Connect with us

The Center Square

Poll: Voters support cutting DEI, foreign aid spending, but not Medicaid, military | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Thérèse Boudreaux – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 09:14:00

(The Center Square) – American taxpayers are divided on federal spending and whether significant cuts should be made, but the vast majority support increasing or maintaining current funding levels for entitlement programs such as Medicaid and for national defense.

The Center Square’s Voters’ Voice Poll, conducted April 15-18 by Noble Predictive Insights, surveyed 1,187 Democrats; 1,089 Republicans; and 251 non-leaning Independents. The poll has a +/- 2.0% margin of error.

The majority of Americans do not want the U.S. government to increase spending on its tax collection efforts, foreign aid or DEI programs.

Of the 2,527 poll respondents, only 19% of voters back boosting funds for the Internal Revenue Service and 30% support a decrease. 

Similarly, only 16% support increased funding to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and other foreign aid, while 39% want to cut spending on foreign aid.

USAID has come under fire for its funding of contraception, LGBTQ+ activism, electric vehicles, armed terrorist groups, and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives around the world. The Department of State effectively assumed control of USAID’s functions after the Trump administration slashed more than 80% of the agency’s contracts

In general, DEI remains a fraught topic among voters, with 35% of poll respondents favoring decreasing government spending on DEI initiatives across all agencies. But 23% – mostly fueled by responses from Democrats and Independents – favor an increase, while 31% are content to keep DEI spending as is.

Medicare and Medicaid programs remain the “third rail” of American politics, with 85% of respondents supporting increasing or maintaining federal funding for the entitlement programs. Only 8% support a funding decrease, and 7% are undecided.



The U.S. military enjoys similar support, with 42% of voters supporting a funding increase and 38% content to keep military funding at current levels. Twelve percent want the roughly $850 billion budget to shrink, an unlikely scenario as Trump wants to boost defense spending to $1 trillion annually

Voters also approve of boosting resources for those who served in the military, with 51% backing a funding increase for the Department of Veterans Affairs and 33% supporting current funding levels. Only 7% prefer a decrease and 9% are unsure.

Some targets of Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, including the Department of Education and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), remain relatively popular with Americans.

Compared to 24% of voters who support funding cuts, 69% of voters support increasing or maintaining federal funding for the Department of Education, which Trump effectively dismantled in March via executive order. 

The Trump administration also announced in March it will cut roughly 2,400 CDC employees and recently leaked budget plans that outline future restructuring and funding cuts. But 32% of voters polled support increasing federal spending on the CDC and 42% prefer maintaining funding levels, with 17% backing a funding cut.

The poll shows that while cutting wasteful government spending is “something Americans conceptually support,” DOGE should be “careful about the particulars,” David Byler, head of research at Noble Predictive Insights, told The Center Square.

“If it’s something where there’s an obvious government function going on, it’s a little bit harder to get the decrease there,” Byler said.

Highlighting Byler’s point, roughly 80% of voters back current or increased government spending on both the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Homeland Security. 

 

The Center Square Voters’ Voice Poll is one of only six national tracking polls in the United States.

The post Poll: Voters support cutting DEI, foreign aid spending, but not Medicaid, military | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the results of a polling survey regarding federal spending, presenting data on various government programs and public opinions without explicitly endorsing a particular viewpoint. However, the framing and selection of certain details—such as highlighting controversies around USAID funding, references to “armed terrorist groups,” and the emphasis on Trump’s spending and administrative actions—reflect a tone that leans slightly conservative. The language occasionally carries subtle critique of progressive programs like DEI and foreign aid, suggesting a center-right bias rather than strictly neutral reporting. Overall, the article focuses on factual reporting of poll data but with language and contextual framing that suggest a leaning towards center-right perspectives.

News from the South - Texas News Feed

Texas House passes abortion-related bills | Texas

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-22 17:02:00


The Texas House advanced two abortion-related bills previously passed by the Senate. SB 33, authored by Sen. Donna Campbell, bans taxpayer funds from supporting out-of-state abortion travel, targeting entities that provide logistical support for abortions. It allows lawsuits against violators to recover misused funds. SB 31, the Life of the Mother Act filed by Sen. Bryan Hughes, clarifies medical emergency exceptions to abortion bans, requiring uniformity and education on the topic. Texas bans elective abortions except to save the mother’s life. Since the Roe overturn, 157 medically necessary abortions occurred with no prosecutions of doctors, while illegal abortion facility operators face prosecution. The bans have reduced elective abortions by nearly 80,000 over two years.

(The Center Square) – The Texas House has advanced two abortion-related bills that already passed the Senate.

On Thursday, the House passed SB 33, filed by state Sen. Donna Campbell, R-New Braunfels, which bans taxpayer money from being used to assist with travel outside of Texas to have an abortion. The bill passed the House by a vote of 87-57. It passed the Senate in April by a vote of 22-9.

Campbell filed the bill after officials in Austin and San Antonio allocated millions of taxpayer funds for “abortion travel” in violation of state law, The Center Square reported.

“Currently, ‘abortion providers’ may no longer commit legal abortion within the state. Even if they did, cities would be prohibited from engaging in business with them. However, cities have found a way to use taxpayer money to support abortion while skirting the law. Instead, they are giving money to entities that aid or abet abortions in some form but are not directly abortion providers themselves. So far, Austin has directly spent money to this end while the San Antonio city council has repeatedly attempted this blatant misuse of Texan taxpayer funds. Other cities are likely to follow suit without legislation that prohibits such actions explicitly,” Campbell’s bill analysis explains.

The bill explicitly prohibits governmental transactions with abortion assistance entities to ensure that taxpayer funds aren’t used to indirectly support or facilitate out-of-state abortion services. It amends state to law to expand the definition of “abortion assistance entities” to include any organization or individual that “provides financial support, travel arrangements, childcare, or other logistical services that facilitate access to abortions.”

It also empowers the Office of the Attorney General, state residents, or individuals within a political subdivision to sue “any entity engaging in prohibited transactions, with provisions for recovering misused funds, court costs, and attorney’s fees.”

The author of Texas’ Heartbeat Act, state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola, filed the Life of the Mother Act, SB 31, which unanimously passed the Senate in late April. State Rep. Charlie Geren, R-Fort Worth, filed companion legislation, HB 44, in the Texas House.

It passed the House Wednesday by a vote of 89-57 after a heated debate.

Despite Gov. Greg Abbott saying earlier this year that there was no need to amend the state’s Human Life Protection Act, state lawmakers advanced the bill.

Abbott signed the Human Life Protection Act into law in June 2021, which became effective after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in 2022. Texas law prohibits all elective abortions of preborn children with the exception of saving the life of the mother. The law and other Texas abortion bans were challenged in court and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court and Texas Supreme Court. Last May, the Texas Supreme Court ruled that doctors could use “reasonable medical judgment” when determining when a medical necessity justified performing an abortion. The Texas Medical Board also established rules and guidelines.

SB 31 “seeks to clarify existing medical emergency exceptions to otherwise prohibited abortions, which are spread throughout or implicated by multiple provisions in different codes, and provide uniformity among them.” It also establishes continuing medical education and continuing legal education courses about state abortion laws and the bill’s medical emergency exceptions, the bill analysis explains.

It revises state law “relating to exceptions to otherwise prohibited abortions based on a physician’s reasonable medical judgment,” which several Republicans argue creates a loophole to allow elective abortions.

SB 31 passed by a vote of 134-4 after heated debate. Four Republicans voting against it: Harrison; Hopper; Lowe; Pierson, according to an unofficial vote tally.

Seven Republicans voted “Present, not voting:” Holt; Money; Mr. Speaker; Olcott; Swanson; Tinderholt; Toth. Five members were absent and didn’t vote.

Democrats overwhelmingly voted for it.

According to the latest data published by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, zero elective abortions and 157 medically necessary abortions have been performed in Texas since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade and Texas’ abortion ban went into effect in August 2022. This is up from 145 medically necessary abortions performed that were reported in March, The Center Square reported.

