Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Mission tries to retain beds it gave up after closing Asheville Specialty Hospital, letter obtained by Watchdog shows • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – ANDREW R. JONES – 2025-01-30 07:00:00

Mission Hospital is trying to keep acute care beds it gave up when it closed Asheville Specialty Hospital late last year, but a 22-year-old legal document prohibits it from doing so.

A Nov. 29 letter from Nashville law firm Holland & Knight to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, obtained by Asheville Watchdog, states that Mission Health wants to find a way to preserve the beds for Mission Hospital.

Before its closing, ASH was the only long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in western North Carolina. The hospital was licensed for 34 acute care beds — nine high-observation ones and 25 progressive care ones — at the time of closure.

Four days after The Watchdog revealed that Mission planned to close ASH, Holland & Knight’s letter, signed by Hannah Ketring Brown, formally notified NCDHHS’ Division of Health Service Regulation (DHSR) that Mission wouldn’t seek to renew the ASH license while stating its intention to keep the beds.

“[T]he Hospital is working with your Department and your Department’s legal counsel to determine whether there is a way to preserve the Hospital’s beds and convert them back to acute care beds at Mission Hospital, even though the Hospital does not plan to see patients at this location [ASH] again (the “Potential Conversion Plan”),” the Holland & Knight letter states.

But Mission’s effort to retain the 34 acute care beds may be futile because the original CON awarded to Mission in 2002 — when there were 38 beds in ASH — mandates that if ASH were closed, the system would lose the beds.

“If the 38-bed long-term care hospital ceases to operate, Memorial Mission Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Mission St. Joseph’s Hospital (lessor) and MSJHS and CCP Joint Development Company, LLC d/b/a Mission CarePartners Specialty Hospital (lessee) shall take the steps necessary to delicense the 38 acute care beds used for the long-term acute care hospital, and shall not add them to the number of licensed acute care beds in Mission St. Joseph’s Hospital,” the CON states.

The Watchdog sent the Holland & Knight letter and the 2002 CON award to Mission Health spokesperson Nancy Lindell along with several questions about the hospital’s intentions.

“I have nothing further on this,” Lindell said.

The Watchdog also sent the documents to NCDHHS, which acknowledged receipt of the letter.

“DHSR is reviewing with NC Department of Justice counsel. A response has not yet been provided to Holland & Knight nor Mission,” spokesperson Hannah Jones said.

Holland & Knight’s Ketring Brown did not respond to calls and an email.

According to emails The Watchdog obtained, another law firm, Baker Donelson, sought and received from NCDHHS a 136-page CON application, created in 2001, for ASH. That request took place between late October and late November, and did not mention Mission’s plans to close ASH, which were not public at the time.

The Baker Donelson lawyer who requested the CON application did not respond to calls and an email.

For years Mission Health has been locked in battle with competing hospital companies for acute care beds, making two unsuccessful attempts through the state’s Certificate of Need (CON) process to boost its count.

The DHSR awarded beds to AdventHealth twice, for a total of 93, over two years. AdventHealth plans to build a hospital in Weaverville, creating the first hospital competition in Buncombe County since Memorial Mission Hospital merged with Asheville’s St. Joseph’s Hospital in 1998. 

Mission has appealed both DHSR decisions, and its latest appeal of the awarding of 26 beds to AdventHealth has stalled the Weaverville hospital’s construction, as the Watchdog previously reported.

State says it learned of ASH closing through the media

There were 15-20 patients at ASH when Tropical Storm Helene hit, according to email exchanges between NCDHHS employees obtained by The Watchdog. All were transferred out of the hospital, and Mission soon decided to close the facility for good. 

Later, as The Watchdog first reported, Mission Hospital CEO Greg Lowe told Mission employees it planned to demolish the building that housed ASH, which was the historic St. Joseph’s Hospital. The building was in poor condition and damage was exacerbated by Helene, Lindell told The Watchdog in December.

Following the news of ASH’s closure and planned demolition, Buncombe residents contacted NCDHHS, frustrated with the decision and wondering whether the shuttering broke the 2019 asset purchase agreement, which included commitments HCA made to keep facilities open for at least 10 years after it bought Mission Health for $1.5 billion.

“From and after such two (2)-year period, buyer shall have the right to discontinue any LTAC (Long-term Acute Care) Service at the St. Joseph campus of Mission Hospital (Asheville, North Carolina),” the APA states, making it clear that the closure did not violate the agreement.

Former NCDHHS Chief Deputy Secretary for Health Mark T. Benton responded to one Buncombe resident in a short email discussing ASH’s closure.

“I’m sorry that you were told that NCDHHS had prior knowledge of and provided its approval to the closure of HCA-Mission’s LTACH,” Benton said. “[T]hat isn’t true. We learned of its permanent closure likely at the same time as you – when it was reported by the media. Even so, their notification did not violate either state or federal law which requires hospitals to notify both levels of government when they close.”

Benton, who retired at the end of 2024, told the resident he wished there had been more conversation before the closure. 

“I’m sorry about the closure of this LTACH and wish that we could have talked with HCA-Mission before a final decision/announcement was made,” Benton wrote.“Perhaps I’m an optimist, but I wonder if we could have – together – identified an option to keep some or all of it open. Even so, my team will stay in contact with our colleagues in Buncombe County and others in western NC to monitor this situation.”


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Andrew R. Jones is a Watchdog investigative reporter. Email arjones@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community.  To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post Mission tries to retain beds it gave up after closing Asheville Specialty Hospital, letter obtained by Watchdog shows • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

NIL legislation advances, has exemption for public records laws | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By David Beasley | The Center Square contributor – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 21:25:00

(The Center Square) – Authorization of sports agents to sign North Carolina’s collegiate athletes for “name, image, and likeness” contracts used in product endorsements is in legislation approved Wednesday by a committee of the state Senate.

Authorize NIL Agency Contracts, known also as Senate Bill 229, is headed to the Rules Committee after gaining favor in the Judiciary Committee. It would likely next get a full floor vote.

Last year the NCAA approved NIL contracts for players.



Sen. Amy S. Galey, R-Alamance




“Athletes can benefit from NIL by endorsing products, signing sponsorship deals, engaging in commercial opportunities and monetizing their social media presence, among other avenues,” the NCAA says on its website. “The NCAA fully supports these opportunities for student-athletes across all three divisions.”

SB229 spells out the information that the agent’s contract with the athlete must include, and requires a warning to the athlete that they could lose their eligibility if they do not notify the school’s athletic director within 72 hours of signing the contract.

“Consult with your institution of higher education prior to entering into any NIL contract,” the says the warning that would be required by the legislation. “Entering into an NIL contract that conflicts with state law or your institution’s policies may have negative consequences such as loss of athletic eligibility. You may cancel this NIL agency contract with 14 days after signing it.”

The legislation also exempts the NIL contracts from being disclosed under the state’s Open Records Act when public universities review them. The state’s two ACC members from the UNC System, Carolina and N.C. State, requested the exemption.

“They are concerned about disclosure of the student-athlete contracts when private universities don’t have to disclose the student-athlete contracts,” Sen. Amy Galey, R-Alamance, told the committee. “I feel very strongly that a state university should not be put at a disadvantage at recruitment or in program management because they have disclosure requirements through state law.”

Duke and Wake Forest are the other ACC members, each a private institution.

The post NIL legislation advances, has exemption for public records laws | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article primarily reports on the legislative development regarding NIL (name, image, and likeness) contracts for collegiate athletes in North Carolina. It presents facts about the bill, committee actions, and includes statements from a state senator without using loaded or emotionally charged language. The piece neutrally covers the issue by explaining both the bill’s purpose and the concerns it addresses, such as eligibility warnings and disclosure exemptions. Overall, the article maintains a factual and informative tone without advocating for or against the legislation, reflecting a centrist, unbiased approach.

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

N.C. Treasurer names conservative climate skeptic to state Utilities Commission

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Lisa Sorg – 2025-04-30 15:52:00

SUMMARY: Donald van der Vaart, a former North Carolina environmental secretary and climate skeptic, has been appointed to the North Carolina Utilities Commission by Republican Treasurer Brad Briner. Van der Vaart, who previously supported offshore drilling and fracking, would oversee the state’s transition to renewable energy while regulating utility services. His appointment, which requires approval from the state House and Senate, has drawn opposition from environmental groups. Critics argue that his views contradict clean energy progress. The appointment follows a controversial bill passed by the legislature, granting the treasurer appointment power to the commission.

Read the full article

The post N.C. Treasurer names conservative climate skeptic to state Utilities Commission appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

‘Crypto-friendly legislation’ clears North Carolina House | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 14:47:00

(The Center Square) – Called “crypto-friendly legislation” by the leader of the chamber, a proposal on digital assets on Wednesday afternoon passed the North Carolina House of Representatives.

Passage was 71-44 mostly along party lines.

The NC Digital Assets Investments Act, known also as House Bill 92, has investment requirements, caps and management, and clear definitions and standards aimed at making sure only qualified digital assets are included. House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, said the state would potentially join more than a dozen others with “crypto-friendly legislation.”

With him in sponsorship are Reps. Stephen Ross, R-Alamance, Mark Brody, R-Union, and Mike Schietzelt, R-Wake.

Nationally last year, the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act – known as FIT21 – passed through the U.S. House in May and in September was parked in the Senate’s Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

Dan Spuller, cochairman of the North Carolina Blockchain Initiative, said the state has proven a leader on digital asset policy. That includes the Money Transmitters Act of 2016, the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021, and last year’s No Centrl Bank Digital Currency Pmts to State. The latter was strongly opposed by Gov. Roy Cooper, so much so that passage votes of 109-4 in the House and 39-5 in the Senate slipped back to override votes, respectively, of 73-41 and 27-17.

The post ‘Crypto-friendly legislation’ clears North Carolina House | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a factual report on the passage of the NC Digital Assets Investments Act, highlighting the legislative process, party-line votes, and related legislative measures. It does not adopt a clear ideological stance or frame the legislation in a way that suggests bias. Instead, it provides neutral information on the bill, its sponsors, and relevant background on state legislative activity in digital asset policy. The tone and language remain objective, focusing on legislative facts rather than promoting a particular viewpoint.

Continue Reading

Trending