Connect with us

The Center Square

Texas leads 19-state coalition challenging green energy transition mandate | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – 2024-06-18 09:24:00

(The Center Square) – Texas is leading a 19-state coalition challenging a federal agency requiring states to implement a “green energy” transition.

The states filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in response to a rule it passed to advance unprecedented federal control over the U.S. electric grid. Currently, state regulatory bodies determine the most efficient mix of energy sources for their states. FERC’s new rule appears to be an unfunded mandate, requiring states to implement “green energy” electricity generation and cover the costs to transition to it.

Texas, which maintains its own electric grid, filed the complaint, leading a 19-state coalition. It argues FERC’s rule exceeds its authority, is arbitrary and capricious and creates an “unjust, unreasonable, and/or unduly discriminatory rates” that violate the Federal Power Act.

The rule is “not supported by reasoned decision-making or explanation and runs counter to the evidence,” the 48-page brief states. FERC issued the rule “attempting to do indirectly what it cannot do directly: usurp the States’ exclusive authority over generation choices by adopting planning rules designed to benefit remote renewable generation and renewable developers, and shift billions or trillions of dollars in transmission costs from those developers onto electric consumers,” the coalition argues.

The coalition includes Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and Utah.

At issue is the FERC’s May 13, 2024, Order No. 1920, which states, “there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion that the existing regional transmission planning and cost allocation processes are unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory or preferential because the Commission’s existing transmission planning and cost allocation requirements do not require transmission providers to: (1) perform a sufficiently long-term assessment of transmission needs that identifies Long-Term Transmission Needs; (2) adequately account on a forward looking basis for known determinants of Long-Term Transmission Needs; and (3) consider the broader set of benefits of regional transmission facilities planned to meet those Long-Term Transmission Needs.”

The order requires states to cover the costs of transitioning regional transmission lines to support “green energy” generation even when doing so doesn’t support the state’s energy needs and would decrease grid efficiency and reliability, the coalition argues.

In Texas, for example, the regulatory body overseeing the state’s grid, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), has repeatedly pointed out that wind and solar power cannot meet energy demands but natural gas does. As temperatures hovered for months at 120 degrees last year, ERCOT issued voluntary conservation appeals while also publishing data showing that low wind generation could not provide a sufficient energy supply. Texas is the world’s fifth largest generator of wind power and leads the U.S. in generating wind energy.

Recognizing the need for reliable non-intermittent energy sources, the Texas legislature, and the majority of voters, approved a plan to invest $5 billion in constructing mostly natural gas infrastructure to expand Texas’ energy grid reliability. The new program has received an “overwhelming response,” state officials said. By contrast, zero bids were received in Texas in response to federal offshore auctions for roughly 200,000 acres of wind energy leases in the Gulf of Mexico. Despite this, the Biden administration is again attempting to auction a second round of offshore wind leases in the Gulf.

The Texas General Land Office has opposed such efforts, refusing to grant any easement to access state-owned submerged land for transmission lines to shore, arguing it’s not in Texas’ best interest. GLO Commissioner Dawn Buckingham said, “The Biden Administration appears hellbent on force-feeding Americans failed ‘green’ policies” and she will “never allow the federal government to endanger the people of Texas and our state’s beautiful wildlife with untested, unproven, and ineffective technology when reliable, clean, and safe energy is already available,” referring to Texas-produced natural gas.

Texas leads the U.S. in natural gas production and Texas and Louisiana lead the U.S. in liquified natural gas exports, The Center Square has reported.

The 19-state coalition argues, “FERC has never been granted the authority to revamp the structure of state energy grids or force states and their ratepayers to subsidize large-scale transmission lines that don’t transport enough energy to justify the cost. This encroachment upon state authority far exceeds FERC’s limited purview and damages the ability of states to regulate their electric grids efficiently, all in the name of advancing costly climate goals.”

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the president’s “attempt to seize unprecedented control over energy production and distribution is a recipe for disaster.” The AGs joined together “to stop his unlawful ‘energy transition’ scheme that would drive up energy costs and reduce reliability of the resources our nation needs most to flourish.”

They did so after the former Louisiana attorney general and now governor, Jeff Landry, led a gubernatorial coalition to “unleash domestic energy production.”

“American energy has done more than any other industry to lift more people out of poverty globally than any other industry that I’ve known of,” Landry said.

Read More

The post Texas leads 19-state coalition challenging green energy transition mandate | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

White House shrugs off Harris’ speech attacking Trump | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Dave Mason – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-01 14:46:00

(The Center Square) – The White House responded indifferently Thursday morning after former Vice President Kamala Harris blasted President Donald Trump in her first major speech since she left office.

“I think I speak for everyone at the White House. We encourage Kamala Harris to continue going out and do speaking engagements,” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said before ending a press conference.

White House Communications Director Steven Cheung went a step further and called Harris “a failed loser desperately clinging to relevance as she spirals into the political abyss” on X.

The White House’s comments came a day after Harris’ speech Wednesday evening at a ballroom at the Palace Hotel in downtown San Francisco. 

Supporters of Harris’ failed bid to win the White House in 2024 said they saw reasons to be encouraged after the former vice president’s speech before Emerge America, an organization training female Democratic candidates. 

“A lot of people have been feeling down, they’ve been feeling like what’s the future for women,” said Aimee Allison with She the People. 

“Our rights. Our power. Our leadership. Her very presence here is telling us it’s not over yet,” Allison told CBS News Bay Area.

Harris gave no hint on whether she plans to run for California governor in 2026 or again for president in 2028 as various Democratic candidates for governor listened to her from their front row seats. One gubernatorial candidate, former U.S. Rep. Katie Porter, accompanied Harris to the stage at the gala for Emerge America, an organization training female Democratic candidates.

Harris used her speech before a crowd of about 500 people to criticize Trump, accusing him of an unconstitutional grab for power and warning of a “constitutional crisis” if the legislative and judicial branches fail to keep the Republican president in check. She accused Trump of defying court orders and trying to bully people into submission.

And Harris condemned the president’s tariffs, warning they would bring a recession. 

Harris praised U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-New Jersey, for his 25-hour Senate speech criticizing the Trump administration and other prominent Democrats who have opposed the president.

“Please always remember this country is ours,” Harris told her audience. “It doesn’t belong to whoever is in the White House. It belongs to you.”

Harris said Trump and other Republicans are counting on creating a chilling effect by making people afraid, but noted, “Courage is contagious.”

The post White House shrugs off Harris’ speech attacking Trump | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article primarily reports on the political actions and statements of former Vice President Kamala Harris and the White House response, presenting both sides’ remarks. However, the language used to describe the White House Communications Director’s comment (“a failed loser desperately clinging to relevance”) is quoted directly but highlighted prominently, which may evoke a negative tone toward the Trump administration. The coverage of Harris’ speech emphasizes her critiques of Trump and her encouragement to supporters, using phrases that frame her criticisms and messages in a somewhat favorable light. Overall, the article leans slightly center-left by focusing more on Harris’ perspective and framing the Trump side comments as combative and dismissive, though it still includes direct quotes from both parties without overt editorializing.

Continue Reading

News from the South - South Carolina News Feed

Analysis: Tax filers to pay an average $2,319 more if 2017 legislation expires | South Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-01 12:44:00

(The Center Square) – Taxpayers in South Carolina will face an average tax increase of $2,319 if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expires at the end of the year, says the National Taxpayers Union Foundation.

Results of analysis were released Thursday morning by the nonprofit organization billing itself a “nonpartisan research and educational affiliate of the National Taxpayers Union.” Its two state neighbors were similar: North Carolina ($2,382) and Georgia ($2,680) were each a tick higher.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of eight years ago was a significant update to individual and business taxes in the federal tax code. According to the Tax Foundation, it was considered pro-growth reform with an estimate to reduce federal revenue by $1.47 trillion over a decade.

Should no action be taken before Jan. 1 and the act expire, the federal standard deduction would be halved; the federal child tax credit would decrease; higher federal tax brackets would return; the federal estate tax threshold will be lower; and some business tax benefits will be gone.

The foundation says South Carolina does not adopt full expensing of business investments. Lawmakers could adopt 100% expensing regardless of federal renewal.

An option is also available to avoid state tax increases even though the federal taxable income starting point is automatic with federal tax exclusion, exemption or deduction. To do so, the state could continue current policy on the standard deduction or Section 199A.

The state standard deduction would be significantly reduced if the expanded federal standard deduction expires. The foundation says the Legislature could combat it by “establishing that the standard deduction in their state is the larger of federal law or the inflation-adjusted amount from this year.”

The National Taxpayers Union Foundation also says lawmakers “should at least be conscious of any retroactive provisions when selecting their date of fixed conformity.” South Carolina is among 21 states conforming to the federal income tax base “only as of a certain date” rather than automatically matching federal tax code changes – meaning definitions, calculations or rules.

The foundation said nationally the average filer will see taxes raised $2,955. It estimates an increase for 62% of Americans. The biggest average increases by state are in Massachusetts ($4,848), Washington ($4,567) and Wyoming ($4,493) and the lowest are in West Virginia ($1,423), Mississippi ($1,570) and Kentucky ($1,715).

Individual wages, nationally, are expected to go down 0.5%, reducing economic growth by 1.1% over 10 years.






The post Analysis: Tax filers to pay an average $2,319 more if 2017 legislation expires | South Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on the potential tax increases if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expires, citing analysis from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, which is described as a nonpartisan research organization but is known for advocating lower taxes and limited government intervention—positions typically aligned with center-right economic policies. The tone is factual and focused on the financial implications of the tax law expiration, without overtly endorsing a political viewpoint. However, the emphasis on the negative consequences of letting the tax cuts expire and the positive framing of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (noted as “pro-growth reform”) subtly reflects a center-right economic perspective that favors tax cuts and limited taxation. The language is neutral in presentation but leans toward a fiscal conservative viewpoint by highlighting the cost increases and suggesting legislative action to mitigate tax hikes.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Tennessee News Feed

Report warns of bigger tax burden if 2017 federal cuts expire | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-01 11:41:00

(The Center Square) – Tennessee residents could have an additional $2,660 tax burden if the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expires, according to a study by the National Taxpayers Union Foundation.

The report’s authors recommend that Tennessee officials look at protecting tax code elements included in the 2017 bill in case Congress does not extend the cuts before the Jan. 1 deadline. Tennessee follows the federal tax code.

The state’s net operating loss policies, which are “less generous” than the federal, should also be reconsidered, the report said.

Tennessee’s potential tax burden if the cuts expire is second only to Georgia at $2,680 among the Volunteer State’s neighbors. Mississippi would have the least impact of the states surrounding Tennessee at $1,570 per taxpayer, according to the report.

More than 80% of Americans could see higher taxes, the organization said in its report.

“The standard deduction used by over 90% of taxpayers will be cut in half,” the report said. “The $2,000 child tax credit will fall to $1,000 and will be phased out for more taxpayers. Higher tax brackets will kick back in, as will a lower estate tax threshold.”

A letter sent to U.S. Rep. David Schweikert, R-Ariz., from the Congressional Budget Office shows the tax cuts could add $37 trillion over the next 30 years, according to previous reporting by The Center Square.

The nonprofit Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said in a March report the cuts could hurt the economy in the long run.

“While CBO finds the TCJA extensions would boost output over the next decade, they find that the higher debt load from deficit-financed extension would negatively impact the economy over the long run while also pushing up interest costs,” it said. “By FY 2054, CBO estimates that GDP would be 1.8% smaller and the average interest rate on federal debt would be 29 basis points higher relative to its baseline scenario.”

The National Taxpayers Union Foundation presented another scenario where an increase in business taxes would also cause the GDP to decrease if the tax cuts expire.

“On the business side, investment in new equipment will be literally taxed through reduced expensing, internationally-sourced income will face higher rates, and the Section 199A deduction used by 25 million small businesses will go away,” the report from the foundation said. “All told, taxes will increase by $500 billion a year, with an economic impact enough to reduce wages by 0.5% and Gross Domestic Product by 1.1%.

Taxpayers in other regions would be impacted more than those in the South, according to the report. Massachusetts is the most affected, with a $4,848 tax increase, followed by Washington ($4,567) and California ($3,768).

The post Report warns of bigger tax burden if 2017 federal cuts expire | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the potential consequences of the expiration of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, citing analyses and recommendations from the National Taxpayers Union Foundation, a known conservative-leaning organization. The language and framing emphasize the financial burden on taxpayers and the importance of protecting tax cuts, reflecting a perspective that aligns with fiscally conservative viewpoints favoring lower taxes. Although it includes counterpoints referencing the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which notes potential long-term economic risks, the overall presentation leans toward advocating for the continuation of tax cuts, suggesting a Center-Right bias rather than purely neutral reporting.

Continue Reading

Trending