Connect with us

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Senate set to approve Missouri governor’s shakeup of state education board

Published

on

missouriindependent.com – Annelise Hanshaw – 2025-04-24 05:55:00

by Annelise Hanshaw, Missouri Independent
April 24, 2025

Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe’s makeover of the State Board of Education is nearly complete, with the state Senate set to confirm the last of his four new appointments this week.

The turnover on the eight-member board also means its longtime leadership has been pushed aside. That includes Charlie Shields, the former Republican lawmaker who has served on the board since 2012 and was its most recent board president.

Shields told The Independent he was willing to continue serving but supports the governor’s appointments.

“We’re in a good position to move education forward,” he said.

The shakeup has created some friction in the confirmation process, with Ash Grove Republican state Sen. Mike Moon and Florissant Democratic Sen. Angela Mosley asking pointed questions of appointees during their Senate hearings.

That continued on Wednesday, when Moon was the lone “no” vote on the appointment of Thomas Prater, an eye surgeon from Springfield.

State Board of Education appointee Tom Prater, an eye surgeon from Springfield, listens to questions about his time on Springfield Public Schools’ board during the Senate Gubernatorial Appointments Committee hearing Wednesday morning (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).

Moon said during the hearing he had received complaints from his district stemming back to Prater’s time serving on the Springfield Public Schools Board of Education.

“There are some people in Springfield who were concerned about things that have happened on the school board after I left,” Prater told The Independent. “So I didn’t have much control over it.”

On the board, Prater helped in the hiring process of former superintendent John Jungmann in 2014 shortly before his departure.

Jungmann faced criticism, as reported by the Springfield News-Leader in 2021, over his diversity and equity training that some labeled “critical race theory.” He was also under fire for his choices on safety measures during the pandemic.

Moon asked Prater how he supported a superintendent who was a proponent of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and what that means today with a governor who has spoken against diversity programs.

Prater said Jungmann was “by far the most experienced and qualified candidate that we interviewed.”

“I don’t remember any kind of DEI discussions coming up in our interviews with him that would have given us the indication, one way or the other, where he stood,” Prater told Moon.

Mosley pushed back on the notion that DEI is harmful.

“You don’t feel that diversity is important,” she said, asking where Prater stood. “All the districts are pretty diverse, so you need to know how to effectively support each area of diversity.”

Prater said he was “right between” Mosley and Moon on the subject, giving an anecdote that he supported the hiring of a Black football coach over a similarly qualified white candidate.

The board is set up to not be dominated by a political party, with law stipulating there can be a maximum of four members of a party. Many appointees, on other state boards as well, take on the “independent” title to conform to this rule.

Prater is joining the board as an independent. His political contributions include donations to Democrats like state Rep. Betsy Fogle of Springfield and St. Louis Circuit Attorney Gabe Gore. But the majority of his donations benefit Republican candidates, with $21,000 given to Kehoe’s political action committee, American Dream PAC, and numerous donations given to former U.S. Sen. Roy Blunt. 

Prater said he has been an independent for “as long as he can remember.”

Shields has repeatedly spoken about board matters with a bipartisan, or nonpartisan, perspective. He told The Independent that the board is intended to be this way.

Appointments are eight-year terms, setting members up to look at issues long-term. These two pieces are “important,” Shields said.

He feels confident that the appointees he knows, Prater and attorney Jon Otto, will take the “same view.”

“I know them to both be really thoughtful, high quality people,” he said. “I think they’ll make great board members.”

Prater was appointed by former Gov. Mike Parson a year ago, serving in an interim capacity while a filibuster blocked full confirmation. He has been sitting in the audience at state board meetings, he said.

Tawni Hunt Ferrarini was appointed at the same time last year by Parson, but Kehoe did not reappoint her to the board and instead chose Brooks Miller for the seat.

Brooks Miller stands with state Sen. Mike Bernskoetter, a Jefferson City Republican, for a picture as part of his appointment to the State Board of Education in a committee hearing Wednesday (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).

Miller, former president and CEO of Jordan Valley Community Health Center in Springfield, takes on the role after recently serving on Truman State University’s board.

He told committee members Wednesday that his experience in community health will help him look for needs inside Missouri’s schools.

“I think that (community health) really kind of goes hand-in-hand with serving children,” he said. “It’s hard to teach a child that has a toothache or other illness.”

Miller is identified as a Republican in his appointment. He donated to President Donald Trump’s campaign and U.S. Rep. Eric Burlison, but also gave $1,000 to Crystal Quade, who lost her bid as the Democratic nominee for governor in November. Quade is from Springfield, which Miller has strong ties to despite currently residing in Sunrise Beach.

Last week, the Senate confirmed the appointment of Otto and Mike Matousek.

Matousek, a Republican from Kansas City, recently served on the Platte County School Board and is the former legislative director for U.S. Rep. Sam Graves.

In his campaign for school board, Matousek opposed mask and vaccine mandates and carried conservative stances on hot-button issues into his time on the board. He was the only member to vote for the district to take up an official bathroom policy that would restrict transgender students’ access to restrooms that fit their gender identity.

Moon complimented Matousek’s willingness to stand alone on an issue.

“You’re not afraid to take those issues on, or at least ask the questions and let them be deliberated,” he said during the hearing.

Matousek has made contributions to several Republican candidates, including state Rep. Josh Hurbert, a Smithville resident who works for Christian private school advocacy and assistance organization Herzog Tomorrow Foundation. Hurlbert also donated to Matousek’s campaign for school board in 2022.

Matousek told The Independent that he was approached about joining the State Board of Education and thought it over before embracing the role.

“Public education is changing in Missouri, and I’d rather be at the table,” he said.

During the Senate Gubernatorial Appointments Committee hearing last week, Mosley asked Matousek questions about his stance on open enrollment and charter schools, asking if he would support funding for public schools or lean on alternatives to neighborhood schools.

Evergy General Counsel Jon Otto stands with Sen. Barbara Washington, a Kansas City Democrat, for a picture as part of his appointment to the State Board of Education in a committee hearing April 16 (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).

Matousek is generally supportive of open enrollment, if the state legislature chooses to pass it into law, but is concerned about provisions that would obligate school districts to transport students that enroll outside their home district. But those decisions are up to state lawmakers, he said.

Mosley’s questions were halted after Moon whispered to the legislative aide of the committee chair, who then asked her to reserve the rest of her questions for time outside of the hearing. Matousek was confirmed by the full Senate the next day. 

The Senate also confirmed Otto, who currently serves as general counsel for Evergy.

Otto is a noted advocate of charter schools. He helped found Académie Lafayette Charter Schools in Kansas City and has served on the board of the Missouri Charter Public School Association.

He told The Independent he didn’t have definitive plans for the board, saying he had to “get in and see what is working” first but noted potential for “a lot of new things.”

Otto has made a few contributions solely to Democratic candidates, like a $500 donation to U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids from Kansas.

Gabby Picard, a spokeswoman for Kehoe, said selections were made with the governor’s priorities in mind.

“Gov. Kehoe hopes that the board will continue to address and prioritize increased accountability in school performances and student outcomes, supporting opportunity across geographic and socioeconomic lines and supporting non-traditional school options like charter or virtual schools,” she said in a statement.

Prater and Miller’s appointments must receive final approval in the Senate before they can take office.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

The post Senate set to approve Missouri governor’s shakeup of state education board appeared first on missouriindependent.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The content is largely focused on the appointments to the Missouri State Board of Education by Republican Governor Mike Kehoe, detailing the political backgrounds of the appointees and their views on significant education policies. While it includes viewpoints from both Republican and Democratic Senators during the confirmation process, the emphasis on Republican appointees and the supportive comments from other Republicans indicate a slant towards the right. The mention of "diversity, equity, and inclusion" issues, often contentious topics in contemporary education debates, suggests a framing that aligns more with center-right perspectives in the context of the current political landscape. However, the article maintains a degree of neutrality by providing quotes and perspectives from both sides, preventing it from being categorized as explicitly right-leaning or far-right.

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Nutriformance shares how strength training can help your golf game

Published

on

www.youtube.com – FOX 2 St. Louis – 2025-04-30 11:50:49

SUMMARY: Nutriformance emphasizes the importance of strength training for golfers to maintain power, endurance, and consistent swing performance throughout the season. Bill Button, a golf fitness trainer, highlights in-season strength training as crucial to prevent loss of distance and stamina, especially for the back nine. Recommended exercises include shoulder rotation and balance drills using medicine balls or bodyweight to enhance power, lower body strength, and balance. Nutriformance also offers golf-specific fitness, personal training, nutrition coaching, physical therapy, and massage. Mobility exercises, like spine rotation with kinetic energy, are key to maintaining flexibility and preventing injury for golfers.

YouTube video

Nutriformance is located at 1033 Corporate Square in Creve Coeur

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

26k+ still powerless: CU talks Wednesday repair plans

Published

on

www.ozarksfirst.com – Jesse Inman – 2025-04-30 07:39:00

SUMMARY: Springfield is experiencing its worst power outage event since 2007, caused by storms with winds up to 90 mph that toppled trees and power lines. City Utilities declared a large-scale emergency Tuesday, calling in mutual-aid crews. Approximately 26,500 people remain without power as of early Wednesday, about half the peak outage number. Crews are working around the clock but progress is slow, especially overnight. Priorities include restoring power to critical locations like hospitals and areas where repairs can restore electricity to many customers quickly. Customers with damaged weather heads or service points face longer repair times. The utility warns against approaching downed power lines.

Read the full article

The post 26k+ still powerless: CU talks Wednesday repair plans appeared first on www.ozarksfirst.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Missouri lawmakers should reject fake ‘chaplains’ in schools bill

Published

on

missouriindependent.com – Brian Kaylor – 2025-04-30 06:15:00

by Brian Kaylor, Missouri Independent
April 30, 2025

As the 2025 legislative session of the Missouri General Assembly nears the finish line, one bill moving closer to Gov. Mike Kehoe’s desk purports to allow public schools to hire spiritual chaplains.

However, if one reads the text of the legislation, it’s actually just pushing chaplains in name only.

The bill already cleared the Senate and House committees, thus just needing support from the full House. As a Baptist minister and the father of a public school child, I hope lawmakers will recognize the bill remains fundamentally flawed.

A chaplain is not just a pastor or a Sunday School teacher or a street preacher shouting through a bullhorn. This is a unique role, often in a secular setting that requires a chaplain to assist with a variety of religious traditions and oversee a number of administrative tasks.

That’s why the U.S. military, Missouri Department of Corrections, and many other institutions include standards for chaplains like meeting educational requirements, having past experience, and receiving an endorsement from a religious denominational body.

In contrast, the legislation on school “chaplains” originally sponsored by Republican Sens. Rusty Black and Mike Moon includes no requirements for who can be chosen as a paid or volunteer school “chaplain.” Someone chosen to serve must pass a background check and cannot be a registered sex offender, but those are baseline expectations for anyone serving in our schools.

While a good start, simply passing a background check does mean one is qualified to serve as a chaplain.

The only other stipulation in the bill governing who can serve as a school “chaplain” is that they must be a member of a religious group that is eligible to endorse chaplains for the military. Senators added this amendment to prevent atheists or members of the Satanic Temple from qualifying as a school “chaplain.”

Members of the Satanic Temple testified in a Senate Education Committee hearing that they opposed the bill but would seek to fill the positions if created, which apparently spooked lawmakers. That discriminatory amendment, however, does nothing to ensure a chosen “chaplain” is actually qualified. For instance, the Episcopal Church is on the military’s list of endorsing organizations. Just because some Episcopalians meet the military’s requirements for chaplains and can serve does not mean all Episcopalians should be considered for a chaplaincy position.

While rejecting this unnecessary bill is the best option, if lawmakers really want to create a school chaplaincy program, they must significantly alter the bill to create real chaplain standards. Lawmakers could look to other states for inspiration on how to fix it.

For instance, Arizona lawmakers a few weeks ago passed a similar bill — except their legislation includes numerous requirements to limit who can serve as a chaplain. Among the various standards in the Arizona bill is that individuals chosen to serve as a school chaplain must hold a Bachelor’s degree, have at least two years of experience as a chaplain, have a graduate degree in counseling or theology or have at least seven years of chaplaincy experience and have official standing in a local religious group.

Rather than passing a pseudo-chaplaincy bill, Missouri lawmakers should add similar provisions.

The Arizona bill also includes other important guardrails missing in Missouri’s bill that will help protect the rights of students and their parents. Arizona lawmakers created provisions to require written parental consent for students to participate in programs provided by a chaplain. Especially given the lack of standards for who can serve as a school “chaplain,” the absence of parental consent forms remains especially troubling.

Additionally, Missouri’s school “chaplain” bill includes no prohibition against proselytization. This is particularly concerning since the conservative Christian group who helped craft the bill in Missouri and other states — and who sent a representative to Jefferson City to testify for the bill in a committee hearing — has clearly stated their goal is to bring unconstitutional government prayer back into public schools.

To be clear, the U.S. Supreme Court did not kick prayer out of schools. As long as there are math tests, there will be prayer in schools. What the justices did was block the government from writing a prayer and requiring students to listen to it each day. Such government coercion violated the religious liberty rights of students, parents, and houses of worship, so the justices rightly prohibited it. Using “chaplains” to return to such coercion is wrong and should be opposed.

There are many proposals and initiatives lawmakers could focus on in these waning weeks of the session if they really want to improve public education. There are numerous ways they could work to better support our teachers and assist our students. Attempting to turn public schools into Sunday Schools is not the answer.

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

The post Missouri lawmakers should reject fake ‘chaplains’ in schools bill appeared first on missouriindependent.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article critiques proposed legislation in Missouri that would allow public schools to hire “spiritual chaplains,” arguing that the bill is insufficiently rigorous in defining qualifications and raises concerns about religious proselytization in schools. The author’s perspective is clear in its opposition to the bill, highlighting the lack of standards for chaplain selection and the potential for the legislation to be a vehicle for promoting government-sponsored religion in schools. The tone is critical of the bill’s sponsors, particularly the conservative Christian groups behind it, and references U.S. Supreme Court rulings on school prayer to reinforce the argument against the proposal. The language and framing suggest a liberal-leaning stance on the separation of church and state, and the article advocates for stronger protections to prevent religious coercion in public education. While the author presents factual details, such as comparing Missouri’s bill to Arizona’s more stringent chaplaincy standards, the overall argument pushes for a progressive stance on religious freedom and public school policies, leading to a Center-Left bias.

Continue Reading

Trending