News from the South - Texas News Feed
Texas bill allowing homes on smaller lots killed in House
“Texas House Democrat kills bill to allow smaller homes on smaller lots” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
A proposal to allow smaller homes on smaller lots in Texas cities — part of a slew of bills intended to tame the state’s high home prices and rents — died by a procedural move in the Texas House Sunday.
Senate Bill 15 — a top priority of Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who leads the Senate — would have reduced the amount of land cities require for single-family homes in new subdivisions. That would give homebuilders the flexibility to build smaller homes on less land, reducing the final cost of the home.
Some city officials as well as neighborhood activists who oppose new housing balked at the idea, arguing the proposal would be an undue incursion on cities’ ability to say what kinds of housing can be built and where.
The bill included narrow language designed to prevent it from taking effect within a mile of a police training center in Dallas County. Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., D-Fort Worth, raised the proposal to kill the bill, stating that language was out-of-bounds. The proposal was upheld, preventing the House from further discussing the bill.
Romero, a former member of Fort Worth’s city planning and zoning boards, said he wasn’t comfortable with the state weighing in on local rules that say how much land single-family homes must sit on. He also had concerns about whether homes allowed under the bill would create nuisances, such as runoff and traffic, for existing residents.
Romero, who owns a business that does residential masonry work, said he also wasn’t convinced that the bill would result in lower home prices, pointing to pricier homes built in recent years on smaller lots in Austin.
“It’s already been proven that just because you have smaller (homes) does not immediately equate to more affordable (homes),” Romero said in an interview. “So if the argument is that that’s what it is, then I’d say, show it to me.”
Allowing smaller homes on less land in Texas has generally been associated with lower home prices. Beginning in the late ‘90s, Houston reduced how much land the city requires single-family homes to sit on. Those reforms resulted in tens of thousands of new homes built on smaller lots, and housing advocates and researchers have credited that building boom with helping to keep the city’s home prices in check, especially when compared to other major U.S cities. Those homes tended to have lower values than traditional single-family homes on larger lots, research from New York University’s Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy shows.
State Rep. Gary Gates, a Richmond Republican who carried the bill in the House, said he’s looking for ways to resurrect the proposal.
For example, it’s possible the proposal could find new life by being attached to another bill. But doing so would be difficult given that the legislative session ends June 2.
The bill sought to reduce the ultimate cost of a home by reducing how much land homebuyers would be required to purchase. Building smaller homes on smaller lots would also allow more homes to be built overall — chipping away at the state’s housing shortage, a key driver of the state’s high housing costs, the bill’s proponents argued.
“When a single legislator kills a bill that would help Texans find an affordable place to live, it’s not just out of touch, it’s a slap in the face to hardworking families trying to stay afloat,” said Nicole Nosek, who chairs Texans for Reasonable Solutions, a group that has pushed several housing bills this session.
Major cities in Texas tend to require single-family homes to sit between 5,000 and 7,500 square feet of land, according to a Texas Tribune analysis. The bill would have barred cities from requiring homes in new subdivisions to sit on more than 1,400 square feet. That provision wouldn’t have applied in existing neighborhoods, and new subdivisions would have to sit on at least five acres of land.
Given higher home prices and high interest rates, reducing the amount of land is necessary to give would-be homebuyers a path to homeownership, Gates said.
“If you’re in a house that you bought a number of years ago, life looks good to you,” Gates said of the bill’s opponents. “We don’t live in that world anymore.”
The proposal is part of a package of GOP bills aimed at reining in the state’s high home prices and rents by allowing more homes to be built. Texas builds more homes than any other state but not enough to keep up with demand amid the state’s population boom.
The state needs 320,000 more homes than it has, according to an estimate by the housing advocacy group Up For Growth. As a result, home prices and rents have skyrocketed, housing advocates and experts say.
Lawmakers this year have advanced proposals aimed at reducing red tape and local regulations to let more homes be built. Legislators have pushed bills to allow apartments and mixed-use developments along retail and commercial corridors and additional dwelling units in the backyards of single-family homes.
They’ve also pushed legislation to make it harder for landowners to stop new homes from being built near them and to allow homebuilders to more quickly obtain city building permits. None of those bills has yet reached the governor’s desk.
House lawmakers are also expected to take up other housing affordability bills Sunday. Those bills aim to make it easier to convert vacant office buildings into residences and encourage the construction of smaller apartments. They also would bar cities from outlawing manufactured homes and relaxing rules in college towns that restrict how many unrelated adults can live in a home.
On Sunday, the Senate approved House Bill 24, a priority for House Speaker Dustin Burrows. It aims to make it more difficult for property owners to block new housing.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/25/texas-housing-costs-bills-tiny-homes-office-buildings-apartments/.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
The post Texas bill allowing homes on smaller lots killed in House appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Right
This article presents the issue of Texas housing legislation with a generally factual tone, focusing on the legislative process and the perspectives of key political actors, notably Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and GOP state Rep. Gary Gates, who support deregulation to increase housing supply. The coverage includes viewpoints of opponents, such as Democratic Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., and community concerns, maintaining a balanced presentation. The article highlights Republican efforts to ease restrictions as solutions to affordability and contrasts them with local government and activist resistance. Overall, the framing slightly favors the Republican legislative agenda by emphasizing market-based approaches and the urgency of addressing housing shortages.
News from the South - Texas News Feed
Mississippi girl goes viral for nailing 2000 rap classic at karaoke
SUMMARY: Nine-year-old Alaynna Doty of Olive Branch, Mississippi, became a viral sensation after performing Project Pat’s 2000 rap hit during karaoke at Crazy Cactus, a local Mexican restaurant. Known for singing country songs, this bold switch wowed the crowd and stunned the internet. Her mother posted the video to TikTok, quickly amassing over 4 million views and 130,000 comments. Even Project Pat shared it. Alaynna, surprised by her sudden fame, was praised for her confidence and stage presence. She hopes to perform in Nashville one day, but for now, she’s enjoying her moment as an internet star before returning to school.
The post Mississippi girl goes viral for nailing 2000 rap classic at karaoke appeared first on www.kxan.com
News from the South - Texas News Feed
Carp release in Lake Austin raises concern among local fisherman
SUMMARY: Austin plans to release 350 sterile grass carp into Lake Austin to control hydrilla, an invasive plant that disrupts recreation and navigation. While grass carp eat hydrilla, local fishermen oppose the move, fearing harm to the lake’s bass fishery by removing vital underwater vegetation. A prior effort from 2011–2013 released 32,000 carp, which devastated native plants. Officials stress the new, smaller-scale approach focuses only on the lake’s eastern section. Critics like fishing guide Carson Conklin argue alternative methods, such as aquatic mowing, are better solutions. Authorities hope to avoid past mistakes while managing hydrilla’s spread responsibly.
The post Carp release in Lake Austin raises concern among local fisherman appeared first on www.kxan.com
News from the South - Texas News Feed
1.7 million Texans could lose health care under ACA changes
“1.7 million Texans could lose health coverage under expiring tax credits, ACA changes in GOP megabill” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.
WASHINGTON — Up to 1.7 million Texans are expected to lose their health insurance through coming changes to the Affordable Care Act marketplace under Republicans’ tax and spending megabill, according to an analysis by health policy experts — a serious blow to a state health care system already strained by the highest uninsured rate in the nation.
Nearly 4 million Texans signed up for ACA health plans this year, a high-water mark in the marketplace’s 12-year history. But between the looming expiration of Biden-era enhanced premium tax credits — which lower out-of-pocket costs for people with marketplace coverage — and changes in the recently passed GOP megabill, the state’s uninsured population is expected to spike.
The effects could reverberate across the health care landscape, with higher premiums, more financial strain on hospitals and destabilized insurance marketplaces, experts said.
Because Texas never expanded Medicaid to people earning above the federal poverty level — as 40 other states have done — the ACA marketplace has been an enormous driver of coverage, particularly among lower-income people. Texas’ uninsured rate fell from 23.7 percent in 2010 to 17.4 percent by 2023, with ACA enrollment contributing significantly.
Of the state’s nearly 4 million enrollees this year, close to 2.5 million earn between 100 and 150% of the federal poverty level, or $32,150 to $48,225 for a family of four. That means the ACA has helped fill the gap for people who would be eligible for Medicaid in expansion states, where adults who earn up to 138% of the federal poverty level are eligible.
The vast majority of Medicaid recipients in Texas are children. Low-income adults can only qualify if they or their child have a documented disability, are pregnant or over 65, or are a parent with a monthly income of less than $300 for a family of four.
The impending changes could represent the biggest source of coverage loss since the passage of the Affordable Care Act, said Cynthia Cox, director of the Program on the ACA at KFF, a nonprofit health policy organization that has projected the state-by-state effect of Trump’s megabill.
“I think back to the Great Recession, when a lot of people lost their jobs and thus lost their job-based health insurance coverage,” Cox said. “This is going to be more than that.”
Making it harder to enroll
Much of the attention around the Republican tax and spending bill has focused on cuts to Medicaid, especially the imposition of work requirements. But Texas is insulated from those changes owing to its status as a non-expansion state, and Medicaid coverage loss — while projected by KFF to be about 200,000 — is muted compared to other states.
The ACA is another story.
For one, the bill adds new layers of bureaucracy that make it harder to enroll in coverage through the marketplace, with an end to automatic renewal and more income documentation requirements. It also shortens the open enrollment period to just one month and ends year-round enrollment for people earning under 150 percent of the federal poverty level in 2026. And it prevents certain lawfully present immigrants — including DACA recipients, asylees, people with Temporary Protected Status and refugees — from acquiring insurance through the ACA marketplace.
The changes will affect most Texans who receive marketplace coverage, 95% of whom claimed a sliding-scale premium subsidy — a monthly tax credit designed to make premiums more affordable based on income — in 2025. Over 1.4 million enrollees — or 36 percent — automatically renewed their plans, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.
Republicans say the changes will eliminate waste, fraud and abuse in the ACA marketplace and help reduce untenable federal spending levels. More frequent documentation and verification processes, they contend, will ensure that taxpayers are only funding health care costs for those who are truly eligible.
“Under the Trump Administration, we will no longer tolerate waste, fraud, and abuse at the expense of our most vulnerable citizens,” Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a statement about ending duplicative enrollment in multiple federal health insurance programs. “With the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, we now have the tools to strengthen these vital programs for generations to come.”
But health care researchers argue the cumulative effect will worsen health outcomes.
“The whole bill is just designed to dismantle these health programs by getting people to disenroll in them, which then makes the entire system less functional,” said Lynn Cowles, the health and food justice director at Every Texan, a left-leaning think tank. “Because the risk level in each enrollment group is higher.”
KFF projects that ACA changes in the bill will lead to 560,000 Texans losing coverage.
End of enhanced premium tax credits
Most of the expected coverage loss will come not from a provision in the bill, but rather what was left out.
ACA enrollment in Texas has skyrocketed since 2021 because of a federal expansion of premium tax credits, a monthly subsidy to insurers that lowers the cost of premiums based on expected income. That year, Congress extended eligibility for tax credits to some middle-income people earning just over 400% of the federal poverty level — the standard cutoff to qualify for the subsidies — in a bid to eliminate the so-called subsidy cliff for those barely above the cutoff. Lawmakers also capped premiums based on income, driving down monthly costs for the lowest-income people who claim the tax credits. ACA enrollees earning less than 150% of the poverty threshold — between $15,650 and $23,475 for individuals in Texas — pay little to no monthly premium.
The policy was created by the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021 and renewed in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Both bills passed with only Democratic votes.
For states like Texas that never expanded Medicaid, the enhanced premium tax credits have been a lifeline for lower-income people who do not qualify for Medicaid. Fifty-eight percent of Texas enrollees have a monthly cost of under $10.
“Since these enhanced premium tax credits have become available, the number of people nationally getting ACA marketplace coverage has more than doubled,” Cox said. “But a lot of that growth is concentrated in Texas and a handful of other states, and it’s really these low-income people that are driving that growth.”
But the enhanced premium tax credits are set to expire at the end of the 2025 — and premiums could skyrocket. This is especially true for lower-income enrollees. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan think tank, projects that someone earning $22,000 a year would see their monthly premium rise from $0 to $63 per month, for example.
KFF projects more than 1.1 million Texans could lose coverage if the tax credits expire. Congress could still strike a deal to extend them — which some GOP senators have expressed openness to — but doing so is unlikely in Republican-controlled Washington.
For those earning over 400% of the poverty level who have claimed tax credits for the past four years — many of them small-business owners, rural Texans or people approaching retirement age — premiums will increase by threefold in some cases, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Using 2024 data, KFF projected that the average premium in Texas will rise by 115%, or $456 per year, for people who use tax credits to get insurance through the ACA.
“There’s some people — in particular, those who make more than four times the poverty level — who are going to be hit by a double whammy where they’re not only losing their financial assistance, they’re also going to have to pay this potentially double-digit premium increase,” Cox said. “For those folks, we’re probably expecting a lot of them to be priced out.”
When premiums become prohibitively expensive, people — especially those who are healthy — tend to drop their coverage, heightening risk for insurance companies and further driving up premiums for enrollees who do not receive coverage through the ACA marketplace. And when the marketplace as a whole contracts, insurers face further cost pressure, which they pass on to enrollees.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, the state’s largest insurer, has requested a rate increase of 21% next year for ACA-compliant individual plans, according to a copy of their rate filing shared with The Texas Tribune. A spokesperson for the company said it was a preliminary rate hike but confirmed rate increases are being driven by federal changes to the ACA market and tax credit expiration.
Disclosure: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas and Every Texan have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today!
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/18/texas-health-coverage-loss-trump-gop-megabill-affordable-care-act/.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
The post 1.7 million Texans could lose health care under ACA changes appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
The article presents a detailed analysis of the projected impacts of a Republican-led tax and spending bill on health insurance coverage in Texas, with a strong focus on potential negative consequences. While the piece includes quotes from Republican officials and outlines their stated goals of reducing fraud and federal spending, the overall framing and emphasis lean toward criticism of the bill’s effects on low-income populations, health equity, and insurance affordability. Sources cited include left-leaning think tanks and health policy advocates. The coverage is rooted in factual reporting but reflects a perspective more sympathetic to Democratic health care policies.
-
News from the South - Tennessee News Feed6 days ago
Bread sold at Walmart, Kroger stores in TN, KY recalled over undeclared tree nut
-
Mississippi Today2 days ago
Driver’s license office moves to downtown Jackson
-
News from the South - Georgia News Feed2 days ago
Aiken County family fleeing to Mexico due to Trump immigration policies
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed7 days ago
Girls Hold Lemonade Stand for St. Jude Hospital | July 12, 2025 | News 19 at 10 p.m. – Weekend
-
Local News6 days ago
Oyster spawning begins as MDMR-USM Hatchery Program enters production phase using mobile hatchery
-
Mississippi Today5 days ago
Coast judge upholds secrecy in politically charged case. Media appeals ruling.
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed5 days ago
The History of Eugenics in Texas Isn’t What You Think
-
News from the South - Alabama News Feed6 days ago
Floods are swallowing their village. But for them and others, the EPA has cut the lifeline.