At baseball games, I have eaten dry roasted peanuts a plenty. While driving across Florida, I have munched on soggy brown paper bagfuls of hot boiled peanuts. And of course, as a longtime journalist, I have for years worked for peanuts.
But I am most definitely NOT on the side of the peanuts in an ongoing rhubarb over some state forest land that’s important for several imperiled species.
A state agency, the Suwannee River Water Management District, owns some land known as the Ellaville Tract that’s part of Twin Rivers State Forest. Now there’s a proposed deal to hand over that land to a Georgia peanut farming company. Nearly 700 acres of prime sandhill habitat would be given away.
In exchange, the will give the state 543 acres of its farmland, which sure sounds like an unequal swap just in terms of general acreage.
As for Ellaville, the newspaper reported that the peanut farm’s property has more than 400 acres in a floodplain and lies along a mile of the Withlacoochee River. That’s why water district officials say that gives the peanut farm property “significantly higher” value than the high-and-dry state forest uplands.
Katherine Sayler via Defenders of Wildlife
One of the first people I talked to when I heard about all this was Katherine Sayler of Defenders of Wildlife. Almost as soon as she learned about the proposed property swap, Sayler pulled on her boots and accompanied a Florida Forest Service employee to look at the supposedly worthless property.
“As soon as we walked out there,” she told me, “we saw there were gopher tortoise burrows.”
She saw white-tailed deer tracks too and heard woodpeckers. She saw healthy wiregrass beds and plenty of longleaf pines, once the magnificent king of the Southern forest, now an embattled presence that’s still hanging on in spots.
But last week, when she told a water district committee about the magnificent bounty of the forest and why it still deserves to be protected, she said, it was as if they didn’t hear her.
Perhaps someone was making too much noise shelling peanuts.
Nature’s condo
The gopher tortoise is a legally protected species in Florida, but you might not know that from the way our state has treated them. Gophers always look like they’re ticked off at us humans, which is kind of understandable.
Gophers became known as “Hoover chickens” in the 1930s, when their plentiful numbers saved a multitude of starving Floridians during the Depression. Herbert Hoover’s Republican Party had promised a chicken in every pot, but there were no chickens to feed the poor, only the tortoises they could catch.
Now the tortoises save scores of other imperiled species from certain doom. Their burrows — up to 40 feet long and 18 feet deep — provide a secluded place to live for about 300 kinds of animals, many of them classified as endangered or threatened. Think of these burrows as nature’s condo.
Unfortunately, the sandy soil where the gophers live is the preferred habitat of a predatory species, the Florida developer.
For 16 years, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission allowed developers to write a check to the state and then run their bulldozers right over the tortoise burrows, sealing up all the wildlife inside to die.
The state handed out 105,000 of these licenses to kill known as “incidental take permits” before biologists reported a problem. Turns out Florida’s tortoise population was dropping like Florida congressman turned National Security Adviser Mike Waltz’s jaw when he found out he’d accidentally added a reporter onto the text chain about secret war plans.
One of the best sites for relocated gophers has been the Nokuse Plantation, a 55,000-acre Panhandle preserve. It was launched by a dirt-road philanthropist named M.C. Davis, whose skills in pool-hustling and poker-playing paid his way through college and law school and made him a tough opponent in negotiations.
The director of Nokuse, Matt Aresco, told me that the state forest property that water district officials want to trade away is an important spot for both gopher tortoises and their frequent tenants, indigo snakes.
Aresco sent me a copy of a 2017 study by the state wildlife commission that found some 440 tortoises on the state forest land. That means it’s like the tortoise equivalent of downtown Tampa.
“For a relatively small property, I’d say 440 tortoises is … a lot of animals,” said Jeffrey Goessling, an Eckerd College biology professor who’s an expert on gopher tortoises and sits on the advocacy group Gopher Tortoise Council.
Aresco also told me this is the second time the water district has tried to give this land away. The first time, M.C. Davis was still alive and among the main opponents.
The old conceits
As Elvis Costello once sang, “History repeats the old conceits, the glib replies, the same defeats.” That’s certainly true with Ellaville.
In 2012, a different peanut farmer cast his covetous eyes on the Ellaville Tract and proposed buying it outright. The water district governing board was keenly interested. However, Davis and other environmental activists, plus the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, all objected.
At Aresco’s suggestion, I contacted Eric Draper about what went down in 2012. Draper, a former Florida Park Service director, was then an official with Audubon Florida.
“This one really shocked us,” Draper recalled. “The deal was all worked out by the water management district to sell the land to the peanut farmer. They were going to declare it as surplus and then sell it.”
The Ellaville Tract is home to lots of longleaf pines. (Photo courtesy of Eric Draper)
Under state law, any land bought for conservation must be officially declared to be no longer useful for conservation purposes before the state agency that owns it can get rid of it. The Ellaville Tract had been purchased by the water district as part of a 5,000-acre deal back in 1988. Since then, thousands of dollars in taxpayer money had been used in maintaining it and cultivating the longleaf pines.
Yet, in 2012, the water district board voted to declare the Ellaville Tract was no longer needed for conservation purposes. It was all set to sell it and let the farmer turn it into an ecologically sterile, heavily fertilized peanut production facility.
But then the deal died.
Eric Draper. when he was Florida State Parks director, via Eric Draper
What happened? According to Draper, the opponents found someone to help them whose opinion carried a lot of weight with the gubernatorial appointees on the water board. It was a council of the state’s largest landowners, such as the timber company Rayonier and the cattle giant Lykes Brothers.
Their undeveloped property holds a lot of gopher tortoises as well, Draper told me. The savvy environmentalists pointed out to them that the loss of so many gophers on the Ellaville Tract would likely result in even more pressure for the remaining landowners to keep their own gopher populations intact.
“In a world full of endangered species,” Draper explained, “you don’t want to be the last one with endangered species on your land.”
What’s even more amazing is what happened next. Davis and the others persuaded the state to buy the peanut farm and turn it into conservation land. Instead of a big loss, they turned this into a gain for the environment.
Julie Wraithmell via Audubon Florida
“We think the same should happen this time,” said Julie Wraithmell, executive director of Audubon Florida. “The parcel they want to pick up is definitely worthy, but so too is the Ellaville parcel. It’s an issue of ‘and’ not ‘or.’”
‘A bona fide offer’
Given how this Ellaville-isn’t-needed idea went south last time, I was curious about how it came up again. What was the corporate farmer’s reason for diving into this morass?
“Lee Peanut has expressed interest in this surplus property for some time,” Troy Roberts, spokesman for the water district, told me. “The district received a bona fide offer … in February 2025 and prepared the item for Lands Committee consideration.”
The “bona fide” offer for the Ellaville Tract, via SRWMD
At my request, he sent me a copy of the “bona fide offer” from Lee Peanut, which owns 1,400 acres and processes 5,000 pounds of peanuts per acre per year. But this document doesn’t explain the motivation either. It just says which parcels would be involved, then concludes with, “All of this is contingent on appraisals and negotiations.”
Sayler told me that a farmer representative showed up for the committee meeting where she testified and talked about what a “win-win” deal this would be. But she couldn’t recall him ever explaining why this would be a “win” for the taxpayers who now own the Ellaville Tract or for the nature that now rules over it.
Looking for clues, I checked their parent company Birdsong’s website, which boasted about how they’re “committed to a sustainable future.” I even watched a YouTube video about how they’re being more careful with their fertilizer now that they know it’s a pollutant.
But there was nothing about gopher tortoises, or rather about getting rid of them. That’s what will happen if this deal goes through. State law exempts agriculture from the requirement to move gophers. That means Birdsong/Lee can just plow right over those 440 burrows and bury every single animal inside.
Finally, after several attempts, I was able to get hold of Lee Peanuts manager Garland Brooks. But he made it clear that he didn’t want to answer my questions. He refused to comment for the record and warned me against quoting him. When I persisted in my questions he hung up on me.
I took that as a sign that he couldn’t tell me any good reason why a private company should get public property.
Not just gophers galore
Suwannee River’s spokesman, Roberts, said he didn’t know when this land swap would come up before the board for a final vote. I’m rooting for “never.”
In fact, I’m hopeful the Suwannee River governing board will reconsider its 2012 vote declaring that Ellaville land to be surplus.
Not only does it have gophers galore but also, according to a wildlife commission official quoted by the Times, “swallow-tailed kites, kestrels, eastern indigo snakes, gopher frogs, fox squirrels and the Florida black bear.”
And the Gopher Tortoise Council, in a letter sent to the water district board, pointed out other important species, such as “Florida pine snakes, Southern hognose snakes, Southern fox squirrel, Bachman’s sparrow, Northern bobwhite quail, and many other species. … It’s a popular wildlife-viewing site as a result, with over 95 bird species documented on eBird by visiting birders.”
The idea that the water district board could declare this naturally teeming forest unnecessary for conservation just based on water district goals turns out to be legally shaky.
That’s according to Clay Henderson, a lawyer who has been involved in land conservation in Florida for so long he wrote a book about it called “Forces of Nature.” He told me the law says the water district board must consider more than just floodplains and river frontage in deciding whether the land is still valuable for conservation.
“Clearly this tract continues to have high biodiversity value and accordingly would still be required for conservation purposes,” Henderson told me. “That being the case, there is no reason to look further to determine whether it could be traded for something else. “
Seems to me, then, that any further effort to push this land swap forward would be totally — oh, what’s a good word for it? Oh yeah. Nuts.
YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.
SUPPORT
Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.
www.clickorlando.com – Mary Clare Jalonick, Associated Press – 2025-04-30 16:28:00
SUMMARY: Senate Democrats are forcing a vote on blocking global tariffs announced by Donald Trump earlier in April. After market turmoil, Trump suspended the tariffs for 90 days. Senate Democrats aim to challenge the policy and force Republicans to take a stance. While 47 Senate Democrats are expected to support the resolution, Republicans are hesitant, with some opposing it to avoid rebuking Trump. Despite concerns over the economic impact, Republicans are wary of crossing the president. Democrats argue the tariffs harm the economy and increase recession risks, pushing the resolution as a way to reassert congressional power.
SUMMARY: South Florida’s weather for Wednesday, April 30, 2025, features breezy conditions, with highs in the low 80s and an east breeze of 10-18 mph, gusting to 25 mph. There’s a risk of rip currents, extended through Friday, making swimming dangerous. While the day remains mostly dry with a mix of sun and clouds, isolated showers are possible. By Friday, rain chances increase, with isolated showers. The weekend brings higher chances of afternoon thunderstorms, especially on Sunday, along with rising temperatures. A 20% chance of rain is expected on Saturday, and 40% on Sunday.
NEXT Weather meteorologist Lissette Gonzalez says Wednesday afternoon will be seasonable and breezy with wind gust up to 20 mph.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 11:33:00
(The Center Square) – The Florida Legislature passed its farm bill this week that officials say could be the most expansive farm-related measure in the state’s history.
Senate Bill 700 was passed 88-27 in the House of Representatives on Tuesday and is now headed to Gov. Ron DeSantis for a likely signature. The Senate passed the 111-page measure 27-9 on April 16.
SB700, which was sponsored by Sen. Keith Truenow, R-Tavares, would protect farmers from environmental, social, and governance-related bias from lenders, ban the addition of medicine such as fluoride from being added to the water supply, bolster the disaster recovery loan program for farmers and preventing the mislabeling of plant-based products as milk, meat, poultry or eggs.
The fluoride additive ban would not remove any chemical required for water purification.
During debate, Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, mentioned a legal challenge to the state’s law on laboratory-grown meat and possible legal challenges to the labeling part of the legislation.
“Consumers aren’t confused, but if anything, the expansion of alternative meat, alternative protein products is based on demand and companies wouldn’t do it there wasn’t demand for it,” Eskamani said. “The changes in this bill, the goal is to hinder that demand by creating confusion.
“And so to trust the free market means to allow companies to advertise themselves and appeal to consumers based on quality and I think I can speak for some members that some of these alternative products aren’t very good. To insert ourselves between the consumer and the product by forcing them to not to use specific language is a step too far. It restricts free speech and it’s just unnecessary.”
Two amendments she tried to add on the bill to eliminate the labeling and fluoride components died on voice votes.
Under SB700, local governments would be banned from zoning changes that would make it impossible for agricultural facilities to be placed on school property for 4-H and Future Farmers of America.
The bill would also prohibit local governments from banning housing for legally verified farm workers on farms. It would also create a requirement for legal worker eligibility to prevent noncitizens from working on farms.
The bill even stretches to Second Amendment issues, as it will streamline the state’s concealed carry permit process.
The measure would also forbid drones on state hunting lands or private shooting ranges for the purpose of harassment.
Charitable organizations would be prohibited from receiving foreign contributions from “countries of concern” such as Iran, Venezuela, China, Cuba, North Korea and Syria.
“This legislation is a blueprint for protecting Floridians and our freedoms,” said Florida Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson in a release. “We are banning medicine – including fluoride – from Florida’s public water systems. We are keeping foreign countries of concern out of Florida’s charitable organizations.
“We are ensuring honesty in food labeling – milk comes from a cow, not an almond. We are upholding Second Amendment rights and cracking down on drone harassment of hunters.”
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Center-Right
The content presents a description of the Florida Legislature’s farm bill (SB700), emphasizing provisions that align with conservative political values, such as the protection of farmers from ESG-related bias, the restriction on certain food labeling, and measures around the Second Amendment and foreign contributions to charitable organizations. The tone of the article highlights actions that may appeal to right-leaning audiences, especially those supportive of agricultural, conservative, and pro-Second Amendment policies. While the article reports on the legislative process and includes a variety of perspectives, including a Democratic representative’s opposition, the framing and tone lean toward presenting the bill’s provisions positively, suggesting a preference for conservative positions. The article provides factual details but could be perceived as highlighting the bill’s conservative aspects more than its potential drawbacks or opposing views.