Connect with us

The Center Square

Multiple states sue over Biden Title IX rule | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Bethany Blankley | The Center Square contributor – 2024-04-29 13:58:00

(The Center Square) – Several Republican attorneys general have sued over the Biden administration’s Title IX rule change, arguing it is illegal. More states are expected to follow.

The lawsuits come after the Biden administration’s Department of Education rewrote the Title IX statute to expand the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity.”

Title IX, which is part of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, states, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

Title IX was created to prohibit discrimination against women in all educational programs that receive federal money, including K-12 schools, colleges and universities. The new rule redefines biological sex and requires schools to allow men and boys, claiming to be women and girls, respectively, to use female-only facilities and join female-only sports or lose federal funding.

The lawsuits were filed after Republican governors and state education commissioners last week said their states would not comply.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was among the first to speak out, saying, “Florida rejects [president] Joe Biden’s attempt to rewrite Title IX. We will not comply and we will fight back. We are not going to let Joe Biden try to inject men into women’s activities … undermine the rights of parents and … abuse his constitutional authority to try to impose these policies on us here in Florida.”

On April 25, Florida Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, Jr., sent a letter to all superintendents and charter school leaders stating, “at Governor Ron DeSantis’ direction no educational institution should begin implementing any changes. Instead of implementing Congress’s clear directive to prevent discrimination based on biological sex, the Biden administration maims the statute beyond recognition in an attempt to gaslight the country into believing that biological sex no longer has any meaning.”

The same day, Oklahoma’s State Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters also instructed Oklahoma schools not to comply, saying, “Biden’s re-write of Title IX is one of the most illegal and radical moves we have ever seen from the Federal Government. Oklahoma will not sit idly by while radicals trample on the Constitution and take away women’s rights. We are taking swift and aggressive action against Biden in his war on women.”

On Monday, Texas sued, arguing the rule is illegal. “Title IX does not apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. But even if those concepts were protected against discrimination by Title IX, the Final Rule’s provisions do not faithfully implement such protections because they mark as unlawful school policies that do not discriminate based on those concepts –  instead, the Final Rule requires schools to discriminate based on sexual orientation and gender identity by allowing single-sex programs and facilities but requiring opposite-sex access to them for only those individuals with a transgender gender identity,” Texas’ 30-page brief states.

The lawsuit asks a district court in north Texas to postpone the effective date of the rule, Aug. 1, declare the rule unlawful and permanently enjoin the Department of Education from implementing it.

Gov. Greg Abbott instructed the Texas Education Agency to ignore Biden’s “illegal dictate.” He also wrote a letter to President Joe Biden, saying, “Title IX was written by Congress to support the advancement of women academically and athletically. The law was based on the fundamental premise that there are only two sexes – male and female. You have rewritten Title IX to force schools to treat boys as if they are girls and to accept every student’s self-declared gender identity. This ham-handed effort to impose a leftist belief onto Title IX exceeds your authority as President.”

Abbott said rewriting Title IX “tramples laws” that he signed to protect women’s sports in Texas. Last year, Abbott and multiple Republican governors signed bills into law to protect women’s and girls’ sports.

A coalition of four Republican attorneys general, led by Louisiana, also sued on Monday. Mississippi, Montana and Idaho joined Louisiana, arguing in their 43-page brief that the rule “is an affront to the dignity of families and school administrators everywhere, and is nowhere close to legal.”

The lawsuit makes similar arguments as Texas’ and asks a U.S. district court in Louisiana to declare the rule is contrary to law, violates Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, is an unlawful exercise of legislative power under Article 1 of the Constitution, is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion, and violates the Administrative Procedures Act.

The lawsuits were filed after a coalition of 15 attorneys general led by Montana AG Austin Knudsen, called on the DOE in 2022 to cancel its plans to rewrite Title IX, The Center Square reported.

Knudsen argues the rule “could cost Montana taxpayers money in civil lawsuits and the possible loss of federal funding in states that seek to protect equal opportunities for women and girls. It would also harm victims of sex discrimination and violence, as Title IX is used in grievance procedures to produce a fair outcome.”

Read More

The post Multiple states sue over Biden Title IX rule | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com

The Center Square

California Democrats gut bill making it a felony to solicit child prostitutes | California

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Kenneth Schrupp – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 17:28:00

(The Center Square)  California Democratic legislators gutted a bill that would have made it a felony to solicit any children for sex, despite support for the measure from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis. 

Assembly Bill 379, a bipartisan bill from Assemblywoman Maggy Krell, D-Sacramento, and State Sen. Shannon Grove, R-Bakersfield, would have closed the loopholes left open by the forced amendments to Grove’s Senate Bill 1414, which passed last year and made it a felony to pay all minors for sex except for those 16 and 17 years old. 

National outrage on the bill’s near-shelving put the bill back onto the legislative schedule, and led Newsom and Kounalakis to come out in support of the bill’s existing provisions. 

However, Assembly Public Safety Chairman Nick Schultz, D-Burbank, has instead opted “to host info hearings on the issue in the fall” as Democratic legislators voted to forcefully gut the bill against Krell’s wishes to remove the provision making it a felony to purchase sex from all minors.

Republicans responded by proposing a “hostile” amendment to restore the provision, which Krell officially endorsed, saying she does not consider the restoration amendment “hostile” and would be voting to support it. 

In one notable exchange on the Assembly floor session on AB 379, Assemblyman Mark Gonzalez, D-Los Angeles, took aim at Assemblyman Carl DeMaio, R-San Diego for his support of making it a felony to buy sex from children.

“SB 357, which this bill is trying to fix, legalized loitering for the purpose of sex work and prostitution. Why? Because somehow it was spun as anti-LGBT to try and enforce laws against sex trafficking,” said DeMaio on the Assembly floor. “I will tell you as a gay Republican it is offensive, and a supermajority of the gay community disavow the LGBTQ caucus claiming that somehow this bill is anti-gay. It’s offensive to use the gay community as window dressing for sex trafficking.”

“What’s offensive is when you stand on this floor and call yourself gay, but yet you vote down the same civil rights for gay people every single day,” said Gonzalez.

SB 357 author State Sen. Scott Wiener argued at the time that decriminalization of loitering to commit prostitution “contributes to “discrimination on the basis of gender, race, class and perceived sex worker status – in particular, targeting Black women and members of the transgender community.”

Since SB 357 has come into law, vast swathes of urban areas in California have become open prostitution zones. In Los Angeles, a 40 block area of South Central is covered by hundreds of prostitutes, some charging as little as $40 for some acts, with “10 girls on the corner, condoms on the ground,” many of whom are minors, all in “broad daylight.” 

Sacramento Sheriff Jim Cooper, who previously was a Democratic Assemblyman, condemned the changes to the bill, and cited his department’s high volume of cases regarding the sex trafficking of minors. 

“In my agency, we currently have 17 open cases of juveniles being trafficked for sex. This year, we have already rescued seven juveniles from the sex trade,” said Cooper. “They are currently getting sexually exploited, and the Legislature made a decision today that the exploitation of these children is acceptable collateral damage.”

The post California Democrats gut bill making it a felony to solicit child prostitutes | California appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Right-Leaning

The article presents a right-leaning bias, primarily through its framing and tone. It criticizes Democratic legislators for “gutting” a bill intended to make solicitation of minors for sex a felony, portraying their actions as obstructive and harmful. The language used, such as “forcefully gut the bill” and describing Democratic decisions as making “the exploitation of these children acceptable collateral damage,” is strongly negative toward the Democrats’ position. The article highlights Republican efforts to restore the provisions and portrays Democratic opposition in a harsh light, often quoting Republicans sympathetically while framing Democrats as dismissive or offensive. While it reports on the ideological conflict, the selective emphasis and charged language suggest advocacy rather than neutral reporting. This framing indicates a clear ideological stance aligned more with conservative or right-leaning perspectives.

Continue Reading

The Center Square

Circle may have missed out by rejecting Ripple’s offer, crypto experts say | National

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – Tom Joyce – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 14:37:00

(The Center Square) – The crypto company Ripple recently offered big money to purchase the company best known for issuing the USDC stablecoin.

Ripple, best known for its XRP token, offered somewhere between $4 billion and $5 billion to take over Circle Internet Group Inc. However, its proposal was rejected and seen as too low, Bloomberg reports.

The offer would have consolidated two prominent stablecoin companies had Circle accepted the deal.

Although Ripple hasn’t ruled out making another offer, the rejection baffled crypto experts. Some argue Circle will regret its decision.

Ripple has aggressively launched a stablecoin of its own (RLUSD) and wants to become a serious competitor to Circle’s USDC and Tether’s USDT, potentially hurting both their market shares; these stablecoins are cryptocurrencies with values pegged to the United States dollar.

Had Ripple acquired Circle, it would have owned the world’s second-largest stablecoin, according to CNBC.

A merger between Ripple and Circle would’ve diversified the two companies’ revenue streams, former Amazon and IBM executive Sandy Carter wrote in a recent Forbes article.

Carter noted Ripple could have introduced USDC stablecoin to foreign markets, vastly expanding its reach.

“Its network reaches far beyond U.S. borders, with strong relationships across Asia, Latin America, and Europe,” she wrote. “Ripple says that 90% of the company’s business is conducted outside the United States. That kind of reach could’ve propelled USDC into markets where stablecoin adoption is still in its infancy but growing fast.”

Carter added that the rejection indicates Circle has confidence in its product and thinks it can build the digital infrastructure necessary to increase its global market share.

“For leaders in fintech, digital assets, and global payments, the lesson is clear: market share alone doesn’t win the future,” she wrote. “It’s about ecosystem reach, interoperability, and trust. Circle is betting that those three pillars will serve it better independently. Ripple is betting it can build or acquire its way to the same destination, faster.”

David Tawil, president of crypto hedge fund ProChain Capital, thinks Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire is taking too much risk by rejecting such a lucrative offer, especially since more mainstream financial companies may start up stablecoins in the coming years.

“Allaire is assuming a lot of risk over whether #Circle will be able to survive on its own when the stablecoin wars are unleashed (every bank, tech company, etc.),” Tawil posted on X. “However, $USDC is Allaire’s baby and it’s certainly hard to part with autonomy over your baby and merge it with Garlinghouse. $XRP.”

Tech policy expert Roslyn Layton said the two sides could have made a good team, especially as Circle has struggled to have an Initial Public Offering.

“Acceleration happens in bear markets, and innovation turns to conquest in the rebound,” she posted on X. “The window is closing. @Circle is hitting IPO headwinds and @Ripple has cash, infrastructure and legal clarity.”

This year, Circle is amid its second attempt to go public. It tried to in 2022 but had a $9 billion merger deal collapse that would have allowed it to happen, according to Reuters.

Amid ongoing stock market volatility, other cryptocurrency companies are delaying their plans to go public, The Wall Street Journal reports.

The post Circle may have missed out by rejecting Ripple’s offer, crypto experts say | National appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a relatively balanced report on the crypto industry, specifically focusing on the potential merger between Ripple and Circle. It mainly covers factual details about the rejected offer, the perspectives of various experts, and the implications for the market. The article includes insights from individuals with different viewpoints, such as a former Amazon and IBM executive and a crypto hedge fund president, without suggesting a particular ideological stance. The tone is largely neutral, with no overt preference for one side, offering an informative look at the situation rather than advocating for one company’s strategy over another. The inclusion of diverse expert opinions allows for a well-rounded portrayal of the topic.

Continue Reading

News from the South - Tennessee News Feed

Trump’s first judicial nomination of second term is a Tennessean | Tennessee

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Kim Jarrett | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-05-02 14:16:00

(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump picked an attorney in the Tennessee attorney general’s office for a spot on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Whitney Hermandorfer is currently the director of the Strategic Litigation Unit in the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office. If confirmed by the Senate, she will fill a judicial vacancy left by Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch, who announced in January she was taking senior status. The court is based in Cincinnati and hears cases from Ohio, Tennessee, Kentucky and Michigan.

“The atate of Tennessee has trusted Whitney Hermandorfer over and over with complex cases of national significance. She has never let us down,” said Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti on Friday. “Her leadership of Tennessee’s Strategic Litigation Unit sets a high bar of excellence at every level of the federal judiciary, all the way up to the Supreme Court of the United States.”

Kentucky Attorney General Russel Coleman said Hermandorfer has been an advocate.

“As neighbors to the north, our office has been grateful for Whitney’s partnership as we uphold our laws and the Constitution. Whitney was one of the brilliant advocates behind our lawsuit to protect women’s sports, and her ability to see around legal corners led to key victories all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court,” Coleman said in a statement.

Tennessee’s U.S. senators praised Trump’s nomination.

“She is a rising star in Tennessee, and she will be a fair-minded jurist who will apply our nation’s laws as they are written and defend the Constitution,” Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., said.

“Few can boast equal credentials, having clerked for Justices Alito and Barrett, as well as then-Judge Kavanaugh. Whitney graduated top of her law school class at the George Washington University Law School,” said Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn.

The post Trump’s first judicial nomination of second term is a Tennessean | Tennessee appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The article primarily reports on the nomination of Whitney Hermandorfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by President Donald Trump. It includes endorsements from Republican officials, highlighting her qualifications and conservative judicial credentials. The tone is positive and supportive of the nominee, with quotes praising her legal work on issues such as protecting women’s sports and upholding the Constitution, which are typically associated with conservative values. Although the article does not explicitly argue for a political position, the framing and selection of supportive quotes from Republican figures suggest a center-right bias. The content emphasizes her alignment with conservative judicial philosophy through mentions of her clerking for conservative Supreme Court justices and the praise from GOP senators, rather than presenting a neutral or balanced view including perspectives from other political sides.

Continue Reading

Trending