Connect with us

The Center Square

SCOTUS decision on religious charter schools will carry widespread ramifications | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Thérèse Boudreaux – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-04 07:49:00

(The Center Square) – In a case that could have major implications for the American public school system, the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether religious charter schools, which are taxpayer-funded, are constitutional.

The St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School v. Drummond case involves a 2023 decision by the Oklahoma Statewide Virtual Charter School Board to allow St. Isidore to join the dozens of charter schools in the state.

Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond sued the charter school board, arguing that allowing St. Isidore to join the public charter school program amounts to state-sponsoring of religion.

The Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled in Drummond’s favor, but St. Isidore is arguing before the Supreme Court that contracting with the state to provide free and public education options as a privately run entity does not mean its religious activities constitute “state actions.”

Lori Windham from Becket law firm, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of St. Isidore, told The Center Square that a major question in the case is whether charter schools are closer to traditional public schools or instead function as private schools that are eligible for public funds like scholarships.

“There are already a lot of programs that taxpayers fund for things like federal student loans or federal scholarships that go to religious schools and non-religious schools alike,” Windham said. “Funds to help disabled students, funds to help schools have better security measures to prevent school shootings and hate crime – those go to religious schools and non-religious schools alike.”

“So in that way, this charter school isn’t so different from lots of other programs that are out there where many different people can come in and ask to be part of that program, regardless of whether they’re religious or not,” she added.

Though identifying as a Catholic school, St. Isidore accepts nonreligious students and does not require a statement of faith. Accordingly, the school also argues that an exclusion of St. Isidore from the state’s charter school program, simply because it is religious, violates the First Amendment’s free exercise clause. 

“When you have a generally available program, you can’t kick out religious people or religious groups just for being religious. You have to allow them to compete on the same basis as everybody else,” Windham told The Center Square. “And that’s the main argument that the charter school is making here, that they’re just trying to compete for that charter on the same basis as any other private group who wants to start running a school as part of that program.”

If precedent is any indication, St. Isidore has a high chance of winning the case. In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned the state of Maine’s ban on state tuition assistance to students attending religious schools.

But if SCOTUS does rule in Drummond’s favor, other areas where religious students and schools are currently receiving state funds – such as assistance for students with disabilities – could be jeopardized.

The post SCOTUS decision on religious charter schools will carry widespread ramifications | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a neutral, factual account of the ongoing legal case regarding the constitutionality of religious charter schools receiving taxpayer funding. It reports on the positions of the involved parties—the Oklahoma Attorney General, St. Isidore Catholic School, and supporting legal entities—without promoting a particular ideological stance. The language and framing remain impartial, presenting both sides of the argument, including legal perspectives and potential consequences for public funding programs. The content does not lean toward a specific political ideology but outlines the facts of the case and the broader implications, ensuring that it adheres to balanced reporting.

The Center Square

U-M Health ends transgender treatment for minors | Michigan

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Elyse Apel – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-27 10:33:00


The University of Michigan’s hospital system, Michigan Medicine, announced it will stop providing hormonal therapies and puberty blockers to minors amid criminal and civil investigations triggered by the Trump Administration into transgender treatments for children. The decision, citing legal risks and external threats, impacts patients under 19, though care for those over 19 continues. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel condemned the move as “shameful” and potentially illegal, warning it may constitute discrimination under Michigan law and pledging to explore legal options. Her office also reissued guidance supporting transgender care amidst a multi-state lawsuit defending minors’ access. Conservative groups praised the administration’s actions.

(The Center Square) – The University of Michigan’s hospital system, Michigan Medicine, announced it will no longer provide hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors.

This came in response to the Trump Administration opening criminal and civil investigations into those providing transgender treatments for minors throughout the country

“In light of that investigation, and given escalating external threats and risks, we will no longer provide gender affirming hormonal therapies and puberty blocker medications for minors,” said a statement from Michigan Medicine released Monday.

“We recognize the gravity and impact of this decision for our patients and our community,” it continued. “We are working closely with all those impacted, and we will continuously support the well-being of our patients, their families, and our teams.”

Michigan Medicine was just one of more than 20 doctors and clinics that were subpoenaed by the Department of Justice in early July.

They were subpoenaed for their part in “performing transgender medical procedures on children,” according to the department.

“Medical professionals and organizations that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable by this Department of Justice,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

On Michigan Medicine’s webpage which previously listed its transgender treatments, it posted more details about its decision to end those for all patients under the age of 19.

“In response to unprecedented legal and regulatory threats to our clinicians and our institution, we have made the difficult decision to stop prescribing puberty blockers and gender affirming hormones for patients under age 19,” it stated. “We will continue to care for our gender diverse patients, providing all appropriate care other than puberty blockers and gender affirming hormones. Care for patients age 19 and over is not affected by this change.”

