Connect with us

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Medical malpractice changes inch closer to final passage

Published

on

floridaphoenix.com – Christine Sexton – 2025-03-26 18:01:00

by Christine Sexton, Florida Phoenix
March 26, 2025

Bills that would increase the potential for wrongful death lawsuits to be filed against Florida doctors and hospitals inched closer to final passage Wednesday.

With very little fanfare, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to approve HB 6017 , with “no” votes cast by just six members.

The Senate companion, SB 734, cleared the Senate Rules Committee with one dissenting vote cast by Sen. Gayle Harrell. Harrell’s late husband was a longtime Florida obstetrician and she has traditionally been a strong voice for organized medicine in the Florida Legislature.

The insurance industry, Florida hospitals, and organized medicine such as the Florida Medical and Florida Osteopathic associations, oppose the bill in its current form. But they are willing to support eliminating the ban if the Legislature agrees to limit damages for pain and suffering by placing caps on the amount that can be recovered. 

Otherwise, increasing civil liability will further increase medical malpractice insurance rates and drive physicians away from practicing, the opponents say.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

SUBSCRIBE

Florida has had no caps on pain and suffering in medical malpractice lawsuits since 2014, when the Florida Supreme Court ruled them unconstitutional. But the makeup of the Florida Supreme Court has changed since then, with the majority of the justices now having been appointed by Gov. Ron DeSantis.

And the medical and insurance industries are eager to reinstate caps and put the new justices to  the test.

If it’s something that the Senate wants to entertain, it’s a conversation that we’re always willing to have. This is part of negotiation.

– House Speaker Danny Perez

To date, neither the House nor Senate have included the industry-coveted caps in the bills.

But House Speaker Danny Perez told reporters that things could change.

“The House didn’t entertain caps. If it’s something that the Senate wants to entertain, it’s a conversation that we’re always willing to have. This is part of negotiation,” he said.

You know, we don’t know where we’re going to end up. It’s kind of like the budget. We came out with our budget … and the Senate came out with theirs, and now we just got to begin to have those conversations and see what the middle ground is, and see where we land. And I think, you know this bill is, is no different.”

When it comes to wrongful deaths stemming from medical malpractice claims, parents of single, childless, adult children cannot sue for noneconomic damages, such as pain and suffering.

Additionally, adults (defined as 25 or older) cannot pursue wrongful death claims for parents who die from medical malpractice.The Legislature adopted the ban during the 1990s as lawmakers wrestled with rising malpractice premiums.

There has been a concerted effort in recent years, though, to eliminate the ban, and members of Senate Judiciary heard from people on both sides of the issue Tuesday, the first day of the annual 60-day legislative session.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

SUPPORT

Florida Phoenix is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Florida Phoenix maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Michael Moline for questions: info@floridaphoenix.com.

The post Medical malpractice changes inch closer to final passage appeared first on floridaphoenix.com

News from the South - Florida News Feed

The Senate is voting on whether to block Trump’s global tariffs amid economic turmoil

Published

on

www.clickorlando.com – Mary Clare Jalonick, Associated Press – 2025-04-30 16:28:00

SUMMARY: Senate Democrats are forcing a vote on blocking global tariffs announced by Donald Trump earlier in April. After market turmoil, Trump suspended the tariffs for 90 days. Senate Democrats aim to challenge the policy and force Republicans to take a stance. While 47 Senate Democrats are expected to support the resolution, Republicans are hesitant, with some opposing it to avoid rebuking Trump. Despite concerns over the economic impact, Republicans are wary of crossing the president. Democrats argue the tariffs harm the economy and increase recession risks, pushing the resolution as a way to reassert congressional power.

Read the full article

The post The Senate is voting on whether to block Trump’s global tariffs amid economic turmoil appeared first on www.clickorlando.com

Continue Reading

News from the South - Florida News Feed

South Florida Weather for Wednesday 4/30/2025 12PM

Published

on

www.youtube.com – CBS Miami – 2025-04-30 11:54:10

SUMMARY: South Florida’s weather for Wednesday, April 30, 2025, features breezy conditions, with highs in the low 80s and an east breeze of 10-18 mph, gusting to 25 mph. There’s a risk of rip currents, extended through Friday, making swimming dangerous. While the day remains mostly dry with a mix of sun and clouds, isolated showers are possible. By Friday, rain chances increase, with isolated showers. The weekend brings higher chances of afternoon thunderstorms, especially on Sunday, along with rising temperatures. A 20% chance of rain is expected on Saturday, and 40% on Sunday.

YouTube video

NEXT Weather meteorologist Lissette Gonzalez says Wednesday afternoon will be seasonable and breezy with wind gust up to 20 mph.

Source

Continue Reading

News from the South - Florida News Feed

Florida House passes expansive state farm bill | Florida

Published

on

www.thecentersquare.com – By Steve Wilson | The Center Square – (The Center Square – ) 2025-04-30 11:33:00

(The Center Square) – The Florida Legislature passed its farm bill this week that officials say could be the most expansive farm-related measure in the state’s history.

Senate Bill 700 was passed 88-27 in the House of Representatives on Tuesday and is now headed to Gov. Ron DeSantis for a likely signature. The Senate passed the 111-page measure 27-9 on April 16. 

SB700, which was sponsored by Sen. Keith Truenow, R-Tavares, would protect farmers from environmental, social, and governance-related bias from lenders, ban the addition of medicine such as fluoride from being added to the water supply, bolster the disaster recovery loan program for farmers and preventing the mislabeling of plant-based products as milk, meat, poultry or eggs.

The fluoride additive ban would not remove any chemical required for water purification. 

A similar regulation in Mississippi was changed in 2019 after a vegan food manufacturer, represented by the Institute for Justice, filed a lawsuit on First Amendment grounds. 

During debate, Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, mentioned a legal challenge to the state’s law on laboratory-grown meat and possible legal challenges to the labeling part of the legislation. 

“Consumers aren’t confused, but if anything, the expansion of alternative meat, alternative protein products is based on demand and companies wouldn’t do it there wasn’t demand for it,” Eskamani said. “The changes in this bill, the goal is to hinder that demand by creating confusion.

“And so to trust the free market means to allow companies to advertise themselves and appeal to consumers based on quality and I think I can speak for some members that some of these alternative products aren’t very good. To insert ourselves between the consumer and the product by forcing them to not to use specific language is a step too far. It restricts free speech and it’s just unnecessary.”

Two amendments she tried to add on the bill to eliminate the labeling and fluoride components died on voice votes. 

Under SB700, local governments would be banned from zoning changes that would make it impossible for agricultural facilities to be placed on school property for 4-H and Future Farmers of America. 

The bill would also prohibit local governments from banning housing for legally verified farm workers on farms. It would also create a requirement for legal worker eligibility to prevent noncitizens from working on farms. 

The bill even stretches to Second Amendment issues, as it will streamline the state’s concealed carry permit process.

The measure would also forbid drones on state hunting lands or private shooting ranges for the purpose of harassment.

Charitable organizations would be prohibited from receiving foreign contributions from “countries of concern” such as Iran, Venezuela, China, Cuba, North Korea and Syria. 

“This legislation is a blueprint for protecting Floridians and our freedoms,” said Florida Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson in a release. “We are banning medicine – including fluoride – from Florida’s public water systems. We are keeping foreign countries of concern out of Florida’s charitable organizations.

“We are ensuring honesty in food labeling – milk comes from a cow, not an almond. We are upholding Second Amendment rights and cracking down on drone harassment of hunters.”

The post Florida House passes expansive state farm bill | Florida appeared first on www.thecentersquare.com



Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Right

The content presents a description of the Florida Legislature’s farm bill (SB700), emphasizing provisions that align with conservative political values, such as the protection of farmers from ESG-related bias, the restriction on certain food labeling, and measures around the Second Amendment and foreign contributions to charitable organizations. The tone of the article highlights actions that may appeal to right-leaning audiences, especially those supportive of agricultural, conservative, and pro-Second Amendment policies. While the article reports on the legislative process and includes a variety of perspectives, including a Democratic representative’s opposition, the framing and tone lean toward presenting the bill’s provisions positively, suggesting a preference for conservative positions. The article provides factual details but could be perceived as highlighting the bill’s conservative aspects more than its potential drawbacks or opposing views.

Continue Reading

Trending