News from the South - Texas News Feed
Texas House moves to limit kids’ access to sexually explicit library books
“After a sometimes graphic debate, Texas House advances bill limiting kids’ access to sexually explicit books in libraries” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
A debate in the Texas House over whether to limit children’s access to books with sexually explicit material in libraries turned heated and philosophical Friday: What’s the definition of sexual conduct? How should teens learn about sex? Are classics like The Bluest Eye and Madame Bovary explicit?
“This is a simple bill intended to protect our Texas kids,” Rep. Daniel Alders, R-Tyler and author of House Bill 3225, said on Friday. “This bill addresses a real issue that we have seen in our public libraries across the state, and it does so in a way that is reasonable as well as effective. It’s not a complicated bill. It shouldn’t be controversial.”
Nearly two hours of debate following the bill’s layout stood to differ.
Democrats lined up one after another, offering numerous amendments and rebuttals to argue that the bill was too sweeping and would restrict teenagers from accessing books that could help them make sense of typical teenage tribulations — from puberty and relationships to sex and masturbation.
“You are conflating sexually explicit or dangerous conduct with basic health information for puberty, which hits people in their early teen years,” Rep. Ann Johnson, D-Houston, said in opposition to the proposal.
House Bill 3225 would require public libraries to require parental consent for anyone under 18 to check out books deemed to contain “sexually explicit” material. The bill defines such material as depicting “sexual conduct,” which includes “actual or simulated sexual intercourse,” “masturbation,” and “sado-masochistic abuse.”
The bill allows for a civil penalty up to $10,000 to be imposed on libraries that do not comply, and it tasks the Texas State Library and Archives Commission with establishing guidelines for libraries to annually review their collections.
The House preliminarily passed the bill, 82 to 53, on a largely party line vote. The measure is part of a broader effort by state leaders to more tightly control the books put in public libraries and remove sexually explicit literature. Critics have argued the efforts target books that explore themes of gender and sexuality, and that center LGBTQ characters and people of color.
After one more vote in the House, usually a formality, the bill will move on to the Senate.
Books that could fall under the bill’s definition of “sexually explicit” include classics and common high school reading including Wuthering Heights, The Lord of the Rings, As I Lay Dying and Catch-22, Rep. Erin Zwiener, D-Driftwood, said. (The bill maintains an exception for “religious materials.”)
She emphasized the value of teens reading and engaging with stories that covered topics like puberty and sex, and argued that public libraries were a preferable site to social media for teens to learn about those topics.
“It is actually incredibly valuable for our young people to have the opportunity to enter the lives and experiences of others, to figure out how they feel about some of these things,” Zwiener said. “Reading a book about another 16-year-old who is making a decision about whether or not to have sex helps that minor who’s reading that book make a good decision.”
She offered an amendment to lower the bill’s age restrictions to apply only to those under 13 years old. Lawmakers rejected the amendment, 86 to 58.
“We all know that the five-year-old and the 17-year-old are very different,” Zwiener said. “Teenagers have a different experience. They need access to different information. Being minors does not prevent them from potentially ending up in a sexual situation.”
Republicans said that the bill would not regulate the kinds of information young people could access, and simply seeks to give that ability to parents. More importantly, they argued, the bill would protect children from unwittingly encountering explicit material.
“It’s important that we protect our kids in the state of Texas and ensure that they can access the books in their public library for their benefit, for their good,” Alders said, “and are not confronted unknowingly with material that is going to potentially traumatize them for the rest of their life.”
Democrats said they agreed that children should be protected from pornographic material, and noted that it is already illegal to share pornography with minors.
But the bill, they argued, was misguided and overly broad. And they worried it could functionally lead public libraries to deny teens access to any book outside the children’s section.
“The over sexualization of children is a problem — but it ain’t happening in your public libraries,” Johnson said, adding that she felt like she was in the movie, “Footloose.”
Libraries are “a healthy place of education,” she said. “And for all these parents that always say, ‘I don’t want my kid to get access to this information,’ — I promise you, they are getting access to the information. And the ones you should not be afraid of are the books that are in your public library.”
The debate itself grew personal and graphic at times, with Johnson pressing Alders on the definitions of “sexual bestiality” and “sado-masochistic abuse,” and on when he, as a teenage boy decades ago, first learned about masturbation.
“Masturbation. Do we know about it?” Johnson said. Alders denied that it was a tenant of standard health education.
“Masturbation is not basic teenage health? Do you really, as a young man, want to describe to me when you had to learn about that?” Johnson said. “I would bet, at some point, you as a young man needed to have the discussion with somebody about what masturbation meant.”
“That’s not a question I expected to be asked on the House floor,” Alders said.
Zwiener, advocating for her amendment lowering the age restriction to those under 13, shared that she was sexually assaulted at 17 years old — and reflected on the difference a book mirroring her experience could have made.
“The right book might have helped me figure out that I didn’t make a mistake — that somebody wronged me — much earlier,” she said. She highlighted a scene in The Perks of Being A Wallflower, a young adult novel, in which a young man witnesses a sexual assault at a party and understands that something wrong is happening.
“That’s a scene that encourages our teenagers to intervene if they see sexual assault occurring,” she said. “It is a scene that encourages teenagers to be mindful of consent when they’re in situations with each other, and it’s a scene that helps victims of sexual assault understand it’s not their fault. Our teenagers should have access to books that help them learn those lessons, regardless of whether or not their parent will sign a permission slip.”
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/09/texas-house-children-library-explicit-material/.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
The post Texas House moves to limit kids’ access to sexually explicit library books appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a balanced view of a contentious political issue involving a bill to restrict access to sexually explicit material in Texas public libraries. It fairly highlights arguments from both Republican supporters emphasizing child protection and parental control, and Democratic opponents concerned about overreach and the importance of access to educational material for teens. The coverage appears neutral, providing context and direct quotes from both sides without evident editorializing or a slant toward either viewpoint.
News from the South - Texas News Feed
Gunfire kills 2, injures 17 at Minneapolis school
SUMMARY: A gunman in his 20s opened fire outside the Annunciation Roman Catholic Church in Minneapolis during morning mass, targeting children attending the first week of school. Armed with a handgun, shotgun, and rifle, he fired multiple shots through the church windows, killing two children aged eight and ten and injuring 17 others, including 14 children, two critically. The shooter then took his own life. Minneapolis officials condemned the deliberate act of violence, expressing deep sorrow and urging community support for the grieving families. Police continue investigating the motive, noting the shooter had no criminal history or known connection to the church or school.
A gunman armed with three weapons opened fire on Catholic school students on Wednesday morning as they celebrated mass at Annunciation Church in Minneapolis, MN. Two children were killed and 17 others were injured. The gunman also died.
Subscribe to FOX 4: https://www.youtube.com/fox4news?sub_confirmation=1
Dallas news, weather, sports and traffic from KDFW FOX 4, serving Dallas-Fort Worth, North Texas and the state of Texas.
Download the FOX LOCAL app: fox4news.com/foxlocal
Watch FOX 4 Live: https://www.fox4news.com/live
Download the FOX 4 News App: https://www.fox4news.com/apps
Download the FOX 4 WAPP: https://www.fox4news.com/apps
Follow FOX 4 on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Fox4DFW/
Follow FOX 4 on Twitter: https://twitter.com/FOX4
Follow FOX 4 on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fox4news/
Subscribe to the FOX 4 newsletter: https://www.fox4news.com/newsletters
News from the South - Texas News Feed
Austin’s Mama Duke advances to AGT finals after getting Golden Buzzer
SUMMARY: Austin-based singer and rapper Mama Duke impressed judges and audiences on America’s Got Talent Season 20. During the live Quarterfinals, judge Mel B slammed the Golden Buzzer for Mama Duke’s original song “The Mama Duke Show,” sending her directly to the finale and bypassing semifinals. Mel B praised her talent, comparing her potential to Missy Elliott. Other judges, including Simon Cowell and Sofía Vergara, also lauded her authenticity and unique style. Mama Duke gained popularity after her audition song “Feels So Good To Be You” charted on iTunes. The finale will air on September 23, with viewers voting to decide the winner.
