Connect with us

The Center Square

Trump order strips funding from sanctuary cities engaged in ‘insurrection’ | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-28 19:11:00

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump issued an executive order on Monday to enhance national security and enforce federal immigration and criminal law in so-called sanctuary jurisdictions and take a range of actions against those obstructing enforcement, including eliminating their federal funding.

Trump’s “Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens” executive order directs the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to publish a list of state and local jurisdictions that obstruct federal immigration enforcement and take action against them.

“Federal supremacy with respect to immigration, national security, and foreign policy is axiomatic,” the order states, citing Article II and Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution, vesting the federal government with the power to protect national security and “protect each of [the States] against Invasion.”

The invasion argument was first made by 55 Texas counties that declared an invasion citing Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution, The Center Square exclusively reported.

“The prior administration allowed unchecked millions of aliens to illegally enter the United States,” the order states, creating a public safety and national security crisis, exacerbated by transnational criminal organizations, terrorists and others intent on harming Americans.

Trump’s latest executive order, as many of his previous ones, is likely to be challenged in court.

Citing an invasion at the southern border, which Trump officially declared on his first day in office, his administration is now responding to some state and local officials who “violate, obstruct, and defy” federal immigration enforcement, the order states.

Local jurisdictions who obstruct federal deportation efforts are engaging in “a lawless insurrection against the supremacy of Federal law and the Federal Government’s obligation to defend the territorial sovereignty of the United States,” it states.

In addition to creating “intolerable national security risks,” the order states sanctuary jurisdictions’ “nullification efforts often violate Federal criminal laws, including those prohibiting obstruction of justice, … unlawfully harboring or hiring illegal aliens …, conspiracy against the United States …, and conspiracy to impede Federal law enforcement.”

The order also notes that “assisting aliens in violating Federal immigration law could also violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act,” an argument made by America First Legal, The Center Square reported. In January, AFL launched a resource to help Americans fight sanctuary policies and sent letters to more than 250 elected officials demanding that they comply with federal law or expect to be sued.

“Concealing, harboring, or shielding aliens could also trigger liability under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) statute,” AFL said. “Civil RICO remedies are available to ‘[a]ny person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation’ and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.’”

Trump’s order also states that those who assist illegal foreign nationals might be violating federal laws that prohibit discrimination against Americans and might be violating Americans’ civil rights.

In order for the federal government “to restore the enforcement of United States law,” Trump directed the attorney general and Secretary of Homeland Security to publish a list of states and local jurisdictions that obstruct the federal immigration enforcement. Each jurisdiction is to be notified of its alleged violation of federal immigration and criminal law.

Those that remain in defiance will lose all federal funding, the order says. The AG and DHS secretary are directed to work with the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to identify, suspend and terminate all federal funds allocated to sanctuary jurisdictions, including grants and contracts. They are also directed to “pursue all necessary legal remedies and enforcement measures to end these violations and bring such jurisdictions into compliance” with U.S. laws.

The order also prevents all federal benefits from being spent on illegal foreign nationals living in sanctuary jurisdictions, including through private entities. It requires federal agencies to create a mechanism “to ensure appropriate eligibility verification is conducted for individuals receiving federal public benefits” under Title 8 of federal immigration law.

It also creates provisions for the AG, DHS secretary and agency heads to “identify and take appropriate action to stop the enforcement of state and local laws, regulations, policies, and practices favoring aliens over any groups of American citizens that are unlawful, preempted by federal law, or otherwise unenforceable.”

This includes state laws that provide in-state higher education tuition “to aliens but not to out-of-State American citizens that may violate” federal law or “that favor aliens in criminal charges or sentencing.”

The order was issued after the Trump administration already warned sanctuary jurisdictions like Massachusetts, whose officials remained steadfast in their policies to protect illegal foreign nationals. They continued to do so after federal authorities arrested alleged terrorists tied to the murder of U.S. troops and hundreds of criminal illegal foreign nationals were charged or convicted of committing violent crimes against Massachusetts residents, The Center Square reported.