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel pushed back against Michigan Medicine’s decision to end those transgender treatments, calling it “shameful, dangerous, and potentially illegal.”

In response to Michigan Medicine’s decision, Nessel’s office reissued an open letter to all Michigan health care providers.

The letter outlines that to refuse these health care services might be discrimination under Michigan law.

“This cowardly acquiescence to political pressure from this president and his administration is not what patients have come to expect from an institution that has labeled itself, ‘the leaders and the best,’ and my department will be considering all of our options if they violate Michigan law,” Nessel said. “UM has chosen instead to sacrifice the health, well-being, and likely the very lives of Michigan children, to protect itself from the ire of an administration who, oftentimes, engages in unlawful actions itself.”

Earlier this month, Nessel also joined a multi-state lawsuit seeking to protect transgender health care for minors.

Others have applauded this move and the Trump Administration’s push to end these treatments nationwide.

“Pressure from the Trump Administration is working,” said a statement from the American Principles Project, a conservative policy group that has been outspoken against transgender treatment for minors. “Thank you, POTUS.”

Elyse Apel is a reporter for The Center Square covering Colorado and Michigan. A graduate of Hillsdale College, Elyse’s writing has been published in a wide variety of national publications from the Washington Examiner to The American Spectator and The Daily Wire.

The post U-M Health ends transgender treatment for minors | Michigan appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article primarily reports on the decision by Michigan Medicine to cease providing hormonal and puberty blocker treatments to minors, contextualizing it within investigations led by the Trump Administration and responses from various political figures. While it includes statements from both sides—Michigan Medicine, the Trump Administration, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, and conservative groups—the selection and framing of quotes lean toward a right-wing perspective. For example, the article highlights language such as “mutilated children” from the Department of Justice and presents opposition to transgender treatments in largely unchallenged terms. It also notes praise from a conservative policy group without equivalent emphasis on supportive arguments for transgender healthcare. Furthermore, the reporter’s associations with conservative outlets and institutions provide subtle context but do not alone define bias. Overall, the article’s tone and framing suggest a Right-Leaning bias, as it frames the issue largely around legal and moral objections to transgender treatments for minors, aligning more with conservative viewpoints.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat | New York

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Chris Wade – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-26 08:22:00


New York Gov. Kathy Hochul opposes President Donald Trump’s executive order threatening to withhold federal funding from states allowing cashless bail, arguing it misunderstands New York’s bail reforms. Trump claims cashless bail endangers public safety by releasing suspects who commit further crimes. Hochul’s office counters that New York hasn’t eliminated cash bail, but reformed laws to hold violent offenders accountable, contributing to a historic low in violent crime rates. Republicans praise Trump’s stance, blaming bail reform for rising crime. NYC Mayor Eric Adams criticized rivals who support bail reform, while Cuomo’s camp defended the changes and questioned the legality of Trump’s order.

(The Center Square) — New York Gov. Kathy Hochul is pushing back on President Donald Trump’s “reckless” push to do away with cashless bail, saying the move to withhold federal funding would undermine public safety. 

Trump signed an executive order Monday threatening to withhold federal funding from states and cities that allow cashless bail, arguing the policies pose a threat to public safety. The White House also released a memo with the new order highlighting several cases where suspects in New York and other cities were released without bail but later accused of committing other crimes, including murder, drug dealing and sexual assault. 

“Maintaining order and public safety requires incarcerating individuals whose pending criminal charges or criminal history demonstrate a clear ongoing risk to society,” Trump’s directive states. “When these individuals are released without bail under city or State policies, they are permitted — even encouraged — to further endanger law-abiding, hard-working Americans because they know our laws will not be enforced.” 

However, a Hochul spokesperson issued a statement blasting Trump for misunderstanding how New York’s bail law works and pointing to changes in the law that strike a balance between due process and protecting public safety. 

“New York has not eliminated cash bail. His reckless threat to withhold federal funds would only undercut law enforcement and make our communities less safe,” the statement said. “The fact is Governor Hochul changed New York’s bail laws so violent offenders are held accountable, and as a result rearrests are down. New York now has one of the lowest violent crime rates in six decades.” 

New York eliminated bail for most nonviolent felony charges in 2020 as part of overhauling the criminal justice system. A series of high-profile murders and shootings across the state prompted Hochul and others to call for tightening pre-detention bail laws. A provision in the two-year $229 billion budget signed by Hochul in April included changes to the system that gave New York state judges more discretion to keep dangerous suspects locked up ahead of trial.

But Trump’s order drew praise from New York Republicans, who have sought unsuccessfully for years to do away with the state’s bail law. 

“Kathy Hochul and NY Democrats’ failed bail reform has been a catastrophic disaster leading to a crime crisis in New York making every family and community less safe,” U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik, a New York City Republican, said in a statement. “Again and again, Kathy Hochul has prioritized violent criminals over law-abiding New Yorkers. Enough is enough.” 

New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat who has pushed for changes to the state’s bail law, used Trump’s order to criticize his main rivals in the upcoming election, Democratic nominee and Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who signed the original bail reform law. 

“Zohran Mamdani wants to finish what Andrew Cuomo started,” Adams, who is running as an independent after losing the Democratic primary, said in a statement. “Cuomo signed the reckless bail reform law that unleashed violent criminals into YOUR neighborhoods. Now Mamdani wants to take it even further by defunding the NYPD and leaving YOUR city — especially Black and Brown communities — defenseless.” 

A Cuomo campaign spokesman defended the 2020 bail reforms and criticized Adams for claiming that he is the “law and order” candidate in the mayoral race.

“As New York has cash bail for violent offenses, and repeat offender arrests have been decreasing, it’s clear that the drafters of this executive order don’t know the facts about New York’s law,” Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi said in the statement. “But it doesn’t matter as it’s very likely that this order — like many of this administration’s EOs — won’t stand up in court.”

The post Hochul pushes back on Trump’s cashless bail funding threat | New York appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the differing ideological positions and actions of political figures regarding bail reform without endorsing a particular viewpoint. It presents statements from both Governor Kathy Hochul and former President Donald Trump, as well as responses from other political actors across the spectrum, including Republicans and Democrats. The language remains factual and balanced, focusing on quotes and policy descriptions rather than using emotionally charged or persuasive language that would indicate a clear bias. Thus, the content adheres to neutral reporting by outlining the debate and contrasting perspectives without promoting one side over the other.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Gruters succeeds Whatley as chairman of Republican National Committee | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-25 14:47:00


State Sen. Joe Gruters of Florida has been elected chairman of the Republican National Committee, succeeding Michael Whatley, a 2026 Senate candidate from North Carolina. Both appointments were influenced by former President Donald Trump. Gruters, 48, an accountant and current state senator, won the post unopposed and emphasized the party’s alignment with Trump’s vision, aiming for a strong 2026 midterm showing. Trump praised Gruters for his role in significant Florida Republican victories since 2016. Gruters’ political career includes serving in the Florida House (2016-18) and Senate (since 2018). He remains in his Senate seat unless running for state CFO in 2026.

(The Center Square) – State Sen. Joe Gruters of Florida has been elected chairman of the Republican National Committee.

He succeeds Michael Whatley, the North Carolinian running for a U.S. Senate seat in 2026. Both were tapped by Donald Trump, Whatley as the 2024 presidential cycle heated up and Gruters in Atlanta on Friday as Trump’s wingman for the party in the 2026 midterms.

Gruters, 48, is an accountant by trade. He is not required to resign his state Senate post; in the “resign-to-run” state law, he would need to if still planning to run for state chief financial officer in 2026.

That post was given to state Sen. Blaise Ingoglia on July 16 by second-term Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. Jimmy Patronis resigned the position and Ingoglia serves until the 2026 midterms.

Trump, a Palm Beach resident when not at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., had encouraged DeSantis to choose Gruters for CFO.

In a network broadcast interview after elected, Gruters said, “This is the president’s party. This is the president’s vision, overall. The party fully embraces the president. We’re going to ride the president all the way to victory in the midterms, and we are going to win big.”

Whatley called his time as chairman “the honor of a lifetime.”

“I am immensely proud of the work we accomplished, and I am excited to pass the torch on to Chairman Gruters,” he said. “Now, it’s time to get to work and fight for the people of North Carolina.”

Gruters had no opposition for election. On social media, Trump called Whatley “incredible” and again pledged his support for the senatorial campaign.

“As state senator and chairman of the Republican Party of Florida,” Trump said of Gruters, “Joe helped us deliver massive and historic victories across the state, including my big six wins, including primaries, in 2016, 2020 and 2024, and has helped us turn Florida red as red can be!”

The connection between Gruters and Trump dates more than a decade. History traces it in earnest to a Sarasota County Statesman of the Year dinner in 2012. He followed with support in 2015 while Marco Rubio, now secretary of state in the Trump administration, and Gov. Jeb Bush were presidential candidates.

Gruters is a former member (2016-18) of the state House of Representatives. He has served in the state Senate since 2018.

The post Gruters succeeds Whatley as chairman of Republican National Committee | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the election of Joe Gruters as chairman of the Republican National Committee, detailing his background, connections to Donald Trump, and statements made by involved parties. The tone is factual and descriptive, focusing on events and quotes without overtly endorsing or criticizing the subjects. However, the content centers on Republican figures and includes positive language from Trump and associates, which may reflect a slight center-right perspective due to the subject matter and source. Overall, it adheres mostly to neutral reporting by presenting information and direct quotes rather than promoting a particular ideological viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending