Pause and effect: Threat of Trump funding freeze is making the future tense for North Carolina nonprofits
by Lucas Thomae, Carolina Public Press March 26, 2025
As President Donald Trump and his appointees rifle through the country’s balance sheets looking for federal spending to slash, many North Carolina nonprofits are operating in a state of financial uncertainty, hoping they’re not the next target of the administration’s cost-cutting ambitions.
While state agencies haven’t reported any major problems accessing the federal funds that trickle down to the more than 3,000 nonprofits that receive government grants, those organizations are still behaving as if it is a possibility.
The strategy for many has been to stay quiet and avoid drawing attention to themselves.
One week after Trump took office, he issued a memo ordering all federal agencies to temporarily freeze spending on loans and grants. This was necessary, the memo stated, so that officials could review whether the agencies’ payments were aligned with Trump’s previous orders aimed at “financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology and the green new deal.”
The vague memo sent shockwaves through Washington, confusing agencies and angering members of Congress across the political spectrum.
The memo directed that Medicare and Social Security benefits be unaffected by the freeze. But the White House later had to clarify that other programs such as Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, colloquially known as food stamps) would also remain untouched.
Two days later, the memo was rescinded altogether.
Lawsuits over the legality of the freeze are ongoing. However, the message to organizations receiving federal money was clear:
Anyone not in lockstep with the Trump agenda risks having their government dollars taken away.
Nonprofit decisions made ‘difficult’
Since 2020, the federal government has funnelled $200 billion into North Carolina through grants and subgrants — funding awarded from an agency to a smaller agency or organization, which is then further distributed to more modest awardees.
The awardees who receive the bulk of federal grants typically fall into one of three categories: state government agencies, universities and hospitals.
None of those types of institutions are at acute risk of being crippled by the revocation of federal funding.
Small nonprofits, however, are worried. Especially those whose values directly contradict the conservative cultural ideology of the Trump administration.
State agencies, such as the N.C. Department of Public Safety, haven’t reported any major problems accessing the federal funds that trickle down to the more than 3,000 nonprofits that receive government grants. Lucas Thomae / Carolina Public Press
Carolina Public Press reached out to a plethora of state-based nonprofits to ask how they were dealing with financial uncertainty in the wake of the funding freeze. The missions of those organizations ranged from providing affordable childcare to advancing creative arts education to supporting victims of violent crime.
Not many organizations were willing to speak openly — or even anonymously.
“With the climate being rather delicate currently, we are not comfortable commenting on the federal funding and grants situation,” said the communications directorof a nonprofit that provides services to the children of migrant workers in North Carolina and several other states.
Other nonprofits who declined to be interviewed or did not respond to CPP’s inquiry at all included the North Carolina Victim Assistance Network, the LGBTQ Center of Durham and Help, Incorporated: Center Against Violence.
Each of those organizations received federal funding last year that originated from the U.S. Department of Justice and was intended to fund programs to support victims of domestic violence and other violent crime.
The strategy for many nonprofits has been to not attract attention in the hopes that they can continue to operate without much trouble.
Other organizations, such as the United Arts Council of Raleigh and Wake County (United Arts), have already seen their federal grants become threatened.
United Arts works closely with Wake County Public Schools to provide students with creative arts experiences, and the organization also awards annual subgrants to local artists to support their projects.
The National Endowment for the Arts recently awarded United Arts a $50,000 grant for distributionto local artists, but that award is now “under review,” United Arts CEO Jenn McEwen announced in February.
“The odds of our NEA grant being rejected in the review process is high,” McEwen said.
In order to offset that potential loss, United Arts urged its supporters for donations.
“Beyond our organization, many of our grantees — small nonprofit arts organizations — are already facing difficult financial decisions,” United Arts public relations manager John Craven told CPP in an email. “Some are scaling back on programs that support their mission but are not central to their signature or flagship offerings as they navigate the uncertainty around federal, state and local funding.
“The combined pressures of this funding uncertainty and economic instability are making it increasingly difficult for these organizations to plan for the future.”
Counting the costs for nonprofits
There are around 10,000 nonprofit organizations in North Carolina. A recent analysis from the nonprofit research center Candid found that 9,946 organizations filed a full 990 tax form at least once between 2021 and 2023.
Of those organizations, just over one third reported receiving at least one government grant in their most recent tax filing.
All in all, North Carolina nonprofits received more than $7 billion from the government through grants.
The Urban Institute, a think tank based in Washington, D.C., further analyzed nonprofit grant data and broke it down at the county level. Researchers found that the organizations in rural regions of the state benefit most from government funding.
The analysis further indicated that nonprofits in rural counties such as Anson, Jones and Northampton would have the biggest financial gap to fill if the Trump administration cost them government grants.
All of the nonprofits in eight North Carolina counties — Anson, Gates, Martin, Montgomery, Perquimans, Person, Sampson and Stokes — would have operating deficits if their government grants were taken away. That’s 46 nonprofits in all.
In 98 of North Carolina’s 100 counties, at least half of the nonprofits would experience an operating deficit if not for their government funding.
As far as subsectors go, the financial uncertainty that comes with the potential loss of government funding is indiscriminate. The Urban Institute found that 75% of education nonprofits, 73% of human services nonprofits and 64% of arts nonprofits in the state would operate in the red without their government grants.
Hospitals and nonprofits related to religion and the environment had the smallest share of organizations reliant on government funding, although that number was still north of 40%.
A ‘fluid’ situation
Although nonprofits are preparing to potentially lose grant money from the Trump funding freeze, that hasn’t been the reality yet.
Two of North Carolina’s most important pass-through funding agencies — the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Public Safety — told CPP they’ve made all scheduled payments to subgrant recipients this year.
Both award millions of dollars worth of subgrants to nonprofits across the state each year.
A spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services said that the agency had experienced unexpected delays to some federal payouts, although they were eventually received.
“There have been instances when payments were unexpectedly delayed as well as isolated payments that were under review by federal counterparts for a short period of time,” the spokeswoman said.
The Health and Human Services grants that were put under federal review included money intended to support mental health services and substance-abuse treatments.
At the same time, neither agency denied that they experienced complications related to the federal funding freeze.
“Presently, (the Department of Public Safety) is not having difficulty accessing funding,” a spokeswoman told CPP in an email last week. “The situation is fluid, and we will continue to monitor our ability to drawdown our federal reimbursements and adjust or modify our operations as necessary.”
SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.
James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.
SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00
North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.
(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.
Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.
Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”
Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.
Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.
Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”
Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”
House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.