Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Multimillion-dollar bonuses for Ingles executives in 2024 despite lower profits at grocery chain • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – SALLY KESTIN – 2025-01-18 11:06:00

Tropical Storm Helene, inflation and higher labor costs ate into Ingles Markets’ profits last year, but the company’s board chairman still received a bonus of more than $6 million.

Robert P. Ingle II, son of the Black Mountain-based grocery chain founder, received a total of $7.4 million in compensation in 2024, including a salary of $1.2 million and bonus of nearly $6.1 million. That’s a 7 percent decrease from his 2023 package of nearly $8 million, according to a proxy statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Friday.

Ingles’ Chief Executive Officer and President James W. Lanning received $3.1 million, 5 percent less than 2023. His bonus for 2024 was nearly $2 million.

Ingles reported decreases in compensation for its top executives in 2024. // Source: Proxy Statement

Although the company’s fiscal year results included only two days following the storm, Helene contributed to lower profits for the company in 2024, as Asheville Watchdog previously reported. The Sept. 27 storm knocked out power to 80 of the company’s 198 stores, forced the closure of four stores, and damaged the Black Mountain distribution center and corporate headquarters.

The grocery company lost $14 million in sales and nearly $35 million in inventory and property damage as of Sept. 28, the day after the storm and the end of Ingles’ fiscal year. Although partially offset by insurance, losses were expected to grow in the early part of this year, the company’s annual report said.

Net income was also down: $105.5 million in 2024 compared to $210.8 million the previous year. The company attributed the loss to “inflation in the cost of goods and increases in operating expenses due to increased labor market competition,” according to the report. 

Ingles awards monthly bonuses to managers based on the performance of their business units and discretionary annual bonuses to some associates and to executives based on company performance. Ingles paid $29.2 million in bonuses last year, down from $34.4 million in 2023, the annual report said. 

Ingles reported a slight increase in the wages of its full-time, part-time and temporary employees. In 2024 the 24,285 employees as of Sept. 15 earned a median salary of $22,801, an increase of $93 annually over the $22,708 median salary for 26,253 employees as of September 2023. 

The company’s fiscal year consisted of 53 weeks in 2023 versus 52 weeks in 2024, which would make the median associate’s weekly salary $438 last year, a $10 increase over the previous year.

The gap between Lanning’s compensation and that of other Ingles employees, known in the SEC filings as the CEO pay ratio, decreased to 137-to-1 in 2024 from 145-to-1 in 2023.

The company’s annual meeting of shareholders is scheduled for March 3. A shareholder proposal to increase the size of the board of directors by adding two Class A shareholder seats is expected to be rejected. Robert P. Ingle holds nearly 73 percent of the voting power at the company and intends to oppose the measure, the proxy statement said.

The proxy statement also indicates that while she remains a director of the company, Laura Lynn Ingle Sharp, Robert P. Ingle’s sister and namesake of the Laura Lynn brands sold at Ingles, no longer holds any shares of the company.


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Sally Kestin is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter. Email skestin@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s reporting is made possible by donations from the community. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post Multimillion-dollar bonuses for Ingles executives in 2024 despite lower profits at grocery chain • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

The Watchdog

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending