by Ariana Figueroa, Virginia Mercury
May 18, 2025

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday kept in place a block on the Trump administration’s efforts to deport 176 Venezuelans in Northern Texas under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.

A majority of the justices found that President Donald Trump’s administration violated the due process rights of Venezuelans when the administration tried to deport them from North Texas last month by invoking the 18th-century wartime law. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.

“Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,” according to the decision.

The justices did not determine the legality of the Trump administration using the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans 14 and older with suspected ties to the gang Tren de Aragua.

On his social media platform, Trump expressed his disapproval of the ruling.

“THE SUPREME COURT WON’T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!” he wrote on Truth Social.

The justices found that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals “erred in dismissing the detainees’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction,” and vacated that order, sending the case back.

The Trump administration on Monday asked the high court to remove the injunction, arguing that detaining suspected members of Tren de Aragua poses a threat to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and staff.

In a Wednesday response, the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the suit, warned that if the Supreme Court lifts its injunction, “most of the putative class members will be removed with little chance to seek judicial review.”

In Friday’s order, the justices noted that because the Trump administration has used the Alien Enemies Act to send migrants to a notorious prison in El Salvador, careful due process is needed.

“The Government has represented elsewhere that it is unable to provide for the return of an individual deported in error to a prison in El Salvador…where it is alleged that detainees face indefinite detention,” according to the order, noting the wrongful deportation of Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador.

“The detainees’ interests at stake are accordingly particularly weighty,” the court continued.

Other rulings

On April 18, the ACLU made an emergency application to the high court, asking to bar any removals under the Alien Enemies Act in the Northern District of Texas over concerns that the Trump administration was not following due process.

Several federal judges elsewhere have blocked the use of the wartime law in their districts that cover Colorado, Southern Texas and Southern New York.

A federal judge in Western Pennsylvania Tuesday was the first to uphold the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, but said those accused must have at least three weeks to challenge their removal.

Virginia Mercury is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Virginia Mercury maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Samantha Willis for questions: info@virginiamercury.com.

The post Trump move to deport Venezuelans violated due process, U.S. Supreme Court rules appeared first on virginiamercury.com

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Centrist

The content presents a factual report on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding the Trump administration’s attempt to deport Venezuelans under the Alien Enemies Act. It discusses the legal reasoning, the dissenting justices’ opinions, and the involvement of the ACLU. The article does not show a clear ideological slant, instead focusing on the procedural aspects of the case, the legal interpretations, and the responses from involved parties. While the tone is neutral and the information presented is balanced, the inclusion of Trump’s social media reaction may subtly reflect a slight inclination toward documenting the political climate surrounding the ruling. However, it largely sticks to reporting the legal outcome without pushing an overt political stance.

SUMMARY: Defense attorneys continued cross-examining Cassie Ventura in the federal trial against Shawn “Diddy” Combs, who faces five federal charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. Ventura alleges years of abuse and violence, while the defense questions her involvement, presenting explicit text messages to suggest she was a willing participant in their sexual activities. They argue Combs’ abusive behavior stemmed from addiction, not sex trafficking. Ventura’s attorneys assert that the evidence will prove the abuse. Prosecutors allege the defense is attempting to delay the trial to provoke a mistrial as Ventura nears labor .

Defense attorneys are questioning Cassie Ventura on the stand again today in their cross-examination.

Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/user/WVECTV/?sub_confirmation=1
Download the 13News Now App: http://bit.ly/13NewsNowApp
Check out our website: https://www.13newsnow.com/
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/13NewsNow/
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/13newsnow
Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/13newsnow/

Source

SUMMARY: Dr. Atiq Samani, a hematologist at Virginia Cancer Institute, had his medical license suspended in March after being accused of inappropriate conduct. The allegations stem from an incident at a Super 8 Motel on July 7, 2024, where Samani allegedly touched a medical observer’s breasts and pubic area despite her discomfort. Samani’s lawyers argue the accuser fabricated the story and had an agenda, pointing to surveillance footage showing her smiling before texting her boyfriend about the alleged assault. Samani has appealed the suspension, with hearings scheduled for May 28 and June 27, 2025.

The doctor contests allegations that he inappropriately touched a medical school graduate during what he claimed was a routine examination at a Super 8 Motel.

Read more: https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/cancer-doctors-license-suspended-may-15-2025

Source