Connect with us

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

New Missouri law means state is no longer allowed to seize assets of prison inmates

Published

on

missouriindependent.com – Rudi Keller – 2025-08-25 05:55:00


Missouri lawmakers passed a bill returning control of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department to the state, sparking controversy and a lawsuit. Hidden in the bill is the repeal of the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act, which forced incarcerated individuals to pay for their imprisonment costs using unrelated assets. Sponsored by Republican Tara Peters and Democrat Stephen Webber, this repeal ends wage garnishments and asset seizures unrelated to crimes. Advocates argue it protects property rights and aids reintegration post-release. The move aligns with another law stopping the seizure of foster children’s Social Security benefits. Critics say the prior act unfairly penalized former inmates.

by Rudi Keller, Missouri Independent
August 25, 2025

One of the most-watched bills approved by Missouri lawmakers this year put the state back in control of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department.

The police takeover provisions made the bill one of the most controversial of the session, and sparked a lawsuit, set for trial Nov. 5. But tucked inside, and noticed only by those watching closely, the bill also includes bipartisan provisions ending the practice of seizing assets from incarcerated people that are unrelated to their crimes.

Known as the Missouri Incarceration Reimbursement Act, the law was passed in 1988, when any idea intended to make life harder for criminals received a favorable hearing. Now, the law is viewed as a violation of property rights and a barrier to a law-abiding life.

“We need to pay our debts to society,” state Rep. Tara Peters, a Rolla Republican, said in an interview with The Independent. “Those who have paid their debt to society should have every opportunity to have a fresh start and to get out on the right foot when it comes time to go back into society.”

Peters sponsored a bill with the repeal, as did state Sen. Stephen Webber, a Columbia Democrat. It was added to the St. Louis police takeover bill to persuade Democrats in the Senate to end a filibuster.

Once enacted, it is one of two bills that will allow people under the control of the state to keep assets they would use when released. The other stops the state from taking foster children’s Social Security benefits to cover the cost of foster care.

The incarceration reimbursement law was intended to take money from inmates to cover the cost of maintaining them in prison. The most recovered over the past five years is $523,000 in fiscal 2024, while the cost of operating the Department of Corrections is greater than $1 billion.

In the fiscal year that ended June 30, efforts to enforce the act brought in only $136,000.

“People who are incarcerated by the state should not have to pay like it’s a hotel or an Airbnb,” said Amy Malinowski, director of the Missouri office of the MacArthur Justice Center. “It’s a prison. It’s the state’s responsibility to maintain those prisons, not the people who are detained there.”

Missouri has laws allowing prosecutors to seize assets gained in a criminal enterprise, and the courts can enforce restitution for stolen or damaged property as part of a sentence. The incarceration reimbursement act allows the attorney general to seek other assets, such as a family inheritance or proceeds from the sale of a house, that are unrelated to the crime.

State Rep. Brad Christ, a Republican from St. Louis County, sponsored the St. Louis police bill and chaired a committee where Peters’ bill was discussed in February. It was an easy decision to accept Democratic requests to include the repeal, he said in an interview.

“Democrats support it from a criminal justice aspect and a number of Republicans supported this, too, because it’s just basic property rights,” Christ said.

Missouri’s prisons hold about 24,000 people. In any given year, about 11,000 will be released on parole or because they have completed their sentence. The goal of prison is to punish and to prepare inmates to live within society’s rules, Christ said.

The seized money can be an important part of avoiding a return to prison, he said.

“Whatever it may be, whether it’s two grand, 20 grand or 200 grand,” Christ said, “to knock someone down a peg while they are in prison, I thought, was a little unjust after their sentence has been fulfilled.”

Under the law, people sentenced to state prison are required to make a statement of their assets when they arrive in custody and, on release, allow the department to garnish their wages for five years.

The attorney general can file a lawsuit to seize any assets found or received by the incarcerated person. 

With the repeal, the Department of Corrections is no longer requiring the statement of assets on entry, agency spokeswoman Karen Pojmann said in an email. But any current garnishments will be stopped only if the person making the payments petitions the courts to end them, she said.

At the House hearing in February, St. Louis attorney Bevis Schock, who has represented clients in civil litigation against the department, said he has won judgments that the attorney general then tried to seize. 

Schock said he believes the law is unconstitutional and expected a court would rule that way in the future. But he still urged lawmakers to act.

“I hate criminals,” Schock said. “I don’t want to help them all. I want them to go to jail, but a criminal’s property should be as sacred as the property of a non-criminal.”

Support The Missouri Independent

As a nonprofit newsroom, our articles are free for everyone to access. Readers like you make that possible. Can you help sustain our watchdog reporting today?

SUPPORT

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

The post New Missouri law means state is no longer allowed to seize assets of prison inmates appeared first on missouriindependent.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

This content presents a balanced view on a bipartisan legislative issue involving criminal justice reform and property rights. It highlights cooperation between Republican and Democratic lawmakers and includes perspectives from multiple sides, focusing on practical and legal considerations rather than ideological extremes. The tone is neutral and informative, reflecting a centrist approach to the topic.

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Southwest Airlines is changing its seating policy for larger customers

Published

on

fox2now.com – Michael Bartiromo – 2025-08-25 13:02:00

SUMMARY: Starting January 27, 2026, Southwest Airlines will require plus-size passengers who cannot fit in a single seat to purchase a second seat in advance, with potential refunds issued post-flight if conditions are met, such as the plane having extra unused seats. This policy change coincides with Southwest’s shift to assigned seating, ending its previous open-seating approach. Advocates for plus-size travelers express disappointment, citing increased anxiety and concerns over fairness. Some passengers support the policy as fair to others, while others view it as discriminatory. Southwest states flight load information won’t be disclosed before departure for competitive reasons.

Read the full article

The post Southwest Airlines is changing its seating policy for larger customers appeared first on fox2now.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Boeing, machinists union to return to contract negotiations Monday amid ongoing strike

Published

on

www.youtube.com – KSDK News – 2025-08-24 22:08:25

SUMMARY: Boeing and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers will resume contract negotiations Monday amid a nearly three-week strike in the Saint Louis area. Around 3,200 machinists are striking for better pay, retirement benefits, and improved pay structures, rejecting Boeing’s latest offer of a 20% wage increase. The union cites economic struggles and demands fair respect and a satisfactory proposal. Boeing previously offered an 8% wage increase in the first year and 4% for subsequent years, which was rejected by 63% of union members. Health benefits for workers are set to expire soon, adding urgency to talks.

The two will return to the negotiating table Monday morning, two union officials said.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Missouri News Feed

Donors to private school voucher program removed from Missouri transparency site

Published

on

missouriindependent.com – Annelise Hanshaw – 2025-07-29 05:55:00


Missouri’s State Treasurer’s Office removed donor information from the MOScholars private school tax credit program’s transparency portal in July 2024, citing a “clerical error.” Major donors previously disclosed included a Fortune 500 healthcare company, a cable firm, and the Kansas City Chiefs’ founding family. The program routes donations through nonprofits, allowing donors to claim tax credits, complicating public disclosure due to donor privacy laws passed in 2022. Critics, including Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck, demand increased accountability and transparency amid audit findings of financial mismanagement and missing program audits. Despite a $51 million direct funding boost and a related lawsuit, the Treasurer’s Office asserts fiscal responsibility.

by Annelise Hanshaw, Missouri Independent
July 29, 2025

Who’s funding a state’s tax credit program for private school tuition is no longer available through Missouri’s transparency portal, following a decision by the State Treasurer’s Office to permanently remove the information.

Donors and their contribution amounts were available July 2, 2024, when The Independent accessed the information and published a report three days later showing the largest donors to the program at the time were a Fortune 500 health care corporation, a cable company and the founding family of the Kansas City Chiefs.

When the article was released, the State Treasurer’s Office called The Independent to ask how the information was accessed. The office didn’t seem to be aware that the list was available on a state-run website detailing state spending.

According to Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, donor information was wiped by the end of the month.

Jackson Bailey, chief of staff to Missouri Treasurer Vivek Malek, chalked the situation up to a “clerical error,” saying the office never intended the information to be posted in the first place.

The office declined to answer further questions on the removal, including whether or not the information is available upon request. 

In 2022, Missouri lawmakers passed a law to shield nonprofits from being forced to disclose donor information. And it was quickly used to conceal public records, such as then-Gov. Mike Parson redacting the names of donors and attendees of his holiday gala.

A year later, lawmakers approved a fix to the law clarifying how it should be implemented.  

Missouri’s tax-credit scholarship program, called MOScholars, is set up using state-approved nonprofits. Donors apply for a tax credit through the State Treasurer’s Office and donate to the nonprofits, which are called educational assistance organizations. At tax time, they are able to deduct the donation amount from their state tax obligations, so long as it’s less than half of their total bill.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

Because the program is set up using private nonprofit organizations as an intermediary, the state might be barred, or at least exempt, from disclosing the donation information, according to Dave Roland, director of litigation at the Freedom Center of Missouri.

Programs like MOScholars, Roland said, are “specifically designed to have the funding treated as private money rather than public money.”

“Due to the connection to a government-created program, the government might be able to require public disclosure of the persons donating to these programs (and thus receiving the tax credits), but they are not obligated to make this information public if they don’t want to,” he wrote in an email.

But for those wary about the MOScholars program, less transparency only makes frustrations worse.

Senate Minority Leader Doug Beck, a Democrat from Affton, has been a vocal critic of MOScholars and has sought clarity from program administrators, including Malek. In 2024, Beck asked for “all the data” the office had compiled on MOScholars and received a screenshot of a webpage with basic demographic information.

“We should have accountability and transparency,” he told The Independent. “We don’t know where the money is coming from. We don’t know how much money it is. How do we know it’s getting where it is supposed to go?”

He pointed to a report from the State Auditor’s Office released earlier this month which called out Malek’s office for depositing $35 million of general revenue into the wrong fund.

The audit also identified a lack of transparency in the administration of the MOScholars program. The treasurer’s office wasn’t hiring annual audits of the program as required and it missed inconsistencies in quarterly reports from educational assistance organizations.

Trent Blair, director of programs in the State Treasurer’s Office, told The Independent that the office has already rectified this mistake and recently hired an auditing company.

The demand for more oversight of MOScholars has accelerated in recent months, with state lawmakers passing a $51 million direct appropriation to the program. A lawsuit filed at the beginning of July is challenging the constitutionality of the funding windfall.

But Blair, when asked if Missourians should feel safe handing over $50 million in the wake of oversight issues, said taxpayers could trust the state.

“There are no fewer accountability issues with this program than any other,” he said in an email. “So Missourians should feel confident about the fiscal responsibility associated with this appropriation.”

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com.

The post Donors to private school voucher program removed from Missouri transparency site appeared first on missouriindependent.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

This content presents a critical view of a state program and its administration, emphasizing issues of transparency, accountability, and potential misuse of public funds. It highlights concerns raised by Democratic lawmakers and watchdogs, while also including responses from the Treasurer’s Office. The focus on government oversight and skepticism toward private school voucher funding aligns with perspectives commonly found in center-left reporting, which often advocates for increased transparency and regulation in public programs. However, the article maintains a factual tone without overt partisan language, placing it near the center but leaning left.

Continue Reading

Trending