Connect with us

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas’ $1.375 billion settlement with Google latest in wins against big tech | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-12 13:44:00


Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton secured a \$1.375 billion settlement with Google, marking the largest recovery against the tech giant by any state. This follows multiple lawsuits Paxton filed against Google for violating Texas privacy laws by unlawfully tracking users’ data. The settlement comes three years after a similar lawsuit where Paxton accused Google of continuing to collect location data despite users’ privacy settings. This win is part of Texas’ broader efforts to hold Big Tech accountable, with Paxton previously winning significant settlements against Facebook’s parent company, Meta, and Google over various privacy violations.

(The Center Square) – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has won a $1.375 billion settlement in principle with Google, the highest recovery received against Google by any state. It’s also the latest of several major wins against big tech in lawsuits filed by Texas.

“In Texas, Big Tech is not above the law. For years, Google secretly tracked people’s movements, private searches, and even their voiceprints and facial geometry through their products and services. I fought back and won,” Paxton said. “This $1.375 billion settlement is a major win for Texans’ privacy and tells companies that they will pay for abusing our trust.”

The settlement was reached three years after Paxton sued Google multiple times alleging the search engine giant violated Texas privacy laws and was unlawfully tracking and collecting users’ private data even after a 2018 multi-state settlement. In 2018, Google agreed to a $391.5 million settlement with 40 sates whose attorneys general argued it was tracking users’ locations without their permission or knowledge.

Three years later, Android and iPhone users’ location data was still being tracked by Google even if their privacy settings were on.

Paxton sued Google in January 2022 alleging it systematically misled and deceived Texas consumers in violation of Texas’ Deceptive Trade Practices Act by continuing to track their personal location even when they disabled the location feature on their phone. “Google then uses the deceptively gathered data to push advertisements to the consumer, earning the Big Tech company enormous profits,” Paxton argued.

Despite its claims, Google continued to track users’ location through other settings and methods it didn’t disclose, Paxton argued.

In May 2022, Paxton sued Google again, amended the January complaint alleging Google’s Incognito mode, or “private browsing,” which “implies to consumers that Google will not track your search history or location activity” was in fact doing that.

This was Paxton’s fifth lawsuit against Google, he argued at the time. By October 2022, Paxton sued Google again, this time for unlawfully capturing and using biometric data of millions of Texans without receiving their informed consent to do so.

This lawsuit alleged that Google “collected millions of biometric identifiers, including voiceprints and records of face geometry, from Texans through its products and services like Google Photos, Google Assistant, and Nest Hub Max,” and exploited Texans’ personal information “for its own commercial interests … a knowing violation of the state’s Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act,” Paxton said.

The settlement announcement also comes after Paxton last July secured a $1.4 billion settlement with Facebook parent Meta for unlawfully collecting and using facial recognition data. At issue was Facebook Tag Suggestions, which allowed users to “tag” images of people in a photo. Since 2011, Meta automatically turned on the feature for all Texas Facebook users without their expressed consent. For more than a decade, it “ran facial recognition software on virtually every face contained in the photographs uploaded to Facebook, capturing records of the facial geometry of the people depicted,” knowing Texas law prohibited it from doing so without providing informed consent, Paxton alleged.

In 2022, Texas sued Meta alleging it violated Texas’ Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act and Texas’ Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Texas’ 2024 victory against Meta was the largest settlement ever obtained by any state and the largest privacy settlement Paxton ever won.

The settlement demonstrated Texas’ “commitment to standing up to the world’s biggest technology companies and holding them accountable for breaking the law and violating Texans’ privacy rights. Any abuse of Texans’ sensitive data will be met with the full force of the law,” Paxton said.

Despite Texas’ historic win, lawsuits continued against big tech.

In 2023, Paxton announced an $8 million settlement with Google in a lawsuit filed over deceptive advertising promoting a Google Pixel 4 smartphone.

Seven months later, Texas secured another settlement with Google, this time for $700 million, over anticompetitive practices. Texas joined a multi-state class action against Google in 2021, arguing it unlawfully monopolized the Android app market by signing anticompetitive contracts to prevent other app stores from preloading on Android devices, paying app developers not to launch products on rival app stores, and creating other technological barriers. In this lawsuit, Google was ordered to paid $630 million in restitution to consumers who purchased apps on Google Play Store over a five-year period.

The post Texas’ $1.375 billion settlement with Google latest in wins against big tech | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuits and settlements with large tech companies, focusing on privacy violations and anticompetitive practices. It features direct quotes from Paxton that highlight his legal actions and victories against “Big Tech.” While the article is largely factual and centered on Paxton’s claims and legal outcomes, the tone and framing portray Paxton’s efforts in a strongly positive light, emphasizing his role as a defender of Texans’ privacy and consumer rights. This framing aligns with a conservative or center-right perspective, given Paxton’s Republican affiliation and the emphasis on holding large tech companies accountable, a stance often supported in conservative circles. However, the article does not overtly criticize opposing viewpoints or present a politically polarized narrative, maintaining mostly informational content with a slight center-right leaning through its positive portrayal of Paxton’s actions.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

TxLege data: How long do sessions last and how many bills are typically passed?

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Christopher Adams – 2025-05-13 10:22:00

SUMMARY: The Texas legislative session sees thousands of bills filed, with 8,700 bills filed in the current session as of May 13, 2025. Of these, 1.9% have passed so far. In the 88th Legislative Session of 2023, 8,616 bills were filed, and 1,252 became law. Historically, fewer than 1,000 bills were filed in the early 1900s. Sessions typically last 140 days, with special sessions lasting up to 30 days. Governors veto an average of 28 bills per session, with notable vetoes by Greg Abbott (76) and Rick Perry (83). The longest session lasted 353 days in 1870-71.

Read the full article

The post TxLege data: How long do sessions last and how many bills are typically passed? appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

These Austin heat records could get smashed this week

Published

on

www.kxan.com – Nick Bannin – 2025-05-13 07:00:00

SUMMARY: Central Texas is facing unprecedented May heat, breaking or approaching historic records in Austin. Temperatures, typically peaking in July, are forecasted to hit triple digits weeks earlier than average, potentially breaking the earliest 105º record previously set in June. Daily high-temperature records from May 13-19 are expected to be exceeded. The hottest May day on record was 104º in 1925, a mark likely to be matched or surpassed this week. Experts attribute this extreme early heat to climate change, with Austin rated highly likely affected. Residents are urged to take precautions as early heat poses significant health risks without acclimation.

Read the full article

The post These Austin heat records could get smashed this week appeared first on www.kxan.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Chronic pain could qualify Texans for medical marijuana under bill

Published

on

feeds.texastribune.org – By Stephen Simpson – 2025-05-12 17:30:00


House Bill 46, introduced by Rep. Ken King, aims to expand Texas’ medical marijuana program by adding chronic pain, Crohn’s disease, and other conditions to the list of qualifying conditions. The bill also permits smokable marijuana products, like vapes, and allows dispensers to open more satellite locations for easier access. This is intended to address access issues and reduce reliance on opioids. Currently, Texas’ program only offers non-smokable products. The bill is a response to the unregulated hemp market, which offers similar effects at a lower cost. The bill will need Senate approval before becoming law.

Texas House signals expanding state’s medical marijuana program” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.


The Texas House advanced a bill Monday that would expand the conditions eligible for the state’s medical marijuana program, including chronic pain and Crohn’s disease, and allow for prescribed smokable products to be sold by prescription.

House Bill 46 by Rep. Ken King, R-Canadian, would allow patients in the state’s medical marijuana program to use products like cannabis patches, lotions, and prescribed inhalers and vaping devices. The House preliminarily approved the bill 118 to 16 on Monday and will need a final round of approval before it heads to the Senate.

If it becomes law, the list of qualifying conditions would also expand to include chronic pain, traumatic brain injury, Crohn’s disease, and degenerative disc disease. The bill would also let licensed dispensers open more satellite locations, which supporters say is necessary to prevent the industry from crumbling.

“There are too many Texans who are still struggling to get access to the medicine they legally have a right to receive,” King said, pointing out his bill would allow for additional dispensing locations outside of Central Texas, where all dispensaries are currently concentrated.

Rep. Penny Morales Shaw, D-Houston, said rural Texans would have more access.

“Too many of our fellow Texans are forced to either suffer or self medicate because they don’t have sufficient access, and this is an amazing alternative to addictive, harmful opioids, which we know is a huge problem,” she said.

In Texas, licensed medical cannabis providers must house all operations, including cannabis cultivation, processing, extracting, manufacturing, testing, and dispensing, under one roof.

State regulations also prohibit inventory storage of medical cannabis products in multiple locations, so products must be distributed from the central dispensary. Any prescriptions scheduled for pickup outside the central dispensary must be driven daily to and from the pickup location—sometimes thousands of miles round-trip.

“This method puts wear and tear on our vehicles. Limits the amount of time we can spend with patients and can compromise product integrity,” said Terrence Baugh, marketing manager for goodblend, Austin-based medical marijuana producer. “We might drive 200 miles, and the person we are delivering to might not even be there at the moment.”

This has made their products more expensive and limited where the medical marijuana program can reach, hampering the small medical cannabis market in Texas.

“We also don’t have enough doctors in the program, and not enough people prescribing for it, and most patients find us through a doctor. We are dealing with several different challenges, but we are hopeful these bills might help,” said Baugh.

House Bill 46 is meant to correct some of this problem by allowing medical marijuana distributors to store their products in various satellite locations instead of having to drive across the state to return the product every day.

However, the most significant potential change would be allowing smokable marijuana products, such as vapes, to be introduced into the program, helping to match the popularity of products found in the hemp industry. The Texas medical program can currently only sell gummies, lozenges, topicals, beverages, and tinctures, as smoking or vaping products have not been approved.

Many hemp products, which are unregulated and sold more freely in smoke shops, also give the same high as medical marijuana, but are cheaper for consumers, and don’t require a visit to a medical professional for pre-approval to purchase. This ease of access has pretty much made the medical marijuana program irrelevant, according to the medical marijuana industry.

Dillan Dabelsutt, senior manager of cultivation at goodblend, said the only difference between hemp and medical marijuana is that hemp is harvested earlier.

“Hemp is just a little more flexible while marijuana is produced for high THC alone,” he said.

By allowing smokeables and expanding the conditions, the medical marijuana producers are hoping this will open the market up to more patients and increase the demand for products.

Texas lawmakers are also determining the future of hemp this session, as a House panel approved last month a bill, also authored by King, to tighten regulations on Texas’ consumable hemp industry, setting up a potential clash with Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and the Senate, who are pursuing a total ban on THC products.

“I think we can co-exist with hemp. We just want an even playing field,” said Baugh. “I believe additional regulations are needed on hemp, and we need to loosen some on medical marijuana.”

King noted on Monday that HB 46 would have no effect on hemp and that the future of that industry will be decided another day.

“The other bill will be coming to a House floor near you,” he told lawmakers.

Texans seeking help for substance use can call the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s free help line at 800-662-4357. They can also access services in their region through the Texas Health and Human Services website.


First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/05/12/texas-marijunia-medical-chronic-pain-crohns-cancer-glaucoma-ptsd/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Chronic pain could qualify Texans for medical marijuana under bill appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article appears to focus on reporting the progress of House Bill 46 in Texas, which aims to expand the state’s medical marijuana program. It provides factual details on the bill, its intended effects, and reactions from various stakeholders, including lawmakers from different political backgrounds. The tone remains largely neutral, presenting the views of both proponents, such as Rep. Ken King, and supporters from the medical marijuana industry, while also briefly touching on opposing perspectives without strong ideological persuasion. This suggests the content leans toward a centrist stance, focusing on policy discussion without promoting a specific political viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending