Connect with us

News from the South - Virginia News Feed

Report: Virginia tops nation for household income | Virginia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Shirleen Guerra | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-03 11:12:00


Virginia ranks first in the nation for household income in 2025, based on WalletHub’s analysis of all 50 states and D.C. The report examined average incomes for the top 5%, bottom 20%, and median households. Virginia excels across these categories: the top 5% earn $533,522 annually (3rd nationally), the bottom 20% earn $19,293 (4th highest), and the median income is $93,275 (17th). Neighboring states like Maryland (15th) and D.C. (13th) also performed well. WalletHub highlights that both high- and low-income earners in Virginia outperform counterparts in most states, reflecting strong income levels overall.

(The Center Square) – Virginia ranks first in the nation for household income in 2025, according to a new analysis from the personal finance site WalletHub.

The report evaluated all 50 states and the District of Columbia using three key income metrics: the average income of the top 5%, the average income of the bottom 20% and the median household income. The goal was to identify where residents are earning the most across the board.

Virginia topped the list with a strong showing in each category. The top 5% of earners make an average of $533,522 per year, ranking third in the nation. The bottom 20% earn $19,293, the fourth-highest for that group. The commonwealth’s median household income is $93,275, ranking 17th overall.

New Jersey ranked second overall, followed by New York, Connecticut and Washington. At the bottom of the list were West Virginia, New Mexico and Mississippi.

Surrounding states also performed well. Maryland ranked 15th overall, with a top 5% income of $438,321 and a median income of $128,496. The District of Columbia ranked 13th, with the highest median income in the nation at $169,153, but a much lower bottom 20% income of $9,768.

WalletHub analysts said in Virginia, both high- and low-earning households outperform their counterparts in most other states.

“Virginia is the state where people have the highest income, when balancing between the median, top 5% and bottom 20% of earners.”

“While there is a big gap between these two numbers, the top 5% ranks as the third-highest in the nation, while the bottom 20% ranks fourth. In other words, both the rich and the poor are doing better than their counterparts in other states.”

The report also included adjusted rankings based on cost of living, and expert commentary on national income trends. According to WalletHub, the analysis is designed to give a fuller picture of income levels beyond just average or median earnings.

“By measuring the income of various percentiles against a state’s median income, we can better identify where income levels are strongest,” the report states.

The post Report: Virginia tops nation for household income | Virginia appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward, data-driven report on household income rankings by state, based on an analysis from WalletHub. It focuses on objective income statistics without promoting any ideological perspective or policy stance. The language is neutral and factual, simply summarizing findings related to income levels across different income percentiles and states. There is no evident framing that favors or criticizes any political ideology, party, or economic system. Thus, the content adheres to neutral reporting, conveying information without ideological bias.

News from the South - Virginia News Feed

Commanders stadium report touts large benefits, experts disagree | Maryland

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Jon Styf | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-06 11:21:00


A marketing report by Conventions, Sports and Leisure (CSL) claims the proposed Washington Commanders stadium and development will generate $24.2 billion in economic output over 33 years, with an $8 billion total cost—$3.2 billion for a new stadium at the former RFK site and $4.8 billion for a mixed-use district featuring housing, offices, retail, hotels, and infrastructure. Despite claims the team would primarily finance it, over $2.5 billion in taxpayer subsidies are planned. Economists widely discredit CSL’s reports as misleading, citing flawed assumptions and omitted economic factors. CSL, linked to major sports franchises, is criticized for inflating benefits to justify public funding.

(The Center Square) – A new marketing report on the Washington Commanders proposed stadium and development says the project will lead to $24.2 billion in total economic output over 33 years.

The group that produced the report, however, is regularly discredited by economists who study the impact of sports stadiums

The report from marketing firm Conventions, Sports and Leisure estimates the project will cost $8 billion, with $3.2 billion a new stadium on the site of the former RFK Stadium over a three-year construction period and $4.8 billion for the surrounding mixed-use district over a seven-year span.

The mixed-use portion of the project is planned to include 8.1 million square feet of development. Also, it will have approximately 6,477 multi-family housing units, 519,200 square feet of office space, 376,300 square feet of restaurant and retail space, 800 hotel rooms, 8,200 parking spaces, a sportsplex, supporting infrastructure and green space.

Despite advocates saying the team would be mainly paying for the project, the plan actually calls for more than $2.5 billion worth of taxpayer subsidies.

The economic impact report says the project will lead to $5.1 billion in taxes, including $1.6 billion in property taxes from the mixed-use district, $2.3 billion in sales and ticket taxes, $735.1 million in income taxes and $452.8 million in hotel taxes.

Economists who have extensively studied the impact of sports stadiums have long said that CSL’s reports are inaccurate and misinformation.

The firm has been referred to as the “Wile E. Coyote of the sports stadium racket” by publicly financed stadium blog “Field of Schemes,” written by Neil DeMause. CSL is owned by Legends Marketing, a joint venture involving the New York Yankees and the Dallas Cowboys. 

“Viewing what ‘economic impact’ consultants do to be economics is like considering horoscopes to be astronomy,” economist J.C. Bradbury of Georgia’s Kennesaw State University wrote. “Newspapers are smart enough to put horoscopes next to the comics and Dear Abby, while economic impact ‘studies’ get banner headlines on the front page.”