Read the full article
The post Austin's Mama Duke advances to AGT finals after getting Golden Buzzer appeared first on www.kxan.com
News from the South - Texas News Feed
West Texas Congressman’s ‘Big Beautiful’ Cuts Could Harm Rural Hospitals in His District
Since it was signed into law on July 4, West Texas Republican Congressman Jodey Arrington has been broadly praised by allies for his stewardship of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson called Arrington, who chairs the powerful House Budget Committee, “one of the most effective and consequential members of Congress.” And Arrington has wasted no time touting his victory in West Texas, proclaiming it to be a “game changer for Rural America” and “a big beautiful win for West Texas.” He’s argued the so-called entitlement cuts to Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will “root out waste and fraud.”
But many of his constituents in Congressional District 19—a vast, deeply red rural district that includes over 30 counties—stand to lose access to both their healthcare and their local hospitals under the massive tax-and-spending bill, which will slash Medicaid and ACA spending by more than $1 trillion and knock 10 million more people off of insurance nationwide over the next 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates. Arrington’s district is home to more rural hospitals than any other in Texas, and roughly a quarter of those are at risk of closing under the new law, according to a recent study. Six of the 25 hospitals in the 19th are at risk of closing, according to a June study by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina. Using data from 2020 to 2022, the study defined at-risk rural hospitals as those with three consecutive years operating with a negative profit margin or those which receive a disproportionately large share of revenue from Medicaid.
Losses to rural hospitals from changes to Medicaid funding under the new law may be blunted by a $50 billion rural health fund that was added as a last-minute concession to rural members. The National Rural Health Association projected that the major hit Texas rural hospitals would take under the new law would shrink from an estimated loss of $1.2 billion to $407 million after the rural fund is applied over the next five years. But both the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and state governments will have wide latitude on how to use the funding.
That’s left rural hospital administrators in Arrington’s district uncertain about the future of their facilities—and how the new law will affect them. Dennis Fleenor, the leader of the hospital in Muleshoe in Arrington’s district, has concerns. “By the time CMS and the state and everybody else get their fingers in that small slice of pie,” Fleenor said, rural hospitals like the one he runs may not get much money from the rural health fund.
Arrington did not respond to the Observer’s questions about the healthcare impact residents and hospitals in his district may face under the OBBBA. Arrington has served as the district’s representative since 2017 after a career that included working for a private healthcare company, for Texas Tech University, and as an aide for George W. Bush in the Texas Governor’s Office and the White House. Arrington has served as chairman of the House Budget Committee, one of the most influential positions in Congress, since 2023. He’s also served on the House’s Rural and Underserved Communities Health Task Force since 2019.
The 19th Congressional District hugs the New Mexico border on the west and crosses central West Texas past Abilene to the east. Anchored by Lubbock and Abilene, the district is largely rural, featuring 17 million acres of farmland that produce a fifth of the state’s total agricultural sales and more cotton than any other district in the country. It’s also mostly white and deeply conservative. Around 15 percent of the district’s residents are uninsured, according to 2023 census figures, which is nearly on par with the statewide rate—the highest in the nation. Many residents in Arrington’s district rely on public healthcare: 131,000 or 18 percent of the district population are enrolled in Medicaid. Statewide, 16 percent of residents are enrolled.
Ten percent of the district’s population is enrolled through the ACA marketplace, lower than the state’s 15-percent rate, according to a study by the health research and policy organization KFF. The tax-and-spending bill doesn’t extend ACA tax credits that expire at the end of the year and thus will cause insurance premiums to surge for the vast majority of current enrollees. KFF estimates the removal of the tax credits and added hurdles to enroll in the ACA could cause 1.7 million Texans to lose ACA coverage.
Because Texas never expanded Medicaid under the ACA, the state will not have to impose work requirements on Texas’ Medicaid patients or reduce its provider tax rate, which will be a requirement under the new law starting in 2027. However, the OBBBA did freeze the provider tax rates states use to finance Medicaid on July 4, making it more difficult for states to increase their own funding for the program.
Dr. Adrian Billings, a longtime West Texas community physician and associate dean of the Rural and Community Engagement Division at Lubbock’s Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, said that hospitals are required by law to provide emergency care to patients regardless of whether they can pay. But unlike urban hospitals that serve a higher volume of patients and can better afford to offset the costs of treating uninsured patients, increases in uninsured rates can quickly dig rural hospitals into bigger financial holes.
“It is harder for a rural hospital to absorb when somebody without insurance shows up in the emergency room or needs to be hospitalized,” Billings said. “There’s just not much fluff at all left in a rural hospital’s margins to suffer any significant hit to their collection.”
The Mitchell County Hospital District serves the county of nearly 9,000 in the southern area of Arrington’s district, situated between Big Spring and Sweetwater. CEO Michelle Gafford told the Observer that the county hospital projected to lose about $700,000 in Medicaid funding, or roughly 3 percent of its 2026 fiscal year budget. “The cuts are going to hurt everybody, but they are not as crucial as they once would have been,” Gafford said, since the hospital’s share of Medicaid patients has steadily transferred to privately run managed care organizations. In the 13 years Gafford has worked at the hospital, it’s made a profit in only one year. The hospital is designated as a critical-access hospital, which allows it to receive Medicare reimbursements at roughly the same amount of the cost of services. However, other insurers, particularly Medicare Advantage and other private insurers, routinely underpay or deny coverage for services, leaving rural hospitals like the Mitchell County Hospital District persistently in a financial hole.
More recent data gathered and analyzed by the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform shows that 11 rural hospitals in Arrington’s district now have had a negative total margin in the most recent three consecutive years with available data—representing over half of the 19 total such hospitals in the state. According to that data, three hospitals in the district have 20 percent or more of the hospital’s patient costs associated with Medicaid services. That includes the Muleshoe Area Medical Center.
Since the 1980s, the Muleshoe-area hospital, located in the sparse western Panhandle near the New Mexico border, has gone through its ups and downs as its owners changed from one group to another. According to the hospital’s website, after one national company bankrupted the hospital in 1987, a Muleshoe physician named Bruce Purdy kept it running by seeing patients, cleaning its bathrooms, repairing the facilities, and even sleeping in his clinic to attend to late-night emergencies. Dennis Fleenor, a Lubbock transplant, now runs the critical-access hospital on a shoestring budget. “It’s a struggle everyday. But we’re here to take care of our community, and we will take care of our community whatever challenges we face,” he told the Observer. But he said that Congress can go a long way to help rural hospitals by making insurers fully reimburse hospitals for patient service costs. Even though the hospital reported an average of 20 percent of the hospital’s patient service costs over the last two years were related to services for Medicaid patients, Medicaid paid the hospital for only 18 percent of those costs.
Between 2005 and 2025, 25 rural hospitals in Texas have closed, the most of any state, according to the center’s analysis. In CD-19, two rural hospitals closed during that time and at least six of the district’s 30 counties in the district already lack hospitals. In Jones County, north of Abilene, there once were three hospitals. In 2018, Stamford Memorial Hospital closed because it didn’t have enough in-patients. The following year, nearby Hamlin Memorial Hospital closed, leaving only its medical clinic and emergency medical services open. By 2023, Anson General Hospital was hanging by a thread with $1.9 million in outstanding debt. At that point, its board decided to convert the facility to a “rural emergency hospital.” That federal designation was established under a 2021 law that Arrington helped spearhead as a last resort for rural hospitals; in order to qualify for federal grants, those facilities must eliminate in-patient services. Texas now has five Rural Emergency Hospitals statewide; two, Anson General Hospital and Crosbyton Clinic Hospital, are in Arrington’s district.
Vance Boyd, an Anson-based cattleman, pro bull rider, and general contractor, told the Observer he remembers when Anson General Hospital was “thriving, productive, and employed a lot of people.” But he said it’s now “a triage center to get you to a bigger market.” As a cancer survivor, he travels roughly 24 miles to Abilene to see his doctor. “If you’re having a health emergency in a more remote area, you’re pretty much on a dice roll whether you’re going to make it,” Boyd said.
Gaines County, which borders New Mexico, was the epicenter of Texas’ recent measles outbreak. Since January, the outbreak led to 762 cases, 99 hospitalizations, and two deaths statewide, according to the Texas Health and Human Services. Eighty-one percent of the cases occurred in counties within Arrington’s district. Cash-strapped county hospitals with crumbling infrastructure in the surrounding area lacked the space to test for measles or beds to treat patients, the Texas Tribune reported.
Frustrated with the healthcare system, the “death spiral” of rural hospitals, and “AWOL” politicians, Boyd, a conservative Republican, ran against Arrington unsuccessfully in the 2020 and 2024 GOP primaries. His campaign centered, in part, around the need to expand Medicaid in Texas.
“When you live in an area where the average income is low and many are on some sort of government assistance, to expect everybody to have a premium healthcare plan is not realistic,” Boyd said. “I feel like our representative didn’t fight for us.”
Arrington, meanwhile, has his sights set on even further cuts to Medicaid. In mid-July, less than two weeks after he helped pass the OBBBA, Arrington told Bloomberg News that he would be seeking to pass deeper cuts to Medicaid, along with Medicare cuts that he had tried and failed to get locked into the Big Beautiful Bill. Among Arrington’s goals for a budget bill sequel this fall are to cut the federal reimbursement rate to penalize states that expanded Medicaid coverage under the ACA and reduce Medicare reimbursements to hospitals by paying the same rate regardless of the provider.
“I think we will do one before the end of the year,” Arrington told Bloomberg News. “It’s going to be a more targeted set of reforms.”
The post West Texas Congressman’s ‘Big Beautiful’ Cuts Could Harm Rural Hospitals in His District appeared first on www.texasobserver.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This content presents a critical perspective on a Republican congressman’s budget bill, emphasizing the negative impacts of Medicaid and ACA cuts on rural hospitals and vulnerable populations. While it acknowledges the congressman’s achievements and conservative district context, the overall tone highlights concerns about healthcare access and funding reductions, reflecting a viewpoint more aligned with center-left critiques of conservative fiscal policies.
-
News from the South - Arkansas News Feed6 days ago
New I-55 bridge between Arkansas, Tennessee named after region’s three ‘Kings’
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed4 days ago
DEA agents uncover 'torture chamber,' buried drugs and bones at Kentucky home
-
News from the South - Missouri News Feed6 days ago
Missouri settles lawsuit over prison isolation policies for people with HIV
-
News from the South - Louisiana News Feed7 days ago
Families with citizen children deported by ICE sue Trump administration
-
Our Mississippi Home6 days ago
Vardaman: The Sweet Potato Capital Serving Up Love, Tradition, and Flavor at Sweet Potato Sweets
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed7 days ago
Bookman: Here’s how Georgia’s 2020 election crisis will factor into 2026 GOP campaigns for governor
-
News from the South - Virginia News Feed6 days ago
Erin: Tropical storm force winds 600 miles wide eases into Atlantic | North Carolina
-
Local News6 days ago
Florida must stop expanding ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ immigration center, judge says