If an average of 2,852 abortions performed per month in the first six months of 2022 were to have continued, an estimated 79,856 elective abortions would have been reported by October 2024, based on the data. Meaning, Texas abortion bans reduced elective abortion by nearly 80,000 in a roughly two-year time span.

No doctor has been prosecuted, sued, or sanctioned for performing any of the medically necessary abortions reported to the state. Several people have been arrested and are being prosecuted for operating illegal abortion facilities, The Center Square reported. Elective abortions performed at these facilities were not reported to the state.

The post Texas House passes abortion-related bills | Texas appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on Texas state legislation related to abortion restrictions, focusing on bills proposed and passed by Republican lawmakers. The tone and language tend to emphasize the legal and procedural aspects of the legislation while framing certain actions, such as the use of taxpayer funds for abortion travel, in a negative light by highlighting terms like “blatant misuse.” It presents legislative outcomes and voting splits, noting Democratic and Republican positions, but the selection of details—such as underscoring the reduction in elective abortions and citing prosecutions of illegal abortion facilities—aligns with a perspective favoring abortion restrictions. While it does not use overtly partisan language, the framing highlights Republican efforts to restrict abortion access and portrays these efforts as effective and justified, which suggests a Center-Right bias rather than neutral reporting on the ideological stances of the involved parties alone.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Georgia News Feed

Update: Corp of Engineers clarifies park closures | Georgia

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-22 16:00:00


The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced the closure of 11 boat ramps and parks at Lake Lanier due to staffing shortages, affecting Burton Mill, Old Federal Day Use, Keith’s Bridge, and others. While 21 areas remain open, the closures sparked political debate in Georgia. Senator Raphael Warnock blamed staffing cuts on former President Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency, while State Senator Greg Dolezal disputed this, citing Corps officials who said the issue stems from a Department of Defense hiring freeze and deferred resignations, not budget cuts. The Corps manages 400 projects across 43 states and hopes to hire temporary summer staff soon.

(The Center Square) – The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers said Thursday that 11 Lake Lanier boat ramps and their parks are closed, revising a number released Thursday. 

The 11 ramps are Burton Mill, Old Federal Day Use, Keith’s Bridge, Robinson, Little Hall, Two Mill, Little River, Van Pugh North, Van Pugh South, Long Hollow and Mountain View. Twenty-one areas managed by the Corps of Engineers are open. 

The Corps of Engineers has closed several recreational areas across the country. A map on its website shows visitors what is open and closed. 

The announced closures set off a debate between Georgia lawmakers. 

U.S. Sen. Raphael Warnock, R-Ga., blamed the staffing shortages on President Donald Trump and the Department of Government Efficiency.

“Trump and Elon’s DOGE cuts are forcing Georgia parks to indefinitely close right before a holiday weekend,” Warnock said in a post on X. “Enough is enough with these reckless cuts. Georgia families deserve better.”

State Sen. Greg Dolezal, R-Cumming, said Warnock was wrong.

“When @RichforGA (U.S. Rep. Rick McCormick) and I spoke with the Corps today, they said ‘this is not about money,’” Dolezal said on X. “Warnock might know this if he bothered to put down the keyboard, pick up the phone, and advocate for his constituents like we did.”

Dustin Gautney, chief of public affairs for the Corps of Engineers Mobile District said in an email to The Center Square: “It is true that the staffing shortage is due to the Department of Defense hiring freeze along with a series of deferred resignations this is a manning issue and not a budget issue. Normally we are able to ‘flex’ our manning with temporary hires during the summer. We are hoping we will be able to bring in more summer positions soon and open even more parks for the public to enjoy.”

The Corps of Engineers manages 400 lake and river projects in 43 states, according to its website. 

The post Update: Corp of Engineers clarifies park closures | Georgia appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on a specific issue—the closure of boat ramps managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—and presents statements from political figures with differing perspectives. It includes a claim by Senator Raphael Warnock attributing the closures to budget cuts under a previous administration and a rebuttal from State Senator Greg Dolezal disputing that claim and offering an alternative explanation. The inclusion of a factual response from the Corps of Engineers adds context that neutrally clarifies the situation. The language and framing maintain a factual tone without endorsing either side’s viewpoint, thus presenting factual reporting on ideological positions rather than adopting an ideological stance itself.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Louisiana News Feed

Advocates plead legislators for disability, addiction, domestic violence funding | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-22 14:59:00


The Louisiana Senate Committee on Finance reviewed the proposed $45 billion budget for fiscal year 2026, focusing on education, health, human services, and infrastructure. Advocates for disabilities, addiction recovery, domestic violence survivors, and low-income students urged increased funding for social safety nets. Easter Seals Louisiana requested $465,000 for support services, and People First of Louisiana sought restoration of a $110,000 funding cut. Addiction treatment advocates called for sustained investment, warning of Medicaid rate cuts without it. The Louisiana Association for the Blind requested $11 million, promising a $35 million return. Domestic violence services requested an additional $3 million for shelters. The Pelican Institute advocated for full funding of the GATOR scholarship program.

(The Center Square) − The Louisiana Senate Committee on Finance took testimony Thursday on the state’s proposed $45 billion operating budget for the 2026 fiscal year, hearing directly from advocates for individuals with disabilities, those battling addiction, survivors of domestic violence, and low-income students.

The budget, which includes constitutionally mandated funding for K-12 education, also outlines major appropriations for health, human services, and infrastructure. As lawmakers begin parsing through the spending plan, nonprofit and community leaders are pressing for renewed or increased investments in social safety net programs.

Tracy Garner, president and CEO of Easter Seals Louisiana, a nonprofit providing support to people with disabilities, urged the committee to approve $465,000 in state funding through House Bill 1. The money would go toward support coordination services — a vital link between individuals and the care they need.

Other organizations made similar appeals. Jamie Duplechine, chapter coordinator for People First of Louisiana, asked the committee to restore $110,000 in funding that had been cut from the group, which advocates for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Several people with disabilities testified in support of the organization’s work. Charles Romera also voiced gratitude for a previous $250,000 allocation to the Louisiana Developmental Disabilities Council, but noted the funds have yet to be reallocated in the current proposal.

Several advocates and protestors rallied in support of disability services funding.

The behavioral health and addiction treatment community also turned out in force.

Lonnie Granier, policy and advocacy manager at Odyssey House Louisiana−one of the state’s largest behavioral health nonprofits−thanked lawmakers for an additional $10 million in the State General Fund for substance use disorder treatment. 

Granier warned, however, that without sustained investment, “addiction Medicaid rates will be cut” once temporary funding enhancements expire. Granier called on legislators to support $31 million in total for substance use disorder Medicaid treatment rates.

Scottie Thompson, a peer support specialist at Serenity Treatment Center, also testified, requesting recurring funds for addiction services, though did not specify an amount.

Brian Patchett, president and CEO of the Louisiana Association for the Blind, requested an additional $11 million in funding, calling it “an investment that would yield $35 million” in return.

Domestic violence services were also the subject of advocacy.

Mariah Wisneski, executive director of the Louisiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence, noted the Legislature has allocated $7 million in state funds for victim services in the current budget.

She requested an additional $3 million, citing tangible results from past funding: over 200 new shelter beds and 11 outreach offices, many in rural areas.

“Investments from the last two years have been incredibly successful,” Wisneski told the committee.

Also appearing before the panel was Laurie Adams with the Pelican Institute for Public Policy, who asked lawmakers to prioritize full funding for the Louisiana GATOR scholarship program to ensure that all eligible applications are supported.

The post Advocates plead legislators for disability, addiction, domestic violence funding | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article provides a straightforward account of testimony before the Louisiana Senate Committee on Finance regarding the proposed state budget. It reports on the appeals and requests made by various advocacy groups—such as those supporting individuals with disabilities, addiction treatment services, and domestic violence survivors—without endorsing or critiquing their positions. The tone is neutral and factual, offering balanced coverage of the budget’s components and the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. There is no language or framing that indicates an ideological stance or bias; instead, the piece focuses on presenting relevant information about policy discussions and funding priorities in an impartial manner.

Continue Reading

Trending