Connect with us

The Center Square

Study projects removing fluoride from public water would cost billions | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Brett Rowland – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-07 08:39:00


Removing fluoride from U.S. public water systems would cause 25.4 million more decayed teeth in children over five years, costing \$9.8 billion, a JAMA Health Forum study found. After 10 years, decayed teeth would rise to 53.8 million, costing \$19.4 billion, disproportionately affecting publicly insured and uninsured kids. While excessive fluoride can cause dental discoloration and high natural levels are linked to lower IQ, fluoridation at safe levels provides significant benefits. The study cites Calgary’s experience, where stopping fluoridation increased cavities, prompting costly reintroduction. Utah banned water fluoridation in 2025; other states debate similar measures. About 72% of U.S. water systems are fluoridated.

(The Center Square)  Taking fluoride out of public water systems across the country would result in millions more rotten teeth and cost $9.8 billion over five years, according to a new study. 

The study, published in JAMA Health Forum, found that if all 50 states removed fluoride from public water systems, kids would develop 25.4 million more decayed teeth over five years. The study noted that “tooth decay would disproportionately affect publicly insured and uninsured children compared to those with private dental insurance.”

After 10 years, the total number of decayed teeth would increase to 53.8 million at a cost of $19.4 billion, according to the study.

The simulation model used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data of 8,484 participants.

It noted that “excessive fluoride exposure can cause mottled discoloration of the teeth” and that fluoride “becomes a neurotoxin at high levels.” The study further stated that “natural sources of drinking water with high levels of fluoride are associated with lower IQ scores.”

The study also noted that the U.S. National Toxicology Program released a monograph that concluded that drinking water with elevated fluoride levels has neurotoxic effects. That monograph “affirmed a lack of evidence for neurocognitive effects with fluoride exposure less than 1.5 parts per million, more than twice the amount of fluoridation recommended in public water systems by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.”

The study comes as Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. seeks to remove fluoride from public water systems. In April, Kennedy said he would study the issue and make new recommendations on fluoride use in public water systems.

The American Dental Association criticized that plan.

“As dentists, we see the direct consequences fluoride removal has on our patients and it’s a real tragedy when policymakers’ decisions hurt vulnerable kids and adults in the long term,” ADA President Brett Kessler, D.D.S., said. “Blindly calling for a ban on fluoridated water hurts people, costs money, and will ultimately harm our economy.”

The JAMA study concluded that “despite the potential harms of excessive fluoride exposure, fluoridation at safe levels offers both individual and societal benefits that would be at risk.” 

The study also noted the case of Calgary in Alberta, Canada. The city added fluoride to its public water system in 1991. The Calgary City Council voted in 2011 to remove fluoride. However, the city reversed course in March after an increase in cavities and a public vote. In the 2021 Civic General Election, 62% of voters supported fluoridation.

Calgary plans to reintroduce fluoride in drinking water starting at the end of June. To do so, it had to spend about $28.1 million on infrastructure improvements at Calgary’s two water treatment plants. Calgary expects to pay additional annual operating and maintenance costs of $1 million at both plants. It noted that “this translates into less than 10 cents per person, per month.”

After Calgary stopped fluoridating water in 2011, researchers at the University of Calgary conducted a study on tooth decay in a large sample of Calgary children and compared them to children in Edmonton, where fluoridation started in 1967 and remains in place.

“The research confirmed the removal of fluoride from drinking water had a negative impact on children’s oral health, where a significantly higher number of cavities were found amongst Calgary children compared to Edmonton children,” the city’s website noted.

Utah recently became the first state to ban the addition of fluoride to public drinking water. Utah lawmakers passed a measure that prohibits the addition of fluoride to public drinking water in Utah. That went into place on May 7, 2025.

Kennedy has urged other states to follow suit.

About 72% of municipal water systems in the U.S. provided fluoridated water in 2022, according to a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

At least 12 states have laws mandating that communities of a certain size fluoridate the public water system, including California, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio and South Dakota, according to a report from the National Conference of State Legislatures. It noted at least 12 states have introduced bills prohibiting or repealing provisions related to the addition of fluoride in public water systems. Utah and Florida were the first states such legislation, according to the report.

The post Study projects removing fluoride from public water would cost billions | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily focuses on reporting findings from a scientific study and the public health debate surrounding fluoride in public water systems. It provides data-driven information on the potential health and economic impacts of removing fluoride, includes statements from authorities like the American Dental Association, and reports on political actions by figures such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. without endorsing a particular viewpoint. The tone remains factual and balanced, detailing concerns about fluoride exposure alongside its purported benefits, as well as noting both support and opposition among policymakers and communities. By presenting multiple perspectives and relying on referenced studies, the article demonstrates neutral reporting rather than promoting an ideological stance.

The Center Square

BP agents continue to arrest Iranians, weapons traffickers at northern border | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-23 09:52:00


At the northern U.S. border’s Swanton Sector, including Vermont, parts of New York, and New Hampshire, Border Patrol agents continue to combat illegal crossings and crime. Recently, seven men from Iran and Uzbekistan, all previously entering illegally, were detained near Mooers Forks, NY. ICE is arresting numerous Iranians, including Revolutionary Guard members, with over 1,500 having illegally entered under the Biden administration. Agents also helped seize 4.7 pounds of fentanyl near Albany, enough to kill over a million people. Additionally, a Honduran weapons trafficker, repeatedly deported, was arrested in Massachusetts. Border Patrol emphasizes strong law enforcement partnerships and urges public reports of suspicious activity.

(The Center Square) – At the northern border, Border Patrol agents continue to arrest Iranians and weapons traffickers and are helping seize record amounts of fentanyl.

While illegal border crossings are down at the northern border under the Trump administration, Border Patrol agents in the busiest northern border Swanton Sector are continuing to interdict crime. The sector includes all of Vermont, six upstate New York counties, and three New Hampshire counties.

Earlier this month, Border Patrol Agents from the Champlain Station in New York responded to a report of suspicious activity near Mooers Forks, New York. Upon arrival, they located a minivan occupied by five Iranian citizens and two Uzbekistan citizens – all adult men in the country illegally.

Border Patrol agents then determined all seven men “had previously illegally entered the United States at various locations along both the U.S./Mexico border and the U.S./Canada border,” Swanton Sector Chief Border Patrol Agent Robert Garcia said. They were detained and are being processed for removal.

“Border security is national security and directly correlates to public safety,” Garcia said, adding that “Swanton Sector agents remain vigilant and committed to protecting our borders and enforcing immigration laws.”

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers are also arresting Iranians in the country illegally, including Revolutionary Guard soldiers, after more than 1,500 Iranians illegally entered the U.S. under the Biden administration, with more than 700 released into the U.S., The Center Square exclusively reported.

In another instance, Border Patrol agents notified the New York State Police about a suspected driver of a vehicle allegedly involved in smuggling activity in upstate New York. State troopers responded, located and stopped the vehicle near Albany, Garcia said. A subsequent vehicle search resulted in a seizure of roughly 4.7 pounds of powdered fentanyl, enough to kill more than one million people.

“This seizure is a powerful reminder of why strong partnerships between federal, state, and local law enforcement are vital to our national security and public safety,” Swanton Sector Chief Patrol Agent Robert Garcia said.

In another instance, Border Patrol agents helped ATF federal partners apprehend a criminal foreign national wanted for weapons trafficking. Honduran national Yubert Yasiel Lopez-Lopez, 31, was arrested in North Attleboro, Mass., after he illegally reentered the country after he was previously deported.

He was first apprehended in 2014 after illegally entering the U.S. in Hidalgo, Texas, under the Obama administration. A federal immigration judge in Houston ordered his removal, which occurred four years later under the first Trump administration. In 2022, he again illegally entered the country in Yuma, Arizona, under the Biden administration. It took another three years to arrest him, this time in Massachusetts, with authorities learning he was wanted in Honduras on weapons trafficking charges. A federal grand jury indicted him last month in Vermont, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Vermont announced. He faces up to two years in prison if convicted and removal from the U.S. for a third time.

“We continue to enforce federal immigration laws and seek maximum consequences against those who violate them,” Garcia said.

Garcia also regularly thanks members of the public for supporting Border Patrol efforts, sometimes acting as the eyes and ears for agents in rural areas by calling in sightings of illegal border crossers or suspicious activity. He continues to encourage members of the public to report suspicious border activity in the Swanton Sector by calling 1-800-689-3362.

The sector was hit hard under the Biden administration with illegal border crossings from Canada reaching record levels, totaling nearly one million, according to CBP data and gotaway data exclusively reported by The Center Square. The greatest number ever reported in U.S. history in the sector was in fiscal 2024 of nearly 200,000, excluding those who evaded capture, The Center Square reported.

The post BP agents continue to arrest Iranians, weapons traffickers at northern border | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on border security issues, illegal immigration, and law enforcement actions with a tone that emphasizes enforcement and border control. The frequent references to actions taken under the Trump administration contrasted with those under the Biden administration, along with highlighting record illegal crossings during the Biden era, suggest a subtle critical framing of the current administration’s immigration policies. The language used—such as “illegal reentry,” “enforcing immigration laws,” and the focus on criminal activity linked to migrants—aligns with a perspective commonly found in center-right discourse prioritizing strong border enforcement and national security. However, the article does not employ overtly partisan language or explicitly advocate a political agenda, maintaining a generally factual tone while framing the issue in terms favorable to stricter immigration enforcement.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Cruz introduces bill to designate Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organization | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Bethany Blankley – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-22 07:23:00


U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz has reintroduced the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act, aiming to classify the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. The bill, with support from U.S. Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart and others, seeks to ban all Muslim Brotherhood members from the U.S., revoke their visas, and impose sanctions on associated groups, including Hamas. Cruz and Díaz-Balart stress the Brotherhood’s threat to U.S. and allied national security, citing its destabilizing activities in the Middle East. Founded in 1928, the Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch emerged as Hamas, responsible for terrorist attacks including the October 7, 2023 assault on Israel. Several countries have already designated it as a terrorist group.

(The Center Square) – U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, has introduced a bill to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

Cruz introduced the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act again this year after doing so in 2015, 2017, 2020 and 2021. U.S. Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart, R-Florida, introduced companion legislation in the House, as he has also previously done. The bill has multiple cosponsors.

“The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization,” Cruz said, which is “committed to the overthrow and destruction of America and other non-Islamist governments across the world, and pose an acute threat to American national security interests. American allies in the Middle East and Europe have already labeled the Brotherhood a terrorist organization, and the United States should do the same, and do so expeditiously.”

The bill states the Muslim Brotherhood “functions as a global terrorist organization and provides material support to [its] branches in countries and territories by providing political support, financial resources, training, services, expert advice, and communications assistance.” Its branches have “sought to destabilize and undermine United States allies and partners throughout the Middle East, including in Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Emirates, and have been outlawed as a terrorist group by the governments of those countries.”

The bill amends the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1987 to include banning all Muslim Brotherhood members from the U.S., making them ineligible for visas or admittance to the U.S. This includes revoking visas of all non-U.S. citizens who are confirmed Muslim Brotherhood members and removing them from the country. It also requires the Secretary of State to impose sanctions on any Muslim Brotherhood branch, charity or organization that is directly or indirectly controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, including Hamas.

“The global Muslim Brotherhood has numerous regional branches, including terrorist organizations such as Hamas, and spreads violence and instability throughout the Middle East,” Díaz-Balart said. “For this reason, it is crucial to U.S. national security interests that we prohibit U.S. dollars from enabling the Muslim Brotherhood’s dangerous activities, and that we ensure Muslim Brotherhood members are blocked from entering the United States. This important legislation gives the Trump Administration the additional authority it needs to protect Americans, and our closest allies, from this insidious threat.”

The Muslim Brotherhood was founded by Egyptian politician Hassan al-Banna in 1928 as a Sunni Islamic militant group. Over the next few decades, it grew to have hundreds of thousands of followers in multiple countries in the Middle East and north Africa. After a failed assassination attempt of Egypt’s prime minister in 1948, the Egyptian government cracked down on Muslim Brotherhood members, arresting them, trying them for treason and executing them.

By the 1980s, the Muslim Brotherhood saw a resurgence in Egypt and multiple countries. In 1987, its Palestinian branch emerged as Hamas in Gaza, committed to the destruction of Israel. The preamble to the 1988 Hamas Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement includes the famous claim, “Israel will exist and will continue to exist until Islam will obliterate it, just as it obliterated others before it,’” made by al-Banna, The Center Square reported.

Since then, Hamas has taken credit for a range of terrorist acts, including the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack against Israel, resulting in the death of more than 40 Americans and the kidnapping at least 53 Americans.

The bill was proposed after antisemitic incidents drastically increased nationwide, reaching their highest level on record last year of nearly 10,000, The Center Square reported. Cruz and U.S. Rep. Monica De La Cruz, R-Texas, have been targeted by pro-Hamas rioters and vandals, including at Cruz’s Houston home and at a U.S. Senate hearing, and at De La Cruz’s offices, The Center Square reported.

Hamas has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the U.S. government since 1997.

After the Hamas Oct. 7 terrorist attack, the U.S. House passed the Hamas International Financing Prevention Act, HR 340, In November 2023. Filed by U.S. Rep. Brian Mast, R-Florida, it would have required the executive branch to impose sanctions on foreign actors that provide certain types of support to Hamas or its affiliates. It went nowhere in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Cruz has also repeatedly called on the president to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. Last month, U.S. Rep. Jared Moskowitz, D-Florida, called on the president to do so highlighting actions taken by other governments.

To date, the governments of Austria, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates have designated the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

The post Cruz introduces bill to designate Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist organization | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on legislative actions and statements made by Republican lawmakers Ted Cruz and Mario Díaz-Balart regarding the designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. The language used in the article generally reflects the terminology and framing these politicians themselves use, reinforcing a security-focused and hardline stance typical of conservative or center-right rhetoric. By highlighting repeated efforts by GOP members, associating the Muslim Brotherhood with terrorism, and citing incidents and threats that underscore national security concerns, the article aligns with a center-right viewpoint emphasizing strong counterterrorism measures and skepticism toward Islamist groups.

However, the article remains largely informational rather than overtly opinionated. It provides context regarding the Muslim Brotherhood’s history and related entities such as Hamas, documents legislative history, and places the bill within a broader political context. While it does not critically examine the stance or present opposing viewpoints, its reliance on official statements and government actions without neutral distancing or counterbalance results in a center-right-leaning tone rather than a fully neutral one.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas legislature to address redistricting, committee members assigned | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-07-21 20:33:00


The Texas special legislative session, called by Gov. Greg Abbott, began Monday to address 18 priorities, including redistricting the state’s 38 congressional districts due to DOJ constitutional concerns. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and House Speaker Dustin Burrows emphasized collaboration on a legal, constitutional plan. Burrows created the bipartisan House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting with 21 members. The 2021 redistricting plan is under ongoing legal challenge, consolidated in LULAC v. Abbott. The committee will hold public hearings to gather input. If passed, the new plan would take effect for 2026 elections, but opposition and further lawsuits are expected.

(The Center Square) – On the call for the special legislative session, which began Monday, is the task of redistricting Texas’ 38 congressional districts.

The special session has begun for an initial 30 days to address 18 legislative priorities identified by Gov. Greg Abbott, including redistricting. The governor may extend the special session for another 30 days and amend agenda items at any time.

In Abbott’s call for the special session, he said the legislature must pass legislation “that provides a revised congressional redistricting plan in light of constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice.”

The legislature is also “working in lockstep on congressional redistricting legislation,” Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and House Speaker Dustin Burrows said in a joint statement.

“Working with the House, the Texas Senate will move forward on redistricting to pass a legal, constitutional congressional map,” Patrick said.

“Texans place their trust in the Legislature to uphold fairness in the redistricting process, and we will continue to work closely together to fulfill this legislative responsibility,” Burrows said.

On Monday, Burrows announced he created the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting and appointed a bipartisan group of 21 members to serve on it. 

They include state Reps. Cody Vasut as chair and Jon Rosenthal as vice chair and Reps. Josey Garcia, Charlie Geren, Barbara Gervin-Hawkins, R.D. “Bobby” Guerra, Ryan Guillen, Cole Hefner, Hillary Hickland, Todd Hunter, Christian Manuel, Will Metcalf, John McQueeney, Joe Moody, Katrina Pierson, David Spiller, Carl Tepper, Senfronia Thompson, Chris Turner, Terry Wilson and Gene Wu.

Patrick has yet to announce Senate committee members.

The Texas legislature has published information about the redistricting process, including about the Legislative Redistricting Board, public hearing process, judicial review and elections. Generally, redistricting takes place after a federal census. Because the last census was conducted in 2020 and the Texas legislature meets every other year during odd years, the legislature convened in 2021 to implement a redistricting plan.

That plan passed the legislature, was approved by the governor, and was met with lawsuits beginning in October 2021. It has been in litigation ever since.

The cases were consolidated into one case before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. This May and June, oral arguments were heard in the consolidated cases, LULAC v. Abbott and the court ordered the involved parties to submit post-trial briefs no later than September 3. The groups argue the redistricting plan violates the 14th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act.

As with other bills and committees, the select committee will hold public hearings to allow “citizens to present relevant testimony concerning the impact of existing districts, local preferences for district changes, communities of interest, local voting patterns, and other issues that the legislature may consider when redrawing district lines. The hearings also promote public awareness of the legislative redistricting process,” the legislature explains.

This year’s process includes the legislature proposing, voting on and potentially passing a redistricting bill. The governor may sign the bill into law, allow it to go into effect without signing it or veto it. If it fails to pass or is vetoed, the Legislative Redistricting Board would meet as required by the Texas Constitution. The LRB is comprised of the lieutenant governor, House speaker, attorney general, comptroller, and General Land Office commissioner.

If the redistricting plan is adopted, it would become effective for the following primary and general election, which would be in 2026. However, Democratic opposition is expected throughout the process and lawsuits are also expected as was the case in 2021.

If or when a redistricting law becomes effective, before elections are held in new districts, impacted counties are required to change their voting precinct boundaries. Candidates for state legislative office are required to have resided in the district they seek to represent for at least one year before the general election is held.

The post Texas legislature to address redistricting, committee members assigned | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article from The Center Square reports on Texas’ redistricting process with an emphasis on official Republican-led actions and statements, including those from Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. While the article includes information about lawsuits and Democratic opposition, it does so briefly and without elaboration. The overall framing reflects a procedural tone, but the consistent use of Republican sources and perspectives, combined with minimal coverage of opposing views or legal arguments, suggests a subtle right-leaning bias typical of Center-Right reporting. The piece aims for neutrality but leans toward the Republican framing of events.

Continue Reading

Trending