Connect with us

The Center Square

Planned Parenthood spends big for Democrats, faces cuts under Republican control | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Casey Harper – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-12 10:09:00

(The Center Square) – Planned Parenthood’s political donations to Republicans have plummeted in the past decade, leaving the nation’s largest abortion provider with few friends on the right as it faces funding cuts under the Trump administration. 

Planned Parenthood reports that about 34% of its funding comes from the federal government, usually through federal grants or reimbursements from Medicaid. 

Planned Parenthood turns around and gives millions of dollars to Democrats each political cycle. In 2024, an analysis from the watchdog group Open Secrets, examining political donations from the large network of Planned Parenthood affiliates and political arms, the group donated $5,144,579, nearly all for liberal groups or Democrats, including former Vice President Kamala Harris in her bid against President Donald Trump.

No Republicans in the U.S. House or Senate received any donations from Planned Parenthood’s array of affiliates, according to Open Secrets. 

At the federal level, Democrats received 99.83% of the political donations. 

The nation’s largest abortion provider seems to have gone all in on one party, but that wasn’t always the case. A look back at the tenures of Barack Obama and George W. Bush showed Planned Parenthood gave to Republicans at the federal level as well. However, federal donation records show that the Trump era in Washington, D.C. is when donating to both sides came to an end. 

Now, Trump is in charge of the executive branch and Republicans hold narrow majorities in both chambers of Congress, which seems poised to make his tax cuts permanent and enact other parts of his agenda.

Among a wave of other cost-saving cuts, Trump’s Health and Human Services agency is reportedly cutting tens of millions of dollars in Title X funding for Planned Parenthood clinics in about two dozen states. 

HHS Title X grants are long-standing funding sources from the HHS Office of Population Affairs to Planned Parenthood for family planning services. During his first term, Trump limited Title X recipients from referring for abortions, a measure that was overturned by the Biden administration. Now, the battle over the same funding is underway.

A coalition of 29 senators sent a letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. this week demanding the funding be reinstated. Notably absent were any Republican signatures.

Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Action Fund, the group’s lobbying arm, blasted Trump for his recent cuts and defended the nonprofit’s work.

“President Trump and Elon Musk are pushing their dangerous political agenda, stripping health care access from people nationwide, and not giving a second thought to the devastation they will cause,” McGill said. 

But so far, it appears nobody is listening. 

Meanwhile, in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, the U.S. Supreme Court is currently considering a case that involves South Carolina’s ban on Planned Parenthood from receiving any Medicaid funds because it performs abortions, even if those funds are not being used on abortions. 

The Supreme Court case is not a direct challenge to South Carolina’s ban but whether private beneficiaries can sue to use their preferred provider, in this case Planned Parenthood. 

The ruling involving South Carolina’s 2018 ban is expected in June. It could rebuff or pave the way for other states to ban Medicaid funds from going to Planned Parenthood. 

Republicans have eyed defunding Planned Parenthood for years, though without success, over the abortion issues. Now, Planned Parenthood has become a staunch advocate on transgender issues, a less popular tenet that has become the subject of scrutiny for Republicans and some moderates. 

“Planned Parenthood” is really a collection of linked groups, not a single entity. Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) provides medical services at hundreds of clinics around the country. The Planned Parenthood Action Fund is one political arm. Planned Parenthood also has a SuperPAC called Planned Parenthood Votes. Affiliates around the country vary in their size, funding and political engagement.

On top of that, there are state and regional political arms of Planned Parenthood affiliates, similar to how labor unions have national political activity and then local activity carried out by local affiliates. 

This series of graphics from Open Secrets, shows the political donations of Planned Parenthood’s affiliates and demonstrates the recent dropoff in support for even moderate Republicans. These figures include donations to members of presidential committees as well.   

When defending their federal funding, Planned Parenthood advocates regularly point to the necessity of their healthcare services, like STI testing and cancer screenings in poorer areas.

In its 2022-2023 annual fiscal year report, Planned Parenthood boasted 392,715 abortions. It also conducted 1,721 adoption referrals.

A Knights of Columbus/Marist Poll in 2022 found that 71% of Americans support legal limits on abortion and 54% oppose taxpayer funding for abortions. 

Under current federal law, Planned Parenthood cannot be reimbursed by the federal government for abortions via Medicaid or Medicare except in the cases of rape, incest or threat to the life of the mother.

However, Planned Parenthood received about $700 million in one year from the government, according to its 2022-2023 report.

Critics argue that even with limitations to prevent federal funding from directly paying for most abortions, taxpayers are still propping up the nation’s largest abortion provider to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars each year. 

Defenders of Planned Parenthood say it helps underserved populations and provides abortions in places where recipients might otherwise struggle to obtain one. 

The post Planned Parenthood spends big for Democrats, faces cuts under Republican control | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

More Republicans clamor for changing Senate rules to bypass Dems’ obstruction | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Thérèse Boudreaux | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-06 15:30:00


Republicans are pushing to change Senate rules to fast-track confirmation of President Trump’s remaining 130+ civilian nominees, frustrated by Democratic obstruction. Democrats have blocked quick confirmations via voice vote or unanimous consent, causing delays. Senate Majority Leader John Thune called it “historic obstruction,” urging Democrats to stop their reflexive opposition. GOP senators plan to pursue a “nuclear option” after recess to limit debate, permit multiple confirmations per vote, or end procedural hurdles. Trump supports this, accusing Democrats of extortion for demanding $2 billion in withheld funds. Changing rules could also help pass the necessary 2026 funding bills and avoid a government shutdown.

(The Center Square) – With Democrats still playing hardball over confirming the rest of President Donald Trump’s civilian nominees, Republicans are becoming increasingly vocal about changing Senate procedural rules to help fast-track the process.

Democrats haven’t allowed a single civilian nominee to pass by voice vote or unanimous consent, which would drastically speed up the confirmation process. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., has called Democrats’ tactics “a historic level of obstruction” and urged them to “rein in their reflexive anti-Trump sentiment.”

With more than 130 nominees remaining, Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., told reporters earlier this week that Senate Republicans plan to take up some kind of rules reform legislation when they return from recess in September.

This so-called “nuclear option,” implemented by a simple majority vote, could include cutting down on debate time, allowing more than one nominee confirmation per vote, or abolishing procedural votes on nominees entirely.

“What Chuck Schumer has done is slow down the process. Typically, by now, 70% of the President’s nominees are confirmed through a short process, a short pass called unanimous consent,” Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., said Wednesday. “But Chuck Schumer is making us spend two hours at a minimum on every one of those.”

Trump also threw his support behind a rules change after nominee-related negotiations between Republican and Democratic leaders apparently blew up. According to a Trump social media post Wednesday, Schumer had demanded the administration release some $2 billion in withheld federal funds in exchange for Democrats’ cooperation.

“This has never happened before. There has never, in U.S. history, been such a delay. THEY ARE EXTORTIONISTS!,” Trump wrote, referring to Senate Democrats. “Republicans must create legislation in order to get out of the grasp of these Country hating THUGS. Move quickly!!!”

This “nuclear option” is not unprecedented. Democrats used it in 2013 to limit debate time and more easily invoke cloture on all nominees except U.S. Supreme Court appointees, while Republicans extended that to include SCOTUS nominees in 2017.

“So when anyone tells you Republicans are taking the ‘nuclear option’ with President Trump to change the Senate rules, remind them that DEMS started this in 2013,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., said on X Wednesday. “We’re working through rule change options with the Trump White House to expedite nominees, end the gridlock, and clear the backlog.”

If Republicans do change Senate rules, it would also allow lawmakers more time to pass the 12 annual appropriations bills providing funding for the federal government in fiscal year 2026. So far, the Senate has only passed three of those bills via a minibus, which still needs the House’s approval.

If Congress is unable to pass all 12 funding bills by Sept. 30 – the end of fiscal year 2025 – they will have to pass a short-term Continuing Resolution, or CR, to prevent a government shutdown.

The post More Republicans clamor for changing Senate rules to bypass Dems’ obstruction | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article largely reports on Senate procedural disputes factually but frames the situation through a lens sympathetic to Republican perspectives. It highlights Republican criticisms of Democratic obstruction, emphasizes Republican calls for rules changes to expedite confirmations, and prominently features quotes from Republican senators and former President Trump’s social media post, which uses charged language against Democrats. While it mentions Democrats’ prior use of the “nuclear option,” the overall tone and source (The Center Square, known for conservative-leaning coverage) suggest a center-right bias that favors the Republican narrative and critiques Democratic Senate tactics. The reporting stops short of overt editorializing but clearly aligns more with the Republican viewpoint.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Moody and McMahon push for expanded school choice to empower families | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Ashley Olds | | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-06 15:21:00


U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody and Secretary of Education Linda McMahon highlighted the importance of parental empowerment and school choice in education during a news conference. Moody emphasized Florida’s progress with the One Big Beautiful Bill, advocating for educational options that allow children to reach their potential. McMahon praised Florida as a leading example and supported universal school choice, stressing the need to end students’ entrapment in failing schools. She outlined a new federal tax credit scholarship program supporting families choosing private education and expanded 529 plans for educational expenses. Congress and states are collaborating to broaden school choice, giving families more control over their children’s education.

(The Center Square) – U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody, R-Fla. and Secretary of Education Linda McMahon discussed empowering parents to help them give their children a quality education. 

At a Wednesday news conference, Moody talked about the One Big Beautiful Bill and how she didn’t want the accomplishments for education and school choice to go unnoticed in Florida and across the nation.

“For those that value parental empowerment, the ability for all kids to have options and education so that they can fulfill their God-given potential,” Moody said. 

McMahon said that being able to have “universal school choice is really fantastic.”

“The president is absolutely committed that no child should be trapped in a failing school and that education needs to be returned to the states,” McMahon said. “Part of my job is to make sure that we’re finding out the best practices so that many states can follow those best practices.”

She also praised Florida for being a “leading example.”

Emphasizing the urgency of reform, she pointed out the need to give all students a chance to thrive. 

“Every student deserves a shot at success, and no child should be shackled to a failing school,” McMahon said.

She gave a brief overview of a new federal tax credit scholarship program for K-12 education, which will help support families who are picking private schools and education options that they feel would be the best fit for their children. 

“The program enables individuals to contribute tax credited scholarship funds that provide scholarships for private school tuition and a host of other education related services, products, and providers,” McMahon said. 

Congress is working alongside states to further expand school choice initiatives across the country. 

“The One Big Beautiful Bill also expands 529 plans, special family savings accounts for education to include books, materials, testing fees, dual enrollment fees, educational and tutoring costs.” 

If school choice is expanded, it gives families control and allows their children to receive the quality education they deserve.

 

• Ashley Olds is an intern reporter and member of the 2025 Searle Freedom Trust and Young America’s Foundation National Journalism Center Apprentice and Internship initiative. 

The post Moody and McMahon push for expanded school choice to empower families | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article presents a clear ideological stance favoring school choice and parental empowerment in education, which are commonly associated with conservative and center-right education policy priorities. The tone is supportive and promotional of these initiatives, highlighting positive remarks from Republican Senator Ashley Moody and Education Secretary Linda McMahon about expanding school choice, tax credit scholarships, and reducing federal control in favor of state and parental control. While the article reports on factual policy proposals, it frames them in a uniformly positive light without presenting opposing viewpoints or critiques, indicating a center-right bias aligned with conservative education reforms.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Kentucky News Feed

State, territorial attorneys general urge crackdown on illegal offshore gambling | Louisiana

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Nolan McKendry | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-08-06 14:09:00


Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill joined 50 attorneys general urging the U.S. Department of Justice to act against illegal offshore gambling operations harming consumers and costing states billions in tax revenue. Their letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi calls for stronger enforcement against foreign-based online gaming platforms that operate without licenses, consumer protections, or age verification. These platforms expose vulnerable populations to fraud and addiction, with the illegal market exceeding $400 billion annually and causing over $4 billion in lost state taxes. The coalition asks DOJ to block illegal websites, seize assets, and work with states and financial firms to disrupt these operations. DOJ’s limited enforcement since 2013 contrasts with successes in other cybercrime cases. Visa and Mastercard support blocking unlawful gambling payments.

(The Center Square) − Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill has joined a bipartisan coalition of 50 attorneys general in urging the U.S. Department of Justice to take swift action against illegal offshore gambling operations that have proliferated across the country, endangering consumers and depriving states of billions in tax revenue.

The call for federal enforcement comes in a letter addressed to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, in which the attorneys general request that DOJ deploy stronger legal tools to combat the surge of foreign-based online gaming platforms operating outside the bounds of state and federal law.

“If you’re not licensed in Louisiana, then it’s illegal gaming,” Murrill said in a statement. “I joined my fellow attorneys general in requesting assistance from Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice to address the rampant spread of offshore gaming operations across our country.”

According to the letter, these platforms are often run by large, unlicensed companies headquartered overseas. They frequently fail to verify users’ ages, operate without consumer protections, ignore state boundaries, and evade taxation.

As a result, the attorneys general warn that vulnerable populations — including youth and problem gamblers — are exposed to fraudulent and addictive gaming environments without any oversight.

The coalition highlighted the massive scale of the issue, citing estimates that the illegal online gaming market now exceeds $400 billion annually and results in over $4 billion in lost tax revenue for states each year.

The letter also links illegal gambling platforms to broader criminal conduct, including money laundering and human trafficking.

Despite the size of the problem, enforcement actions by the DOJ have been “extremely limited” since 2013, the attorneys general note. They call on the department to:

  • Pursue injunctive relief under the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act to block access to illegal websites and payment processing tools;

  • Seize servers, domains, and assets linked to illegal gaming operations;

  • Coordinate with state governments, banks, and credit card companies to cut off the financial infrastructure supporting these enterprises.

The letter references successful DOJ actions in unrelated cybercrime cases as a blueprint for a broader crackdown. It also notes that Visa and Mastercard have expressed willingness to work with law enforcement to block unlawful gambling transactions.

 

The post State, territorial attorneys general urge crackdown on illegal offshore gambling | Louisiana appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article reports on a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general urging federal action against illegal offshore gambling. It presents factual information without endorsing a particular political ideology or framing the issue in a partisan manner. The language is neutral and focuses on consumer protection, legal enforcement, and state revenue concerns, issues that transcend typical party lines. Thus, the content is aligned with objective reporting on governmental actions rather than promoting an ideological stance.

Continue Reading

Trending