The reports are often criticized because they do not include crowding out of other visitors on event days, diverted spending from other events and fail to use basic economic principles such as the broken window fallacy, which states that money spent to repair broken items is not a net benefit.

Bradbury previously told The Center Square that CSL is hired by a group looking to push public funding for a project and those numbers are used to tell constituents about how good a project is for a community, even though the actual economic numbers do not show that.

“It’s resulted in a larger cottage industry for giving out tax incentives in general,” Bradbury said. “These are totally fake and they mean nothing but they are required to provide some sort of guidance, even though they don’t.”

The post Commanders stadium report touts large benefits, experts disagree | Maryland appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the economic impact analysis of the Washington Commanders stadium project and includes critical perspectives of the marketing firm producing the report. While it presents factual details about the proposed project and taxpayer subsidies, the framing leans toward skepticism of public funding for sports stadiums, highlighting economists’ criticisms of the economic impact claims and labeling the firm’s work as misleading. The tone is somewhat critical of public subsidies and economic “impact” studies, aligning with a center-right, fiscally cautious viewpoint skeptical of government spending on large sports developments. However, it remains largely factual and does not overtly promote a partisan agenda.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Virginia News Feed

Virginia hits $100B in corporate investment commitments | Virginia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Shirleen Guerra | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-05 14:34:00


Since January 2022, Virginia has secured over $100 billion in corporate investments, surpassing the combined totals of the previous two administrations. Governor Glenn Youngkin announced this milestone at the future site of the Kalahari Resorts in Spotsylvania County. The investments are projected to create more than 265,000 jobs and 15,000 new businesses statewide. Youngkin signed Executive Order 49, making permanent the Made in Virginia Investment Accelerator, a program streamlining development for projects investing over $250 million or creating 250+ jobs. Focused on six sectors, the initiative unites state agencies to boost economic growth, supported by tax relief and regulatory reforms.

(The Center Square) – Virginia has secured more than $100 billion in corporate investment commitments since January 2022.

Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced it during a press event at the future site of Kalahari Resorts & Conventions in Spotsylvania County. According to the governor’s office, that investment total exceeds the combined amount secured under the past two administrations. It includes more than 265,000 new jobs and over 15,000 new business starts across the commonwealth.

That’s about the cost of 1,200 F-35 fighter jets.

Youngkin signed Executive Order 49 at the event, making permanent the Made in Virginia Investment Accelerator, a state-led program designed to streamline site development, permitting, infrastructure planning and workforce coordination for major business projects.

The program supports companies planning to invest more than $250 million or create at least 250 new jobs in Virginia. It focuses on six key sectors: energy, data centers, advanced manufacturing, life sciences, supply chain management, and commercial aerospace and defense.

“Virginia isn’t just competing to win. Virginia is winning, Youngkin said in a statement. He pointed to $9 billion in tax relief, regulatory reforms, and expanded infrastructure investments as key factors behind the surge in corporate interest.

The governor’s office said the investment accelerator brings together state agencies responsible for permitting, transportation, workforce training, economic development and energy planning. It is led by the Virginia Economic Development Partnership and Secretary of Commerce and Trade Juan Pablo Segura.

“We are setting business investment records because of the Governor’s leadership and his signal to the market that Virginia wants to partner with the business community, wants to innovate with private industry, and wants to support private investment as much as possible, Segura said.

Partner agencies include Virginia Housing, Virginia Energy, the Virginia Department of Health, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and the Virginia Department of Transportation.

The Kalahari project, which hosted the executive order signing, is expected to become the largest indoor water park on the East Coast and is one of the state’s major tourism and hospitality investments.

The post Virginia hits $100B in corporate investment commitments | Virginia appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article primarily reports on Governor Glenn Youngkin’s announcement of significant corporate investment in Virginia under his administration, highlighting economic achievements and policy initiatives such as tax relief and regulatory reform. The tone is generally positive toward Youngkin’s leadership and economic agenda, using language that underscores business success and governmental efficiency without critical analysis or opposing viewpoints. While it does not explicitly advocate a partisan position, the framing aligns with a pro-business, market-friendly perspective typical of center-right reporting. The piece focuses on conveying the administration’s accomplishments without broader ideological commentary, maintaining a mostly factual, though favorable, presentation.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Virginia News Feed

These popular snack foods could soon require warning labels in US

Published

on

www.youtube.com – WTVR CBS 6 – 2025-06-04 16:59:51

SUMMARY: A Texas bill proposes requiring warning labels on popular snack foods containing 44 specific ingredients like food dyes, bleached flour, and certain oils. Affected products include candies such as Skittles and M\&M’s, chips like Doritos and Ruffles, and drinks like Gatorade and Mountain Dew. The initiative aligns with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again campaign, aiming for greater transparency. Though these ingredients are legal in the U.S., many are banned in other countries. Health experts say warning labels could reduce risks linked to ultraprocessed foods, which constitute over half of Americans’ calorie intake. Food industry groups oppose the bill, citing economic concerns and the bill’s broad scope. If passed, the law could prompt nationwide labeling due to Texas’s large market.

YouTube video

These popular snack foods could soon require warning labels in US

Source

Continue Reading

Trending