Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas bill would end in-state tuition for undocumented students

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Jessica Priest and Ayden Runnels – 2025-05-06 18:49:00



A Texas Senate bill, Senate Bill 1798, is advancing through the legislative process, which would eliminate in-state tuition eligibility for undocumented students, including those who have lived in the state for most of their lives. The bill would require those who were previously eligible for in-state tuition to pay the difference between in-state and out-of-state rates. Proponents argue that it saves taxpayer money, while opponents, including many undocumented students, contend that the bill undermines the contributions these students make to the state’s economy. This bill follows similar legislation in the House and would impose additional requirements on universities.

Texas Senate panel advances bill that would no longer allow undocumented students to pay in-state tuition” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


A bill that would make college less affordable for undocumented students, including those who have called the state their home for most of their lives, is advancing in the Texas Senate.

The Senate’s K-16 committee voted 9-2 on Tuesday to bring Senate Bill 1798 to the chamber’s floor for a full vote. It would eliminate undocumented students’ eligibility for in-state tuition and require those previously deemed eligible to pay the difference between in- and out-of-state tuition.

State Sen. Mayes Middleton, who authored the bill, said taxpayers are subsidizing higher education for people in the country illegally, which he estimated cost $150 million in the 2024-2025 academic year.

“These are funds that could have been used for lawful residents, perhaps even to lower tuition and fees,” Middleton said during an April 22 Senate education hearing when the bill was discussed.

The House is contemplating similar legislation. House Bill 232 by state Rep. Cody Vasut, R-Angleton, would require students 18 or older to provide proof that they had applied to become a permanent U.S. resident to be eligible for in-state tuition.

Both bills would also make the students liable for covering the difference between in- and out-of-state tuition should their school determine they had been misclassified or if their application for permanent residency in the U.S. is denied.

The Senate’s measure would go further by allowing universities to withhold a student’s diploma if they don’t pay the difference within 30 days of being notified and if the diploma has not already been granted.

The Senate bill also bars universities and colleges from using any state money on financial aid to help undocumented students, requires them to report students whom they believe have misrepresented their immigration status to the Attorney General’s Office, and ties their state funding to compliance with the law.

Groups that advocate for more restrictions on immigration have expressed support for the Senate’s bill.

“This dismantles one of the many incentive structures that help drive illegal immigration into our state. Certainly not the biggest incentive structure, but one of a plethora,” said Texans for Strong Borders president Chris Russo, who has connections to a white supremacist movement.

Many undocumented students spoke for hours in opposition to both the Senate and the House bills during testimony before lawmakers in recent weeks. They said investing in them has paid dividends for Texas.

Emiliano Valencia, who was brought to the U.S. when he was 2 years old, said paying in-state tuition and working as a bank teller made it possible for him to earn a bachelor’s degree in finance, start a restaurant and later a construction company in the state.

“Altogether, I’ve created over a hundred jobs,” he said. “I’m not an American by paper, but I am in my heart and in my work ethic.”

Out-of-state tuition is typically three times more expensive than in-state tuition.

In 2001, Texas became the first state to extend in-state tuition and grant eligibility to undocumented students. Twenty-three states now offer it, too, although Florida recently repealed its law.

As it stands, Texas law allows undocumented students to qualify for in-state tuition if they have lived in the state for three years before graduating from high school and for a year before enrolling in college. They must also sign an affidavit stating they will apply for legal resident status as soon as they can.

These so-called “affidavit students” accounted for only 1.5% of all students enrolled at Texas universities in 2023, said Luis Figueroa, chief of legislative affairs at the liberal think tank Every Texan.

Each new graduating class of “affidavit students” generates $461.3 million to the Texas economy per year, according to the American Immigration Council.

While efforts to eliminate in-state tuition for undocumented students have failed in the Texas Legislature in the past, these bills are concerning because they come at a time when the federal administration has made immigrants public enemy No. 1, said Faye Kolly with the American Immigration Lawyers Association.

Kolly submitted written testimony opposing the House’s version of the bill. While it doesn’t explicitly eliminate in-state tuition for undocumented students like the Senate’s version does, both bills would have that effect.

“Just because it gives a glimmer of hope doesn’t mean a vast majority of students are going to be able to meet that criteria,” she said.

Kolly said she included in her written testimony her assessment of a recent executive order from President Donald Trump.

Trump ordered “the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and appropriate agency heads,” to “identify and take appropriate action to stop the enforcement of state and local laws, regulations, policies and practices favoring aliens of any groups of American citizens.” Trump said this included state laws that provide in-state tuition to undocumented students.

Kolly thinks the 2001 Texas Dream Act does not conflict with federal law because it is tied to students’ residency, not their legal immigration status.

“Everyone in Texas qualifies under the same pathway for in-state tuition, and so there isn’t any discrimination against U.S. citizens, and oddly this bill, if it passes, because it does single out people based on their immigration status, might violate federal law,” she said.

Disclosure: Every Texan has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.


First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!


Correction, :

An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated Texas law allows undocumented students to qualify for in-state tuition if they have lived in the state for three years before graduating from high school or for a year before enrolling in college. Undocumented students qualify for the benefit only if they meet both criteria.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/06/texas-undocumented-immigrants-in-state-college-tuition/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Texas bill would end in-state tuition for undocumented students appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article discusses a bill in Texas aimed at removing in-state tuition eligibility for undocumented students, presenting both the proponents’ and opponents’ views. The language is neutral, presenting factual information about the bill’s progress and its potential impact. However, it emphasizes the economic contributions of undocumented students, citing statistics and personal testimony in favor of maintaining their tuition eligibility. The inclusion of voices from advocacy groups like the American Immigration Lawyers Association and the mention of the broader political context, including opposition to federal immigration actions, aligns more closely with a Center-Left viewpoint, particularly in its focus on the benefits of inclusion and the economic value of undocumented residents.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Trump delays mercury pollution rule, helps Texas power plants

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Elena Bruess, Capital & Main – 2025-08-27 05:00:00


Texas power plants and chemical companies benefit from President Donald Trump’s easing of Biden-era pollution regulations, experts say. The W.A. Parish Generating Station near Houston, a major mercury polluter, is among six Texas coal plants granted a two-year exemption from stricter Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS). Additionally, chemical companies received a two-year delay on the 2024 Hazardous Organic National Emission Standards (HON Rule). Critics argue these rollbacks prioritize industry profits over public health and may lead to permanent repeal of regulations. Environmentalists warn of increased toxic emissions affecting nearby communities, urging public action against the regulatory rollbacks.

Texas power plants and chemical companies benefit as Trump eases pollution rules, experts say” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


The nonprofit publication Capital & Main produced this article. It is co-published with permission.

For Donna Thomas, smokestacks are a typical sight from her home in Fort Bend County. Since she was a child, she has seen the coal and natural gas-powered W.A. Parish Generating Station puff clouds of haze during the day and light up brightly at night. The facility — which has been around since 1958 — is both part of the background and all she thinks about.

Thomas is not alone. For decades, residents have expressed concerns over the pollution emitted from the Parish coal plant — a separate facility from the natural gas plant — and called for its closure. The plant, located about 30 miles southwest of downtown Houston, is ranked by Texas environmental regulators as one of the worst polluters in the state for certain hazardous emissions. These include mercury, a toxic heavy metal particularly harmful for children and pregnant people.

This year, mercury has been top of mind for environmental activists and residents like Thomas. In April, President Donald Trump announced an exemption for companies from implementing stricter Biden-era mercury regulations for two years. Of the 163 eligible coal plants, 11 are in Texas and six have been approved, including Parish’s operator, NRG Energy. In Missouri and Illinois, five coal plants have been exempted, and in Pennsylvania, all 12 of the coal plants seeking approval have been approved.

Then in July, Trump exempted chemical companies for two years from Biden’s 2024 HON Rule, a set of regulations that control hazardous air emissions from chemical plants called the Hazardous Organic National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.

The Trump administration determined the exemptions are in the country’s best interest and represent a burden on industry, and that the technology is not available to meet stricter regulations. Companies like NRG agree.

However, critics say the Biden administration’s 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics Standards — called MATS for short — and the HON Rule were long overdue and the two-year delay in implementing them is merely a tactic to protect industry profit margins at the expense of public health.

Moreover, critics point out that the MATS delay may be giving companies the freedom to ignore toxic air emission rules until the Trump administration repeals the Biden-era regulations altogether. In June, the Environmental Protection Agency under Trump proposed a rule to eliminate the 2024 MATS rule completely.

The two rules together have set off alarm bells for experts and environmentalists in Texas, home to one of the world’s largest petrochemical sectors and 11 coal-powered plants. The exemptions will run from 2027 — when the Biden rules were supposed to take effect — to 2029.

“We know these rollbacks are not good for anyone, especially for those that are community fenceline,” said Thomas, also the founder and president of the Fort Bend Environmental — a grassroots organization focused on environmental justice. “We have around 1,000 homes within three miles of Parish, so that’s going to affect all of them.”

A two-year delay

The EPA has been working on stricter environmental regulations for chemical plants since the early 1990s. Only in 2020 did Biden’s EPA begin drafting new rules in earnest.

But owners of the chemical plants should not act so surprised, said Neil Carman, a former regulator for the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

“The chemical industry has known for decades that this was all coming, but they don’t like rules, because it means they have to put on more pollution control and they have to do more leak inspections,” said Carman, now the clean air director for the Texas chapter of the Sierra Club. “These plants will always tell you safety first, safety first, but then you run into this thing called money.”

Of the 79 chemical facilities in Texas requesting exemptions, 15 have been approved, including 13 along the Gulf Coast and the so-called petrochemical corridor.

Carman pointed out that the heads of chemical companies have been in talks with Trump’s EPA since the election. In March, the administration announced that companies could apply for exemption from MATS, HON and seven other sets of emissions standards.

That same month, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin met with Dow Inc. Chair-CEO Jim Fitterling to discuss regulations imposed by the Biden administration, according to public records and emails obtained by the Sierra Club.

In one email sent on March 17, Dow reps asked to discuss “clarity” on the EPA’s recent announcement that it will reconsider the HON rule and “Dow has met with the Office of Air and Radiation regarding an extension of the current compliance deadline, which is impossible to meet.”

In May, Zeldin met with Fitterling and other chemical company CEOs to discuss the industry at large. Then in July, Trump announced the exemptions for HON, including for two chemical plants in Louisiana and one in Seadrift, Texas, operated by Dow and its subsidiary Union Carbide.

In a statement to Capital & Main, a Dow spokesperson said that “safety and integrity are at the core of both companies’ operations” and the “extensions are appropriate and necessary to address the technical challenges and to ensure the continued safe and efficient operation of these facilities.”

Carman doesn’t buy it. He worked as an environmental regulator in Texas for 12 years. Even then, he said, companies never seemed to be able to find the budget to limit their emissions and chemical leaks. For him, it’s still the cost.

“A lot of these are old plants and so when they go in and do all this work,” Carman said, “they have to find a place where they’re going to put in new controls and they have to engineer it. They have to design it all. It’s months of planning, but these rules were out there. They knew they were coming. They just want two more years of delay.”

Limiting mercury

When the EPA implemented the 2012 MATS rule, mercury emissions dropped 86% — or four tons — in five years.

In 2024, Biden’s EPA approved a rule to strengthen MATS by tightening the emissions standards for mercury by another 70% and reducing pollutants discharged through wastewater from coal-fired plants by more than 660 million pounds per year.

The rule could prevent as many as 11,000 premature deaths, 2,800 cases of chronic bronchitis and 130,000 asthma attacks, according to the EPA under Biden.

However, in April, Trump approved the exemptions for 47 coal-powered plants across the nation. As of mid-August, 70 are now exempted, including Parish.

“These rules were just so critically important to people’s health,” said Surbhi Sarang, senior attorney for the Environmental Defense Fund. The Trump administration “was doing this process that was just not transparent. I mean, there was no process. Whereas in rulemaking, there’s public comment. This is just like a presidential action that was kind of taken in a vacuum and then announced.”

In response to the exemption, Erik Linden, senior director of communications at NRG, said the time is needed and will be used to evaluate the technology for air quality systems and monitoring equipment for compliance.

“All existing MATS emission controls will be properly maintained and remain in service,” Linden said of the current MATS rules that began in 2012. The exemption would give NRG until 2029 to implement the changes.

However, in July, Trump’s EPA proposed eliminating Biden’s rule entirely by the end of the year. Interested parties had three weeks to submit comments, and the Environmental Defense Fund’s request for an extension was denied.

“Rule-making usually takes 12-18 months if not longer,” Sarang said. “They’re moving very quickly.”

All of this is alarming for residents living near industry. With the extent of the changes to environmental regulations coming down from the Trump administration, there’s a lot for Thomas, the Parish generating station neighbor, to process. But she hasn’t given up. Increasingly, Thomas is talking to her neighbors and fellow residents about fighting back.

This means sending letters to representatives in Texas and in Washington, D.C. Thomas said it pays to be loud.

Parish is “going to do the same thing it’s been doing,” Thomas said. “If the EPA does not put a stop to these [emissions] getting out, then everyone is going to pay for this with their lives and in their water and in their air.”

Disclosure: Environmental Defense Fund and NRG Energy have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Copyright 2025 Capital & Main


More all-star speakers confirmed for The Texas Tribune Festival, Nov. 13–15! This year’s lineup just got even more exciting with the addition of State Rep. Caroline Fairly, R-Amarillo; former United States Attorney General Eric Holder; Abby Phillip, anchor of “CNN NewsNight”; Aaron Reitz, 2026 Republican candidate for Texas Attorney General; and State Rep. James Talarico, D-Austin. Get your tickets today!

TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/08/27/texas-trump-mercury-rule-mats-coal-power-plants-pollution/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Trump delays mercury pollution rule, helps Texas power plants appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content focuses on environmental regulations and critiques the Trump administration’s rollbacks of Biden-era pollution controls, emphasizing the potential public health risks and environmental justice concerns. It highlights the perspectives of environmental activists and regulatory experts who advocate for stricter pollution standards, while portraying industry and the Trump administration’s actions as prioritizing economic interests over health and safety. This framing aligns with a center-left viewpoint that supports stronger environmental protections and regulatory oversight.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

It's a love story: Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce announce engagement

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Addy Bink – 2025-08-26 12:17:00

SUMMARY: Taylor Swift and Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce are engaged, announcing it on Instagram with a photo of Kelce proposing in a garden and showcasing Swift’s dazzling “Old Mine brilliant cut” ring. The couple, both 35, began dating in 2023 after Kelce attended Swift’s Eras Tour. Despite early challenges, including Kelce’s unsuccessful attempt to give Swift a friendship bracelet with his number, their relationship blossomed. Swift has supported Kelce at numerous games, including two Super Bowls, while Kelce frequently attends her concerts. Their relationship has garnered massive media attention and was featured in ESPN’s documentary “The Kingdom.” Kelce’s parents praise their bond as genuine and deserving.

Read the full article

The post It's a love story: Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce announce engagement appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

We're excited for National Dog Day!

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KHOU 11 – 2025-08-26 07:44:49

SUMMARY: To celebrate National Dog Day, the studio welcomed three dogs: Mac, Sandy, and Leo. Sandy sports a playful lipstick kiss from Kim Castro, while lively one-year-old Leo kept everyone entertained. The dogs’ owners, also producers, shared that it’s usually breakfast, walk, or nap time for them. The studio enjoyed the furry therapy vibe and encouraged viewers to treat their dogs with special offers from PetSmart (buy one, get one 25% off on treats), Lazy Dog Restaurant and Bar (coupon with dog bowl and entree), and free Puppuccinos from Starbucks. Viewer-submitted dog photos added to the joyful celebration of our furry friends.

We had in-studio guests to help us celebrate.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending