News from the South - Tennessee News Feed
See what research at Tennessee universities was defunded in Trump’s federal grant cuts
by Cassandra Stephenson, Tennessee Lookout
May 27, 2025
Modeling for infectious disease research, vaccine education programs, a rural mental health program, disinformation research and a project developing evacuation route technology for active shooter scenarios are among the federally funded grants at Tennessee universities terminated by the Trump administration.
The University of Tennessee system reported losing $37.7 million in funding for 42 grants earlier this month, the majority of which came from grants for the UT Institute of Agriculture. Six grants remain “pending.”
Nine partial stop work orders are in effect, preventing portions of projects from being completed but not impacting the total award, according to University of Tennessee spokesperson Melissa Tindell. The university released a full list of its federal grants on Wednesday.
Middle Tennessee State University reported losing roughly $640,000 due to 10 grant terminations, encompassing grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Institute of Museum and Library Sciences and the Tennessee Department of Health.
Vanderbilt University, Tennessee State University, East Tennessee State University and the University of Memphis did not respond to requests for a list of terminated grants. Records maintained by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) list millions more in grant cuts at those schools, but data posted to the DOGE website is imperfect.
UT system loses $37.7M in federal grants; Institute of Agriculture is hardest hit
For example, DOGE’s website lists only one terminated grant at MTSU: a roughly $305,000 National Science Foundation grant for the development of a “Framework for Integrating Technology for Equity.” While this is among MTSU’s terminated grants, several others are not listed in DOGE’s data, including a program that supported students with disabilities in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), archeological research at Fort Negley and research on COVID-19 health disparities.
One of the grant recipients — The Alliance of Students with Disabilities for Inclusion, Networking, and Transition Opportunities in STEM – stated on its website that its NSF funding terminated on May 2, “due to the alignment of our work with the agency’s evolving priorities.”
“This decision does not reflect the quality or importance of the work we’ve done together — work that has empowered students with disabilities and advanced equity in STEM across the country,” the website states.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the selection process for terminated grants.
Broadly, President Donald Trump’s executive orders have included orders to terminate “‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ discrimination in the federal workforce, and in federal contracting and spending.” Trump’s administration has also taken aim at Biden-era climate policies.
Of the 42 grants terminated across the University of Tennessee system, nearly 40% referenced diversity, inclusion, minorities, race, underserved or marginalized groups, sexuality or gender in their titles. Five terminated grants mentioned infectious disease or immunization in their titles, and COVID-19 disparities or prevention efforts were specifically mentioned in three.
Impact not limited to college campuses
Cuts to collegiate research can have impacts far beyond their fields.
Most basic, foundational research is done in the academic sphere, according to Alexandra Graddy-Reed, an associate professor at the University of Southern California’s Sol Price School of Public Policy. It’s more difficult to tell if this type of research will be profitable, so about 60% of this type of research is funded by the federal government rather than industries or nonprofits, she said.
“Without the federal government funding academic research, it would drastically decrease what we can accomplish,” Graddy-Reed said.
A portion of the University of Tennessee’s terminated grants deal with COVID-19 disparities. Graddy-Reed used this as an example of potential long-term implications.
“If you look at COVID in particular, Vanderbilt was one of the first organizations leading to a vaccine through their research, but that research wasn’t just started in 2020, right?” she said. It was decades in the making.
“When you stop that basic research, when you stop understanding how pandemics spread, how they impact our populations, when the next pandemic hits, we are not as prepared to address the issue,” Graddy-Reed said.
Federal judge extends order blocking ‘devastating’ NIH cap on research payments
Terrell Morton, an assistant professor of identity and justice in STEM education at the University of Illinois Chicago’s School of Education, had similar concerns.
“One of the things that people talk about is this concept of brain drain, or the idea that as a country, we’re going to lose a lot of the rich innovation, because colleges and universities are sort of the main driving sites for research-based innovation,” Morton said.
Researchers at MTSU and University of Tennessee declined interviews.
Regarding the termination of multiple grants that included a focus on minorities, Morton said science has shown that “the experiences, the needs and the outcomes of people differ based off of not only things like their race, but also their gender, their socioeconomic status, whether or not they live in an urban or rural or suburban neighborhood.”
Morton highlighted the National Science Foundation’s authority to engage in “broader impacts work,” which can include increasing participation of women, people with disabilities and underrepresented minorities in STEM, according to NSF’s website. Morton said that also includes veterans and people from rural communities.
“If you remove federal funding from grants that explore things like the implications of rurality on mental health, then there’s not going to be any knowledge or resources generated to help people in rural spaces that don’t have access to high-quality health care or don’t have access to high-quality mental health services,” he said.
Further implications stretch to the economy — less funding means less support for graduate students, research technicians, and publication editors. Less funding also means fewer researchers attending professional conferences, booking hotels and meeting space and supporting the service industry in conference locations, Morton said.
One of the things that people talk about is this concept of brain drain, or the idea that as a country, we’re going to lose a lot of the rich innovation, because colleges and universities are sort of the main driving sites for research-based innovation.
– Terrell Morton, University of Illinois Chicago
Graddy-Reed said less research funding can erode an institution’s ability to provide the infrastructure and equipment needed to do research.
“Science is America’s competitive advantage, and we rely heavily on government funding for that,” she said. “If that gets cut, we’re in decline as a society, but so is our competitive advantage in the global economy.”
While grant funding cuts were catalyzed by politics, Morton said these cuts impact everyone, regardless of their political affiliation. He said he’s hopeful that people will see the results not from a political perspective but from a practical one: what benefits the nation and its communities.
“In my opinion, what truly benefits our nation and our communities are research and scientific explorations that can help develop new innovations and outcomes that elevate the life, the liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of our people,” he said.
Explore terminated grants
Terminated grants at MTSU include:
- Tennessee Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (Mid-Level Alliance) TLSAMP
- NSF Includes Alliance: The Alliance of Students with Disabilities for Inclusion, Networking, and Transition Opportunities in STEM
- Race, Religion, and STEM: (Examining the Intersections for Black Students)
- Collaborative Research: Framework for Integrating Technology for Equity
- Archaeological and Ethnographic Field Research at Fort Negley (in Nashville)
- An Investigation of Virtual Reality Initiatives and Workforce Development Outcomes in Libraries
- The Works of Anne de Graville: A New Edition and English Translation
- Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Prevention and Control of Emerging Infectious Diseases – Building and Strengthening Epidemiology, Laboratory and Health Information Systems Capacity
- A-IP19-1901 Immunization and Vaccines for Children
- Covid Vaccination Pods – TN Covid-19 Health Disparities Initiative
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com.
The post See what research at Tennessee universities was defunded in Trump’s federal grant cuts appeared first on tennesseelookout.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This content presents a critical perspective on federal grant terminations under the Trump administration, highlighting the potential negative impacts on research, diversity, public health, and scientific innovation. The article emphasizes the value of government-funded academic research and portrays the funding cuts as detrimental to societal progress, equity, and preparedness for future challenges. While it provides factual information and quotes from experts, the framing and focus on the adverse consequences of the cuts and the specific mention of Trump’s policies targeting diversity and climate initiatives signal a center-left bias. The piece advocates for the importance of inclusive and federally supported research without overt partisan language, positioning it slightly left of center in political orientation.
News from the South - Tennessee News Feed
Metro Nashville edits immigration report to remove names
SUMMARY: Metro Nashville quietly edited a city report tracking 35 interactions between local and federal immigration officials to remove names, including ICE, Homeland Security agents, and a Metro Council member. This change follows criticism from Republican lawmakers amid fallout from Mayor Freddie O’Connell’s executive order mandating immigration encounter tracking. State Representatives Johnny Garrett and Andy Ogles argue the policy endangers federal officers, risks legal violations, and may breach state law. Republicans have called for state-level investigation alongside an ongoing federal inquiry. The Homeland Security and Judiciary Committees plan to assess if federal funding restrictions related to sanctuary city policies were violated.

A city report that originally named federal immigration officials has since been edited, removing all names.
News from the South - Tennessee News Feed
Moving beyond moral indignation on Tennessee immigration enforcement
by Bruce Barry, Tennessee Lookout
May 29, 2025
The rank awfulness of the recent “we’re just looking for cars with tail lights out so we can help drivers realize they need to make some safety repairs” immigrant roundup in South Nashville needs little amplification from me given the blast of righteous contempt blowing around much of the city. But moving beyond indignation, it’s worth pondering broader dimensions of the moral insult here. Why is this happening in the way that it’s happening, and what should be done by those who are outraged?
