Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

North Carolina braced for harsh impact of trade war tariffs | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-16 15:56:00

(The Center Square) – Within North Carolina’s $111.1 billion agriculture industry, American tariff target China is the leading export market including for pork, poultry, lumber and tobacco.

The 2024 agricultural exports there topped $691 million. President Donald Trump’s moves in some cases are removing cloaks of darkness, and in others are pushing the state’s industry leaders to encourage patience. Some, such as heads of key product organizations, want the tariff war to end sooner rather than later.

In an email to The Center Square, Agriculture Commissioner Steve Troxler wrote of China in part, “We have worked hard to develop strong business relationships there and want to see them continue. Unfortunately, when there’s a disagreement over tariffs other countries hit us through agriculture. From the last time we experienced trade disputes because of tariffs, the Trump administration was very good at looking after farmers interests and we certainly hope it happens this time.



Steve Troxler, North Carolina agriculture commissioner 




“In reviewing the tariff levels that other countries have in place on agricultural products, I was appalled that we were under those kinds of business restrictions.”

Agriculture and agribusiness have been the state’s No. 1 industry forever. About 42,500 farms are operated on 8.1 million acres from Murphy to Manteo. The state is eighth in the nation in value of agricultural products sold, 14th in exports.

North Carolina production is No. 1 nationally each in sweetpotatoes, all tobacco, flue-cured tobacco, and poultry and eggs. The state is No. 2 in Christmas tree sales, production of turkeys, and food-size trout sold. It is No. 3 in cucumbers and hogs, No. 4 in peanuts and broilers (chicken), and No. 5 in cotton.



FNF - Brooke Rollins US Agriculture Secretary USDA gov

Brooke Rollins, secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture




U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins over the weekend said farmers and ranchers have not been treated well in the tariff regime of other countries for decades. Michelle Grainger, executive director of the nonprofit NC Sweetpotato Commission, said she appreciates the efforts to address imbalances.

“That said,” Grainger wrote in an email to The Center Square, “for North Carolina sweetpotato growers, what matters most is stability – in the marketplace, in the supply chain, and in trade relationships. Protection against unfair practices is important, but so is access to global markets.

“When disruptions occur, it’s not just lost sales – it’s lost relationships, and those are hard to rebuild. A balanced approach that protects U.S. farmers while preserving long-term trade opportunities is critical to our success.”

According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, tariffs by China on American products and America on Chinese products was 21.5% or lower from January 2018 until this year. Since Feb. 4, China has four times retaliated against imposed U.S. tariff increases. Chinese tariffs on U.S. exports have gone from 6.5% in January seven years ago to 147.6%, and U.S. tariffs on Chinese exports have gone, respectively, from 10.3% to 124.1%.

Grainger suggests “negotiated solutions and targeted enforcement – rather than broad tariffs – offer a better path forward.” Lessons are available from the past, she said.

“One is that agriculture can inadvertently become collateral damage in broader trade disputes as happened with the soybean industry,” she says. “While we understand the need to confront unfair labor practices, blanket tariffs can cause significant hardship for farmers – especially those who depend on exports to grow and diversify their markets, as well as the added cost pressures on inputs that come from other countries.

“Another lesson is the importance of predictability. Sudden shifts in trade policy disrupt planning, investment, and supply chain relationships.”

Roy Lee Lindsey, CEO of the North Carolina Pork Council, told The Center Square in an email that international trade, and the ability to trade freely is critical and vital to North Carolina farmers.

“More than 25% of America’s pork production is exported to high-value markets” around the world, Lindsey says. “We are vigorously opposed to retaliatory tariffs on American products, including those affecting our pork producers. Retaliatory actions against food, and pork, are the wrong approach to resolving trade disputes.”

Lindsey said U.S. pork is in demand, and barriers to market access “impact our ability to serve.”

Smithfield Foods operates the world’s largest pork processing plant in the crossroads community of Tar Heel, just south of Fayetteville on N.C. 87. The 1 million square-foot facility employs about 5,000 people and produces an average of 8 million pounds of meat daily.

Mountaire Farms operates America’s largest broiler-processing plant in Lumber Bridge, just south of Fayetteville on N.C. 71. The plant employs about 3,400 people and produces an average of more than 500,000 chickens per day.

“Tariffs are a complicated process, and it is difficult to predict an outcome,” says Troxler, the sixth-term agriculture commissioner. “This is a negotiating tactic by the Trump administration, and it will take time. History has shown us that getting countries to negotiate is a long and tedious process.

“Hopefully, these tariffs will give us a better place to negotiate from and we will be able to come up with something that’s much more favorable to the United States.”

The post North Carolina braced for harsh impact of trade war tariffs | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending