SUMMARY: The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide if a high-level nuclear waste storage facility can be built in West Texas. Texas and Fasken Oil sued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to block the temporary site, arguing federal law requires waste to remain onsite at reactors unless a permanent facility exists. Interim Storage Partners, seeking to build the site, counters the law doesn’t ban temporary storage. Currently, nuclear waste is stored at reactors due to the absence of a federal site, raising concerns about safety, transport risks, and the site’s proximity to West Texas oil fields. The debate highlights tensions between nuclear energy expansion and safety.

Read the full article

The post US Supreme Court to decide if nuclear waste facility can be built in Texas appeared first on www.kxan.com

“Attorney General Ken Paxton requests new execution date for Robert Roberson” was first published by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Monday requested a new execution date for Robert Roberson, the East Texas man whose execution was delayed last year after his case became a political lightning rod that shook up the state’s judicial system.

Roberson was convicted of capital murder in 2003 for the death of his 2-year-old daughter Nikki, who was diagnosed with shaken baby syndrome. He has maintained his innocence over two decades on death row, arguing that new scientific evidence debunks Nikki’s shaken baby diagnosis and shows that she died of severe illness worsened by prescribed medications that are no longer given to children.

Roberson faced an October execution date last year, but state lawmakers — some persuaded of his innocence and others convinced that the courts had not properly considered his appeals — managed to force a delay after subpoenaing Roberson to testify at a House committee meeting scheduled a few days after his execution date.

That triggered a separation of powers conflict between the state executive and legislative branches, leading to a Texas Supreme Court order that temporarily paused Roberson’s execution.

Paxton’s office took over the case in June after Anderson County District Attorney Allyson Mitchell requested it — an unusual move, according to a criminal defense attorney who requested anonymity because they are employed by the state.

Paxton’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on why he is requesting a new execution date and why he took over for Mitchell.

The attorney general’s office generally does not have prosecutorial power in state court on criminal cases, unless a local prosecutor requests their involvement. That typically happens when prosecutors have a conflict of interest or lack the resources or expertise to handle a particular case.

But Mitchell had been deeply engaged in Roberson’s case for the past several years. Mitchell handled an evidentiary hearing for Roberson’s case in 2021, sought his October execution date and litigated his appeals. She also testified before a House panel last year to answer questions about the case.

Mitchell did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

“I have never heard of the AG taking over a state court representation after the local DA’s office has been handling the case for years,” Roberson’s attorney, Gretchen Sween, said. “The AG’s office has not been involved in this case and plainly does not know the case in light of all of the shocking misrepresentations that were made in filings and press releases by that office when state lawmakers sought to use their subpoena power to hear from Robert directly.”

After Roberson’s execution was delayed last year, Paxton continued to insist that the sentence should be carried out, and he blocked a second attempt by House lawmakers to bring Roberson to the Capitol for testimony. The attorney general’s office also put out a graphic press release maintaining Roberson’s guilt and accusing the House committee of pursuing “eleventh-hour, one-sided, extrajudicial stunts that attempt to obscure the facts and rewrite his past.”

In response to Paxton’s request Monday — the state’s first move since the Texas Supreme Court delayed Roberson’s execution — a judge could set his new execution date for no sooner than three months from now.

In an objection filed Tuesday, Roberson’s attorneys argued that the district court was barred from scheduling a new execution date while Roberson has a pending appeal and “if additional proceedings are necessary.”

Roberson filed a new appeal in February that includes new expert opinions finding that Nikki’s shaken baby diagnosis was unsound and that the autopsy that concluded her death was a homicide was flawed. Those conclusions support other medical and forensic opinions presented in Roberson’s previous appeals, which were repeatedly denied.

“Robert Roberson is innocent,” Sween said. “The AG’s unjustified rush to seek an execution date while that new evidence of innocence is before the court is outrageous.”

Roberson’s appeal also cites an October decision by Texas’ top criminal court overturning the conviction of another man in a shaken baby case out of Dallas County. That decision recognized that the scientific consensus around shaken baby diagnoses had changed over the last two decades. Roberson’s attorneys called that case “materially indistinguishable” from Roberson’s.

Legislation this session to bolster the state’s junk science law, which lawmakers and advocates argued was not being properly applied by the courts in Roberson’s case and others, died in the Senate after winning broad approval in the House. The junk science law, which Roberson tried repeatedly to use to win a new trial, is meant to provide justice in criminal cases whose convictions rest on since-discredited science.

“Legislators across the entire political spectrum are certain Robert didn’t get a full and fair trial,” state Rep. Joe Moody, D-El Paso, who chaired the House panel that led the effort to give Roberson a new trial, said in a statement to the Tribune. “Many of us believe he’s innocent. What I know is that we’re no closer to truth or fairness today than we were one year ago — all we’ve added to this is politics, which should never have any role in our justice system.”

Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O’Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.

Get tickets.

TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/06/17/texas-robert-roberson-execution-date-ken-paxton/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.

The post Texas AG requests new execution date for Robert Roberson appeared first on feeds.texastribune.org

Note: The following A.I. based commentary is not part of the original article, reproduced above, but is offered in the hopes that it will promote greater media literacy and critical thinking, by making any potential bias more visible to the reader –Staff Editor.

Political Bias Rating: Center-Left

The article presents a detailed account of a contentious legal and political issue in Texas with a focus on defense arguments and legislative concerns about judicial fairness. It emphasizes the potential wrongful conviction and critiques of state officials, including Attorney General Ken Paxton, while highlighting opposition perspectives and the role of changing scientific consensus. The coverage tends to align more with perspectives critical of tough-on-crime stances and raises questions about due process, which is characteristic of center-left media that prioritize criminal justice reform and governmental accountability. However, the article maintains a factual tone without overt partisan language or clear ideological advocacy, reflecting a generally balanced but moderately progressive viewpoint.

SUMMARY: The Climate Prediction Center now gives a 51% chance of an ENSO Neutral winter for 2025–2026, marking the first time this phase leads the forecast with over 50% confidence. La Niña odds are at 37%, and El Niño at just 12%, making El Niño winters effectively ruled out. ENSO Neutral means Pacific Ocean temperatures won’t drive winter patterns, making other, less predictable systems more influential. While La Niña could still occur, bringing drier, warmer weather to the South and wetter conditions to the Pacific Northwest, ENSO forecasts are only becoming reliable now, post-spring, as prediction accuracy improves through summer.

Read the full article

The post This weather pattern is now 'likely' this winter appeared first on www.kxan.com