Connect with us

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Mission tries to retain beds it gave up after closing Asheville Specialty Hospital, letter obtained by Watchdog shows • Asheville Watchdog

Published

on

avlwatchdog.org – ANDREW R. JONES – 2025-01-30 07:00:00

Mission Hospital is trying to keep acute care beds it gave up when it closed Asheville Specialty Hospital late last year, but a 22-year-old legal document prohibits it from doing so.

A Nov. 29 letter from Nashville law firm Holland & Knight to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, obtained by Asheville Watchdog, states that Mission Health wants to find a way to preserve the beds for Mission Hospital.

Before its closing, ASH was the only long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in western North Carolina. The hospital was licensed for 34 acute care beds — nine high-observation ones and 25 progressive care ones — at the time of closure.

Four days after The Watchdog revealed that Mission planned to close ASH, Holland & Knight’s letter, signed by Hannah Ketring Brown, formally notified NCDHHS’ Division of Health Service Regulation (DHSR) that Mission wouldn’t seek to renew the ASH license while stating its intention to keep the beds.

“[T]he Hospital is working with your Department and your Department’s legal counsel to determine whether there is a way to preserve the Hospital’s beds and convert them back to acute care beds at Mission Hospital, even though the Hospital does not plan to see patients at this location [ASH] again (the “Potential Conversion Plan”),” the Holland & Knight letter states.

But Mission’s effort to retain the 34 acute care beds may be futile because the original CON awarded to Mission in 2002 — when there were 38 beds in ASH — mandates that if ASH were closed, the system would lose the beds.

“If the 38-bed long-term care hospital ceases to operate, Memorial Mission Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Mission St. Joseph’s Hospital (lessor) and MSJHS and CCP Joint Development Company, LLC d/b/a Mission CarePartners Specialty Hospital (lessee) shall take the steps necessary to delicense the 38 acute care beds used for the long-term acute care hospital, and shall not add them to the number of licensed acute care beds in Mission St. Joseph’s Hospital,” the CON states.

The Watchdog sent the Holland & Knight letter and the 2002 CON award to Mission Health spokesperson Nancy Lindell along with several questions about the hospital’s intentions.

“I have nothing further on this,” Lindell said.

The Watchdog also sent the documents to NCDHHS, which acknowledged receipt of the letter.

“DHSR is reviewing with NC Department of Justice counsel. A response has not yet been provided to Holland & Knight nor Mission,” spokesperson Hannah Jones said.

Holland & Knight’s Ketring Brown did not respond to calls and an email.

According to emails The Watchdog obtained, another law firm, Baker Donelson, sought and received from NCDHHS a 136-page CON application, created in 2001, for ASH. That request took place between late October and late November, and did not mention Mission’s plans to close ASH, which were not public at the time.

The Baker Donelson lawyer who requested the CON application did not respond to calls and an email.

For years Mission Health has been locked in battle with competing hospital companies for acute care beds, making two unsuccessful attempts through the state’s Certificate of Need (CON) process to boost its count.

The DHSR awarded beds to AdventHealth twice, for a total of 93, over two years. AdventHealth plans to build a hospital in Weaverville, creating the first hospital competition in Buncombe County since Memorial Mission Hospital merged with Asheville’s St. Joseph’s Hospital in 1998. 

Mission has appealed both DHSR decisions, and its latest appeal of the awarding of 26 beds to AdventHealth has stalled the Weaverville hospital’s construction, as the Watchdog previously reported.

State says it learned of ASH closing through the media

There were 15-20 patients at ASH when Tropical Storm Helene hit, according to email exchanges between NCDHHS employees obtained by The Watchdog. All were transferred out of the hospital, and Mission soon decided to close the facility for good. 

Later, as The Watchdog first reported, Mission Hospital CEO Greg Lowe told Mission employees it planned to demolish the building that housed ASH, which was the historic St. Joseph’s Hospital. The building was in poor condition and damage was exacerbated by Helene, Lindell told The Watchdog in December.

Following the news of ASH’s closure and planned demolition, Buncombe residents contacted NCDHHS, frustrated with the decision and wondering whether the shuttering broke the 2019 asset purchase agreement, which included commitments HCA made to keep facilities open for at least 10 years after it bought Mission Health for $1.5 billion.

“From and after such two (2)-year period, buyer shall have the right to discontinue any LTAC (Long-term Acute Care) Service at the St. Joseph campus of Mission Hospital (Asheville, North Carolina),” the APA states, making it clear that the closure did not violate the agreement.

Former NCDHHS Chief Deputy Secretary for Health Mark T. Benton responded to one Buncombe resident in a short email discussing ASH’s closure.

“I’m sorry that you were told that NCDHHS had prior knowledge of and provided its approval to the closure of HCA-Mission’s LTACH,” Benton said. “[T]hat isn’t true. We learned of its permanent closure likely at the same time as you – when it was reported by the media. Even so, their notification did not violate either state or federal law which requires hospitals to notify both levels of government when they close.”

Benton, who retired at the end of 2024, told the resident he wished there had been more conversation before the closure. 

“I’m sorry about the closure of this LTACH and wish that we could have talked with HCA-Mission before a final decision/announcement was made,” Benton wrote.“Perhaps I’m an optimist, but I wonder if we could have – together – identified an option to keep some or all of it open. Even so, my team will stay in contact with our colleagues in Buncombe County and others in western NC to monitor this situation.”


Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. Andrew R. Jones is a Watchdog investigative reporter. Email arjones@avlwatchdog.org. The Watchdog’s local reporting is made possible by donations from the community.  To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/support-our-publication/.

Original article

The post Mission tries to retain beds it gave up after closing Asheville Specialty Hospital, letter obtained by Watchdog shows • Asheville Watchdog appeared first on avlwatchdog.org

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Children of Negro Leaguer Jenkins reflect on dad's life, impact

Published

on

www.youtube.com – ABC11 – 2025-06-15 21:26:40


SUMMARY: Jim Jenkins, a North Carolina baseball trailblazer and Negro Leagues player, exemplified resilience and excellence both on and off the field. His sons recall his superior skills—hitting, running, and catching—and how he faced challenges due to his skin color. Beyond baseball, Jenkins was a community father, teaching youths fundamentals and helping those in need. He shared a friendship with legend Hank Aaron, often attending Braves games with his family. His legacy endures through his children, who honor not just his athletic achievements but his kindness and humanity, inspiring future generations to carry on his impact.

James “Jim” Jenkins had a profound impact on the game of baseball as a trailblazer known in the Carolinas.

https://abc11.com/post/jenkins-family-remembers-patriarch-nc-baseball-trailblazer-fathers-day/16759447/
Download: https://abc11.com/apps/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ABC11/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/abc11_wtvd/
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@abc11_wtvd
TIKTOK: https://www.tiktok.com/@abc11_eyewitnessnews
X: https://x.com/ABC11_WTVD

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health

Published

on

ncnewsline.com – Hannah Friedman – 2025-06-15 05:00:00

SUMMARY: A scientist reflecting on the politicization of science warns that ideological influence undermines objectivity, breeds mistrust, and hampers public understanding. The FY2026 budget proposal cut NIH funding by about 40%, saving taxpayers $18 billion, but only 1.5% of the total federal budget, while increasing defense spending by 13%. These cuts severely impact states like North Carolina, where science drives $2.4 billion in tax revenue and thousands of jobs. The cuts target indirect costs vital for research infrastructure and diversity efforts, mistakenly seen as ideological rather than essential scientific practices. The author calls for unity to prioritize facts over politics and protect scientific progress for societal and economic health.

Read the full article

The post The cost of saving 1.5%: Our health appeared first on ncnewsline.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - North Carolina News Feed

Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Alan Wooten | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-06-15 02:01:00


North Carolina’s U.S. House members voted along party lines on two Republican-backed bills: the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (H.R. 1), which cuts \$1.6 trillion in government spending, and the “Rescissions Act of 2025” (H.R. 4), which eliminates \$9.4 billion from entities like USAID and public broadcasting. Republicans called it a purge of waste, citing spending on drag shows and foreign projects. Democrats criticized the cuts as harmful and symbolic, calling the effort fiscally irresponsible. H.R. 1 passed 215-214; H.R. 4 passed 214-212. No Democrats supported either. A few Republicans broke ranks and voted against their party on each bill.

(The Center Square) – North Carolinians in the U.S. House of Representatives were unwavering of party preference for two bills now awaiting finalization in the Senate.

Republicans who favored them say the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, known also as House Resolution 1, slashed $1.6 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse of government systems. The Rescissions Act of 2025, known also as House Resolution 4, did away with $9.4 billion – less than six-tenths of 1% of the other legislation – in spending by the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Corp. for Public Broadcasting (PBS, NPR), and other entities.

Democrats against them say the Department of Government Efficiency made “heartless budget cuts” and was an “attack on the resources that North Carolinians were promised and that Congress has already appropriated.”

Republicans from North Carolina in favor of both were Reps. Dr. Greg Murphy, Virginia Foxx, Addison McDowell, David Rouzer, Rev. Mark Harris, Richard Hudson, Pat Harrigan, Chuck Edwards, Brad Knott and Tim Moore.

Democrats against were Reps. Don Davis, Deborah Ross, Valerie Foushee and Alma Adams.

Foxx said the surface was barely skimmed with cuts of “$14 million in cash vouchers for migrants at our southern border; $24,000 for a national spelling bee in Bosnia; $1.5 million to mobilize elderly, lesbian, transgender, nonbinary and intersex people to be involved in the Costa Rica political process; $20,000 for a drag show in Ecuador; and $32,000 for an LGBTQ comic book in Peru.”

Adams said, “While Elon Musk claimed he would cut $1 trillion from the federal government, the recissions package amounts to less than 1% of that. Meanwhile, House Republicans voted just last month to balloon the national debt by $3 trillion in their One Big Ugly Bill. It’s fiscal malpractice, not fiscal responsibility.”

House Resolution 1 passed 215-214 and House Resolution 4 went forward 214-212. Republican Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Thomas Massie of Kentucky were against the One Big Beautiful Bill and Republican Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, Nicole Malliotakis of New York and Michael Turner of Ohio were against the Rescissions Act.

No Democrats voted yea.

The post Unwavering party preference in 2 bills valued at $1.6T | North Carolina appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The article presents a straightforward report on the partisan positions and voting outcomes related to two specific bills, highlighting the contrasting views of Republicans and Democrats without using loaded or emotionally charged language. It neutrally conveys the Republicans’ framing of the bills as efforts to cut waste and reduce spending, alongside Democrats’ critique of those cuts as harmful and insufficient fiscal discipline. By providing direct quotes from representatives of both parties and clearly stating voting results, the content maintains factual reporting without promoting a particular ideological stance. The balanced presentation of arguments and absence of editorializing indicate a commitment to neutrality rather than an intentional partisan perspective.

Continue Reading

Trending