Connect with us

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

U.S. Supreme Court declines to revive landmark climate suit brought by young Oregonians

Published

on

arkansasadvocate.com – Alex Baumhardt – 2025-03-24 14:51:00

by Alex Baumhardt, Arkansas Advocate
March 24, 2025

The nation’s highest court declined to hear a petition that would have revived a landmark climate change lawsuit against the federal government, led by young Oregonians and their peers from across the country.

The court’s denial ends 21 youths’ decade-long fight for a trial where they could hold the U.S. government accountable for accelerating global climate change through lawmakers’ policies and fossil fuel subsidies. Despite the setback, it has spurred dozens more cases like it in individual states and around the world.

The nine members of the U.S. Supreme Court denied Monday a petition to throw out a lower court’s decision to dismiss the case Juliana v. United States. The Supreme Court justices dismissed the petition without prejudice, meaning the plaintiffs could attempt to bring it back one day.

Juliana v. United States was first filed in U.S. District Court in Eugene in 2015. Eleven Oregon youths and 10 of their peers from Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, New York, Pennsylvania and Washington, who were between 8 and 18 years old at the time the suit was filed, are listed as plaintiffs.

Among them is Miko Vergun of Beaverton, who said in a news release that she was proud of the impact the case has had on more than 60 similar lawsuits filed against other states and nations.

“For almost ten years, we’ve stood up for the rights of present and future generations, demanding a world where we can not only survive, but thrive,” Vergun said. “We’ve faced extreme resistance by the federal government, yet we’ve never wavered in our resolve.”

Vergun, now 22, has been involved in climate activism since she was in seventh grade, according to Our Children’s Trust. She was born in the Marshall Islands, a Pacific island nation, and attributed her activism to making sure that land stays above sea level.

In the U.S., the Juliana case most recently inspired Held v. State of Montana and Navahine v. Hawaii Department of Transportation, both of which led to 2024 decisions affirming the youth plaintiffs’ state constitutional rights to a clean, healthful and life-sustaining environment.

Since 2015, fossil fuel companies, the U.S. Department of Justice, former President Joe Biden, current President Donald Trump and Republican states attorneys general have filed court documents to dismiss the case and to keep it from going to trial.

Most recently, in May, three Trump-appointed judges on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco sided with the U.S. Department of Justice in ordering the case be dismissed. In June Julia Olson, attorney for the youth behind the case, filed a request for a rehearing with the Ninth Circuit.

Oregon’s U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, filed a “friend of the court brief” urging the court to grant it. It was signed by 39 other congressional Democrats, including Oregon Sen. Jeff Merkley, state Rep. Val Hoyle, representing Oregon’s 4th Congressional District and former state Rep. Earl Blumenauer, who represented Oregon’s 3rd Congressional District.

“The Supreme Court’s decision today is not the end of the road and the impact of Juliana cannot be measured by the finality of this case alone,” Olson said in a news release.

Olson said the trust would continue supporting other cases worldwide, and that she would see the U.S. government back in court one day soon. The Supreme Court did not address the merits of the case, and Our Children’s Trust noted in its news release that the court hears less than 2% of the cases it’s brought each year.

“This fight is far from over,” Olson said. “This is a call to all young people who want to stand up to those in the executive office of the president who would silence you and threaten your health and safety — join us in protecting your constitutional rights.”

Oregon Capital Chronicle is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Julia Shumway for questions: info@oregoncapitalchronicle.com.

Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.

The post U.S. Supreme Court declines to revive landmark climate suit brought by young Oregonians appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

REAL ID requirements among policies difficult for transgender, nonbinary Arkansans to navigate

Published

on

arkansasadvocate.com – Tess Vrbin – 2025-04-30 05:15:00

by Tess Vrbin, Arkansas Advocate
April 30, 2025

Gender-nonconforming Arkansans might not meet the state’s requirements to obtain a REAL ID in order to board flights or enter certain federal buildings, which is a week away from being required by federal law.

Applicants for REAL IDs need to provide the Department of Finance and Administration with four different forms of identification:

A current driver’s license, state-issued ID, or school or work ID as proof of identityA passport or birth certificate as proof of legal presence in the United StatesA government-issued social security cardTwo documents providing proof of address, such as utility bills or bank statements, issued within the last six months

The documents “all have to sync up,” Finance Secretary Jim Hudson said last week.

Transgender and nonbinary Arkansans might have changed their names or gender information on some but not all legal documents, and state policies have made it difficult for these groups of people to obtain documents that accurately reflect who they are, advocates say. Birth certificates can be legally altered, and until this year, the federal government allowed gender-neutral information on U.S. passports.

“The government has played politics with people’s lives and upended people’s ability to accurately and properly identify themselves,” said Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas. “This has created much chaos and turmoil for no good reason while making life harder and more unsafe for all of us.”

Last year, the ACLU of Arkansas led a lawsuit against the DFA’s decision to stop issuing gender-neutral driver’s licenses. The case was dropped after Arkansas officials permanently adopted the new policy, which prohibits the use of an “X” to indicate someone’s gender in place of “M” or “F.”

Arkansans urge state finance department not to reverse gender-neutral driver’s license policy

Several transgender and nonbinary Arkansans, including Maggs Gallup of Little Rock, urged the finance department to maintain the previous policy, which had been in place for 14 years. Gallup said in an interview Monday that they are putting off obtaining a REAL ID in case doing so requires the state to remove the X gender marker from their driver’s license.

Hudson told lawmakers that a driver’s license is “not a platform for speech” and “not a platform for personal identity.” Gallup disagreed, saying their gender-neutral ID is important to them and putting incorrect information on an ID is “a deeply incongruent thing to do.”

“In an ideal world, it would be great to have the state and officials recognize our gender,” Gallup said. “They don’t get to determine who we are, no matter what letters we put on our IDs.”

REAL IDs began with a law passed by Congress in 2005 as a response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Instituting REAL IDs statewide “will help fight terrorism and reduce identity fraud,” according to the finance department website.

The federal Transportation Security Administration accepts passports in place of REAL IDs as identification to board a flight. Miss Major Griffin-Gracy, a well-known transgender advocate who lives in Little Rock, said last week on Facebook that she was initially denied access to a flight because she has an X on her driver’s license, but she was allowed to board after displaying her passport containing a male gender marker.

Griffin-Gracy is 78 years old and gender-nonconforming, and she was present at the 1969 Stonewall riot between LGBTQ+ people and police in New York City. In her Facebook video, she expressed disbelief that her passport was accepted even though she did not appear masculine. She also said “we the people” should “stand up and fight” President Donald Trump’s administration, which does not recognize gender-neutral IDs.

Gallup said they are also concerned about potential limits on travel, both domestic and international, with or without a REAL ID. Their teenage child is old enough to learn to drive but is putting off obtaining a learner’s permit because of potential bureaucratic obstacles due to their gender-nonconforming identity, Gallup said.

Bill regulating transgender Arkansans’ bathroom use heads to House despite public pushback

“This is just one part of a larger, really complicated network of new rules and legislation that are challenging to navigate” for transgender and nonbinary Arkansans, Gallup said.

State lawmakers and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders approved a law this month that will allow Arkansans to sue for damages if they encounter someone in a bathroom, changing room, shelter or correctional facility who does not align with the “designated sex” of the space.

The state has also enacted laws in the past few years that ban transgender girls from playing girls’ sports, require public school students to use bathrooms that match their gender assigned at birth, regulate pronoun use in schools and allow doctors who provide transgender minors’ health care to be sued for medical malpractice.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com.

The post REAL ID requirements among policies difficult for transgender, nonbinary Arkansans to navigate appeared first on arkansasadvocate.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article appears to adopt a Center-Left perspective primarily through its focus on issues affecting transgender and nonbinary individuals, particularly with regard to identity documentation requirements in Arkansas. It emphasizes the challenges faced by gender-nonconforming individuals in obtaining accurate identification and highlights criticisms from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) regarding the state’s policy changes. The language used is sympathetic toward these groups, portraying the state’s actions as creating unnecessary turmoil and being politically motivated. Although the article provides factual information about the REAL ID process and relevant legal actions, its framing leans toward advocacy for the rights of transgender individuals, positioning the state’s policies in a critical light. This reflects a broader pattern of liberal advocacy for gender inclusivity in government identification practices. However, the piece does offer direct quotes from state officials, which helps balance the presentation of opposing views. Thus, the overall tone remains more supportive of progressive policies on gender identification, hence the Center-Left categorization.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Arkansas Army vet uses experience to help other veterans

Published

on

www.youtube.com – THV11 – 2025-04-29 20:03:22

SUMMARY: Arkansas Army veteran Jared Eeken uses his military experience and counseling background to help struggling veterans through his nonprofit, Scars and Stripes. Recognizing gaps in existing support systems, Eeken assists veterans in navigating mental health challenges, finding jobs, healthcare, and transportation, ensuring they don’t fall through the cracks. His own struggles with mental health inspired him to create this organization alongside his wife. Eeken emphasizes the importance of camaraderie and continuous support, often advocating for veterans to receive the services they’re entitled to. Recently, he was honored with the Saluting Heroes Award for his impactful work aiding Arkansas veterans.

YouTube video

One Arkansas Army veteran is showcasing how he uses his knowledge of social work and his own experiences to help other veterans in the state.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Arkansas News Feed

Latest updates on Conway park shooting

Published

on

www.youtube.com – THV11 – 2025-04-29 07:43:35

SUMMARY: Two suspects remain on the run after the Conway Park shooting, while two others are in custody. One of the arrested suspects, Ryan Goens, was free on bond for a previous gun charge at the time of the shooting. He had posted a $75,000 bond for an alleged February gun crime, including possession of a machine gun, and was scheduled for a hearing the same week as the shooting, but it was postponed. This case has raised concerns about the state’s bail system and balancing public safety with the presumption of innocence. Goens faces 11 counts of aggravated assault.

YouTube video

As the search continues for two additional suspects in the Conway park shooting, here’s the latest information from police.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending