A passenger jet on its initial approach to the Asheville Regional Airport in October came within seconds of colliding midair with a private plane in a harrowing incident described by the jet’s captain in federal data obtained by Asheville Watchdog.
The private plane was “so close that I could see the occupant in the aircraft,” the jet’s captain reported. “It was approaching almost directly perpendicular to us.”
Shem Malmquist, a Boeing 777 captain and consultant on aviation safety, told The Watchdog the planes likely narrowly averted disaster. “If you’re close enough to see the occupants, that’s really close,” he said.
The account in the Aviation Safety Reporting System, a database maintained by NASA to identify aviation issues, does not include any identifying information such as the names of the airline or pilots, the flight number or departing city, the number of passengers, or the day of the month. The event was described as an “NMAC,” near midair collision and occurred sometime between noon and 6 p.m.
The collision last week between an American Airlines jet and an Army Black Hawk helicopter was one of the nation’s deadliest in recent history, killing 67 passengers and crew members, and occurred in the crowded, busy airspace of the U.S. capital. But close calls happen at much smaller airports, including Asheville.
The captain in the October near-miss reported that the airport’s air traffic control tower had informed the flight crew about “traffic.”
“I responded that we were looking,” the captain said. “We were unable to get a visual on the traffic however.”
A few minutes later, “Tower came back and she said it was less than a mile do we have it in sight [sic]. I only responded with no, as we were trying to find the traffic and Tower responded immediately to cancel approach clearance and to climb to 6000.”
Advisory issued when aircraft are 15-35 seconds from colliding
During the ascent, the airliner’s collision avoidance system issued a “resolution advisory” or RA, an urgent warning when two aircraft are 15 to 35 seconds from colliding without a change in course. The advisory instructed the crew to descend.
As the jet leveled off and began the descent, the captain looked out the first officer’s window and spotted the small, single-engine plane and its pilot, within eyesight, perpendicular to the airliner.
“It was slightly lower than us and also descending,” the captain reported. “I saw that our guidance was to continue to descend but using my own judgment of what I’m looking at visually I chose to say to the FO [first officer], no climb instead he’s below us [sic].”
As the jet ascended, the RA switched from descend to climb.
“We complied with the climbing RA guidance and safely maneuvered the aircraft away,” the captain reported. “It was a difficult decision to change the aircraft path by starting a climb when the RA wanted us to descend. Especially because it is supposed to resolve the conflict. But after making visual contact with the aircraft I knew we needed to climb away from it.”
The Aviation Safety Reporting System, a database maintained by NASA to identify aviation issues, contains this account of a near-miss between a small plane and a passenger jet on approach to Asheville Regional Airport last October.
A synopsis of the event said the private plane “was crossing the [airliner’s] final approach course and not in communication with ATC [Air Traffic Control]. Captain took evasive action to avoid a collision.”
Tina Kinsey, a spokeswoman for the Asheville Airport, referred questions from The Watchdog to the Federal Aviation Administration.
The FAA did not respond by deadline to questions, including whether the event was investigated and how close the planes came to a collision.
Malmquist said resolution advisories are “really rare.”
Airliners are equipped with airborne collision avoidance systems that serve as a “last resort” for preventing midair collisions by instructing pilots to perform evasive maneuvers, according to the FAA.
“It’ll first give you just a target advisory,” said Malmquist, a graduate lecturer at the Florida Institute of Technology in Melbourne, Fla. “It’ll just say, ‘Traffic, traffic,’ and then just address your attention, be paying attention. And that’s already getting pretty close before it does that.
“And then, if it’s predicting collision,” he said, “it will command an immediate response, and response to that we’re trained is mandatory.”
Malmquist, an airline pilot since the 1980s, said he could recall receiving just one RA in all his flights.
“I mostly fly International,” he said. “I would expect airplanes that are flying domestically encounter it more often.”
He said the FAA may have investigated the incident if the private plane “was in the wrong spot.”
Close calls involving commercial airlines have been on the rise and are alarmingly common, occurring multiple times a week, often at or near major airports, a New York Times investigation found.
Frontline aviation workers, including pilots, air traffic controllers, mechanics and flight attendants, are encouraged to report incidents, including near-misses, to the NASA reporting database. The information is used for analysis and safety prevention and is scrubbed of identifying details before being made public.
Four other near-misses have been reported around the Asheville airport since 2003, three involving private planes in close proximity to each other. In the fourth, the pilot of a commercial airliner landing at the airport in January 2023 reported “a drone about 100 ft. below us.”
“We alerted tower about the drone and subsequently had an uneventful landing,” the pilot reported. “The drone appeared to be a personal quadcopter that was not of commercial nature.”
Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Sally Kestin is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter. Email skestin@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.
SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.
James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.
SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.
www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00
North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.
(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.
Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.
Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”
Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.
Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.
Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”
Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”
House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.
Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.
Political Bias Rating: Centrist
The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.