The post Trump order strips funding from sanctuary cities engaged in ‘insurrection’ | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

This article presents a clear right-leaning perspective, primarily supporting President Trump’s executive order to enhance national security by taking action against sanctuary jurisdictions. The tone is assertive and critical of those jurisdictions that obstruct federal immigration enforcement, framing them as violating federal law and creating national security risks. The language used, such as “lawless insurrection” and “criminal aliens,” suggests a strong stance against sanctuary policies, which aligns with conservative viewpoints emphasizing strict immigration control and federal supremacy. The sources quoted, including America First Legal, are aligned with right-wing groups advocating for tougher immigration enforcement. There is little counterargument presented, with opposing viewpoints largely dismissed or framed negatively. The focus on federal supremacy and the invocation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) further solidifies the article’s right-wing bias, emphasizing the perceived threat posed by sanctuary policies to national security and legal order. The historical context, referencing Trump’s first-day declaration of an “invasion,” ties the argument to his broader immigration and national security agenda. The content is designed to resonate with audiences who support stricter immigration policies and federal authority.

News from the South - Alabama News Feed

Katrina displaced 1.5M across the South, only 61% returned to New Orleans | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Emilee Calametti | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-27 11:00:00


Hurricane Katrina displaced an estimated 1.5 million people across Louisiana, Alabama, and Mississippi, with New Orleans most affected. About 40% of displaced families never returned. Former resident Lauren Breaux recalled evacuating multiple times and losing her home after levee failures caused severe flooding. The storm caused $125 billion in damage, dropping from Category 5 to 3 at landfall. Louisiana had 1.12 million displaced residents, with others from Mississippi and Alabama. While 61.9% of Louisiana evacuees returned within 33 days on average, many resettled elsewhere. New Orleans’ population decreased by 80,000, and the city and residents still feel Katrina’s impact 20 years later.

(The Center Square) – An estimated 1.5 million people were displaced during Hurricane Katrina across Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi, but most significantly from New Orleans.

It is estimated that 40% of displaced families did not return to the city.

As the 20th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina arrives Friday, The Center Square spoke with former New Orleans resident Lauren Breaux, who was evacuated with her family during the destructive storm.

“We had evacuated many times leading up to Katrina,” Breaux said. “I think already once that year, so we were nonchalant about the entire situation. I remember we started to realize the gravity of the situation when we were driving home and our side of the road was completely clear going back into the city.

“We didn’t know until seeing the cars bumper to bumper trying to exit the city, how bad it was going to be.”

Breaux and her family lost their home, part of the $125 billion destruction caused by a storm that mercifully dropped from Category 5 to Category 3 when making landfall.

A study conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that 1.12 million of those displaced from their homes were living in Louisiana before Hurricane Katrina. Of the remaining evacuees, 288,000 were residing in Mississippi and 88,000 in Alabama.

“Once the levee broke, there was no hope for our home,” said Breaux. “We had water through our attic, and possibly above our roof, but we are not 100% sure since no one could be down there at the peak water height.”

Her family eventually settled across Lake Pontchartrain in Pearl River months after evacuating.

Saint Tammany, Orleans, Jefferson, Saint Charles, Terrebonne and Saint Bernard were among the most displaced counties in Louisiana during the storm. Each county had between 10,000 to 350,000 residents evacuated.

While Breaux and her family did not return to New Orleans, 61.9% of Louisiana evacuees returned to their prior residence after the storm. It is reported that on average, families who evacuated but returned to their former address were displaced for 33 days.

Those who did not return settled in other parts of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, Tennessee, Georgia, Florida and Arkansas.

Now, the New Orleans population sits at 380,000, a drop of about 80,000 – or roughly a tick more than can fill the Superdome for Saints football games. The NFL team lost its home, too, relocating to various other “home” venues from San Antonio to New York.

Residents who moved back to the city had to rebuild or move entirely and still feel the effects of the storm 20 years later.

Emilee Ruth Calametti currently serves as Staff Reporter for The Center Square covering the Northwestern Louisiana region. She holds her M.A. in English from Georgia State University and an additional M.A. in Journalism from New York University. Her articles have been featured in DIG Magazine, Houstonia Magazine, Bookstr, inRegister, EntertainmentNOW, AOL, MSN, and more. She is a Louisiana native with over seven years of journalism experience.

