Connect with us

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Op-Ed: Oklahoma should tell Maryland: Let them eat crab cake | Opinion

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Brandon Arnold | National Taxpayers Union – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 08:41:00

Hi Oklahoma! I’m from Maryland, one of the bluest and most progressive states in the country. Our taxes are way too high. Our spending is out of control. Our state’s finances are a total mess.

But it could get worse. If Congress can’t get its act together, Oklahoma taxpayers and residents of other red states across the country might help bail out Maryland with an enormous tax cut for our wealthiest residents.

That’s the way the state and local tax deduction works, better known as SALT. If you’re not familiar with SALT, it is basically a blue state tax scheme. It allows wealthier taxpayers to deduct what they pay in state and local taxes from their taxable federal income.

That might sound innocuous, or even appealing at first, since it decreases taxes for some people. Yes, cutting taxes is usually a good thing, but this is not your typical tax cut. It’s actually a scheme that has allowed certain states to boost taxes on their residents with the understanding that the federal government will shoulder much of that cost when taxpayers deduct their massive state tax bill from their federal income taxes.

This has effectively shifted the overall tax burden away from wealthy people in high tax states and onto working class people in lower tax states.

That’s why the 2017 Trump tax cuts – more formally, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act – wisely placed a $10,000 cap on the SALT deduction, which helps to blunt its harmful impact.

But at the end of this year, most of the Trump tax cuts, including the SALT cap, are scheduled to expire. We can’t let that happen.

Congress needs to make sure the Trump tax cuts are locked in permanently. And part of that legislation must include keeping the SALT deduction capped. If the SALT cap disappears, it would provide a tax cut of almost $1 trillion, nearly 60% which would go to just five states: Maryland, Connecticut, California, New Jersey, and New York. People who make more than $200,000 would claim 93% of the tax benefit.

Not coincidentally, the states with the worst, least competitive tax systems in the country just so happen to be (descending order): Maryland, Connecticut, California, New Jersey, and New York. Allowing the SALT cap to disappear is essentially rewarding these states for their bad, anti-taxpayer policies.

Meanwhile, most residents of lower tax states would get peanuts. This means the overall burden of federal taxation would shift away from high-tax blue states and toward states like Oklahoma that have done a better job on taxes and spending.

There’s no other way of saying it: that’s incredibly unfair.

It comes down to this: lifting or removing the SALT cap would encourage lawmakers in Annapolis, Sacramento, Albany, and other capital cities to double down on their harmful policies. It will give them a free pass to spend even more and boost their tax rates even higher knowing full well that their higher state tax bills will effectively be passed along to federal taxpayers.

Already, these highly progressive states have shown a tremendous penchant for not just overtaxing their residents, but also overspending.

Just look at the eye-popping stats. On a per resident basis, California spends more than $10,500, Maryland spends nearly $11,000, and New York spends a little more than $11,000. Compare that to Oklahoma, with per-resident spending around $7,200. Or to fast-growing states like Florida and Texas that spend about half of what blue states are spending: $5,200 and $4,500 per resident, respectively.

As Congress debates Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” politicians from the high-tax, high-spending states are trying to significantly raise or even eliminate the SALT cap. They are raising a stink in Congress and threatening to tank the entire bill over the issue. While I understand their frustration, their ire is directed in the wrong direction. It should be targeted at the state lawmakers in Annapolis, Sacramento, Albany, Trenton, among other state capitals, who have allowed spending to reach such exorbitant levels and financed their excessive spending with ridiculous levels of taxation.

If those state lawmakers would do a better job at managing their states’ finances, there would be no need for a SALT deduction and no need to shift the federal tax burden onto the good people of Oklahoma and other red states.

For the benefit of red states, blue states, and the entire country, we should keep SALT tightly capped and force fiscal discipline on politicians who desperately need it.

In other words, Congress shouldn’t force Oklahomans to shoulder a larger share of federal taxes in order to deliver a massive tax cut for my millionaire neighbors in deep blue Maryland. They can afford their own crab cakes.

The post Op-Ed: Oklahoma should tell Maryland: Let them eat crab cake | Opinion appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article presents a clear ideological stance aligned with Center-Right perspectives, primarily focused on fiscal conservatism and tax policy criticism. It frames high-tax, “blue” states such as Maryland, California, and New York as fiscally irresponsible and accuses them of overspending and relying on federal tax breaks to benefit wealthy residents. The language used (“bad, anti-taxpayer policies,” “ridiculous levels of taxation,” “free pass to spend even more”) reflects a critical tone toward progressive tax policies and state spending, which is characteristic of conservative economic arguments. The article advocates for maintaining the Trump-era SALT deduction cap, emphasizing fairness for lower-tax “red” states like Oklahoma, indicating a preference for limited government spending and tax restraint. This perspective is presented with clear normative judgment rather than neutral reporting, marking it as ideologically driven content from a Center-Right viewpoint.

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Attorney General alleges AI used in Swadley's BBQ case

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KFOR Oklahoma’s News 4 – 2025-09-11 23:31:49

SUMMARY: Attorney General Drummond alleges that Swadley’s BBQ owner Brent Wadley and his defense team used artificial intelligence (AI) in legal filings, leading to errors and falsehoods as their trial approaches in November. The defense denies using AI, attributing mistakes to human error amid tight deadlines. The case involves allegations that Swadley’s overbilled the state by nearly $5 million in a state parks contract, leading to indictments in 2022. The defense seeks to remove the Attorney General, claiming his remarks compromised their fair trial rights. Experts warn AI use by attorneys may be unethical or illegal, with potential punishments pending.

Attorney General alleges AI used in Swadley’s BBQ case

Stay informed about Oklahoma news and weather! Follow KFOR News 4 on our website and social channels.

https://kfor.com/
https://www.youtube.com/c/kfor4news
https://www.facebook.com/kfor4
https://twitter.com/kfor
https://www.instagram.com/kfortv4/

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Judge Attempts to Quash Press Investigation With Gag Order

Published

on

oklahomawatch.org – JC Hallman – 2025-09-09 06:00:00


In 2024, Estelle Simonton, 91, was placed under APS guardianship and moved to a care facility. A judge denied APS’s request to fully restrict visitation but barred her son Matthew from discussing the case with Estelle or the press. Nursing home staff attempted to block Matthew’s visit, despite a court ruling allowing it. Experts criticize Oklahoma’s guardianship system for lack of transparency, oversight, and respondent rights, suggesting predatory practices. The judge’s gag order on media has raised First Amendment concerns. This case highlights systemic issues in Oklahoma’s guardianship laws amid growing calls for reform and better safeguards against abuse.

On August 29, Oklahoma County Special Judge Michelle “Shel” Harrington heard arguments on an Adult Protective Services motion to restrict all visitation for Estelle Simonton, 91. Simonton was moved from her Del City home to Wolfe Living Center at Summit Ridge in Harrah in 2024, after being put under an APS guardianship order.

Harrington did not restrict all visitation, but she came close. Then she added a couple of stunners: ordering her son, Matthew Simonton, not to discuss his mother’s case with his mother and barring her from talking to reporters.

On August 4, Matthew Simonton went to visit his mother. Nursing home staff attempted to deny access; after a tense confrontation, the Oklahoma County Sheriff’s Office was called.

Deputies deferred to statutory proof that a visit was legal; over strenuous objections from nursing home staff, a visit was permitted and a subsequent incident report confirmed that the nursing home did not have the necessary court order to deny visitation.

Though aged, Estelle Simonton was found to be lucid and expressed a fervent desire to be with her son.

“The judge had already ruled that I could see my mother,” Matthew Simonton said. “They were defying what the judge had already ordered.”

Participate in Decisions that Affect Them

In 2015, Rep. Richard Morrissette, D-Oklahoma City, requested guidance from then-Attorney General Scott Pruitt on when and how visitation to a vulnerable adult under a guardianship order can be restricted.

Pruitt’s lengthy opinion first articulated the guiding principle of Title 30, Oklahoma’s laws on guardians and wards.

The clear intent of the law, the opinion said, was to encourage the self-reliance and independence of wards as much as possible; to the maximum extent of their ability, wards should be enabled to participate in all decisions that affect them.

Restriction of visitation to adults under guardianship orders was detailed in Title 43a, Oklahoma’s mental health laws, the opinion said.

Wards should be permitted the ability to associate with whomever they wish, the opinion said; but if a judge does restrict access, the order must specify the persons who are to be restricted.

A Restraining Order is Hereby Entered

In the August 29 hearing, Harrington ruled against the APS request to restrict all access to Estelle Simonton; Matthew Simonton was permitted to visit his mother.

