating frequently, and taking cooling breaks. Firefighters face extra challenges as heat drains their oxygen tanks faster, requiring more backups. Parks and Recreation employees follow similar protocols. Workers are encouraged to watch for heat illness signs like fatigue, dizziness, and nausea and to look out for one another. An OSHA heat index app, available in English and Spanish, helps users monitor heat risk levels and provides first aid advice to stay safe.

Officials discuss ways to protect workers as temperatures rise in Louisville

Subscribe to WLKY on YouTube now for more: http://bit.ly/1e5KyMO

Get more Louisville news: http://www.wlky.com
Like us: http://www.facebook.com/wlkynews
Follow us: http://twitter.com/WLKY
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wlky/

Source

Continue Reading

Trending