The post Katrina displaced 1.5M across the South, only 61% returned to New Orleans | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The content presents a factual, neutral account of the impact and aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, focusing on statistics and personal testimony without adopting a political or ideological stance. It reports on displacement figures, the demographic impact, and personal experiences without framing these in a way that promotes a particular viewpoint or agenda. The language is descriptive and straightforward, aimed at informing rather than persuading, which aligns with neutral, factual reporting rather than ideological commentary.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

U-M Health ends transgender treatment for minors | Michigan

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Elyse Apel – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-27 10:33:00


The University of Michigan’s hospital system, Michigan Medicine, announced it will stop providing hormonal therapies and puberty blockers to minors amid criminal and civil investigations triggered by the Trump Administration into transgender treatments for children. The decision, citing legal risks and external threats, impacts patients under 19, though care for those over 19 continues. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel condemned the move as “shameful” and potentially illegal, warning it may constitute discrimination under Michigan law and pledging to explore legal options. Her office also reissued guidance supporting transgender care amidst a multi-state lawsuit defending minors’ access. Conservative groups praised the administration’s actions.

(The Center Square) – The University of Michigan’s hospital system, Michigan Medicine, announced it will no longer provide hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors.

This came in response to the Trump Administration opening criminal and civil investigations into those providing transgender treatments for minors throughout the country

“In light of that investigation, and given escalating external threats and risks, we will no longer provide gender affirming hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors,” said a statement from Michigan Medicine released Monday.

“We recognize the gravity and impact of this decision for our patients and our community,” it continued. “We are working closely with all those impacted, and we will continuously support the well-being of our patients, their families, and our teams.”

Michigan Medicine was just one of more than 20 doctors and clinics that were subpoenaed by the Department of Justice in early July.

They were subpoenaed for their part in “performing transgender medical procedures on children,” according to the department.

“Medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

On Michigan Medicine’s webpage which previously listed its transgender treatments, it posted more details about its decision to end those for all patients under the age of 19.

“In response to unprecedented legal and regulatory threats to our clinicians and our institution, we have made the difficult decision to stop prescribing puberty blockers and gender affirming hormones for patients under age 19,” it stated. “We will continue to care for our gender diverse patients, providing all appropriate care other than puberty blockers and gender affirming hormones. Care for patients age 19 and over is not affected by this change.”

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel pushed back against Michigan Medicine’s decision to end those transgender treatments, calling it “shameful, dangerous, and potentially illegal.”

In response to Michigan Medicine’s decision, Nessel’s office reissued an open letter to all Michigan health care providers.

The letter outlines that to refuse these health care services might be discrimination under Michigan law.

“This cowardly acquiescence to political pressure from this president and his administration is not what patients have come to expect from an institution that has labeled itself, ‘the leaders and the best,’ and my department will be considering all of our options if they violate Michigan law,” Nessel said. “UM has chosen instead to sacrifice the health, well-being, and likely the very lives of Michigan children, to protect itself from the ire of an administration who, oftentimes, engages in unlawful actions itself.”

Earlier this month, Nessel also joined a multi-state lawsuit seeking to protect transgender health care for minors.

Others have applauded this move and the Trump Administration’s push to end these treatments nationwide.

“Pressure from the Trump Administration is working,” said a statement from the American Principles Project, a conservative policy group that has been outspoken against transgender treatment for minors. “Thank you, POTUS.”

Elyse Apel is a reporter for The Center Square covering Colorado and Michigan. A graduate of Hillsdale College, Elyse’s writing has been published in a wide variety of national publications from the Washington Examiner to The American Spectator and The Daily Wire.

The post U-M Health ends transgender treatment for minors | Michigan appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on the decision by Michigan Medicine to cease providing hormonal and puberty blocker treatments to minors, contextualizing it within investigations led by the Trump Administration and responses from various political figures. While it includes statements from both sides—Michigan Medicine, the Trump Administration, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and conservative groups—the selection and framing of quotes lean toward a right-wing perspective. For example, the article highlights language such as “mutilated children” from the Department of Justice and presents opposition to transgender treatments in largely unchallenged terms. It also notes praise from a conservative policy group without equivalent emphasis on supportive arguments for transgender healthcare. Furthermore, the reporter’s associations with conservative outlets and institutions provide subtle context but do not alone define bias. Overall, the article’s tone and framing suggest a Right-Leaning bias, as it frames the issue largely around legal and moral objections to transgender treatments for minors, aligning more with conservative viewpoints.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Fortified roof program informed by the legacy of Katrina | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan Mckendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-27 08:01:00


The Louisiana Fortify Homes Program, launched in 2023, aims to strengthen homes against hurricane-force winds by providing up to $10,000 grants for roof upgrades to national standards. Since Hurricane Katrina’s devastating 2005 impact, Louisiana invested over $14 billion in levees and pump stations, reducing flood risks but still facing wind damage threats. Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple emphasizes that resilient homes help keep communities intact, lower insurance costs, and speed recovery after storms. The program has awarded over 3,700 grants, with more homeowners fortifying independently. The next registration opens Sept. 2, offering 500 grants to eligible coastal residents, streamlining the application process for repeat entrants.

(The Center Square) − As  New Orleans has rebuilt and rebounded, Hurricane Katrina’s impact has informed much of the policy and initiatives throughout the state.

The Louisiana Fortify Homes Program, Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple told The Center Square, focuses not just on flood protection but on stronger homes and communities.

“The city, the state, and the federal government spent over $14 billion to fortify levees and build additional pump stations,” Temple said. “But we’re still going to have hurricanes. Our properties are still going to be subject to hurricane-force winds. That’s why the focus now is on resilient housing stock.”

The Crescent City was braced for a Category 5 hurricane in the gulf 20 years ago this week. It arrived that Aug. 29, Category 3 at landfall, tearing through levees, homes and lives. It remains among the most deadly and costly of all time from the Atlantic basin.

Temple said the state’s investments in levees and pump stations after Katrina reduced the risk of another catastrophic flooding event. But, he warned, Louisiana remains highly vulnerable to hurricane-force winds that can tear apart homes and destabilize entire communities.

The Louisiana Fortify Homes Program provides grants of up to $10,000 for homeowners to upgrade roofs to nationally recognized standards able to withstand stronger winds. Since launching in 2023, the program has awarded more than 3,700 grants, with thousands more homeowners fortifying their roofs without state help.

Temple said the program’s impact goes beyond lowering individual insurance costs. Strengthening homes, he said, helps keep communities intact in the wake of major storms.

“When people’s homes are damaged, the longer it takes to repair and rebuild, the less likely they are to move back,” he said. “More resilient homes mean people are more likely to return, insurance remains affordable, and entire communities recover faster. That’s a part of resilience that hasn’t been talked about enough.”

The program’s next registration round opens Sept. 2, with 500 grants available. Homeowners in Louisiana’s coastal zone, Lake Charles, Sulphur and Westlake are eligible to apply. Those who registered in the September 2024 or February lotteries will be automatically reentered into the new round.

Temple said his office is working to make the process smoother for applicants.

“The last time, we had over 10,000 people sign up,” he said. “We’ve tried to make sure people don’t have to resubmit every single time. Once you put your name in the hat, it should stay there until you’re selected.”

The program’s momentum is part of what Temple calls a shift toward long-term resiliency in Louisiana.

“We built the levees,” he said. “We built the pump stations. Now we’re focused on building resilient properties so insurers are willing to stay in coastal Louisiana – and so people can afford to live here.”

The post Fortified roof program informed by the legacy of Katrina | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on a state government program and the statements of Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple regarding Louisiana’s efforts to bolster housing resilience against hurricanes. The tone is factual and explanatory, focusing on the details and benefits of the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program without promoting a particular political ideology. It refrains from partisan commentary or language that would suggest an ideological agenda, making it a straightforward report on policy initiatives and their practical impacts. This adherence to neutral, balanced reporting indicates a centrist stance without clear political bias.

Continue Reading

Trending