SUMMARY: Former President Joe Biden, 82, has been diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer that has spread to his bones. His office confirmed the diagnosis following increasing urinary symptoms. Doctors are considering multiple treatment options, including hormone therapy, as the cancer is hormone-sensitive. Dr. Jonathan Wong, an expert in urology, noted that while this type of cancer is aggressive, hormone suppression can manage it, potentially keeping it in remission for an extended period. Biden’s age may complicate treatment, but the priority is controlling the cancer. Wong emphasized the importance of prostate cancer screening for men, especially those with a long life expectancy.

Former President Joe Biden was diagnosed with a more aggressive form of prostate cancer, his office announced. News4’s Tony Perkins, who underwent treatment for prostate cancer earlier this year, sat down with Dr. Jonathan Hwang, his surgeon at MedStar Washington Hospital Center, to learn more about the disease and who should ask for screenings.
_______
NBC4 Washington / WRC-TV is the No. 1 broadcast television station and the home of the most-watched local news in Washington, D.C. The station leads the market in providing timely and breaking news and information in text, video and graphics across more than 15 platforms including NBCWashington.com, the NBC4 app, NBC4 streaming news channel, newsletters, and social media.

FOLLOW & STREAM NBC4 WASHINGTON

NBC4 News Streaming channel: https://www.nbcwashington.com/watch/
Xumo Play: https://play.xumo.com/live-guide/nbc-washington-dc-news
Roku: https://therokuchannel.roku.com/watch/021707311e0b595597f97a389e0051e6/nbc-washington-dc-news
Also available on Pluto TV, Freevee, Google TV, TCL, Local Now, and Samsung TV Plus.
More here: https://www.nbcwashington.com/watchlive/
Instagram: http://nbc4dc.com/3HxYkYH
Threads: http://nbc4dc.com/ZYZAAHJ
Facebook: http://nbc4dc.com/iD1GvRQ
X: http://nbc4dc.com/APF7vQM
TikTok: http://nbc4dc.com/pg5Nx67
VISIT OUR SITE: https://www.nbcwashington.com/
DOWNLOAD OUR FREE APPS: https://www.nbcwashington.com/products/
WATCH NBC4 LIVE ON AMAZON FIRE TV: https://www.nbcwashington.com/firetv/
WATCH NBC4 LIVE ON ROKU: https://www.nbcwashington.com/roku/d

Source

by Ariana Figueroa, Virginia Mercury
May 18, 2025

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday kept in place a block on the Trump administration’s efforts to deport 176 Venezuelans in Northern Texas under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.

A majority of the justices found that President Donald Trump’s administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelans when the administration tried to deport them from North Texas last month by invoking the 18th-century wartime law. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

“Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,” according to the decision.

The justices did not determine the legality of the Trump administration using the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans 14 and older with suspected ties to the gang Tren de Aragua.

On his social media platform, Trump expressed his disapproval of the ruling.

“THE SUPREME COURT WON’T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!” he wrote on Truth Social.

The justices found that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals “erred in dismissing the detainees’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction,” and vacated that order, sending the case back.

The Trump administration on Monday asked the high court to remove the injunction, arguing that detaining suspected members of Tren de Aragua poses a threat to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and staff.

In a Wednesday response, the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the suit, warned that if the Supreme Court lifts its injunction, “most of the putative class members will be removed with little chance to seek judicial review.”

In Friday’s order, the justices noted that because the Trump administration has used the Alien Enemies Act to send migrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador, careful due process is needed.

“The Government has represented elsewhere that it is unable to provide for the return of an individual deported in error to a prison in El Salvador…where it is alleged that detainees face indefinite detention,” according to the order, noting the wrongful deportation of Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador.

“The detainees’ interests at stake are accordingly particularly weighty,” the court continued.

Other rulings

On April 18, the ACLU made an emergency application to the high court, asking to bar any removals under the Alien Enemies Act in the Northern District of Texas over concerns that the Trump administration was not following due process.

Several federal judges elsewhere have blocked the use of the wartime law in their districts that cover Colorado, Southern Texas and Southern New York.

A federal judge in Western Pennsylvania Tuesday was the first to uphold the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, but said those accused must have at least three weeks to challenge their removal.

Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Samantha Willis for questions: info@virginiamercury.com.

The post Trump move to deport Venezuelans violated due process, U.S. Supreme Court rules appeared first on virginiamercury.com

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The content presents a factual report on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding the Trump administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act. It discusses the legal reasoning, the dissenting justices’ opinions, and the involvement of the ACLU. The article does not show a clear ideological slant, instead focusing on the procedural aspects of the case, the legal interpretations, and the responses from involved parties. While the tone is neutral and the information presented is balanced, the inclusion of Trump’s social media reaction may subtly reflect a slight inclination toward documenting the political climate surrounding the ruling. However, it largely sticks to reporting the legal outcome without pushing an overt political stance.

SUMMARY: Defense attorneys continued cross-examining Cassie Ventura in the federal trial against Shawn “Diddy” Combs, who faces five federal charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. Ventura alleges years of abuse and violence, while the defense questions her involvement, presenting explicit text messages to suggest she was a willing participant in their sexual activities. They argue Combs’ abusive behavior stemmed from addiction, not sex trafficking. Ventura’s attorneys assert that the evidence will prove the abuse. Prosecutors allege the defense is attempting to delay the trial to provoke a mistrial as Ventura nears labor .

Defense attorneys are questioning Cassie Ventura on the stand again today in their cross-examination.

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/WVECTV/?sub_confirmation=1
Download the 13News Now App: http://bit.ly/13NewsNowApp
Check out our website: https://www.13newsnow.com/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/13NewsNow/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/13newsnow
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/13newsnow/

Source