First, though, some professional grade outrage, so here’s the American Civil Liberties Union: “A deportation system that herds 75 percent of people through fast-track, streamlined removal is a system devoid of fairness and individualized due process. Nonjudicial removals violate our constitutional tradition.” They go on to say that the administration has “prioritized speed over fairness in the removal system.” (Disclosure: I sit on the board of ACLU’s Tennessee affiliate but do not speak for them.)
I suspect many who are appalled at traffic-stop detentions and the climate of fear they create would say that “speed over fairness” sums it up pretty well. But here’s the thing: that ACLU quote is from 2014, and the administration in question was Barack Obama’s. And indeed, Obama’s record on immigration — the “deporter in chief” by some accounts — did feature removals of noncitizens far outpacing the Clinton and Bush administrations that came before.
I mention this not to frame some sort of moral equivalence between President Donald Trump and Obama, but to highlight a chronic policy equivalence that has afflicted not just those two but every administration since Clinton’s.
The culprit of course is Washington’s inexhaustible futility on immigration. The last comprehensive bill signed into law by Ronald Reagan in 1986 gave rise to legal status for a few million of the undocumented. Ensuing decades brought tweaks in federal law on admissions, enforcement and border control, but also growth in the unauthorized immigrant population to its current eight-figure level. Meanwhile, occasional stabs at meaningful reform of a system that pretty much everyone agrees needs an overhaul have repeatedly failed.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement “dragnet” in Nashville results in detentions
That’s left each administration over the last four decades with basically three options: (1) try to light a fire under major immigration reform in Congress, or (2) do essentially nothing and let legal and nonlegal immigrant demography go where it will on its own, or (3) use instruments of state power to try to rein in that demography in the short run and kick the actual reform can down the road. And while (1) gets its share of lip service, each administration since Reagan has ultimately opted for a blend of (2) and (3): throw some people out, hope some others leave , don’t talk about it much and focus on other things.
This informal working consensus that we’ll just muddle through until major reform magically happens has sufficed because immigration and the border have not been big issues driving voters. Attitudes toward immigration have trended in a positive direction over the decades, in 2016 even most Trump supporters thought many undocumented immigrants should be allowed to remain, and in 2020 Immigration continued to rank relatively low among issues important to voters. But then in 2024 Trump parlayed border mayhem and isolated migrant violence (with an assist from Bidenworld’s policy fecklessness) into a hefty surge in voter interest and alarm.
So Trump runs on “mass deportation,” wins, takes office and starts detaining and deporting. With roots in due process nonchalance and public information minimalism, his administration’s methods run the gamut from crude to cruel: pseudorandom traffic stops as we’ve seen here in Nashville, workplace raids and the particularly vile tactic of nabbing people when they show up for required appointments at immigration courts. Not to be that glib schmuck who rationalizes — “he’s doing what voters elected him to do” — but he is doing what he said he’d do.
Strident moral outrage is an appropriate reflex, but it’s not as widely shared as some may wish. A recent Pew survey finds an overall majority of U.S. adults think Trump is not overstepping when it comes to deporting immigrants.
A message to Democrats and liberals grousing loudly and justifiably about the President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement is you can’t stop there; you need to say concretely what you would do differently.
Especially relevant to doings in Nashville are the majority who are fine with law enforcement asking for immigration status during routine encounters and making immigration arrests in homes,workplaces and at public gatherings. It feels as though the public mind on this projects a kind of passive tolerance for something distasteful (like eating a rutabaga)— a sense of being generally “not not okay” with it.
Let’s keep in mind also that most of what’s happening is legally kosher. Sure, there’s the occasional need for a court to throw in with a due-process face slap. On the whole, though, ICE and its lackeys (like our servile Tennessee Highway Patrol) may be using tactics that prior administrations wouldn’t use, but these aren’t tactics that prior administrations couldn’t use.
My theory is that many who tolerate Trump’s brackish regime of detention and deportation do so not through blindness to its calamitous effects on families and communities, but through exasperation with the government’s inability to get anything done. However repellant the methods, and however botched the surgery, this is a twisted but measurable version of getting something done.
My message to Democrats and liberals grousing loudly and justifiably about the hideousness of Trumpian immigration enforcement is you can’t stop there; we need to hear what concretely you would do differently.
The voting public has made it clear that the Obama-Biden approach — timid enforcement aimed at preserving the status quo and kicking the can down the road — is no longer viable. And political realities strongly suggest that Reagan-style amnesty is not on the table. So how would you affirmatively alter the landscape of unauthorized immigration? How fast and with what methods?
Morally principled agita on this issue may be a constructive outlet for conscience and community, but it’s not by itself enough to carve a path back to power.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
Tennessee Lookout is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Tennessee Lookout maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Holly McCall for questions: info@tennesseelookout.com.
The post Moving beyond moral indignation on Tennessee immigration enforcement appeared first on tennesseelookout.com
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Left
This article exhibits a Center-Left bias by critiquing aggressive immigration enforcement tactics, highlighting civil liberties concerns, and referencing the ACLU’s condemnation of expedited deportations as unfair. It acknowledges the moral and community harms caused by recent ICE operations but also frames the issue within the broader, bipartisan failure to reform immigration policy. The piece calls for Democrats and liberals to propose concrete alternatives beyond moral outrage, implicitly criticizing both Trump-era enforcement and previous administrations’ inaction. While sympathetic to immigrant rights, it adopts a pragmatic tone that balances critique of current policy with recognition of political realities, avoiding extreme partisanship.
News from the South - Tennessee News Feed
‘I’m living again’: Medical device gives man who was planning his own funeral second chance at life
SUMMARY: A Midsouth man, Richard Cororum, who once planned his own funeral due to advanced heart failure, now has a second chance at life thanks to a breakthrough treatment called Baroreflex Activation Therapy (Barostim). This small device, implanted in the chest, sends signals to the brain to reduce the heart’s stress response, significantly easing symptoms. Since receiving it at Baptist Memorial Hospital, Cororum’s symptoms have nearly vanished, allowing him to walk long distances and plan a trip to Europe. Despite heart failure challenges in the Midsouth, Cororum’s recovery highlights the importance of prevention and new therapies in fighting heart disease.

A retired chaplain with advanced heart failure was planning his own funeral. He’d had heart problems for decades and even bought a tombstone with his name engraved on it. Then his doctor introduced him to a new device. A month later, he’s planning vacations and living a life he, literally, never planned on. READ MORE: https://www.fox13memphis.com/health/im-living-again-retired-chaplain-plans-funeral-gets-a-second-chance-at-life-thanks-to/article_873f982a-de5f-4562-95d1-c51ca5942f93.html
ABOUT FOX13 MEMPHIS:
FOX13 Memphis is your home for breaking news, live video, traffic, weather and your guide to everything local for the Mid-South.
CONNECT WITH FOX 13 MEMPHIS:
Visit the FOX13 Memphis WEBSITE: https://www.fox13memphis.com/
Like FOX13 Memphis on FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/fox13news.myfoxmemphis
Follow FOX13 Memphis on TWITTER: https://twitter.com/FOX13Memphis
Follow FOX13 Memphis on INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/fox13memphis
-
News from the South - Kentucky News Feed6 days ago
A Kentucky couple who lost opposite arms in a tornado reunite days later
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed6 days ago
Security First offers new homeowners’ policies, indicating signs of recovery
-
News from the South - Florida News Feed6 days ago
🏫 Best private high schools in the Orlando metro area
-
Local News6 days ago
Pass Road Elementary hosts inaugural Color Run with Wounded Warrior Project to teach students about service and gratitude
-
News from the South - Texas News Feed6 days ago
THC ban edges closer to finish line, lawsuits expected | Texas
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed5 days ago
Edwards defends vote for “One Big Beautiful Bill” despite nonpartisan analysis predicting it would benefit the rich and harm the poor
-
News from the South - North Carolina News Feed3 days ago
Martin General to reopen as new hospital type for NC.
-
News from the South - Kentucky News Feed6 days ago
6 Kentucky counties hit by tornadoes, storms are approved for federal aid. More could be added.