But the judge issued several other rulings.

Special judges in Oklahoma are not elected; district court judges appoint them, and their duties and powers are significantly limited.

Judge Harrington’s LinkedIn page identifies her not as a judge, but as an attorney whose practice is entirely restricted to family law; she is a “divorce lawyer who doesn’t like divorce,” and who values “dating smarter” and “keeping marriage strong.”

In addition to denying APS’s motion, Harrington issued three orders: Matthew Simonton cannot discuss his mother’s case with his mother; he cannot bring anyone other than his domestic partner and her child to visit Estelle Simonton; and access to Estelle Simonton is denied to any member of the media.

“A restraining order is hereby entered preventing Mrs. Simonton from being interviewed by press without further order of this court,” the ruling reads.

Predatory Guardianship

Rick Black, founder of the Center for Estate Administration Reform, which has investigated 5,000 suspect adult guardianships since 2013, said the story of Estelle Simonton reeked of judicial hubris.

Black said that Oklahoma’s guardianship system appeared to lack best practices designed to avoid abuse and ignored an obligation to seek the least restrictive alternatives to guardianship. A lack of respondent counsel, transparency and third-party oversight, combined with an absence of video recordings at hearings and a requirement to seal files to avoid independent investigation, were significant issues with Oklahoma’s system, Black said.

Nationwide, Black said, there was a growing trend toward using claims of defamation as retaliation against those who expose guardianship wrongdoing. Lawsuits have been used to hobble the production of exposé documentary films being produced by Netflix and A&E.

For Black, Estelle Simonton was a case in point.

“The desire to silence [her son] Matthew and isolate Estelle is consistent with a predatory guardianship,” Black said. “The judge attempting to silence media on Estelle’s situation is also concerning.”

Oklahoma law requires judges to seal guardianship cases, a double-edged sword that is meant to protect patient privacy but also effectively thwarts any third-party investigation or oversight, a problem exacerbated by Harrington’s gag order.

Oklahoma City attorney Andy Lester, who has chaired the Oklahoma Free Speech Committee since it was created in 2022, agreed that Harrington’s ruling looks like an inappropriate encroachment on the First Amendment and the freedom of the press.

“This ruling appears to be an overreaching prior restraint,” Lester said. “It looks like a restriction on Ms. Simonton, but, as worded, it purports to bar all press. That is a step too far.”

The court did not respond to a request for comment by the story’s deadline.

No Oklahomans for Oklahoma City Event

In October, the National Guardianship Association will hold a Guardianship/Conservatorship National Investigator Training Program in Oklahoma City. The three-day event will feature talks on nursing home regulations, the ethics and standards of guardianship, and the role of judges in guardianship cases.

Former NGA president Anthony Palmieri, who will deliver the conference’s opening remarks, noted in a September 6 LinkedIn post that there had been no registrations from Oklahoma for the Oklahoma City event.

Editor’s note: This story was updated to show the judge barred Estelle Simonton from speaking to the press, not Matthew Simonton. 

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Judge Attempts to Quash Press Investigation With Gag Order appeared first on oklahomawatch.org

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This article critiques the guardianship and judicial system in Oklahoma, highlighting issues of transparency, individual rights, and potential abuses of power. It emphasizes concerns about government overreach, the silencing of dissent, and the protection of vulnerable individuals, which aligns with a center-left perspective that often advocates for civil liberties, accountability, and social justice reforms. The tone is investigative and critical of institutional authority without veering into partisan rhetoric, maintaining a focus on systemic reform rather than ideological extremes.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

College gameday preps underway in Norman

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KFOR Oklahoma’s News 4 – 2025-09-04 23:28:41

SUMMARY: College Gameday preparations are in full swing in Norman as the University of Oklahoma hosts Michigan in a highly anticipated top-20 matchup Saturday. The national spotlight returns to Norman for the second consecutive year, with the College Gameday stage being set up on the South Oval. Nearby, The Standard restaurant, co-owned by Cameron Brewer, was selected as the guest chef for the show after submitting a proposal to ESPN over Labor Day weekend. They will serve burgers, catfish po’boys, chicken and waffles, and desserts, starting early Saturday before bringing food to the College Gameday set. Excitement is high as the city gears up for game day.

College gameday preps underway in Norman Stay informed about Oklahoma news and weather! Follow KFOR News 4 on our …

Source

Continue Reading

Trending