Connect with us

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Oklahoma District Attorneys Gain Ally in Glossip Case

Published

on

oklahomawatch.org – Keaton Ross – 2025-07-25 06:00:00


Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond appointed Ryan Stephenson, assistant executive coordinator of the District Attorneys Council, as a special prosecutor in Richard Glossip’s murder case, sparking controversy. Stephenson’s role is unusual, potentially conflicting with his full-time duties under Oklahoma law. The appointment follows Drummond’s effort to overturn Glossip’s death sentence due to prosecutorial misconduct, which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld. Drummond’s office is now seeking first-degree murder conviction, reversing a prior plea deal. Critics view the move as politically motivated, aiming to regain district attorneys’ support ahead of Drummond’s 2026 gubernatorial run. The case continues with bond and trial dates pending.

Oklahoma Attorney General Gentner Drummond has appointed the assistant executive coordinator of the District Attorneys Council as a special prosecutor in the Richard Glossip case, raising eyebrows among attorneys and prompting scrutiny from supporters of the former death row prisoner. 

Ryan Stephenson, a former Oklahoma County prosecutor who now serves as a legislative liaison and organizes training events for the DA Council, made an initial appearance on behalf of the state in the Glossip case on April 24. He received official notice of his appointment as a special assistant attorney general on June 4, nearly six weeks later. 

Stephenson, who earned $12,333 from the DA Council in May, has not received supplemental payments from the attorney general’s office, according to a records request fulfilled on July 18. 

The appointment comes two years after several district attorneys sparred with Drummond over his efforts to overturn Glossip’s death sentence over prosecutorial misconduct. In a group text thread, a few district attorneys suggested wielding their collective power to get Drummond to recuse and choose one of them to represent the state in the matter. 

“The AG [Drummond] has a conflict of interest because he has taken a position against the victim and so he should appoint one of us,” District 8 District Attorney Brian Hermanson wrote on May 9, 2023. “Then we can do it on the AG’s nickel.” 

Drummond ultimately prevailed when the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Glossip’s death sentence on Feb. 25 because the prosecution knowingly withheld evidence. But his office is now seeking to convict Glossip of non-capital first-degree murder in Oklahoma County District Court, a reversal from 2023, when he agreed over email to accept a time-served plea deal on an accessory to murder charge. In a July 16 court filing, the Attorney General’s office stated the deal was still being negotiated and was anticipatory at best. 

Multiple attorneys, who requested anonymity because they are working on pending cases involving the attorney general’s office, said Stephenson’s appointment to the case is unusual and not clearly outlined in statute. 

Section 215.28 of Title 19 of the Oklahoma Statutes states that the assistant executive coordinator shall devote full time to their duties and not engage in the private practice of law. Working on behalf of the state is generally considered public practice, but long hours could interfere with his full-time employment. 

The statute Drummond cited when appointing Stephenson does not explicitly authorize a special assistant attorney general, though it grants the attorney general the broad authority to appoint employees deemed necessary for the “proper performance of his or her duties.” 

Brook Arbeitman, a spokesperson for Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna, said Behenna had no involvement in the appointment. Through District Attorney’s Council spokesperson Damon Gardenhire, Stephenson declined comment and referred questions to the attorney general’s office.

Leslie Berger, a spokeswoman for Drummond, acknowledged an inquiry from Oklahoma Watch on July 14 but said a person with knowledge of the situation was unavailable. Several follow-up requests for comment were unsuccessful. 

Three of Glossip’s most vocal supporters, including a current and one former state lawmaker, said Stephenson’s appointment appears to be a political maneuver to win back support from Oklahoma’s district attorneys. Drummond, a Republican, launched his gubernatorial campaign in January and will face a crowded primary field in 2026

“He’s just giving them [DA’s Council] a shot at him regardless of what’s right and what’s wrong,” said Rep. Justin Humphrey, a Republican from Lane who has said he believes Glossip is innocent. 

“It’s 1,000% political. The DAC were aggravated at him and he needs their support for governor.”

Kevin McDugle

Justin Jackson, a former state Senate candidate from Tuskahoma and personal friend of Glossip, said he approached Drummond at a fundraising event in Stephens County to talk about the case. He said Drummond responded that the state had an obligation to follow the process.

“He has scars,” Jackson said. “But my response to him was an endorsement from the DAs means nothing to the populace of Oklahoma. It’s more important that he stood up for what was right, and I’m grateful he did at the time that he did.” 

Kevin McDugle, a former state representative who tried to pause the death penalty because he believes Glossip is innocent, said he had several productive meetings with Drummond in 2023 to discuss the case. 

“It’s 1,000% political,” McDugle said. “The DAC were aggravated at him and he needs their support for governor. Now he’s trying to play both sides, and that aggravates me.”

The District Attorneys Council, a state agency tasked with providing administrative support and training to Oklahoma’s 27 independently elected district attorneys, isn’t allowed to endorse candidates. But a closely related group with nearly identical leadership, the Oklahoma District Attorney’s Association, is politically active. The DA Association, which isn’t subject to Oklahoma’s open meetings law, usually meets five minutes after the conclusion of the DA Council meeting. 

The DA Association lobbied against three criminal justice reform ballot initiatives that appeared on the ballot since 2016: State Question 780, State Question 805 and State Question 820. The organization also joined an amicus brief asking the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold Glossip’s death sentence. 

With a potential trial date likely several months or years in the future, the most recent discussion has centered on whether Glossip should be allowed to bond out of the Oklahoma County Detention Center. Oklahoma County District Judge Heather Coyle issued a ruling late Wednesday afternoon denying the defense’s motion to set bond, writing that the state has shown clear and convincing evidence of Glossip’s guilt. 

During a July 21 status conference, Glossip’s attorneys argued he should be granted release on his own recognizance because Drummond preliminarily agreed to release him on time served in 2023. 

“There can be no better statement that the state of Oklahoma does not believe that Mr. Glossip is a danger to anyone in any way,” attorney Don Knight wrote in a July 16 filing. 

In response, Senior Assistant Attorney General Jennifer Hinsperger said the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling does not discredit other evidence tying Glossip to Barry Van Treese’s murder. 

Richard Glossip

“The State maintains that the evidence against Mr. Glossip remains as strong today as it did at the time of the prior juries’ verdicts of guilt,” she wrote. 

Hinsperger and Jimmy Harmon, the chief of the attorney general’s criminal division, are prosecuting the Glossip case alongside Stephenson. Both previously worked as assistant district attorneys for the Oklahoma County DA’s office.  

The next hearing, where the two sides could decide when to consider the defense’s motion to honor the 2023 plea agreement, is set for Aug. 14 at 1 p.m. 

In a June 9 written statement, Drummond vowed that his office would re-prosecute Glossip solely on hard facts, solid evidence and truthful testimony. He said he decided not to seek the death penalty because Justin Sneed, Glossip’s co-conspirator, who admitted to beating Van Treese to death with a baseball bat in an Oklahoma City motel room in 1997, received life without the possibility of parole. Glossip has maintained that Sneed implicated him as plotting the murder to avoid getting the death penalty. 

“The Van Treese family has endured grief, pain and frustration since the murder of their loved one, and my heart goes out to them,” Drummond said. “The poor judgment and previous misconduct of past prosecutors have only compounded that pain and frustration. While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today.”

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Oklahoma District Attorneys Gain Ally in Glossip Case appeared first on oklahomawatch.org

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

This article presents a detailed account of the Richard Glossip case with a focus on legal and political maneuvering involving Oklahoma’s Attorney General Gentner Drummond, a Republican preparing for a gubernatorial run. The coverage highlights tension between the AG and local district attorneys, emphasizing political strategy behind appointments and prosecutorial decisions. The language remains largely factual and neutral, but the framing around Drummond’s political calculations and criticism from Republican supporters suggests a mild center-right perspective, reflecting mainstream conservative legal and political concerns without overt editorializing or partisan rhetoric.

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Historic Cuts to SNAP Put 131,000 Oklahomans at Risk of Losing Benefits 

Published

on

oklahomawatch.org – Valerie Scott – 2025-07-24 06:00:00


President Trump’s recently signed budget bill imposes major cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), risking food benefits for 131,000 Oklahomans—about one-sixth of the state’s 686,800 SNAP users, including 255,000 children. Starting in 2028, states with SNAP error rates over 6% must pay 5-15% of costs; Oklahoma’s 10.87% error rate means it will pay 15%. The bill also tightens eligibility, expanding work requirements and excluding some refugees and trafficking victims. Food banks in Oklahoma expect increased demand. Critics warn cuts worsen food insecurity, especially for children, while supporters argue for program sustainability and reduced fraud.

President Donald Trump’s budget bill brings stricter rules to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the federal food assistance program, and shifts costs to states, putting an estimated 131,000 Oklahomans at risk of losing food benefits.

That’s about one-sixth of the 686,800 SNAP users in Oklahoma, which includes 255,000 children and 68,000 seniors.

One estimate showed Oklahoma could lose $628 million in 2029, a 39.3% reduction.

The bill requires states to assume a greater share of costs previously covered by the federal government. The share is based on the error rates within the SNAP program. Beginning in 2028, states that pass a 6% error rate must pay 5% to 15% of the cost for food benefits.

As of fiscal year 2024, Oklahoma’s error rate was at 10.87%, requiring tax money to pay the highest bracket of cost-sharing at 15%. With 17% of Oklahoma residents on SNAP, the state spent $1.51 billion on benefits in fiscal 2024. 

It is unclear where Oklahoma will source the funding and whether the state has the resources to fill in the growing gaps.

“I don’t think we will cut out SNAP, but I also don’t think Oklahoma is prepared to pay,” U.S. Rep. Tom Cole said. “There is certainly a need for the program. It is up to the state; I believe Oklahoma will make responsible decisions.”

In Cole’s district alone, 25,000 Oklahoma households will be at risk of losing SNAP benefits.

Trump signed the bill on July 4. In addition to SNAP, it cuts other safety net programs such as Medicaid. There was overwhelming support in Congress from Republican lawmakers, with support from all but three. Senators Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine joined all Democrats in voting against the bill. 

“This is an extraordinary piece of legislation,” said U.S. Rep. Tom Cole, R-Moore. “It includes all of Trump’s promises-energy independence, border security, and addresses entitlements in respect to Medicaid. There are problem areas, but when you pull off something this big there will be areas to address.” 

Key points from the new law:

  • Cuts back on the increases in SNAP benefits based on the Thrifty Food Plan
  • Expands work requirement to parents with children over the age of 14, adults aged 55 to 64, foster youths who have aged out of the system, veterans and people experiencing homelessness
  • Refugees, people granted asylum, certain survivors of domestic violence and certain victims of sex or labor trafficking no longer qualify for SNAP

Food Pantries Brace for Impact

With cuts to SNAP, food pantries project an increase in patrons. Food access organizations across the state are preparing for the fallout. 

Stacy Dykstra, the chief executive officer of The Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma, said they provided more than 70.7 million meals in 2024 and they anticipate an increase in demand as SNAP recipients lose access to benefits or see their monthly allotments shrink.

“I think all food pantries will see an uptick,” Dykstra said. “Even without these cuts, we are already in a perilous place. I am concerned about what it will look like when people lose even more of their food benefits.” 

Cole argued for the changes, stating that SNAP is not sustainable the way it is now. He said there will be a stricter process in meeting requirements; the bill will stop immigrants who do not have the correct documentation from getting aid, put an end to those who can work but are not, reduce error rates and save money.

Food providers warned that such assumptions overlook the reasons people rely on SNAP. Katy Leffel, the chief executive officer of Skyline Food Bank in Oklahoma City, said her organization has seen a 99% increase in unique clients served and a 117% increase in service deliveries to individuals from 2022 to 2024.

“We’re already stretched,” Leffel said. “We’re meant to be a supplemental gap filler; people come once every 30 days, and 70% of our patrons come just three times a year or less. They’re not abusing the system. They’re coming because they had a medical bill, popped a tire, or missed a shift because their kid was sick. This idea that people are freeloading just doesn’t hold up.”

The bill also includes language to ensure that people who have entered the U.S. illegally do not receive benefits, although undocumented residents did not qualify under the previous requirements. The United States Department of Agriculture has said that non-citizen immigrants are ineligible for SNAP. To apply for the program, applicants must submit personal documents, such as their Social Security card, which people who have entered the U.S. illegally do not possess. 

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities also released a statement on June 6, noting that people who lack documentation are already ineligible for benefits. The cuts would affect immigrants who lawfully live and work in the U.S., along with children of U.S. citizen immigrants. 

Parents with school-aged children, meaning seven or older, could see their SNAP benefits cut or terminated entirely.

SNAP provides food assistance to 1 of every 5 children in the U.S. It is estimated that more than 2 million children will be affected by the funding cuts. Students will also lose access to free school meals. Children whose parents are enrolled in SNAP automatically qualify for free school lunches, breakfasts and summer EBT, which stands for electronic benefits transfer..

“There’s tons of research that tells us nutrition is critical for health outcomes,” Dykstra said. “When people have consistent access to nutritious food, it reduces ER visits, saves the state money, and supports our economy. So investing in SNAP is actually investing in Oklahoma.”

According to data collected by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, food insecurity is harmful to a child’s health and, in turn, their education. The research showed that low-income children who don’t receive SNAP are more likely to be underweight, obese or in poor health. The CBPP collected information showing that children who have access to adequate food have better math and reading scores, fewer absences due to illness and increased chances of graduating. 

“The sad thing is that SNAP has been shown to be economically advantageous,” Leffel said. “For every dollar you invest, you get more back in the local economy. I think Oklahoma’s not alone in being a state that’s going to have a serious problem making up the funding difference.”

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Historic Cuts to SNAP Put 131,000 Oklahomans at Risk of Losing Benefits  appeared first on oklahomawatch.org

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The content primarily focuses on the negative impact of budget cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and other safety net programs, emphasizing the risks and hardships faced by affected Oklahoma residents, including children and seniors. It highlights concerns from food pantry leaders and cites research on the benefits of SNAP, which aligns with a viewpoint advocating for social welfare and government support for vulnerable populations. The inclusion of criticism towards the legislation and its potential consequences, while acknowledging some Republican perspectives, suggests a leaning towards a viewpoint that favors expanded social programs and protection for disadvantaged groups, characteristic of a center-left stance.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Task force team returns to Oklahoma after 16-day mission

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KFOR Oklahoma’s News 4 – 2025-07-23 22:52:22

SUMMARY: The first Oklahoma task force team sent to assist Texas after historic, deadly flooding has returned home after a demanding 16-day mission. Led by Battalion Chief Derek Stewart, the team worked tirelessly in the Texas Hill Country, focusing on the hardest-hit areas like Kerrville. Their recovery efforts involved physically exhausting searches along the Guadalupe River, using rafts, canine units, and thorough ground coverage. The experience was mentally draining, with the team facing emotional challenges while bringing closure to affected families. The flooding caused over 100 deaths and catastrophic damage. Stewart emphasized the powerful force of water and expressed gratitude to Texans for their support.

Task force team returns to Oklahoma after 16-day mission

Stay informed about Oklahoma news and weather! Follow KFOR News 4 on our website and social channels.

https://kfor.com/
https://www.youtube.com/c/kfor4news
https://www.facebook.com/kfor4
https://twitter.com/kfor
https://www.instagram.com/kfortv4/

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Oklahoma News Feed

Missing, Murdered Native American Cases Delayed as Police Struggle to Work Together

Published

on

oklahomawatch.org – Elizabeth Caldwell – 2025-07-23 06:00:00


Brandon Hummel, a 28-year-old Choctaw citizen, disappeared in January 2024, deeply troubling his family, especially his mother, Deana Floyd. Despite his past struggles and occasional run-ins with the law, Hummel was devoted to his two children. Law enforcement’s response was complicated by jurisdictional confusion following the 2020 McGirt Supreme Court decision, which shifted many cases in eastern Oklahoma to tribal or federal courts. Floyd criticized delays and lack of cooperation among local, tribal, and federal agencies. Advocates call for better coordination, training, and resources to address missing Indigenous persons cases more effectively, while families like Floyd’s continue to wait for answers.

The most important part of 28-year-old Brandon Hummel’s life was his two children, according to his mother.

“I know in my heart he’s probably not alive anymore because he never would’ve stayed away from those kids this long, or me,” Deana Floyd said.

Floyd left Hummel, a Choctaw citizen, and her other son at home for a trip out of town in January 2024. Hummel stayed in Atoka while his brother reported going to the movies in Ada. When the family returned, Hummel had vanished.

“Yeah, he made mistakes, but through it all, he loved them kids,” Floyd said. “He was just a down-to-earth guy. Even when he got in trouble with the police before, they all liked him. It wasn’t like he was a bad guy or anything, he just had some issues that he got in trouble for.”

Hummel had a track record of leaving home without a lot of communication, so Floyd didn’t contact authorities to report him missing until a month passed. What followed, she said, was a disorganized and lackluster performance from law enforcement resistant to cooperation.

The first organization involved in the search for Hummel was the Atoka County Sheriff. Floyd said the agency initially responded, but passed the case to Choctaw Lighthorse police without further involvement. That was something new, Floyd said, because the sheriff helped the family before.

“When [Brandon] was in his addiction, they didn’t have a problem coming out and arresting him and taking him to jail,” Floyd said. “He was in their jail before.”

Things changed in Oklahoma after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the McGirt case. That 2020 decision drastically altered the state’s legal landscape, finding much of the eastern portion to be reservation land. As a result, cases that the state would have previously handled were scheduled for tribal or federal courts.

“I think this law that they passed is ridiculous,” Floyd said. “They just want to shove everything over to the [Bureau of Indian Affairs] or the Lighthorse. If they’re Indian, they want nothing to do with it.”

Atoka County Sheriff Kody Simpson was elected last summer, defeating the incumbent after Hummel’s disappearance. Simpson said relations between his office and the Choctaw Nation have improved and it’s no longer policy that cases be sent without follow-up to the tribe.

“I hate to say this, but it’s the truth: in the municipal police and the county sheriff’s offices, it is a way to be lazy,” Simpson said. “It’s absolutely what it boils down to, 100%. They don’t want to deal with the call; they don’t want to deal with any call. The municipalities and the county sheriff’s offices that hand every call off, for tribal citizens, it is a way to be lazy.” 

Under the purview of the Lighthorse police, Hummel’s case languished, Floyd said. They weren’t interested in helping because of Hummel’s criminal record. In a written statement, Lighthorse police denied negligence, saying it “investigated and followed local leads diligently for a year before the remaining leads were identified to be individuals located out of the state.” 

Lighthorse eventually requested help from the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation and the BIA. Floyd said the first BIA agent in charge left without an explanation. His replacement, who is based in Tennessee due to a staff shortage in Oklahoma, has been scarce.

The BIA did not respond to requests for information.

Advocates note similar breakdowns in procedures and relationships. The Northeastern Oklahoma Indigenous Safety & Education advocacy network creates reports for cases it handles. Last year, the group was involved in the search for Trey Glass, a 19-year-old United Keetoowah Band member found dead in a well belonging to a former Kansas, Oklahoma police chief.

In its report on Glass, NOISE noted a tangle of issues, including a delay before tribal authorities were notified of Glass’ disappearance by the family, not the police.

“Much of the confusion could have been delayed, and more resources could have been deployed if the Kansas PD had some foundational knowledge of operating a police department within the exterior boundaries of the Cherokee Nation Reservation,” the NOISE report stated.

The confusion was compounded by an intertribal dispute. Because Glass’ family is UKB, they chose to contact their tribe for help, but the UKB and the Cherokee Nation are at odds over a recent opinion that they legally share the same reservation. The initial search for Glass was a “cluster,” according to the report, as the UKB, the Cherokee Nation and the police tried to sort out who was in charge.

“It should not take 10 hours to issue an AMBER Alert when it meets all the criteria.”

Karissa Newkirk

Chaos, apathy and uncooperative interagency behavior are not uncommon in missing or murdered Native cases such as Hummel’s and Glass’. That’s according to Karrisa Newkirk, president and founder of Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Oklahoma, who said it can be difficult to get law enforcement at any level across the state involved, even in violent emergencies.

“There’s been many domestic violence cases too,” Newkirk said. “So there’s been many times when someone has called because of a domestic violence incident and the city police are like, ‘Oh, you’re tribal? You’re going to have to call tribal police.’ Even though they’re in the city limits. And when you’re in a time of need, that’s not something you want to hear.”

Newkirk, who also collaborates with the Department of Justice, said responses improve if a cross-deputization agreement is in place, but the responsibility for contacting tribal police often still falls on the shoulders of victims, which breeds distrust and confusion. 

“I can’t tell you how many times I have been told, ‘Well, they said this, but I was so flustered in the moment, I didn’t do it. I called you,’” Newkirk said. 

Newkirk advocates for a range of solutions, including greater resources for the BIA, continued involvement of a responding officer and a standardized approach to police notifying tribes of arrests. 

“They probably don’t have a manual, but I really do think there needs to be some kind of workflow,” she said. “Like, ‘Oh, this is a tribal member. How many hours do we have to contact the tribal authority?’”

Newkirk also said agencies that work together should have biweekly check-ins, networking events and annual training.

“A lot of these small PDs don’t even have proper training in human trafficking, or missing children, or even murder cases,” Newkirk said. “It should not take 10 hours to issue an AMBER Alert when it meets all the criteria. Training is a necessity.”

In the meantime, Deana Floyd and other families with missing loved ones wait. 

“It’s a nightmare when you don’t know where your child is,” she said. “At this point, I don’t care about anything anymore, except for finding him.”

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post Missing, Murdered Native American Cases Delayed as Police Struggle to Work Together appeared first on oklahomawatch.org

Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This content leans center-left as it highlights systemic issues related to law enforcement’s handling of missing Native American persons, emphasizing problems such as bureaucracy, interagency conflicts, and underfunding that disproportionately affect Indigenous communities. It advocates for increased accountability, better coordination, and expanded resources—positions commonly associated with center-left perspectives that focus on social justice and institutional reform without taking an extreme ideological stance.

Continue Reading

Trending